
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Negotiating Modernity in the Austrian Context
- 1 Modernity, Nationalism, and the Austrian Crisis
- 2 Vater, Landesvater, Gottvater: Musil and the Ancien Régime
- 3 Hans Sepp, Feuermaul, and Schmeisser: Enemies of the Empire in Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften
- 4 “Europe is committing suicide”: Joseph Roth's Radetzkymarsch
- 5 “How much home does a person need?”: Ingeborg Bachmann's “Drei Wege zum See”
- Conclusion: Austria and the Transition to Modernity
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction: Negotiating Modernity in the Austrian Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Negotiating Modernity in the Austrian Context
- 1 Modernity, Nationalism, and the Austrian Crisis
- 2 Vater, Landesvater, Gottvater: Musil and the Ancien Régime
- 3 Hans Sepp, Feuermaul, and Schmeisser: Enemies of the Empire in Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften
- 4 “Europe is committing suicide”: Joseph Roth's Radetzkymarsch
- 5 “How much home does a person need?”: Ingeborg Bachmann's “Drei Wege zum See”
- Conclusion: Austria and the Transition to Modernity
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The old order has passed away.
— Revelation 21:4Narratives of Modernity
THIS STUDY EXAMINES THE CRISIS OF MODERNITY in Austria as reflected in fiction written by Austrian authors between 1920 and 1970. Although Karl Kraus called Austria a “Versuchsstation des Weltuntergangs,” it was only one of many such “laboratories” in which the old order disintegrated: the crisis was universal and the main themes of the fiction examined here are commonly found in other European literatures of the period. This study will, however, demonstrate that the arrival of modernity was experienced in Austria in a particular way. It will also show that the different interpretations of the dilemmas of modernity offered by each of the three writers are closely related to the changing historical conditions under which they wrote.
The central concept of modernity is notoriously hard — perhaps even impossible, to define or date. If modernity is taken to mean “the condition of living in the modern world,” then that definition raises several questions: experienced by whom, in what ways, and where? What are the essential criteria for considering a phenomenon modern and when did society become inescapably modern? That debate might lead to the conclusion that modernity is no more than a catchall term meaning “the totality of perceptions of the world in which we now live” — an idea too vague to be helpful. It is hardly surprising that there is no agreement among interpreters of modernity that it constitutes a single phenomenon or even a viable concept.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- In the Shadow of EmpireAustrian Experiences of Modernity in the Writings of Musil, Roth, and Bachmann, pp. 1 - 44Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2008