Select Bibliography

Abdulkadir Yilmazcan

doi:10.1017/9781009450904.008

Aggarwal, Aradhna, ‘Trade Effects of Anti-dumping in India: Who Benefits?’, Int’l Trade J. 25, no. 1 (2010), 112–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alam, M. H., ‘Next Steps Might Be Considered by Joe Biden for the Development of International Trade Law’, Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 5, no. 11 (2020), 1372–1375.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andrews, Michael, ‘The Facts Available on “Facts Available”: An Analysis of Article 6.8 and Annex II of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement’, N.Z. J. Public & Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2008), 11–42.Google Scholar

Aranoff, Shara L., Patel, Sonam and Doggett, Molly J., ‘A Review of the Court of International Trade’s 2015 Decisions Addressing Trade Remedy Determinations of the US International Trade Commission and the Court’s Decisions Pursuant to 28 USC 1581 (i)’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 48 (2016), 7–68.Google Scholar

Areeda, Philip and Turner, Donald F., ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’, J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ. 6 (1975), 697–733.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, Claude, Encaoua, David and Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, ‘Competition Policy and Game Theory: Reflections Based on the Cement Industry Case’, in Norman, George (ed.), Market Structure and Competition Policy: Game Theoretical Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 9–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bacon-Shone, John, Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods (Graduate School, The University of Hong Kong, 2013).Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle, Bown, Chad and Staiger, Robert W., ‘Is the WTO Passé?’, J. Econ. Lit. 54, no. 4 (2016), 1125–1231.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, in Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 2000), 237–293.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard and Di Mauro, Beatrice W., Economics in the Time of COVID-19: A New eBook (VOX, CEPR Policy Portal, 2020).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard and Tomiura, Eiichi, ‘Thinking Ahead about the Trade Impact of COVID-19’, in Baldwin, R. and Weder di Mauro, B. (eds.), Economics in the Time of COVID-19 (CEPR Press, 2020), 59.Google Scholar

Bao, Xiaohua and Qiu, Larry D., ‘Is China’s Antidumping More Retaliatory than That of the US?’, Rev. Int’l Econ. 19, no. 2 (2011), 374–389.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barkworth, Julie M. and Murphy, Kristina, ‘Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion’, Psychol. Crime & L. 21, no. 3 (2015), 254–273.CrossRef Google Scholar

Benedetto, John, Gamache, Lauren, Holbein, James and Thomsen, Craig, ‘Summary of the US International Trade Commission Centennial Proceedings’, J. Int’l Com. & Econ. 2017 (2017), 1–23.Google Scholar

Beshkar, Mostafa and Chilton, Adam S., ‘Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US–Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures (China)’, World Trade Rev. 15, no. 2 (2016), 375–395.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bi, Ying, ‘Is Dumping Still Harmful? New Thinking on Anti-dumping in the Global Free Trade’, JE Asia & Int’l L. 6 (2013), 29–51.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox (Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar

Bouët, Antonie and Métivier, Jeanne, ‘Is the Dispute Settlement System, “Jewel in the WTO’s Crown”, beyond Reach of Developing Countries?’, Rev. World Econ. 156 (2020), 1–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 Trade War and the End of Dispute Settlement as We Knew It’, in Crowley, Meredith A. (ed.), Trade War: The Clash of Economic Systems Endangering Global Prosperity (CEPR Press, 2019), 21–32.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 US–China Trade Conflict after 40 Years of Special Protection.’ Chin. Econ. J. 12, no. 2 (2019), 109–136.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., ‘Antidumping and Other Trade Disputes’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 114–119.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., Hoekman, Bernard and Ozden, Caglar, ‘The Pattern of US Antidumping: The Path from Initial Filing to WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Trade Rev. 2, no. 3 (2003), 349–371.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brander, James and Krugman, Paul, ‘A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade’, J. Int’l Econ. 15, nos. 3–4 (1983), 320–321.Google Scholar

Brander, James and Spencer, Barbara, ‘Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition’, in Grossman, G. M. (ed.), Imperfect Competition and International Trade (MIT Press, 1992), 107–119.Google Scholar

Brewster, Rachel, ‘The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement’, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 80, no. 1 (2011), 102–158. Accessed 17 June 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146121.Google Scholar

Broncken, Marco and Natalie, McNelis, ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. World Trade 33, no. 3 (1999), 73–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., ‘The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States’, Foreign Aff. 95 (2016), 91–104.Google Scholar

Bruton, Samuel V., ‘Teaching the Golden Rule’, J. Bus. Ethics 49, no. 2 (2004), 179–187.CrossRef Google Scholar

Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory, ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members’, World Trade Rev. 8, no. 4 (2009), 559–577.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRef Google Scholar

Cann, Wesley A., ‘Internationalizing Our Views toward Recoupment and Market Power: Attacking the Anti-dumping/Antitrust Dichotomy through WTO-Consistent Global Welfare Theory’, U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 17 (1996), 69–231.Google Scholar

Carmody, Chios, ‘A Theory of WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 11, no. 3 (2008), 527–557.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien and Debashis, Chakraborty, ‘Normative Obsolescence of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement: Topography of the Global Use and Misuse of Initiations and Measures’, Asian J. Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2016), 233–263.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chan, Kam C. and Fung, Hung-gay, eds., China’s Capital Markets: Challenges from WTO Membership (Edward Elgar, 2007).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Constitutional Law (Aspen, 2019).Google Scholar

Chen, Chien-Hsun, Mai, Chao-Cheng and Yu, Hui-Chuan, ‘The Effect of Export Tax Rebates on Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from China’, China Econ. Rev. 17, no. 2 (2006), 226–235.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, Yusong, ‘Laws and Implementation in China: A 16 Years Review after Accession to the WTO’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 283–294.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheng, Wenting and Drahos, Peter, ‘How China Built the World’s Biggest Patent Office: The Pressure Driving Mechanism’, Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. L. 49, no. 1 (2018), 5–40.Google Scholar

Chilton, Adam S. and Davis, Ryan W., ‘Equality, Procedural Justice, and the World Trade Organization’, Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 7 (2012), 277–327.Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, ‘No More Zeroing?: The United States Changes Its Antidumping Policy to Comply with the WTO’, Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 16, no. 8 (2012).Google Scholar

Choi, Won-mog, ‘People’s Republic of China’s Proposals for Anti-dumping in WTO/DDA Rules Negotiations’, Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y 2 (2007), 25–64.Google Scholar

Chunhui, Liu, Yao, Lee J., Hu, Nan and Liu, Ling, ‘The Impact of IFRS on Accounting Quality in a Regulated Market: An Empirical Study of China’, J. Account. Audit. & Finance 26, no. 4 (2011), 659–676.Google Scholar

Colantone, Italo and Stanig, Piero, ‘The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe’, Am. J. Pol. Sci. 62, no. 4 (2018), 936–953.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cook, Graham, ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in the WTO’s Party-Centric Dispute Settlement System’, in Huerta-Goldman, J. and Molina-Tejeda, Marco Tulio (eds.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation (Wolters Kluwer, 2019), 1–23.Google Scholar

Corr, Christopher F., ‘Trade Protection in the New Millennium: The Ascendancy of Anti-dumping Measures’, Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 18 (1997), 49-110.Google Scholar

Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, Jack H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’, Am. J. Int’l Law 90, no. 2 (1996), 193–213.CrossRef Google Scholar

Czako, Judith, Johann, Human and Jorge, Miranda, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Daly, Gemma, ‘Should Truth Commissions Be Viewed as Second-Best Alternatives to Prosecutions’, SOAS L.J. 2 (2015) 176.Google Scholar

Dani, Rodrik, ‘Has Globalization Gone Too Far?’, Challenge 41, no. 2 (1998), 81–94.Google Scholar

Davey, William J., ‘The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 17, no. 3 (2014), 679–700.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deardorff, Alan V., ‘Economic Perspectives on Dumping Law’, in Jackson, John H. and Vermulst, Edwin A. (eds.), Anti-dumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study (The University of Michigan Press, 1989), 23–39.Google Scholar

Debroy, Bibek and Debashis, Chakraborty, eds., Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007).Google Scholar

Dent, Christopher M., ‘Brexit, Trump and Trade: Back to a Late Nineteenth Century Future?’, Compet. Change 24, nos. 3–4 (2020), 338–357.CrossRef Google Scholar

Denton, Ross, “(Why) Should Nations Utilize Anti-dumping Measures?’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 11 (1989), 224-272.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Richard, Alexander, Peter, Calum, Brown, Cossar, Frances, Henry, Roslyn C. and Rounsevell, Mark, ‘Why the US–China Trade War Spells Disaster for the Amazon’, Nature 567, no. 7749 (2019), 451–454.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Edlin, Aeron S., ‘Stopping Above-Cost Predatory Pricing’, Yale L. J. 111, no. 4 (2002), 941–991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Effron, Robin J., ‘Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law’, Ala. L. Rev. 65 (2013), 683–733.Google Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Lockhart, Nicolas, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 7, no. 3 (2004), 491–521.CrossRef Google Scholar

Endriss, Ulle, ‘Logic and Social Choice Theory’, Log. Philos. Today 2 (2011), 2–38.Google Scholar

Erixon, Fredrik, ‘Anti-dumping in the European Union’, in Debroy, B. and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 139–142.Google Scholar

Ezzamel, Mahmoud and Xiao, Jason Zezhong, ‘The Development of Accounting Regulations for Foreign Invested Firms in China: The Role of Chinese Characteristics’, Account. Organ. Soc. 44 (2015), 60–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert, International Political Economy (University of London Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo, eds., The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRef Google Scholar

Feenstra, Robert C., Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence (Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Feinberg, Robert M. and Reynolds, Kara M., ‘How Do Countries Respond to Anti‐dumping Filings? Dispute Settlement and Retaliatory Anti‐dumping’, World Econ. 41, no. 5 (2018), 1251–1268.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fetzer, Thiemo and Schwarz, Carlo, ‘Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump’s Trade Wars’, Econ. J. 131, no. 636 (2021), 1717–1741.Google Scholar

Fontanelli, Filippo and Busco, Paolo, ‘The Function of Procedural Justice in International Adjudication’, Law Pract. Internat’l Court. Trib. 15, no. 1 (2016), 1–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Competition Law and the Agenda for the WTO: Forging the Links of Competition and Trade’, Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J. 4 (1995), 1.Google Scholar

Francois, Joseph, ‘Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Determining the Benefits of Subsidies’ in Bagwell, Kyle W., Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 113–115.Google Scholar

Fusch, Patricia I. and Ness, Lawrence R., ‘Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 20, no. 9 (2015), 1408–1416.Google Scholar

Gaffney, John P., ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’, Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 14 (1998), 1179–1221.Google Scholar

Gallo, Andres, ‘Trade Policy and Protectionism in Argentina’, Econ. Affairs 32, no. 1 (2012), 55–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gambardella, Maurizio, ‘Transparency in EU Antidumping Investigations: The European Ombudsman Perspective’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 6, no. 3 (2011), 157–163.CrossRef Google Scholar

Garner, Bryan A., Black’s Law Dictionary (West Group, 1999).Google Scholar

Garrity-Rokous, Gates and Brescia, Raymond H., ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, Yale J. Int’l L. 18 (1993), 559–603.Google Scholar

Gaudin, Germain and Mantzari, Despoina, ‘Margin Squeeze: An Above-Cost Predatory Pricing Approach’, J. Comp. L. & Econ. 12, no. 1 (2016), 151–179.Google Scholar

Gong, Xun and Corinne, Cortese, ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, Andrew and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘Enforcing WTO Obligations: What Can We Learn from Export Subsidies?’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 10, no. 3 (2007), 653–683.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guest, Greg, Bunce, Arwen and Johnson, Laura, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006), 59–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gwartney, James D., Stroup, Richard L., Sobel, Russel S. and Macpherson, David A., Economics: Private and Public Choice (Cengage Learning, 2016).Google Scholar

Halverson, Karen, ‘China’s WTO Accession: Economic, Legal, and Political Implications’, BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 27 (2004), 319–370.Google Scholar

Han, Baoqing, ‘Analyzing China’s Litigation Costs in the WTO: Problems and Solutions’, J. WTO China 3, no. 4 (2013), 119–128.Google Scholar

Hannah, Erin, Scott, James and Wilkinson, Rorden, ‘The WTO in Buenos Aires: The Outcome and Its Significance for the Future of the Multilateral Trading System’, World Econ. 41, no. 10 (2018), 2578–2598.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hartman, Stephen W., ‘The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs’, Int’l Trade J. 27, no. 5 (2013), 411–430.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hawkins, Janice E., ‘The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 23, no. 2 (2018), 493–501.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michael M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., World Trade Organization (WTO): Law, Economics, and Politics (Routledge, 2007).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hollander-Blumoff, Rebecca and Tyler, Tom R., ‘Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, J. Disp. Resol. 1, no. 1 (2011), 1–20.Google Scholar

Horlick, Gary, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the United States’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 169–179.CrossRef Google Scholar

Horlick, Gary and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Areeda–Turner Test for Exclusionary Pricing: A Critical Journal’, Rev. Indust. Org. 46, no. 3 (2015), 209–228.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Michael, Trebilcock, The Regulation of International Trade (Routledge, 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hua, Xiuping, Jiang, Ying, Sun, Qian and Xing, Xinyi. ‘Do Antidumping Measures Affect Chinese Export-Related Firms?’, Rev. Quant. Finance Account. 52 (2019), 891–900.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E., ‘Differences in National Environmental Standards: The Level-Playing-Field Dimension’, Minn. J. Global Trade 5 (1996), 1–28.Google Scholar

Hutton, Susan and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘An Empirical Study of the Application of Canadian Anti-Dumping Laws: A Search for Normative Rationales,’ J. World Trade 24 (1990), 123–146.Google Scholar

Jensen, Bradford J., Quinn, Dennis P. and Weymouth, Stephen, ‘The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes’, Int’l Org. 69, no. 4 (2015), 913–947.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kazeki, Jun, ‘Anti-dumping Negotiations under the WTO and FANs’, J. World Trade 44, no. 5 (2010), 931–965.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. and Stiglitz, Joseph E., eds., Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRef Google Scholar

Kerr, William A., ‘Dumping–One of Those Economic Myths’, Estey Centre J. Int’l L. Trade Pol’y 2, no. 2 (2001), 211–220.Google Scholar

Khan, Owais Hasan, ‘Interface between Antidumping and Competition Law: A Critical Analysis’, Interface 123 (2016), 123–138.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry, On China (Penguin Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Krishna, Raj, Anti-Dumping in Law and Practice (The World Bank, The World Bank E-Library, 1999).CrossRef Google Scholar

Kroeber, Arthur R., China’s Economy: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kwok, Kelvin, ‘The New Hong Kong Competition Law: Anomalies and Challenges’, World Comp. 37, no. 4 (2014), 541–567.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kyounghwa, Kim and Ahn, Dukgeun, ‘To Be or Not to Be with Targeted Dumping’, J. Int’l Econ. L.21, no. 3 (2018), 567–598.Google Scholar

Lai, Chung-Fu and Lee, Xi-Tsz, ‘The Effects of Anti-Dumping Duties in a New Open Economy Macroeconomics Model’, Int’l J. Econ. Fin. Issues 6, no. 3 (2016), 837–844.Google Scholar

Lai, Edwin, ‘The US–China Trade War, the American Public Opinions and Its Effects on China’, Econ. Pol. Stud. 7, no. 2 (2019), 169–184.Google Scholar

Langlois, John D., ‘The WTO and China’s Financial System’, China Quart. 167 (2001), 610–629.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leclerc, Jean-Mark, ‘Reforming Anti-dumping Law: Balancing the Interests of Consumers and Domestic Industries’, McGill L.J. 44 (1998), 111–140.Google Scholar

Lee, Pierce, ‘Rethinking the Rhetoric of Anti-dumping: A Response to Mark Wu’s Reform Proposal’, Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 42 (2013), 459–488.Google Scholar

Lehne, Jens, Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified? (Carl Grossmann Verlag, 2019).Google Scholar

Lekfuangfu, Nam-Ake, ‘Rethinking the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement from a Fairness Perspective’, Cambridge Student L. Rev. 4 (2008), 300.Google Scholar

Lenway, Stefanie, Randall, Morck and Bernard, Yeung, ‘Rent Seeking, Protectionism and Innovation in the American Steel Industry’, Econ. J. 106 (1996), 410–421.Google Scholar

Liu, Hongsong, ‘China’s Proposing Behavior in Global Governance: The Cases of the WTO Doha Round Negotiation and G-20 Process’, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 57, no. SPE (2014), 121–137.CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu, Tao and Woo, Wing Thye, ‘Understanding the US–China Trade War’, China Econ. J. 11, no. 3 (2018), 319–340.CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu, Xuepeng and Shi, Huimin, ‘Anti‐dumping Duty Circumvention through Trade Rerouting: Evidence from Chinese Exporters’, World Econ. 42, no. 5 (2019), 1427–1466.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtman, Marilyn, Qualitative Research for the Social Sciences (SAGE Publications, 2013).Google Scholar

Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, Antidumping 101: The Devilish Details of ‘Unfair Trade’ Law (Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute, 2002).Google Scholar

Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘The Rhetoric and Reality of US Anti-dumping Law’, in Debroy, Bibek and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 101–118.Google Scholar

Lo, Chung-fa, ‘A Proper Balance between WTO’s Members-Driven Nature and the Appellate Body’s Role as an Adjudicator: Careful Exercise of Judicial Activism’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 125–139.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lu, Yi, ‘Exploring Aggressive Legalism: Is Now a Good Time to Promote This Approach in Greater Asia?’, Asian J. L. Econ. 6, no. 1 (2015), 85–123.CrossRef Google Scholar

Luo, Yan, Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU, and China: The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and Its Consequences, Vol. 69 (Kluwer Law International BV, 2010).Google Scholar

Lynn, Preece S. and McMillan, Bart M., ‘Free Trade Does Not Equal Freedom from Red Tape: Practitioner Thoughts on FTAA Rules of Origin’, Int’l L. Rev. 1 (2003), 159.Google Scholar

Malawer, Stuart S., ‘Biden, National Security, Law & Global Trade: Less Subterfuge & More Strategy in the New Era of Crisis’, China WTO Rev. 7, no. 1 (2021), 185–198.CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolis, Stephen E., ‘Two Definitions of Efficiency in Law and Economics’, J. Legal Stud. 16, no. 2 (1987), 471–482.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marsh, Sarah J., ‘Creating Barriers for Foreign Competitors: A Study of the Impact of Anti‐dumping Actions on the Performance of US Firms’, Strateg. Manag. J. 19, no. 1 (1998), 25–37.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, Antoine and Bryan, Mercurio, ‘Doha Dead and Buried in Nairobi: Lessons for the WTO’, J. Int’l Trade L. Pol’y 16, no. 1 (2017), 49–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martyn, Taylor D., International Competition Law: A New Dimension for the WTO? (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Basic Principles of the WTO and the Role of Competition Policy’, Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 3 (2004), 363–385.Google Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J., Mavroidis, Petros C. and Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., Messerlin, Patrick A. and Wauters, Jasper M., The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO (Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. and Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Die Another Day: Zeroing in on Targeted Dumping: Did the AB Hit the Mark in US–Washing Machines?’, World Trade Rev. 17, no. 2 (2018), 239–264.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maxwell, Joseph A., ‘Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation’, Field Methods 16, no. 3 (2004), 243–264.CrossRef Google Scholar

Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘Anti‐Dumping Regulations or Pro‐Cartel Law? The EC Chemical Cases’, World Econ. 13, no. 4 (1990), 465–492.CrossRef Google Scholar

Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards’, World Bank Econ. Rev. 18, no. 1 (2004), 105–130.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miranda, Jorge, ‘Implementation of the ‘Shift in Burden of Proof’ Approach to Interpreting Paragraph 15 of China’s Protocol of Accession’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 11, no. 10 (2016), 447–453.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy and Tania, Voon, eds., Good Faith and International Economic Law (Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mokrov, Gennady, Kamanina, Raisa V., Pavlova, Valentina V., Isaeva, Katerina V. and Bashkatov, Leonid D., ‘Antidumping Investigation: Calculation of the Dumping Margin’, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, no. 42 (2016), 104276, 1-11.Google Scholar

Moore, O. Michael, ‘US Facts–Available Antidumping Decisions: An Empirical Analysis’, Eur. J. Pol. Econ. 22, no. 3 (2006), 639–652.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, O. Michael and Maurizio, Zanardi, ‘Does Anti-dumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?’, Can. J. Econ./Rev. Can. d’Econ. 42, no. 2 (2009), 469–495.Google Scholar

Morgan, Clarisse, ‘Competition Policy and Anti-Dumping’, J. World Trade 30 (1996), 61–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Niels, Gunnar and Kate, Adriaan T., ‘Anti‐dumping Protection in a Liberalising Country: Mexico’s Anti‐dumping Policy and Practice’, World Econ. 27, no. 7 (2004), 967–983.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nielsen, Ulff-Moller Jorgen and Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, ‘EU Lobbying and Anti-dumping Policy’, J. World Trade 46 (2012), 187–211.Google Scholar

Oesch, Matthias, ‘Standards of Review in WTO Panel Proceedings’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 6, no. 3 (2005), 635–659.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 22, no. 3 (2019), 297–321.CrossRef Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst U., ‘The 2018 Trade Wars as a Threat to the World Trading System and Constitutional Democracies’, Trade L. & Dev. 10 (2018), 179–225.Google Scholar

Porter, Michael, Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Vol. 2. (Simon & Schuster, 2011).Google Scholar

Prost, Oliver, ‘Confidentiality Issues under the DSU: Fact-finding Process versus Confidentiality’, in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 190–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Anti‐dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade’, World Econ. 28, no. 5 (2005), 683–700.CrossRef Google Scholar

Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Certain Methodologies and Their Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings Involving China: Nails in the Coffin of Unfair Dumping Margin Calculation Methodologies’, World Trade Rev. 18, no. 2 (2019), 1–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology: The End of Zeroing?’, World Trade Rev. 10, no. 1 (2011), 45–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, ‘China, India, and the Law of the World Trade Organization’, Asian J. Comp. L. 3 (2008), 1–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Trade, Investment and Beyond: The Impact of WTO Accession on China’s Legal System’, in Keller, Perry (ed.), Law and the Market Economy in China (Routledge, 2017), 720–741.Google Scholar

Quartner, David, ‘Public Choice Theory, Protectionism and the Case of NAFTA’, Econ. Aff. 26, no. 1 (2006), 59–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Raju, K. D., ‘India’s Involvement in Anti-Dumping Cases in the First Decade of WTO’, in Debroy, Dibek and Chakraborty, Debahsis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 31–47.Google Scholar

Ramírez, Rafael S. Espinosa, ‘Reciprocal Dumping and Environmental Polices’, Panor. Econ. 3, no. 6 (2017), 7–33.Google Scholar

Reich, Arie, ‘The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis’, in Kono, Toshiyuki, Hiscock, Mary and Reich, Arie (eds.), Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law (Springer, 2018), 1–43.Google Scholar

Resnick, David, ‘Due Process and Procedural Justice’, NOMOS Am. Soc’y Pol. Legal Phil. 18 (1977), 206–228.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, ‘Political Economy of Trade Policy’, in Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier Science BV, 1995), 1457–1494.Google Scholar

Romano, Alessandro and Thammapitagkul, Peachya, ‘Anti-dumping: A Public Interest Not So Much in the Public Interest’, Manchester J. Int’l Econ. L. 10 (2013), 59–77.Google Scholar

Rovegno, Laura, ‘Trade Protection and Market Power: Evidence from US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties’, Rev. World Econ. 149, no. 3 (2013), 443–476.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruttley, Philip R., Macvay, Iain and Weisberger, Mark, Due Process in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cameron May, 2001).Google Scholar

Schneider, Andrea K., ‘Not Quite a World without Trials: Why International Dispute Resolution Is Increasingly Judicialized’, J. Disp. Resol. 2006 (2006), 119–129.Google Scholar

Seo Dong, Woo, ‘Material Retardation Standard in the US Anti-dumping Law’, Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 24 (1992), 835–914.Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 21, no. 4 (2018), 885–905.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sharma, Rajesh, WTO Appellate Body at Cross Roads: Options and Alternatives, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 239–254.CrossRef Google Scholar

Slater, Valerie A. and Ross, Lisa W., ‘Judicial Review of the International Trade Commission’s Determinations in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: An Overview of Decisions in 2006’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 39 (2007), 69.Google Scholar

Smith, Stephen C. and Pan, Yao, ‘US–China Economic Relations’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 119–124.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B., ‘Procedural Justice’, S. Cal. L. Rev. 78 (2004), 181–320.Google Scholar

Spamann, Holger, ‘Standard of Review for World Trade Organization Panels in Trade Remedy Cases: A Critical Analysis’, J. World Trade 38 (2004), 509–555.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stancil, Paul, ‘Substantive Equality and Procedural Justice’, Iowa L. Rev. 102 (2016), 1635–1690.Google Scholar

Steinbach, Armin, ‘Price Undertakings in EU Anti-dumping Proceedings – An Instrument of the Past?’, J. Econ. Integr. 29, no. 1 (2014), 165–187.CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinbock, Dan, ‘US–China Trade War and Its Global Impacts’, China Q. Int. Strateg. Stud. 4, no. 4 (2018), 515–542.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stemler, Steve, ‘An Overview of Content Analysis’, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 7, no. 17 (2001), 137–146.Google Scholar

Stewart, TerenceP., ‘US–Japan Economic Disputes: The Role of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws’, Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 16 (1999), 689–750.Google Scholar

Sun, Shuwei, Zhao, Hailong, He, Xianjie and Zhang, Ying, ‘The Impact of Accounting Standards Convergence on Chinese Firms’ Overseas Mergers and Acquisitions’, China J. Account. Res. 12, no. 3 (2019), 231–250.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suranovic, M. Steven, ‘A Positive Analysis of Fairness with Applications to International Trade’, World Econ. 23, no. 3 (2000), 283–307.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’, Univ. Chi. L. Rev. 66 (1999), 1–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Telep, Jeffrey M. and Lutz, Richard C., ‘China’s Long Road to Market Economy Status’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 693–708.Google Scholar

Tharakan, P. K. Mathew, ‘Is Anti‐Dumping Here to Stay?’, World Econ. 22, no. 2 (1999), 179–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trommer, Silke Melanie, ‘Special Market Economy: Undermining the Principles of the WTO?’, Chin. J. Int’l L. 6, no. 3 (2007), 565–599.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., ‘What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures’, Law & Soc’y Rev. 22 (1988), 103–136.CrossRef Google Scholar

Updegraff, Ragan, ‘Striking a Balance between Necessity and Fairness: The Use of Adverse Facts Available in Dumping and Subsidies Investigations’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 710–787.Google Scholar

Van Bael, Ivo and Bellis, Jean-François, EU Anti-Dumping and Other Trade Defence Instruments (Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter and Denise, Prévost, ‘Rules on Unfair Trade’, in Van den Bossche, Peter and Prévost, Denise (eds.), Essentials of WTO Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 141–177.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the European Community’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘Zeroing under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Where Do We Stand?’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 2, no. 6 (2007), 231–242.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin and Gatta, Brian, ‘Concurrent Trade Defense Investigations in the EU, the EU’s New Anti-Subsidy Practice against China, and the Future of Both’, World Trade Rev. 11 (2012), 527–553.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin and Sud, Juhi Dion, ‘The New Rules Adopted by the European Union to Address “Significant Distortions” in the Anti-Dumping Context’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 63–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: I’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 5 (1922), 655–680.CrossRef Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: II’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 6 (1922), 796–826.CrossRef Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, ‘Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements’, Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 59, no. 3 (2010), 625–667.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wagner, Markus, ‘The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 67–90.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaosong, Hou, Jack and Lin, Faqin, ‘ITC Antidumping toward China Rulings: Is Political Factor Overwhelming?’, Bull. Econ. Res. 74, no. 1 (2021), 106–122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang, Xiasong, Liu, Zhexi, Yue, Lu and Zhao, Chunming, ‘Trade Barriers and Participation in the Global Value Chain: An Empirical Study Based on Anti‐dumping toward China’, China World Econ. 27, no. 2 (2019), 86–106.CrossRef Google Scholar

Washington, Andre J., ‘Not So Fast, China: Non-Market Economy Status Is Not Necessary for the Surrogate Country Method’, Chi. J. Int’l L. 19 (2018), 260–294.Google Scholar

Webley, Lisa, ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research,’ in Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–21.Google Scholar

Whalley, John and Wang, Jing, ‘Using Tax-Based Instruments for Innovative China’s Trade Rebalancing,’ in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 145–149.Google Scholar

William, Judge, Li, Shaomin and Pinsker, Robert, ‘National Adoption of International Accounting Standards: An Institutional Perspective’, Corp. Gov. Int’l Rev. 18, no. 3 (2010), 161–174.Google Scholar

Williams, Adam, ‘What a Dump! The Current State of Antidumping Duty Calculations in Non-Market Economy Cases’, Emory Int’l L. Rev. 32 (2017), 433–465.Google Scholar

Willems, Arnould R. and Brolin, Matilda J., ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Customs and Anti-Dumping Legislation: Tensions Relating to Product Description and Origin’, Leg. Issues Econ. Integration 45, no. 3 (2018), 229–251.Google Scholar

Williams, Mark, Competition Policy and Law in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Willig, Robert D., ‘Economic Effects of Antidumping Policy’, in Lawrence, Robert (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 1998), 57–79.Google Scholar

Wooton, Ian and Zanardi, Maurizio, ‘Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust’, University of Glasgow Discussion Paper in Economics No. 02-06 (2002).Google Scholar

Wood, Diane P., ‘“Unfair” Trade Injury: A Competition-Based Approach’, Stan. L. Rev. 41, no. 5 (1989), 1153–1200.CrossRef Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Reports 2001: Volume 8, Pages 3303–4047, Vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Wróbel, Anna, ‘The Functionality and Dysfunctionality of Global Trade Governance: The European Union Perspective’, in Rewizorski, Marek, Jędrzejowska, Karina and Wróbel, Anna (eds.), The Future of Global Economic Governance (Springer, 2020), 161–175.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wruuck, Patricia, The Political Economy of Anti-dumping Protection (Springer, 2015).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wu, Mark, ‘Anti-dumping in Asia’s Emerging Giants’, Harv. Int’l L.J. 53 (2012), 1–72.Google Scholar

Xu, Bin, ‘Trade Policy Reform and Trade Reform’, in Fan, Shenggen, Kanbur, Ravi, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 156–160.Google Scholar

Xun, Gong and Cortese, Corinne. ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.Google Scholar

Yan, Shi, ‘The EU’s Push for WTO Reform: Proposals, Paths and Impacts’, China Int’l Stud. 76 (2019), 60.Google Scholar

Yang, Dennis Tao, ‘China’s Agricultural Crisis and Famine of 1959–1961: A Survey and Comparison to Soviet Famines’, Comp. Econ. Stud. 50, no. 1 (2008), 1–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Role of Anti-Dumping in the US–China Trade War’, China & WTO Rev. 2021, no. 1 (2021), 7–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 335–360.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures: Concrete Solutions for the Future’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 517–531.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yong, Liu and Yiyi, Xie, ‘Analysis of the EU’s New Surrogate Country System for External Anti-Dumping and Its Illegality’, J. WTO & China 10 (2020), 52.Google Scholar

Yu, Chen, ‘Currency Manipulation and WTO Laws: Should the Anti-Dumping Mechanism Be Entirely Dumped?’, J. World Invest. Trade 20, no. 6 (2019), 891–915.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yu, Tian, ‘The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in The People’s Republic of China’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 97–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yu, Yongding, ‘Can China and the United States Avoid a Full-Blown Trade War?’, in Jiming, Ha and Posen, Adam S. (eds.), US–China Economic Relations: From Conflict to Solutions (PIIE, 2019), 41–57.Google Scholar

Zeng, Lingliang, ‘Non-market Economy Issues in Sino-EU Relations: A Purely Technical Matter or Beyond?’, in Chen, An (ed.), Contemporary International Law and China’s Peaceful Development (Springer, 2021), 577–597.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang, Yan and Wildemuth, Barbara M., ‘Qualitative Analysis of Content’, in Wildemuth, B. M. (ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (Libraries Unlimited, 2009), 53–70.Google Scholar

Zhao, Yun, ed., International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative (Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRef Google Scholar

Zheng, Wentong, ‘Reforming Trade Remedies’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 34 (2012), 151.Google Scholar

Zhou, Weihuan, ‘China’s Litigation on Non-Market Economy Treatment at the WTO: A Preliminary Assessment’, Chin. J. Comp. L. 5, no. 2 (2017), 345–364.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhou, Weihuan and Andrew, Percival, ‘Debunking the Myth of “Particular Market Situation” in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 19, no. 4 (2016), 863–892.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhou, Weihuan and Delei, Peng, ‘EU–Price Comparison Methodologies (DS516): Challenging the Non-Market Economy Methodology in Light of the Negotiating History of Article 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol’, J. World Trade 52, no. 3 (2018), 505–533.Google Scholar

Zhou, Weihuan and Zhang, Shu, ‘Anti-dumping Practices and China’s Implementation of WTO Rulings’, China Quart. 230 (2017), 512–527.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Claus D., ‘The Neglected Link between the Legal Nature of WTO Rules, the Political Filtering of WTO Disputes, and the Absence of Retrospective WTO Remedies’, Trade L. & Dev. 4, no. 1 (Summer 2012), 251–267.Google Scholar