Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:10:05.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Pythagorean Immortality of the Soul?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2021

By
Phillip Sidney Horky
Edited by
A. G. Long
A. G. Long
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

It is a commonplace among scholars that the early Pythagoreans posited an immortal soul. The earliest source to associate immortality of the soul to the Pythagoreans unequivocally, Dicaearchus of Messana, stipulates that they held that (a) the soul is immortal; (b) it changes into other kinds of animals; (c) there is eternal recurrence; and (d) embodied animate creatures are of the same genus. A problem with Dicaearchus' account is that each of these doctrines can also be found in the dialogues of Plato. Given Dicaearchus' penchant for conflating Platonic with Pythagorean philosophy, we cannot employ this account for a historical understanding of Pythagorean psychology in a straightforward way. This chapter instead investigates Pythagorean psychology through analysis of two passages of Aristotle’s De anima that are often not brought to bear on the question. One passage draws important comparisons between the psychology of the Pythagoreans and Democritean and Ecphantic atomism, suggesting that the early Pythagoreans held a material theory of soul; by reference to arguments similar to Cebes' in Plato's Phaedo (87b-e), the other explains how a transmigratory soul could nevertheless be mortal. The early Pythagoreans are thus likely to have held that the soul is material, mortal, and transmigratory.

Keywords

PythagorasPythagoreanismPlatoPsychologySoulAtomistsDicaearchusDemocritusMaterialism
Type
Chapter
Information
Immortality in Ancient Philosophy , pp. 41 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, A. 2006. ‘Archytas unbound: a discussion of Carl A. Huffman, Archytas of Tarentum’, Oxford Studies of Ancient Philosophy 31: 297–322.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2016. ‘Transfer of afterlife knowledge in Pythagorean eschatology”, in Renger and Stavru (eds.): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. 2014. ‘Pythagoreans, Orphism and Greek religion’, in Huffman (ed.): 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancacci, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.) 2007. Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Translated by E. L. Minar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Casadesús Bordoy, F. 2013. ‘On the origin of the Orphic–Pythagorean notion of the immortality of the soul’, in Cornelli et al. (eds.): 153–76.Google Scholar
Cornelli, G. 2016. 'Aristotle and the Pythagorean myths of metempsychosis', Méthexis 28: 1-13.Google Scholar
Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R., and Macris, C. (eds.) 2013. On Pythagoreanism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Schútrumpf, E. (eds.) 2001. Dicaearchus of Messana. New Brunswick, NJ; Transaction.Google Scholar
Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.) 2009. Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2013. Plato and Pythagoreanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2020. ‘Approaches to the Pythagorean acusmata in the Early Academy’, in Kalligas et al. (eds.): 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, C. 1993. Philolaus of Criton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. 2003. ‘Alcmaeon’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 edn), ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/alcmaeon/.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. 2005. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, C. 2009. ‘The Pythagorean conception of the soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus’, in Frede and Reis (eds.): 21–44.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. (ed.) 2014a. A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, C. 2014b. ‘The Peripatetics on the Pythagoreans’, in Huffman (ed.): 274–95.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2020. ‘The ethical maxims of Democritus of Abdera’, in Wolfsdorf (ed.): 211–42.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2001. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P., Balla, C., Baziotopoulou-Valavani, E., and Karasmanis, V. (eds.) 2020. Plato’s Academy: Its Workings and its History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2014. ‘Pythagoras’, in Huffman (ed.): 24–45.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. 2017. ‘Immortality in Empedocles’, Apeiron 50(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macris, C. 2014. ‘Porphyry’s Life of Pythagoras’, in Huffman (ed.): 381–98.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. 2014. ‘The Pythagoreans and Plato’, in Huffman (ed.): 204–26.Google Scholar
Pellò, C. 2018. ‘The lives of Pythagoras: a proposal for reading Pythagorean metempsychosis’, Rhizomata 6(2): 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1949. Die Stoa: Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Renger, A. B. and Stravru, A. (eds.) 2016. Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis, Religion, Science. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2008. Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching, and Influence. Translated by S. Rendall. Second Edition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, C. 2009. ‘Das Pythagorasfragment des Xenophanes und die Frage nach der Kritik der Metempsychosenlehre’, in Frede and Reis (eds.): 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schibli, H. S. 1990. Pherekydes of Syros. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1995. ‘The dramatis personae of Plato’s Phaedo’, Proceedings of the British Academy 85: 3–26.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. and Long, A. G. 2010. Plato: Meno and Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taufer, M. 2008. ‘Zalmoxis nella tradizione greca: rassegna e rilettura delle fonti’, Quaderni di storia 68: 131–64.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 2007. ‘Democritus and Lucretius on death and dying’, in Brancacci and Morel (eds.): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2020. ‘The Pythagorean acusmata’, in Wolfsdorf (ed.): 3–18.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2017. ‘From Hades to the stars: Empedocles on the cosmic habitats of soul’, Classical Antiquity 36(1): 130–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. 2001. ‘Principes Sapientiae: Dicaearchus’ biography of philosophy’, in Fortenbaugh and Schútrumpf (eds.): 195–236.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. C. (ed.) 2020. Early Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2014. ‘Sixth-, fifth and fourth-century Pythagoreans’, in Huffman (ed.): 88–111.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2016. ‘Pythagoras’ northern connections: Zalmoxis, Abaris, Aristeas’, Classical Quarterly 66(2): 446–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×