The Institute of International Law's Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility Introduction, Text and Commentaries
Book contents
- The Institute of International Law’s Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility
- The Institute of International Law’s Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Note on the Cover Image
- I Introduction
- II Article-by-Article Commentary
- Annex Institute of International Law, Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility (English and French texts)
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2019
Book contents
- The Institute of International Law’s Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility
- The Institute of International Law’s Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Note on the Cover Image
- I Introduction
- II Article-by-Article Commentary
- Annex Institute of International Law, Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility (English and French texts)
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Institute of International Law's Resolution on State Succession and State ResponsibilityIntroduction, Text and Commentaries, pp. 159 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case, PCIJ, Series A/B No. 76, 35.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, ICJ Reports 2007.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia), Judgment of 3 February 2015, ICJ Reports 2015.Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Second Phase) (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment of 5 February 1970, ICJ Reports 1970.Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997, ICJ Reports 1997.Google Scholar
Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1992.Google Scholar
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1995.Google Scholar
Bijelic v. Montenegro and Serbia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, 11 June 2009, Application no. 11890/05.Google Scholar
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., Award No. 115–33–1, 22 June 1984, in: 6 Iran-U.S. C.T.R. 149.Google Scholar
Administrative Decision No. 1, Tripartite Claims Commission, 25 May 1927, 6 UNRIAA 203.Google Scholar
Administrative Decision No. V, United States-German Mixed Claims Commission, 31 October 1924, in: 7 UNRIAA 119.Google Scholar
Claim of Finnish Shipowners against Great Britain in respect of the Use of Certain Finnish Vessels During the War (Finland v. United Kingdom), Award of Dr. Bagge, 9 May 1934, in: 3 UNRIAA 1481.Google Scholar
Emeric Koranyi & Mme. Ernest Dengcjel v. Romanian State, Hungary-Romania Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, Award of 27 February 1929, in: 8 Recueil des decisions des tribunaux arbitraux mixtes 980; in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 64.Google Scholar
R.E. Brown (United States v. Great Britain), Award of 23 November 1923, 6 UNRIAA 120.Google Scholar
Hawaiian Claims case (Great Britain v. United States), Award of 10 November 1925, 6 UNRIAA 157.Google Scholar
In the Matter of the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom), Award, 18 March 2015, PCA Case 2011-03.Google Scholar
Levy v. German State, French-German Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, Award of 10 July 1924, in: 4 Recueil des décisions des tribunaux arbitraux mixtes 726, in: (1923–1924) Annual Digest, case no. 27.Google Scholar
Mytilineos Holdings SA v. State Union of Serbia & Montenegro and Republic of Serbia, UNCITRAL, Partial Award on Jurisdiction, 8 Sept. 2006.Google Scholar
Pablo Nájera (France) v. United Mexican States, France-Mexico Claims Commission, Decision no. 30-A, 19 October 1928, in: 5 UNRIAA 466, (1927–1928) Annual Digest 52.Google Scholar
Sentence arbitrale en date des 24/27 juillet 1956 rendue par le Tribunal d’arbitrage constitué en vertu du Compromis signé à Paris le 15 juillet 1932 entre la France et la Grèce, Award of 24/27 July 1956, in: 12 UNRIAA 155; (1956) 23 ILR 91.Google Scholar
Alsace-Lorraine Railway v. Ducreux Es-qualité, France, Court of Cassation, Civil Chamber, 30 March 1927, in: (1928) 55 JDI 1034; (1928) I Sirey 300; (1927–1928) Annual Digest 85.Google Scholar
Baron A. v. Prussian-Treasury, Germany, Reichsgericht in Civil Matters, 19 December 1923, in: 107 ERZ. 382, in: (1923–1924) Annual Digest 60.Google Scholar
Crépet c. Etat belge et Société des forces hydro-électriques de la colonie, Belgium, Civil Tribunal of Brussels, 30 January 1962, (1962) Journal des tribunaux 242.Google Scholar
Dzierzbicki v. District Electric Association of Czestochowa, Poland, Supreme Court, First Division, 21 December 1933, in: (1934) OSP, no. 288, in: (1933–1934) Annual Digest 89.Google Scholar
Grillo, France, Conseil d’Etat, case no. 178498, 28 July 1999, in: Tables du Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Hespel, France, Conseil d’Etat, 2/6 SSR, case no. 11092, 5 December 1980, in: Tables du Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Kalmar v. Hungarian Treasury, Hungary, Supreme Court, 24 March 1929, case no. P.VI.5473/1928, in: Maganjog Tara, X, no. 75, in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 61.Google Scholar
Kern v. Chemin de fer d’Alsace-Lorraine, France, Cour de Colmar (Première Ch, civile), 16 May 1927, in: (1929) 56 JDI 446.Google Scholar
Military Pensions (Austria) Case, Austria, Constitutional Court, 7 May 1919, case no. 126, in Sammlung der Erkenntniss des österreichischen Verfassungsgerichtshofes, vol. I (1919), no. 9, 17, in (1919–1922) Annual Digest 66.Google Scholar
Minister of Defence, Namibia v. Mwandinghi, Namibia, 25 October 1991, in: 1992 (2) SA 355 (NmS), in: 91 ILR 358.Google Scholar
Mordcovici v. P.T.T., Romania, Court of Cassation, 29 October, 1929, in: Buletinul deciziunilor Inaltei Curti de Casatie, LXVI (1929), Part 2, p.150, in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 62.Google Scholar
Mutua et al. v. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office, United Kingdom, 21 July 2011, [2011] EWHC 1913 (QB) and of 5 October 2012, [2012] EWHC 2678 (QB).Google Scholar
Mwandinghi v. Minister of Defence, Namibia, Namibia, 14 December 1990, in: 1991 (1) SA 851 (Nm), in: 91 ILR 343.Google Scholar
Niedzielskie v. (Polish) Treasury, Poland, Supreme Court, 13 October 1926, in: Rw. III, 1485/26/I; 3 (1925–26) Annual Digest 74.Google Scholar
Niemiec and Niemiec v. Bialobrodziec and Polish State Treasury, Poland, Supreme Court, Third Division, 20 February 1923, in: 2 Annual Digest, case no. 33.Google Scholar
Olpinski v. Polish Treasury (Railway Division), Poland, Third Division, 16 April 1921, O.S.P., I, no. 15, in: (1919–1922) Annual Digest 63.Google Scholar
Perriquet, Conseil d’Etat, France, case no. 119737, 15 March 1995, in: Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Personal Injuries (Upper Silesia) Case, Federal Republic of Germany, Court of Appeal of Cologne, 10 December 1951, in: NJW, 5 (1952), 1300, in: (1951) ILR 67.Google Scholar
Pittacos c. Etat belge, Belgium, Brussels Court of Appeal (2nd Chamber), 1 December 1964, Journal des tribunaux, 1965, 9; and Cour de cassation, 26 May 1966, Pasicrisie belge, (1966) Part I, 1221, also in: 48 ILR 22.Google Scholar
Poldermans v. State of the Netherlands, Netherlands, Court of Appeal of The Hague (First Chamber), 8 December 1955, in: (1959) NJ, no. 7 (with an analysis by Boltjes); (1957) ILR 69.Google Scholar
Samos (Liability for Torts) Case, Greece, Court of the Aegean Islands, 1924, N° 27, in: 35 Thémis 294; (1923–1924) Annual Digest 70.Google Scholar
Sechter v. Ministry of the Interior, Romania, Court of Cassation, 1929, in: (1930)17 (4) Jurisprudenta Româná a Inaltei Curti de Casatiesi Justitie, 58; (1929–1930), Annual Digest, case no. 37.Google Scholar
Van der Have v. State of the Netherlands, Netherlands, District Court of The Hague, 12 January 1953, in: (1953) NJ, no. 133; (1953) ILR 80.Google Scholar
Vozneac v. Autonomous Administration of Posts and Telegraphs, Romania, Court of Cassation, 22 June 1931, in: (1932) Jurisprudenta Româná a Inaltei Curti de Casatiesi Justitie, 36; (1931–1932) Annual Digest, case no. 30.Google Scholar
West Rand Central Gold Mining Company Ltd. v. The King, United Kingdom, Decision of 1 June 1905, in: (1905) LR; 2 KB, 391; British International Law Cases, vol. II (London: Stevens, 1965), 283.Google Scholar
Zilberszpic v. (Polish) Treasury, Supreme Court of Poland, First Division, 14 December 1928, in: Zb. OSN, 1928, no. 190; 4 (1927–1928) Annual Digest 82.Google Scholar
International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, Arbitration Commission, Opinion No 1, 29 November 1991, in: (1993) 92 ILR 166.Google Scholar
International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, Arbitration Commission, Opinion No 13, Effects of War Damages on Division, 16 July 1993, in: 96 ILR 727.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case, PCIJ, Series A/B No. 76, 35.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, ICJ Reports 2007.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia), Judgment of 3 February 2015, ICJ Reports 2015.Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Second Phase) (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment of 5 February 1970, ICJ Reports 1970.Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997, ICJ Reports 1997.Google Scholar
Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1992.Google Scholar
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1995.Google Scholar
Bijelic v. Montenegro and Serbia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, 11 June 2009, Application no. 11890/05.Google Scholar
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., Award No. 115–33–1, 22 June 1984, in: 6 Iran-U.S. C.T.R. 149.Google Scholar
Administrative Decision No. 1, Tripartite Claims Commission, 25 May 1927, 6 UNRIAA 203.Google Scholar
Administrative Decision No. V, United States-German Mixed Claims Commission, 31 October 1924, in: 7 UNRIAA 119.Google Scholar
Claim of Finnish Shipowners against Great Britain in respect of the Use of Certain Finnish Vessels During the War (Finland v. United Kingdom), Award of Dr. Bagge, 9 May 1934, in: 3 UNRIAA 1481.Google Scholar
Emeric Koranyi & Mme. Ernest Dengcjel v. Romanian State, Hungary-Romania Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, Award of 27 February 1929, in: 8 Recueil des decisions des tribunaux arbitraux mixtes 980; in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 64.Google Scholar
R.E. Brown (United States v. Great Britain), Award of 23 November 1923, 6 UNRIAA 120.Google Scholar
Hawaiian Claims case (Great Britain v. United States), Award of 10 November 1925, 6 UNRIAA 157.Google Scholar
In the Matter of the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom), Award, 18 March 2015, PCA Case 2011-03.Google Scholar
Levy v. German State, French-German Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, Award of 10 July 1924, in: 4 Recueil des décisions des tribunaux arbitraux mixtes 726, in: (1923–1924) Annual Digest, case no. 27.Google Scholar
Mytilineos Holdings SA v. State Union of Serbia & Montenegro and Republic of Serbia, UNCITRAL, Partial Award on Jurisdiction, 8 Sept. 2006.Google Scholar
Pablo Nájera (France) v. United Mexican States, France-Mexico Claims Commission, Decision no. 30-A, 19 October 1928, in: 5 UNRIAA 466, (1927–1928) Annual Digest 52.Google Scholar
Sentence arbitrale en date des 24/27 juillet 1956 rendue par le Tribunal d’arbitrage constitué en vertu du Compromis signé à Paris le 15 juillet 1932 entre la France et la Grèce, Award of 24/27 July 1956, in: 12 UNRIAA 155; (1956) 23 ILR 91.Google Scholar
Alsace-Lorraine Railway v. Ducreux Es-qualité, France, Court of Cassation, Civil Chamber, 30 March 1927, in: (1928) 55 JDI 1034; (1928) I Sirey 300; (1927–1928) Annual Digest 85.Google Scholar
Baron A. v. Prussian-Treasury, Germany, Reichsgericht in Civil Matters, 19 December 1923, in: 107 ERZ. 382, in: (1923–1924) Annual Digest 60.Google Scholar
Crépet c. Etat belge et Société des forces hydro-électriques de la colonie, Belgium, Civil Tribunal of Brussels, 30 January 1962, (1962) Journal des tribunaux 242.Google Scholar
Dzierzbicki v. District Electric Association of Czestochowa, Poland, Supreme Court, First Division, 21 December 1933, in: (1934) OSP, no. 288, in: (1933–1934) Annual Digest 89.Google Scholar
Grillo, France, Conseil d’Etat, case no. 178498, 28 July 1999, in: Tables du Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Hespel, France, Conseil d’Etat, 2/6 SSR, case no. 11092, 5 December 1980, in: Tables du Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Kalmar v. Hungarian Treasury, Hungary, Supreme Court, 24 March 1929, case no. P.VI.5473/1928, in: Maganjog Tara, X, no. 75, in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 61.Google Scholar
Kern v. Chemin de fer d’Alsace-Lorraine, France, Cour de Colmar (Première Ch, civile), 16 May 1927, in: (1929) 56 JDI 446.Google Scholar
Military Pensions (Austria) Case, Austria, Constitutional Court, 7 May 1919, case no. 126, in Sammlung der Erkenntniss des österreichischen Verfassungsgerichtshofes, vol. I (1919), no. 9, 17, in (1919–1922) Annual Digest 66.Google Scholar
Minister of Defence, Namibia v. Mwandinghi, Namibia, 25 October 1991, in: 1992 (2) SA 355 (NmS), in: 91 ILR 358.Google Scholar
Mordcovici v. P.T.T., Romania, Court of Cassation, 29 October, 1929, in: Buletinul deciziunilor Inaltei Curti de Casatie, LXVI (1929), Part 2, p.150, in: (1929–1930) Annual Digest 62.Google Scholar
Mutua et al. v. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office, United Kingdom, 21 July 2011, [2011] EWHC 1913 (QB) and of 5 October 2012, [2012] EWHC 2678 (QB).Google Scholar
Mwandinghi v. Minister of Defence, Namibia, Namibia, 14 December 1990, in: 1991 (1) SA 851 (Nm), in: 91 ILR 343.Google Scholar
Niedzielskie v. (Polish) Treasury, Poland, Supreme Court, 13 October 1926, in: Rw. III, 1485/26/I; 3 (1925–26) Annual Digest 74.Google Scholar
Niemiec and Niemiec v. Bialobrodziec and Polish State Treasury, Poland, Supreme Court, Third Division, 20 February 1923, in: 2 Annual Digest, case no. 33.Google Scholar
Olpinski v. Polish Treasury (Railway Division), Poland, Third Division, 16 April 1921, O.S.P., I, no. 15, in: (1919–1922) Annual Digest 63.Google Scholar
Perriquet, Conseil d’Etat, France, case no. 119737, 15 March 1995, in: Recueil Lebon.Google Scholar
Personal Injuries (Upper Silesia) Case, Federal Republic of Germany, Court of Appeal of Cologne, 10 December 1951, in: NJW, 5 (1952), 1300, in: (1951) ILR 67.Google Scholar
Pittacos c. Etat belge, Belgium, Brussels Court of Appeal (2nd Chamber), 1 December 1964, Journal des tribunaux, 1965, 9; and Cour de cassation, 26 May 1966, Pasicrisie belge, (1966) Part I, 1221, also in: 48 ILR 22.Google Scholar
Poldermans v. State of the Netherlands, Netherlands, Court of Appeal of The Hague (First Chamber), 8 December 1955, in: (1959) NJ, no. 7 (with an analysis by Boltjes); (1957) ILR 69.Google Scholar
Samos (Liability for Torts) Case, Greece, Court of the Aegean Islands, 1924, N° 27, in: 35 Thémis 294; (1923–1924) Annual Digest 70.Google Scholar
Sechter v. Ministry of the Interior, Romania, Court of Cassation, 1929, in: (1930)17 (4) Jurisprudenta Româná a Inaltei Curti de Casatiesi Justitie, 58; (1929–1930), Annual Digest, case no. 37.Google Scholar
Van der Have v. State of the Netherlands, Netherlands, District Court of The Hague, 12 January 1953, in: (1953) NJ, no. 133; (1953) ILR 80.Google Scholar
Vozneac v. Autonomous Administration of Posts and Telegraphs, Romania, Court of Cassation, 22 June 1931, in: (1932) Jurisprudenta Româná a Inaltei Curti de Casatiesi Justitie, 36; (1931–1932) Annual Digest, case no. 30.Google Scholar
West Rand Central Gold Mining Company Ltd. v. The King, United Kingdom, Decision of 1 June 1905, in: (1905) LR; 2 KB, 391; British International Law Cases, vol. II (London: Stevens, 1965), 283.Google Scholar
Zilberszpic v. (Polish) Treasury, Supreme Court of Poland, First Division, 14 December 1928, in: Zb. OSN, 1928, no. 190; 4 (1927–1928) Annual Digest 82.Google Scholar
International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, Arbitration Commission, Opinion No 1, 29 November 1991, in: (1993) 92 ILR 166.Google Scholar
International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, Arbitration Commission, Opinion No 13, Effects of War Damages on Division, 16 July 1993, in: 96 ILR 727.Google Scholar
Abkommen zwischen der Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Regierung der Russischen Föderation über kulturelle Zusammenarbeit, 16 December 1992, in: BGBl., 1993, vol. II, 1256.Google Scholar
Accord du 27 mai 1997 entre le Gouvernement de la République française et le Gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie sur le règlement définitif des créances réciproques financières et réelles apparues antérieurement au 9 mai 1945, 19 December 1997 (Bill No. 97–1160, in: JORF, 15 May 1998).Google Scholar
Accord général entre le gouvernement de la République française et le gouvernement de la République arabe unie, in: La documentation française, 18 October 1958, no. 2473; (1958) RGDIP 738.Google Scholar
Additional Protocol to the Agreement on Reparation from Germany, on the Establishment of an Inter-Allied Reparation Agency, and on the Restitution of Monetary Gold of 14 January 1946, signed in Brussels on 15 March 1948, entered into force on 15 March 1948, in: 555 UNTS 104.Google Scholar
Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Settlement of certain Property Claims, 13 May 1992, in: TIAS no. 11959.Google Scholar
Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt Regarding Compensation for British Property, Rights and Interests Affected by Arab Republic of Egypt Measures of Nationalisation and other Matters Concerning British Property in the Arab Republic of Egypt, entered into force on 28 March 1972, in: (1972) UKTS no. 62 (Cmd. 4995); 858 UNTS 3.Google Scholar
Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Mauritius, 7 July 1982 (in force on 28 October 1982), in: (1983) UKTS no. 6 (Cmnd. 8785).Google Scholar
Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United Arab Republic Concerning Financial and Commercial Relations and British Property in Egypt, in: (1959) UKTS no. 35 (Cmd. 723); 343 UNTS 159; (1958) 14 Rev. Égyptienne d.i., 364; (1960) 54 AJIL 511–519.Google Scholar
Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam concerning the settlement of certain property claims, signed in Hanoi, 28 January 1995, 2420 UNTS No. 43661.Google Scholar
Agreement between Italy and the United Arab Republic Relative to the Indemnisation of Italian Interests in Egypt with Protocol for the Application of the Exchange of Notes, 23 March 1965, entered into force on 5 September 1966, in: Gaz. Off., No. 215, 1 April 1966; in: 7 Diritto Internazionale, 1966, Pt. II, at 231Google Scholar
Agreement between the State of Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany on Compensation, in: 162 UNTS 205.Google Scholar
Agreement for the Determination of the Amounts to be paid by Austria and by Hungary in satisfaction of their Obligations under the Treaties concluded by the United States with Austria on August 24, 1921, and with Hungary on August 29, 1921, signed in Washington, 26 November 1924, 48 LNTS No. 1151, 69; 6 UNRIAA 199.Google Scholar
Agreement Establishing the Commonwealth of Independent States, UN Doc A/46/771, 13 December 1991, in (1992) 31 ILM 138.Google Scholar
Agreement on the Establishment of the Republic of Yemen and the Organisation of the Thirty-Month Interim Period, 22 April 1990, entered into force on 21 May 1990, in: (1990) 30 ILM 820.Google Scholar
Agreement on Reparation from Germany, on the Establishment of an Inter-Allied Reparation Agency and on the Restitution of Monetary Gold, signed in Paris on 14 January 1946, entered into force on 24 January 1946, in: 555 UNTS 69.Google Scholar
Agreement relating to the Separation of Singapore from Malaysia as an Independent and Sovereign State, signed at Kuala Lumpur, on 7 August 1965, 563 UNTS 89, No. 8206.Google Scholar
Agreement on Succession Issues of 29 June 2001 (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Macedonia) 2262 UNTS 251; (2002) 41 ILM 1–39.Google Scholar
Alma Ata Declaration, 21 December 1991, UN Doc A/46/60, 30 December 1991, (1992) 31 ILM 147.Google Scholar
Claims Convention between the United States and Panama, signed on 28 July 1926, ratified on 3 October 1931, in: 138 LNTS 120–126: 6 UNRIAA 301.Google Scholar
Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Government of the Republic of the Sudan and the Sudan’s People’s Liberation Movement/Sudan People’s Liberation Army, signed in May 2004.Google Scholar
Peace Treaty (U.K., Soviet Union, USA, France, Italy, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Finland), signed on 10 February 1947 at Paris, entered into force on 15 September 1947, in: 49 UNTS 126; (1948) UKTS no. 50 (Cmd. 7481).Google Scholar
Protocol between the United States of America and Venezuela (1 May 1852, Caracas), in: Malloy W.M., Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements between the United States of America and other Powers, 1776–1909, vol. II (Washington: US Govt., 1910).Google Scholar
Protocol I between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany, in; 162 UNTS 205; (1953) II BGBl. 85.Google Scholar
Protocol II between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany, in: 162 UNTS 205; (1953) II BGBl. 85.Google Scholar
Treaty Establishing Friendly Relations between the United States of America and Hungary, signed in Budapest on 29 August 1921, in 660 USTS; (1922) 16 AJIL, Suppl., 13–16.Google Scholar
Treaty on the Establishment of German Unity, 31 August 1990, in: (1991) 30 ILM 457; (1991) 51 ZaöRV 494.Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Austria; Protocol, Declaration and Special Declaration, St. Germain-en-Laye, 10 September 1919, entered into force on 16 July 1920, in (1919) UKTS No. 11 (Cmd. 400).Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between Japan and Malaysia, signed on 11 September 1967, entered into force on 7 May 1968, in: (1969) 13 Jap. Ann. Int’l L. 209.Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia, entered into force on 15 April 1958, in: 324 UNTS 227; (1959) 3 Jap. Ann. Int’l L 158.Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between Japan and Singapore, signed on 21 September 1967, entered into force on 7 May 1968, in: (1969) 13 Jap. Ann. Int’l L. 244.Google Scholar
Vertrag zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik über die Herstellung der Einheit Deutschlands [Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic on the Establishment of German Unity], 31 August 1990, (1990) II BGBl. 885; (1991) 30 ILM 463.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of State Property, Archives and Debts, 8 April 1983, not yet in force, Official Records of the United Nations Conference on Succession of States in Respect of State Property, Archives and Debts, vol. II (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.94.V.6).Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties, 23 August 1978, entered into force on 6 November 1996, 1946 UNTS 3.Google Scholar
Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-Operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res 2625 (XXV), UNGAOR, 25th Sess, Supp No, UN Doc A/8082, (1970) 121.Google Scholar
Resolution 36/121 of 10 December 1981 (Question of Namibia).Google Scholar
Resolution 38/36 of 2 December 1983 (Question of Namibia).Google Scholar
Resolution 40/52 of 2 December 1985 (Activities of foreign economic and other interests which are impeding the implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples in Namibia and in all other Territories under colonial domination and efforts to eliminate colonialism, apartheid and racial discrimination in southern Africa).Google Scholar
Resolution 55/153 of 12 December 2000 (Nationality of Natural Persons in relation to the Succession of States).Google Scholar
Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts).Google Scholar
Resolution A/60/264 of 12 July 2006 (Admission of the Republic of Montenegro to membership in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 65/308 of 25 August 2011 (Admission of the Republic of South Sudan to membership in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 67/19 of 29 November 2012 (Status of Palestine in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 71/292 of 22 June 2017 (Legal Consequences of the Separation of Chagos from Mauritius in 1965, Request for an Advisory Opinion).Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Addendum to First Report on Diplomatic Protection’, by Mr. John R. Dugard, Special Rapporteur, 20 April 2000, UN Doc. A/CN.4/506/Add.1.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Commentaries to the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted by the International Law Commission at Its Fifty-Third Session (2001)’, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-third Session, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-sixth Session, Supplement No. 10(A/56/10), (2001) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 30.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection with commentaries’, (2006) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 23.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Nationality of Natural Persons in Relation to the Succession of States’, adopted by the ILC on second reading in 1999, ILC Report, U.N. Doc. A/54/10, 1999, ch. IV, paras. 44 and 45, in: (1997) II Yearbook ILC, 14.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Fifth Report on Succession in Respect of Treaties, prepared by the Special Rapporteur, Sir Humphrey Waldock’, A/CN.4/256 and Adds.1–4, 10 April, 29 May and 8, 16 and 28 June 1972, A/8710/Rev.1, in: (1972) II Yearbook ILC, 292–298.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on State Responsibility (addendum no. 4)’, by Crawford J., Special Rapporteur, 26 May 1998, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/490/Add.4.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on Succession of States in Respect of Rights and Duties Resulting from Sources other than Treaties’, by Mr Mohammed Bedjaoui, Special Rapporteur, 20th session of the ILC, 1968, UN Doc. A/CN.4/204, ILC Report, A/7209/Rev.1 (A/23/9), 1968, ch. III(C)(a), in: (1968) II Yearbook ILC, 94.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on Succession of States in Respect of State Responsibility, by Special Rapporteur, Mr. Pavel Šturma’, 69th session, 2017, A/CN.4/708, 31 May 2017.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Fourth Report on State Responsibility of the Special Rapporteur’, Mr. Roberto Ago, 24th session of the ILC, 1972, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/264 and Add.1, ILC Report, A/8710/Rev.1 (A/27/10), 1972, chp. IV(B), in: (1972) II Yearbook ILC, 71.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations’, General Assembly Resolution 61/34 of 4 December 2006, in (2006) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 159.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Proposal by the Chairman of the ILC Sub-committee on Succession of States and Governments, Manfred Lachs’, (1963) II Yearbook ILC, 260.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Twenty-Seventh Session’, 5 May to 25 July 1975, Draft Articles on State Responsibility, U.N. Doc. A/10010/Rev.1, in: (1975) II Yearbook ILC, 47.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its Fifty-third session’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-sixth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp. IV.E.2, 208, (2001) I Yearbook ILC, 202.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Fourth Session’, 29 April–7 June and 22 July–16 August 2002, ILC Report, A/57/10, 2002, chp. V, (2002) II(2), Yearbook ILC, 1.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-first session, Supplement No. 10 (A/71/10), recommendation of the Working-Group on the long-term programme of work, Annex B: ‘Succession of States in respect of State responsibility’, Syllabus by Pavel Šturma, 409.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Second Report on Succession of States in Respect of State Responsibility, by Special Rapporteur, Mr. Pavel Šturma’, 70th session, 2018, A/CN.4/719, 5 April 2018.Google Scholar
ILC, Titles and Texts of the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading, 26 July 2001, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/L.602/Rev.1., (2001) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 30.Google Scholar
Decree on the Natural Resources of Namibia, Addendum to the Report of the United Nations Council for Namibia, 29 UN GAOR Supp. 24A, at 27–28, UN Doc. A/9624/add 1(1975).Google Scholar
Report of the Secretary-General on the Sudan, 12 April 2011, UN doc. D/2011/239.Google Scholar
UN Press Release, U.N. Doc PM/473, 12 August 1947 (Legal Department on the admission of Pakistan to the United Nations).Google Scholar
Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-Operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res 2625 (XXV), UNGAOR, 25th Sess, Supp No, UN Doc A/8082, (1970) 121.Google Scholar
Resolution 36/121 of 10 December 1981 (Question of Namibia).Google Scholar
Resolution 38/36 of 2 December 1983 (Question of Namibia).Google Scholar
Resolution 40/52 of 2 December 1985 (Activities of foreign economic and other interests which are impeding the implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples in Namibia and in all other Territories under colonial domination and efforts to eliminate colonialism, apartheid and racial discrimination in southern Africa).Google Scholar
Resolution 55/153 of 12 December 2000 (Nationality of Natural Persons in relation to the Succession of States).Google Scholar
Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts).Google Scholar
Resolution A/60/264 of 12 July 2006 (Admission of the Republic of Montenegro to membership in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 65/308 of 25 August 2011 (Admission of the Republic of South Sudan to membership in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 67/19 of 29 November 2012 (Status of Palestine in the United Nations).Google Scholar
Resolution 71/292 of 22 June 2017 (Legal Consequences of the Separation of Chagos from Mauritius in 1965, Request for an Advisory Opinion).Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Addendum to First Report on Diplomatic Protection’, by Mr. John R. Dugard, Special Rapporteur, 20 April 2000, UN Doc. A/CN.4/506/Add.1.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Commentaries to the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted by the International Law Commission at Its Fifty-Third Session (2001)’, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-third Session, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-sixth Session, Supplement No. 10(A/56/10), (2001) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 30.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection with commentaries’, (2006) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 23.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Nationality of Natural Persons in Relation to the Succession of States’, adopted by the ILC on second reading in 1999, ILC Report, U.N. Doc. A/54/10, 1999, ch. IV, paras. 44 and 45, in: (1997) II Yearbook ILC, 14.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Fifth Report on Succession in Respect of Treaties, prepared by the Special Rapporteur, Sir Humphrey Waldock’, A/CN.4/256 and Adds.1–4, 10 April, 29 May and 8, 16 and 28 June 1972, A/8710/Rev.1, in: (1972) II Yearbook ILC, 292–298.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on State Responsibility (addendum no. 4)’, by Crawford J., Special Rapporteur, 26 May 1998, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/490/Add.4.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on Succession of States in Respect of Rights and Duties Resulting from Sources other than Treaties’, by Mr Mohammed Bedjaoui, Special Rapporteur, 20th session of the ILC, 1968, UN Doc. A/CN.4/204, ILC Report, A/7209/Rev.1 (A/23/9), 1968, ch. III(C)(a), in: (1968) II Yearbook ILC, 94.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘First Report on Succession of States in Respect of State Responsibility, by Special Rapporteur, Mr. Pavel Šturma’, 69th session, 2017, A/CN.4/708, 31 May 2017.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Fourth Report on State Responsibility of the Special Rapporteur’, Mr. Roberto Ago, 24th session of the ILC, 1972, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/264 and Add.1, ILC Report, A/8710/Rev.1 (A/27/10), 1972, chp. IV(B), in: (1972) II Yearbook ILC, 71.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations’, General Assembly Resolution 61/34 of 4 December 2006, in (2006) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 159.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Proposal by the Chairman of the ILC Sub-committee on Succession of States and Governments, Manfred Lachs’, (1963) II Yearbook ILC, 260.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Twenty-Seventh Session’, 5 May to 25 July 1975, Draft Articles on State Responsibility, U.N. Doc. A/10010/Rev.1, in: (1975) II Yearbook ILC, 47.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its Fifty-third session’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-sixth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp. IV.E.2, 208, (2001) I Yearbook ILC, 202.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Fourth Session’, 29 April–7 June and 22 July–16 August 2002, ILC Report, A/57/10, 2002, chp. V, (2002) II(2), Yearbook ILC, 1.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-first session, Supplement No. 10 (A/71/10), recommendation of the Working-Group on the long-term programme of work, Annex B: ‘Succession of States in respect of State responsibility’, Syllabus by Pavel Šturma, 409.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Second Report on Succession of States in Respect of State Responsibility, by Special Rapporteur, Mr. Pavel Šturma’, 70th session, 2018, A/CN.4/719, 5 April 2018.Google Scholar
ILC, Titles and Texts of the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading, 26 July 2001, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/L.602/Rev.1., (2001) II(2) Yearbook ILC, 30.Google Scholar
Decree on the Natural Resources of Namibia, Addendum to the Report of the United Nations Council for Namibia, 29 UN GAOR Supp. 24A, at 27–28, UN Doc. A/9624/add 1(1975).Google Scholar
Report of the Secretary-General on the Sudan, 12 April 2011, UN doc. D/2011/239.Google Scholar
UN Press Release, U.N. Doc PM/473, 12 August 1947 (Legal Department on the admission of Pakistan to the United Nations).Google Scholar
Bundesgesetz über den Fonds für freiwillige Leistungen der Republik Österreich an ehemalige Sklaven und Zwangsarbeiter des nationalsozialistischen Regimes (Versöhnungsfonds Gesetz) (Federal Law Concerning the Fund for Voluntary Payments by the Republic of Austria to Former Slave Labourers and Forced Labourers of the National Socialist Regime), in: ÖBGBl., I No. 74/2000 of 8 August 2000, entered into force on 27 November 2000.Google Scholar
Constitution of Namibia, adopted by the Constituent Assembly of Namibia on 9 February 1990, entered into force on 21 March 1991, UN Doc. S/20967/Add.2.Google Scholar
Decision on Obligations of Public Authorities of the Republic of Serbia in Assuming Powers of the Republic of Serbia as Successor State to the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, 12 June 2006.Google Scholar
Gesetz zur Errichtung einer Stiftung ‘Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft’, in: (2000) I BGBl., p. 1263.Google Scholar
Indian Independence Act (1947), 10 and 11 Geo. VI, c. 30; L.R. Statues 1947.Google Scholar
Indian Independence (International Arrangements) Order, Gazette of India (Extraordinary), 14 August 1947.Google Scholar
1947 Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, Gazette of India (Extraordinary), 14 August 1947, in: Whiteman M.M., Digest of International Law, vol. II (Washington: US Govt.,1973), 873.Google Scholar
Agreement between the United Arab Republic and Société Financière de Suez, 13 July 1958, UN Doc. A/3898, S/4089, 23 September 1958.Google Scholar
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), amicus brief, 20 Oct. 2008, opinion no. 495/2008, CDL-AD(2008)021.Google Scholar
Exchange of notes UK–UAR, in: (1960) 54 AJIL 511–519.Google Scholar
Letter from Russia to the UN Secretary-General, 24 December 1991, in UN Doc 1991/RUSSIA, Appendix, 24 December 1991, 31 ILM 138.Google Scholar
Letter of US Secretary of State Mr. Marcy to French Minister Count Sartiges concerning the claims of French subjects as a result of the U.S. bombardment of Greytown in 1854, 26 February 1857, in: MS. Notes to French Leg. VI. 301; S. Ex. Doc. 9, 35 Cong. 1 sess. 3, in: Moore J.B., History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party, vol. III (Washington: US Govt., 1898), 929–930.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Le caractère national d’une réclamation internationale présentée par un Etat en raison d’un dommage subi par un individu’ (1965) 51-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 157.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Les effets des changements territoriaux sur les droits patrimoniaux’, in: (1952) 44-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 471.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘La protection diplomatique des individus en droit international. La nationalité des réclamations’, in: (1965) 51-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 157.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Resolution on Responsibility and Liability under International Law for Environmental Damage’, in: 67-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 486–513.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Deliberations, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 305.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Rapport provisoire par le Rapporteur Georg Ress, 15 August 1999, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 140.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Resolution, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 712.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Deliberations, in: (2013) 75 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 209.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Deliberations, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 624.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Final Report by Rapporteur Marcelo Kohen, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 511Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Provisional Report by Rapporteur Marcelo Kohen, in: (2013) 75 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 123.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Resolution, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 703.Google Scholar
International Law Association, ‘The Changing Law of Nationality of Claims, Interim Report’, Interim Report, Francisco Orrego Vicuña, Committee on Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property (2000), 28.Google Scholar
International Law Association, ‘Final Report on Aspects of the Law of State Succession’, Co-rapporteurs Władysław Czapliński and Marcelo G. Kohen, Report of the Seventy-Third Conference, Rio de Janeiro (2008), 250–263.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Le caractère national d’une réclamation internationale présentée par un Etat en raison d’un dommage subi par un individu’ (1965) 51-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 157.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Les effets des changements territoriaux sur les droits patrimoniaux’, in: (1952) 44-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 471.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘La protection diplomatique des individus en droit international. La nationalité des réclamations’, in: (1965) 51-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 157.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘Resolution on Responsibility and Liability under International Law for Environmental Damage’, in: 67-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 486–513.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Deliberations, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 305.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Rapport provisoire par le Rapporteur Georg Ress, 15 August 1999, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 140.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts’, Resolution, in: (2000–2001) 69 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international, 712.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Deliberations, in: (2013) 75 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 209.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Deliberations, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 624.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Final Report by Rapporteur Marcelo Kohen, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 511Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Provisional Report by Rapporteur Marcelo Kohen, in: (2013) 75 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 123.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international, ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’, Resolution, in: (2015) 76 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 703.Google Scholar
International Law Association, ‘The Changing Law of Nationality of Claims, Interim Report’, Interim Report, Francisco Orrego Vicuña, Committee on Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property (2000), 28.Google Scholar
International Law Association, ‘Final Report on Aspects of the Law of State Succession’, Co-rapporteurs Władysław Czapliński and Marcelo G. Kohen, Report of the Seventy-Third Conference, Rio de Janeiro (2008), 250–263.Google Scholar
Barde, J., La notion de droit acquis en droit international public (Paris: Publ. univ. de Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2006).Google Scholar
Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015).Google Scholar
Donner, R., The Regulation of Nationality in International Law, 2nd ed. (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publ., 1994).Google Scholar
Drinhausen, F., Die Auswirkungen der Staatensukzession auf Verträge eines Staates mit privaten Partnern (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1995).Google Scholar
Dugard, J., International Law; a South African Perspective 2nd ed. (Kenwyn: Juta, 2000).Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., A Guide to State Succession in International Investment Law (London: Elgar Publ., 2018).Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., State Succession to International Responsibility (Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 2007).Google Scholar
Gould, W.L., An Introduction to International Law (New York: Harpers & Brothers Publi., 1957).Google Scholar
Guggenheim, P., Traité de droit international public, vol. I (Geneva: Librairie de l’Université, 1953).Google Scholar
Hyde, C.C., International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States, vol. I, 2nd ed. (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1945).Google Scholar
Jenning, R. & Watts, A., Oppenheim’s International Law, vol. I (Peace: Introduction and Part 1) (London: Longman, 1996).Google Scholar
Juillard, P. & Stern, B. (eds.), Les emprunts russes et le règlement du contentieux financier franco-russe (Paris: Cedin Cahiers internationaux n°16, 2002).Google Scholar
Klappers, J. (ed.), State Practice Regarding State Succession and Issues of Recognition (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar
de Lapradelle, A. & Politis, N., Recueil des arbitrages internationaux, vol. III, 1872–1875 (Paris: Pedone, 1954).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., Oppenheim’s International Law, vol. I (London: Longmans Green & Co., 1955).Google Scholar
Mälksoo, L., Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR (A Study of the Tension between Normativity and Power in International Law) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 2003).Google Scholar
Marek, K., Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1968).Google Scholar
Moore, J.B., History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party, vol. III (Washington, DC: US Govt., 1898).Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.P., State Succession in Municipal Law and International Law, vol. I (Cambridge: CUP, 1967).Google Scholar
Sastry, T.S.N., State Succession in Indian Context (New Delhi: Dominant Publ. & Dist., 2004).Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G., International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, vol. I, 3rd ed. (London: Steven & Sons, 1957).Google Scholar
Verzijl, J.H.W., International Law in Historical Perspective, vols. V and VII (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1973).Google Scholar
Weston, B.H., Lillich, R.B. & Bederman, D.J., International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump Sum Agreements, 1975–1995 (New York: N.Y.T.P., 1999).Google Scholar
Whiteman, M.M., Digest of International Law, vol. II (Washington: Dept. of State, 1973).Google Scholar
Wyler, E., La règle dite de la continuité de la nationalité dans le contentieux international (Paris: PUF, 1990).Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G., ‘Que reste-t-il du «crime international»’, in: Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Brussels: Bruylant, 2007), 69–91.Google Scholar
Atlam, H., ‘National Liberation Movements and International Responsibility’, in: Spinedi, M. & Simma, B. (eds.), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana, 1987), 35–56.Google Scholar
Cahin, G., ‘Attribution of Conduct to a State: Insurrectional Movements’, in: Crawford, J., Pellet, A. & Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Cambridge: CUP, 2010), 247–256.Google Scholar
Cosnard, M., ‘Les créances au titre de l’intervention occidentale de 1919–1922’, in: Juillard, P. & Stern, B. (eds.), Les emprunts russes et le règlement du contentieux financier franco-russe (Paris: Cedin Cahiers internationaux, 2002), 121–149.Google Scholar
Czaplinski, W., ‘Equity and Equitable Principles in the Law of State Succession’, in: Mrak, M. (ed.), Succession of States (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1999), 61–73.Google Scholar
Degan, V.D., ‘Equity in Matters of State Succession’, in: Macdonald, R.S.J. (ed.), Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993), 201–210.Google Scholar
Dugard, J., ‘Continuous Nationality’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, online ed. (OUP, 2006).Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘La succession d’Etats en matière de responsabilité internationale et ses liens avec la responsabilité des Etats en matière de traités’, in: Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015), 1581–1608.Google Scholar
Eisemann, P.M., ‘Emprunts russes et problèmes de succession d’États’, in: Juillard, P. & Stern, B. (eds.), Les emprunts russes et le règlement du contentieux financier franco-russe (Paris: Cedin Cahiers internationaux, 2002), 53–78.Google Scholar
Garrido-Muñoz, A., ‘Article 8’, in: Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015), 261–294.Google Scholar
Gradoni, L., ‘Article 2’, in: Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015), 87–124.Google Scholar
Kohen, M.G., ‘Le problème des frontières en cas de dissolution et de séparation d’États: quelles alternatives?’, in Corten, O. et al. (eds.), Démembrement d’États et délimitations territoriales: L’utipossidetis en question(s) (Brussels: Bruylant, 1999), 365–399.Google Scholar
Kohen, M.G., ‘Succession of States in the Field of International Responsibility: The Case for Codification’, in: Kohen, M.G., Kolb, R. & Tehindrazanarivelo, D. (eds.), Perspectives of International Law in the 21st Century. Liber amicorum Professor Christian Dominicé in Honour of his 80th Birthday (Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 2011), 161–174.Google Scholar
Kolliopoulos, A., ‘Article 9’, in: Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015), 295–335.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M., ‘The Runaway Train: The Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen’, in: Weiler, T. (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: CMP, 2005), 97–149.Google Scholar
Mikulka, V., ‘State Succession and Responsibility’, in: Crawford, J., Pellet, A. & Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: OUP, 2010), 291–296.Google Scholar
Mikulka, V., ‘Succession of States in Respect of Rights of an Injured State’, in: Crawford, J., Pellet, A. & Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: OUP, 2010), 965–967.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘The Spatial Dimension: Treaties and Territory’, in: Tams, C.J., Tzanakopoulos, A. & Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014), 186–221.Google Scholar
Pellet, A., ‘Le crime international de l’Etat: un phœnix juridique’, in: Koufa, K. (ed.), The New International Criminal Law: 2001 International Law Session (Thessalonika: Sakkoulas, 2003), 281–351.Google Scholar
Stern, B., ‘General Concluding Remarks’, in: Stern, B. (ed.), Dissolution, Continuation and Succession in Eastern Europe (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1998), 197–210.Google Scholar
Stern, B., ‘Responsabilité internationale et succession d’Etats’, in: Boisson de Chazournes, L. & Gowlland, V. (eds.), The International Legal system in Quest of Equity and Universality, Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab (Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 2001), 327–355.Google Scholar
Szabó, M., ‘State Succession and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Binder, C. & Lachmayer, K. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Public International Law Fragmentation or Unity? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014), 19–144.Google Scholar
Tanzi, A. & Iapichino, L., ‘Article 15’, in: Distefano, G., Gaggioli, G. & Hêche, A. (eds.), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d’État en matière de traités: Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Brussels: Bruylant, 2015), 543–555.Google Scholar
Torres Bernárdez, S., ‘Succession of States’, in Bedjaoui, M. (ed.), International Law: Achievements and Prospects (Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff/Unesco, 1995), 381–404.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. & Devaney, J.G., ‘Succession to Treaties and the Inherent Limits of International Law’, in: Tams, C.J., Tzanakopoulos, A. & Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (London: Edward Elgar, 2014), 505–540.Google Scholar
Binder, C., ‘Sanum Investments Limited v. The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic’ (2016) 17 J. World Invest. & Trade 280–294.Google Scholar
Booysen, H., ‘Succession to Delictual Liability: A Namibian Precedent’ (1991) 24 Comp. & Int’l L.J. S. Afr. 204–214.Google Scholar
Brockman-Hawe, B.-E., ‘Succession, the Obligation to Repair and Human Rights; The European Court of Human Rights Judgment in the Case of Bijelic v. Montenegro and Serbia’ (2010) 59(3) ICLQ 845–867.Google Scholar
Cotran, E., ‘Some Legal Aspects of the Formation of the United Arab Republic and the United Arab States’ (1959) 8 ICLQ 346–390.Google Scholar
Czapliński, W., ‘State Succession and State Responsibility’ (1990) 28 Canadian YIL 339–359.Google Scholar
Drakidis, P., ‘Succession d’Etats et enrichissements sans cause des biens publics du Dodécanèse’ (1971) 24 RHDI 72–123.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Controversial Issue of State Succession to International Responsibility in Light of Recent State Practice’ (2006) 49 German YIL 413–448.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Is a New State Responsible for Obligations Arising from Internationally Wrongful Acts Committed before its Independence in the Context of Secession?’ (2005) 43 Canadian YIL 419–453.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Is Turkey the “Continuing” State of the Ottoman Empire under International Law?’ (2012) 59(2) Netherlands ILR 235–262.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘New State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts by an Insurrectional Movement’ (2006) 17(3) EJIL 605–621.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Obsolete and Unjust: the Rule of Continuous Nationality in the Context of State Succession’ (2007) 76(2) Nordic JIL 153–183.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘State Succession to State Contracts: A New Framework of Analysis for an Unexplored Question’ (2018) 19 J. World Invest. & Trade 595–627.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Turkey’s International Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts Committed by the Ottoman Empire’ (2012) 42 Revue générale de droit 562–589.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Use of the Concept of Unjust Enrichment to Resolve Issues of State Succession to International Responsibility’ (2006) 39(2) RBDI 506–528.Google Scholar
Fastenrath, U., ‘Der deutsche Einigungsvertragim Lichte des Rechts der Staatennachfolge’ (1992) 44 ÖZöRV 1–54.Google Scholar
Focsaneanu, L., ‘L’accord ayant pour objet l’indemnisation de la compagnie de Suez nationalisée par l’Egypte’ (1959) AFDI 161–204.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., ‘Théorie générale du droit international public. Problèmes choisis’ (1932) 42 Rec. des Cours 117–351.Google Scholar
Kohen, M.G., ‘La création d’Etats en droit international contemporain’ (2002) 6 Bancaja Euromediterranean Courses of International Law 543–636.Google Scholar
Lagrange, E., ‘Les successions d’États: pratiques françaises’ (2003) 63 La. L.Rev 1187–1240.Google Scholar
Lehner, O, ‘The Identity of Austria 1918/19 as a Problem of State Succession’ (1992) 44 ÖZöRV 63–84.Google Scholar
Monnier, J.-P., ‘La succession d’Etats en matière de responsabilité internationale’ (1962) 8 AFDI 65–90.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.P., ‘Recent Problems of State Succession in Relation to New States’ (1970) 130 Rec. des Cours 95–206.Google Scholar
Quint, P.E., ‘The Constitutional Law of German Unification’ (1991) 50 Md. L.Rev. 475–662.Google Scholar
Repousis, O.G., ‘On Territoriality and International Investment Law: Applying China’s Investment Treaties to Hong Kong and Macao’ (2015) 37(1) Michigan JIL 113–190.Google Scholar
Stahn, C., ‘The Agreement on Succession Issues of the Former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’ (2002) 96(2) AJIL 379–397.Google Scholar
Stavridi, J. & Kolliopoulos, A., ‘L’Accord du 29 juin 2001 portant sur des questions de succession entre les Etats issus de la dissolution de l’ex-Yougoslavie’ (2002) AFDI 163–184.Google Scholar
Strydom, H.A., ‘Namibian Independence and the Question of the Contractual and Delictual Liability of the Predecessor and Successor Governments’ (1990) 15 South African YIL 111–121.Google Scholar
Šturma, P., ‘State Succession in Respect of International Responsibility’ (2016) 48 George Washington ILR 653–678.Google Scholar
Szurek, S., ‘Epilogue d’un contentieux historique. L’accord sur le règlement des créances réciproque entre la France et la Russie’ (1998) 44 AFDI 144–166.Google Scholar
Tams, C.J., ‘State Succession to Investment Treaties: Mapping the Issues’ (2016) 31(2) ICSID Rev. 314–343.Google Scholar
Udina, M., ‘La succession des Etats quant aux obligations internationales autres que les dettes publiques’ (1933) 44 Rec. des Cours 665–773.Google Scholar
Volkovitsch, M., ‘Righting Wrongs: Toward a New Theory of State Succession to Responsibility of International Delicts’ (1992) 92 Columbia LR 2162–2214.Google Scholar
Zemanek, K., ‘State Succession after Decolonization’ (1965) 116 Rec. des cours 181–300.Google Scholar
Atlam, H.M., Succession d’Etats et continuité en matière de responsabilité internationale, Thesis, Université de droit, d’économie et des sciences d’Aix-Marseille (France), 1986.Google Scholar
Peterschmitt, M., La succession d’États et la responsabilité internationale pour fait illicite, Mémoire de DES, Université de Genève/Institut Universitaire de hautes études internationales (Switzerland), 2001.Google Scholar