Book contents
- Reviews
- Inequality and Political Cleavage in Africa
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
- Inequality and Political Cleavage in Africa
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Economic Inequalities and Territorial Oppositions in African Politics
- 2 Region and Regionalism in African Politics
- 3 Endowment, Institutions, and Spatial Inequality
- 4 Regional Blocs and Bloc Voting in National Elections
- 5 Regional Hierarchies and Winning Coalitions
- 6 Territorial Oppositions in African Politics
- 7 Regionalism and the National Agenda
- 8 Conclusion
- Appendices
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
7 - Regionalism and the National Agenda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2024
- Reviews
- Inequality and Political Cleavage in Africa
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
- Inequality and Political Cleavage in Africa
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Economic Inequalities and Territorial Oppositions in African Politics
- 2 Region and Regionalism in African Politics
- 3 Endowment, Institutions, and Spatial Inequality
- 4 Regional Blocs and Bloc Voting in National Elections
- 5 Regional Hierarchies and Winning Coalitions
- 6 Territorial Oppositions in African Politics
- 7 Regionalism and the National Agenda
- 8 Conclusion
- Appendices
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
Summary
Regional competition in African countries finds expression in tensions, debates, and competition over policy. Regional economic tensions in African countries tend to find expression in four persistently salient issue areas: (a) demand for redistributive policies and social policy, (b) region- and sector-specific development and regulatory policies, (c) land policy, where redistributive tensions and conflicts arise in the building of national land markets, and (d) issues around state structure and design (the territorial division of powers and prerogatives, as under federalism or decentralization). In most countries, regional cleavages trump class-like or interpersonal income inequalities as a driver of national contestation over issues of policy and collective choice. A 2x2 matrix predicts “regional preferences for decentralization and redistribution” based on a region’s relative economic standing and its political alignment with the center. South Africa, where regional inequality is lower and nationalizing institutions are stronger, is an outlier: Redistributive social policy is more developed than it is anywhere else in Africa, and the issue of national land market integration is less salient than it is in many African countries.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Inequality and Political Cleavage in AfricaRegionalism by Design, pp. 195 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024