Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:04:16.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Ultrasonography of the Endometrium for Infertility

from PART II - INFERTILITY EVALUATION AND TREATMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Botros R. M. B. Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco
Affiliation:
Rey Juan Carlos University School of Medicine,
Hassan N. Sallam
Affiliation:
University of Alexandria School of Medicine
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Affiliation:
University of Crete
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound (US) measurement of the endometrium is now an indispensable part of ovulation induction monitoring and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). It also has a role in evaluation of unexplained infertility. Before ultrasound, the condition of the endometrium could only be evaluated by progesterone challenge to induce withdrawal bleeding or by invasive procedures, biopsy, curettage, and hysteroscopy. Endometrial physiology and implantation have recently been reviewed by Strowitzki et al. (1). This chapter will describe the use of US in the evaluation of infertility and monitoring ovulation induction for ART and for relations or artificial insemination.

ENDOMETRIAL EVALUATION

Endometrial Pattern

Evaluation of the endometrium in infertility was initially focused on its appearance or pattern and only later was the importance of endometrial thickness fully appreciated. Smith et al. (2) first reported use of the appearance and thickness of the endometrium to decide when to administer human chorionic gonadotropin to initiate ovulation (hCG). They classified endometrial patterns as Type A, a multilayered “triple-line” endometrium consisting of a prominent outer and central hyperechogenic line and inner hypoechogenic or black regions; Type B, an intermediate isoechogenic pattern, with the same reflectivity as the surrounding myometrium and a nonprominent or absent central echogenic line; and Type C, an entirely homogenous endometrium without a central echogenic line. Subsequently, Gonan et al. (3, 4) reversed the ABC order. The ABC classification is infrequently used in current literature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Strowitzki, T, Germeyer, A, Popovici, R, Wolff, M (2006) The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update 12, 617–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B, Porter, R, Ahuja, K, Craft, I (1984) Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J IVF-ET 1, 233–8.Google Scholar
Gonen, Y, Casper, RF, Jacobson, W, Blankier, J (1989) Endometrial thickness and growth during ovarian stimulation: a possible predictor of implantation in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 52, 466–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonen, Y, Casper, R (1990) Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. J IVF-ET 7, 146–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Dickey, RP, Olar, TT, Curole, DN, Taylor, SN, Rye, PH (1992) Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 7, 418–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Matulich EM (1993B) Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: effect of clomiphene citrate alone and with human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 59, 756–60.
Hofmann, GE, Thie, J, Scott, RT, Navot, D (1996) Endometrial thickness is predictive of histologic endometrial maturation in women undergoing hormone replacement for ovum donation. Fertil Steril 66, 380–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, PAW, Polson, D, Murphy, CR, Hosie, M, Susil, B, Leoni, M (1991) Correlation of endometrial histology, morphometry, and ultrasound appearance after different stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 55, 583–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterzik, K, Abt, M, Grab, D, Schneider, V, Strehler, E (2000) Predicting the histologic dating of an endometrial biopsy specimen with the use of Doppler ultrasonography and hormone measurements in patients undergoing spontaneous ovulatory cycles. Fertil Steril 73, 94–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abramowicz, J, Archer, DF (1990) Uterine endometrial peristalsis—a transvaginal ultrasound study. Fertil Steril 54, 451–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vries, K, Lyons, EA, Ballard, G, Levi, CS, Lindsay, D (1990) Contraction of the inner third of the myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162, 679–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, EA, Taylor, PJ, Zheng, XH, Ballard, G, Levi, CS, Kredentser, JV (1991) Characterization of subendometrial myometrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycles in normal fertile women. Fertil Steril 55, 771–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalubinski, K, Deutinger, J, Bernaschek, G (1993) Vaginosonography for recording of cycle-related myometrial contractions. Fertil Steril 59, 225–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ijland, MM, Evers, JLH, Dunselman, GAJ, Katwijk, C, Lo, CR, Hoogland, HJ (1996) Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 65, 746–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ijland, MM, Evers, JLH, Dunselman, GAJ, Hoogland, HJ (1998) Endometrial wavelike activity, endometrial thickness, and ultrasound texture in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 70, 279–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, JM, Fisk, MM, McTavish, A, Templeton, AA (1989) Transvaginal ultrasonic assessment of endometrial growth in spontaneous and hyperstimulated menstrual cycles. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96, 954–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, JM, Templeton, A (1991) Transvaginal sonographic assessment of follicular and endometrial growth in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate cycles. Fertil Steril 56, 208–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakos, O, Lundkvist, O, Bergh, T (1993) Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of endometrial growth and texture in spontaneous ovulatory cycles—a descriptive study. Hum Reprod 8, 799–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, LW, Lee, WS, Au, HK, Tzeng, CR (2004) Assessment of changes in utero-ovarian arterial impedance during the peri-implantation period by Doppler sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23, 496–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, G, Herbert, C, Maassarani, G, Jacobs, MH (1991) Assessment of the late proliferative phase endometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 6, 232–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagel, S, Ben-Chetrit, A, Anteby, E, et al. (1992) The effect of ethinyl estradiol on endometrial thickness and uterine volume during ovulation induction by clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril 57, 33–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strohmer, H, Obruca, A, Radner, KM, Feichtinger, W (1994) Relationship of the individual uterine size and the endometrial thickness in stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril 61, 972–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohrer, MK, Hock, DL, Rhoads, GG, Kemmann, E (1996) Sonographic assessment of endometrial pattern and thickness in patients treated with human menopausal gonadotropins. Fertil Steril 66, 244–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, HD, Chang, CC, Hsieh, YY, Lee, CC, LO, HY (2000) Role of endometrial thickness and pattern, of vascular impedance of the spiral and uterine arteries, and of the dominant follicle. J Reprod Med, 44, 195–200.Google Scholar
Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Harrigill K (1993A) Relationship of biochemical pregnancy to preovulatory endometrial thickness and pattern in patients undergoing ovulation induction. Hum Reprod 8, 327–330.
Fleischer, AC, Herbert, CM, Sacks, GA, Wentz, AC, Entman, SS, Jeames, AE (1986) Sonography of the endometrium during conception and nonconception cycles of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 46, 442–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imoedemhe, DA, Shaw, RW, Kirkland, A, et al. (1987) Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on different ovarian stimulation regimens during in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2, 545–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eden, JA, Place, J, Carter, GD, et al. (1989) The effect of clomiphene citrate on follicular phase increase in endometrial thickness and uterine volume. Obstet Gynecol 73, 187–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Shoham, Z, Carlo, C, Patel, A, Conway, GS, Jacobs, HS (1991) Is it possible to run a successful ovulation induction program based solely on ultrasound monitoring? The importance of endometrial measurements. Fertil Steril 56, 836–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, JD, Wells, CS, Williams, DB, Odem, RR, Gast, MJ, Strickler, RC (1996) Endometrial thickness is a valid monitoring parameter in cycles of ovulation induction with menotropins alone. Fertil Steril 65, 262–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Glissant, A, Mouzon, J, Frydman, R (1985) Ultrasound study of the endometrium during in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 44, 786–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welker, BG, Gembruch, U, Diedrich, K, Al-Hasani, S, Krebs, D (1989) Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium during ovum pickup in stimulated cycles for in vitro fertilization. J Ultrasound Med 8, 549–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ueno, J, Oehniger, S, Bryzski, RG, Acosta, AA, Philput, B, Muasher, SJ (1991) Ultrasonographic appearance of the endometrium in natural and stimulated in-vitro fertilization cycles and its correlation with outcome. Hum Reprod 6, 901–04.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serafini, P, Batzofin, J, Nelson, J, Olive, D (1994) Sonographic uterine predictors of pregnancy in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproductive treatments. Fertil Steril 62, 815–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharara, FI, Lim, J, McClamrock, D (1999) Endometrial pattern on the day of oocyte retrieval is more predictive of implantation success than the pattern or thickness on the day of hCG administration. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 523–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanchin, R, Righini, C, Ayoubi, JM, Olivennes, F, Ziegler, D, Frydman, R (2000) New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 74, 274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulam, CB, Bustillo, M, Soenksen, DM, Britten, ST (1994) Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 62, 1004–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Check, JH, Nowroozi, K, Choe, J, Dietterich, C (1991) Influence of endometrial thickness and echo patterns on pregnancy rates during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 56, 1173–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, N, Liu, HC, Sultan, K, Schattman, G, Rosenwaks, Z (1995) Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 10, 919–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, JBA, Baruffi, RLR, Mauri, AL, Petersen, CG, Borges, MC, Franco, JG (1997) Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone and gonadotropin. Hum Reprod 12, 2515–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, R, Laufer, N, Lewin, A, Navot, D, Bar, I, Margalioth, EJ (1986) The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy following in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 45, 824–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundstrom, P (1998) Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum Reprod 13, 1550–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antinori, S, Versaci, C, Gholami, GH, Panci, C, Caffa, B (1993) Oocyte donation in menopausal women. Hum Reprod 8, 1487–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Check, JH, Nowroozi, K, Choe, J, Lurie, D, Dietterich, C (1993) The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 59, 72–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdalla, HI, Brooks, AA, Johnson, MR, Kirkland, A, Thomas, A, Studd, JWW (1994) Endometrial thickness: a predictor of implantation in ovum recipients. Hum Reprod 9, 363–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, A, Gotlieb, L, Casper, RF (1999) The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 71, 147–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krampl, E, Feichtinger, W (1993) Endometrial thickness and echo patterns. Hum Reprod 8, 1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camus, E, Poncelet, C, Goffinet, FG, Wainer, B, Merlet, F, Nisand, I, Philippe, HJ (1999) Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 14, 1243–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nackley, AC, Muasher, SJ (1998) The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 69, 373–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voorhis, BJ, Sparks, ET, Syrop, CH, Stovall, DW (1998) Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 13, 736–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansour, RT, Aboulghar, MA, Serour, GI, Riad, R (1991) Fluid accumulation of the uterine cavity before transfer: a possible hindrance for implantation. J IVF-ET 8, 157–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Lass, A, Williams, G, Abusheikha, N, Brinsden, P (1999) The effect of endometrial polyps on outcomes of in vitro fertilization cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 410–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boué, J, Boué, A, Lazar, P (1973) Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology 12, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, YY, Tsal, HD, Chang, CC, Lo, HY, Chen, CL (2000) Low-dose aspirin for infertile women with thin endometrium receiving intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet 17, 174–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, I, Hs, CC, Williams, G, Macnamee, MC, Brinsden, PR (1994) The benefits of low-dose aspirin therapy in women with impaired uterine perfusion during assisted conception. Hum Reprod 9, 1954–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weckstein, LN, Jacobson, A, Galen, D, Hampton, K, Hammel, J (1997) Low-dose aspirin or oocyte donation recipients with a thin endometrium: prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 68, 927–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubinstein, M, Marazzi, A, Fried, EP (1999) Low-dose aspirin treatment improves ovarian responsiveness, uterine and ovarian blood flow velocity, implantation, and pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled assay. Fertil Steril 71, 825–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, G, Fisch, JD (2000) Vaginal sildenafil (Viagra): a preliminary report of a novel method to improve uterine artery blood flow and endometrial development in patients undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 13, 806–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, RR (2008) Ultrasonography of the endometrium. In Rizk, B (Ed.) Ultrasonography in reproductive medicine and infertility. Cambridge: United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, chapter 14, 112–4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×