Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:55:26.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

Joshua Stuchlik
Joshua Stuchlik
Affiliation:
University of St Thomas, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Intention and Wrongdoing
In Defense of Double Effect
 , pp. 188 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, David E. 2012. Goodness, God and Evil. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. 2000. “Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability.” California Law Review 88 (3): 931–54.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria. 2010. Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1985. Model Penal Code: Official Draft and Explanatory Notes: Complete Text of the Model Penal Code as Adopted at the 1962 Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute at Washington, DC, May 24, 1962. Philadelphia: The Institute.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981a. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 26–42. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981b. “Mr. Truman’s Degree.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 62–71. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981c. “The Justice of the Present War Examined.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 72–81. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981d. “The Two Kinds of Error in Action.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 3–9. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981e. “War and Murder.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 51–61. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005a. “Action, Intention and ‘Double Effect’.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 207–26. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005b. “Knowledge and Reverence for Human Life.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 59–66. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005c. “Murder and the Morality of Euthanasia.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 261–78. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005d. “Practical Inference.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 109–48. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005e. “Practical Truth.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 149–58. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005f. “The Dignity of the Human Being.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 67–73. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2008. “Contraception and Chastity.” In Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 170–91. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 5 vols. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2016. Means, Ends, and Persons: The Meaning and Psychological Dimensions of Kant’s Humanity Formula. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Awad, Edmond, Dsouza, Sohan, Shariff, Azim, Rahwan, Iyad, and Bonnefon, Jean-François. 2020. “Universals and Variants in Moral Decisions Made in 42 Countries by 70,000 Participants.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (5): 2332–7.Google Scholar
Ayars, Alisabeth. 2016. “Can Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Explain Deontological Moral Judgments?” Cognition 150: 232–42.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia. 2005. “Justifications and Excuses.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 (2): 387–406.Google Scholar
Bayertz, Kurt. 1999. “Four Uses of ‘Solidarity’.” In Solidarity, edited by Bayertz, Kurt, 3–28. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1995. The Act Itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berker, Selim. 2009. “The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4): 293–329.Google Scholar
Biggar, Nigel. 2013. In Defense of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. 1995. “A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath.” Cognition 57 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Bland, Larry, ed. 1991. George C. Marshall Interviews and Remembrances for Forrest C. Pogue. Lexington, VA: George C. Marshall Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence A. 1980. Friendship, Altruism and Morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bommarito, Nicolas. 2016. “Private Solidarity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2): 445–55.Google Scholar
Boyle, Joseph. 1980. “Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect.” Ethics 90 (4): 527–38.Google Scholar
Boyle, Joseph. 2004. “Medical Ethics and Double Effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1): 51–60.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. 2011. The Retrieval of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 2013. Rationality through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, T. A. 2006. Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ruth. 2015. “Value Incomparability and Incommensurability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, edited by Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas, 205–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Timothy. 2011. “The Action-Omission and Double Effect Distinctions.” In Bioethics with Liberty and Justice: Themes in the Work of Joseph M. Boyle, edited by Tollefsen, Christopher, 113–41. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 2008. Morality and Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, A. J. 2016. The Ethics of War. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, Paul and Gawronski, Bertram. 2013. “Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104 (2): 216–35.Google Scholar
Cowan, Howard. 1945. “Terror Bombing Gets Allied Approval as Step to Speed Victory.” Washington Star, February 18, 1945, 1.Google Scholar
Crockett, Molly. 2013. “Models of Morality.” Trends in Cognitive Science 17 (8): 363–6.Google Scholar
Cullity, Garrett. 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cureton, Adam. 2012. “Solidarity and Social Moral Rules.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5): 691–706.Google Scholar
Cushman, Fiery. 2013. “Action, Outcome and Value: A Dual-System Framework for Morality.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 17 (3): 273–92.Google Scholar
Cushman, Fiery. 2016. “The Psychological Origins of the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 763–76.Google Scholar
Cushman, Fiery and Miller, Ryan. 2013. “Aversive for Me, Wrong for You: First-person Behavioral Aversions Underlie the Moral Condemnation of Harm.” Social Personality Psychology Compass 7 (10): 707–18.Google Scholar
Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane, and Hauser, Marc. 2006. “The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm.” Psychological Science 17 (12): 1082–9.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2018. Practical Shape: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Eric. 1963. Human Acts: An Essay in Their Moral Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2002. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Ramon. 2003. “Virtue Ethics and Right Action.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3): 324–39.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700.Google Scholar
Delaney, Neil. 2015. “The Doctrine of Double Effect: Some Remarks on Intention and Evaluation.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3): 397–406.Google Scholar
Di Nucci, Ezio. 2014. Ethics without Intention. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Doestoevsky, Fyodor. 2002. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Peaver and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. 2018. Understanding Criminal Law. 8th ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 1996. Criminal Attempts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 2007. Answering for Crime. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Duffy, Shane. 2007. “Obstetric Haemorrhage in Gimbie, Ethiopia.” The Obstetrician and Gynecologist 9 (2): 121–6.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2003. “In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.” Trends in Cognitive Science 7 (10): 454–9.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Patricio A. 2016. “Practical Reasoning: Where the Action Is.” Ethics 126 (4): 869–900.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1983. Fundamentals of Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1991. Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision, and Truth. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1995. “A Philosophical Case against Euthanasia.” In Euthanasia Examined, edited by Keown, John, 23–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 2011a. “Human Acts.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 133–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 2011b. “Intention and Side Effects.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 173–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 2011c. “Intention in Direct Discrimination.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 269–75. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 2013. “Reflections and Responses.” In Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, edited by Keown, John and George, Robert P., 459–584. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 1987a. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 1987b. “Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1): 99–151.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 2001. “‘Direct’ and ‘Indirect’: A Reply to Critics of Our Action Theory.” The Thomist 65 (1): 1–44.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William J. 2003. “Acts, Intentions, and Moral Permissibility: In Defense of the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Analysis 63 (4): 317–21.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William J. 2006. “The Intend/Foresee Distinction and The Problem of ‘Closeness’.” Philosophical Studies 128 (3): 585–617.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William J. 2012. “Intention, Permissibility, and Double Effect.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Vol. 2, edited by Timmons, Mark, 97–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2002. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, 19–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2008a. “Morality, Action, and Outcome.” In Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy, 88–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2008b. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues.” In Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy, 59–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Anton. 2016. “On What Is in Front of Your Nose.” Philosophical Topics 44 (1): 141–61.Google Scholar
Ford, Anton. 2017. “The Representation of Action.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80: 217–33.Google Scholar
Ford, John C. 1944. “The Morality of Obliteration Bombing.” Theological Studies 5 (3): 261–309.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard B. 1999. Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1961a. Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated and edited by Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1961b. The Future of an Illusion. Translated and edited by Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. 1978. Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, Jorge L. A. 1993. “The New Critique of Anti-Consequentialist Moral Theory.” Philosophical Studies 71 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Garrett, Stephen. 2007. “Airpower and Non-combatant Immunity: The Road to Dresden.” In Civilian Immunity in War, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 161–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Stephen. 2014. “The Bombing Campaign: The RAF.” In Terror from the Skies: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 19–38. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
George, Robert P. 1999. In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel and Young, Liane. 2013. “Low Levels of Emphatic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment.” PLoS One 8 (4): e60418.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1970. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso. 2002. Morality and the Human Goods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso and Keown, John. 2015. Bioethics and the Human Goods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gormally, Luke. 2013. “Intention and Side Effects: John Finnis and Elizabeth Anscombe.” In Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, edited by Keown, John and George, Robert P., 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gormally, Luke. 2016. “On Killing Human Beings.” In The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe, edited by Gormally, Luke, Jones, David Albert, and Teichmann, Roger, 133–53. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. 2006. Among the Dead Cities: Is the Targeting of Civilians in War Ever Justified? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.” In Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Disease, and Development, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, 35–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2014. “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics.” Ethics 124 (4): 695–726.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2016. “Reply to Driver and Darwall.” In Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality, edited by Matthew Liao, S., 170–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2017. “The Rat-a-gorical Imperative: Moral Intuition and the Limits of Affective Learning.” Cognition 167: 66–77.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D., Cushman, Fiery A., Stewart, Lisa E., Lowenberg, Kelly, Nystrom, Leigh E., and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2009. “Pushing Moral Buttons: The Interaction between Personal Force and Intention in Moral Judgment.” Cognition 111 (3): 364–71.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia. 2015. “Confabulating the Truth: In Defense of ‘Defensive’ Moral Reasoning.” Journal of Ethics 19 (2): 105–23.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, edited by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain. 1993. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume 2: Living A Christian Life. Quincy: Franciscan Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1949. The Laws of War and Peace. Translated by Ropes Loomis, Louise. Roslyn, NY: Walter J. Black.Google Scholar
Guglielmo, Steve and Malle, Bertram F.. 2010. “Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (12): 1635–47.Google Scholar
Gury, Joannes. 1874. Compendium Theologiae Moralis. Regensburg: Georgii Josephi Manz.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.” Psychology Review 108 (4): 814–34.Google Scholar
Hannikainen, Ivar R., Machery, Edouard, and Cushman, Fiery A.. 2018. “Is Utilitarian Sacrifice Becoming More Morally Permissible?” Cognition 170: 95–101.Google Scholar
Hanser, Matthew. 2005. “Permissibility and Practical Inference.” Ethics 115 (3): 443–70.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2008. “Intention and Punishment.” In Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 113–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartle, Anthony. 2004. Moral Issues in Military Decision Making. 2nd ed. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc, Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane, Kang-Xing Jin, R., and Mikhail, John. 2007. “A Dissociation between Moral Judgments and Justifications.” Mind & Language 22 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan. 2018. Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heuer, Ulrike. 2015. “Intentions, Permissibility, and the Reasons for Which We Act.” In Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency, edited by Pavlakos, George, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Robert L. 1989. On War and Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1980. Actions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2006. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. In Moral Philosophy, edited by Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, 185–310. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 2005. “Proportionality in the Morality of War.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1): 34–66.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas. 2009. “The Cost to Criminal Theory of Supposing that Intentions Are Irrelevant to Permissibility.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1): 51–70.Google Scholar
Hyman, John. 2015. Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2010. Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court. 2011. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Hague. www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf (accessed January 25, 2020).Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven J. 2014. “Causal Constraints on Intention: A Critique of Tollefsen on the Phoenix Case.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14 (2): 273–93.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. 1999. Morality and Contemporary Warfare. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 1991. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2001. “Thinking about Cases.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2): 44–63.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kamm, Frances M. 1991. “The Doctrine of Double Effect: Reflections on Theoretical and Practical Issues.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5): 571–85.Google Scholar
Kamm, Frances M. 2000. “The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 74 (1): 21–39.Google Scholar
Kamm, Frances M. 2004. “Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice.” Ethics 114 (4): 650–92.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J., 37–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J., 353–603. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Whitley. 2009. Justified Killing: The Paradox of Self-Defense. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Whitley. 2016. “The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem.” Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (1): 21–31.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1995. “Philippa Foot on Double Effect.” In Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, edited by Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin, and Quinn, Warren, 77–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kindhäuser, Urs, Neumann, Ulfrid, and Paeffgen, Hans-Ulrich. 2010. Nomon Kommentar Strafgesetzbuch, Volume 2. 3rd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua. 2003. “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language.” Analysis 63 (3): 190–4.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2011. “Scanlon’s Investigation: The Relevance of Intent to Permissibility.” Analytic Philosophy 52 (2): 100–23.Google Scholar
Königs, Peter. 2018. “Two Types of Debunking Arguments.” Philosophical Psychology 31 (3): 383–402.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, Douglas. 2014. “The Bombing Campaign: The USAAF.” In Terror from the Skies: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 39–59. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Lavin, Douglas. 2016. “Action as a Form of Temporal Unity: On Anscombe’s Intention.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (4–5): 609–29.Google Scholar
Lee, Patrick. 2017. “Distinguishing between What Is Intended and Foreseen Side Effects.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 62 (2): 231–51.Google Scholar
Lee, Patrick. 2019. “The New Natural Law Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics, edited by Angier, Tom, 73–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Patrick and George, Robert. 2008. “The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity.” Ratio Juris 21 (2): 173–93.Google Scholar
Levine, Sydney, Leslie, Alan M., and Mikhail, John. 2018. “The Mental Representation of Human Action.” Cognitive Science 42 (4): 1229–64.Google Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew. 2012. “Intentions and Moral Permissibility: The Case of Acting Permissibly with Bad Intentions.” Law and Philosophy 31 (6): 703–24.Google Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew. 2016. “The Closeness Problem and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Way Forward.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 849–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew. 2017. “Neuroscience and Ethics: Assessing Greene’s Debunking Argument against Deontology.” Experimental Pyschology 64 (2): 82–92.Google Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew, Wiegmann, Alex, Alexander, Joshua, and Vong, Gerard. 2012. “Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case.” Philosophical Psychology 25 (5): 661–71.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, Hallvard. 2010. “Scanlon on Intention and Permissibility.” Analysis 70 (3): 578–85.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2014. “Just War Theory, Intentions, and the Deliberative Perspective Objection.” In How We Fight: Ethics in War, edited by Frowe, Helen and Lang, Gerald, 138–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lott, Micah. 2016. “Moral Implications from Cognitive (Neuro)Science? No Clear Route.” Ethics 127 (1): 241–56.Google Scholar
Lyons, Edward C. 2013. “Slaughter of the Innocent: Justification, Excuse, and the Principle of Double Effect.” Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 18 (2): 231–316.Google Scholar
Mangan, Joseph. 1949. “An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect.” Theological Studies 10 (1): 41–61.Google Scholar
Marcus, Eric. 2019. “Reconciling Practical Knowledge with Self-Deception.” Mind 128 (512): 1205–25.Google Scholar
Masek, Lawrence. 2018. Intention, Character, and Double Effect. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Andrew. 2000. Community, Solidarity and Belonging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, David. 2002. “Intending Harm, Foreseeing Harm, and Failures of the Will.” Noûs 36 (4): 622–42.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 2010. “What Is the Content of an Intention in Action?” Ratio 23 (4): 415–32.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alison. 2001. “Doing Away with Double Effect.” Ethics 111 (2): 219–55.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2004. “The Ethics of Killing in War.” Ethics 114 (4): 693–733.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2009. “Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism, and War.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 345–72.Google Scholar
Mikhail, John. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miscamble, Wilson D. 2011. The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bomb, and the Defeat of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. 1978. “Events, Processes, and States.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3): 415–34.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2001. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2004. “Intention, Foresight, and Success.” In Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, edited by Oderberg, David S. and Chappell, Timothy, 252–68. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nathanson, Stephen. 2010. Terrorism and the Ethics of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana Kay and Rickless, Samuel C.. 2015. “So Close Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem to the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short.” Noûs 49 (2): 376–409.Google Scholar
Newman, Robert P. 1995. Truman and the Hiroshima Cult. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Norcross, Alastair. 1999. “Intending and Foreseeing Death: Potholes on the Road to Hell.” Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1): 115–23.Google Scholar
Nye, Howard. 2013. “Objective Double Effect and the Avoidance of Narcissism.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Vol. 3, edited by Timmons, Mark, 260–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orend, Brian. 2013. The Morality of War, 2nd ed. Petersborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. 2008. “Double Effect, Triple Effect and the Trolley Problem: Squaring the Circle in Looping Cases.” Utilitas 20 (1): 92–110.Google Scholar
Øverland, Gerhard. 2014. “Moral Obstacles: An Alternative to the Principle of Double Effect.” Ethics 124 (3): 481–506.Google Scholar
Øverland, Gerhard. 2016. “Why Kamm’s Principle of Secondary Permissibility Cannot Save the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3): 286–96.Google Scholar
Perkins, David N., Faraday, Michael, and Bushey, Barbara. 1991. “Everyday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence.” In Informal Reasoning and Education, edited by Voss, James F., Perkins, David N., and Segal, Judith W., 83–105. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perkins, Rollin M. 1934. “A Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought.” Yale Law Review 43 (4): 537–70.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1999. Gorgias. Translated by W. D. Woodhead. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, 229–307. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Primoratz, Igor. 2007. “Civilian Immunity in War: Its Grounds, Scope, and Weight.” In Civilian Immunity in War, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 21–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Primoratz, Igor. 2013. Terrorism: A Philosophical Investigation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander. 2013. “The Accomplishment of Plans: A New Version of the Principle of Double Effect.” Philosophical Studies 165 (1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. 1993a. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Morality and Action, 175–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. 1993b. “Reply to Boyle’s ‘Who Is Entitled to Double Effect?’” In Morality and Action, 194–7, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rachels, James. 1986. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Paul. 1968. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Laws of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Ben A. 2001. Strange Bedfellows: How Medical Jurisprudence Has Influenced Medical Ethics and Medical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Riisfeldt, Thomas David. 2019. “Weakening the Distinction between Euthanasia, Palliative Opiod Use and Palliative Sedation.” Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2): 125–30.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. “Solidarity.” In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 189–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 2008. Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2017. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments, Explanatory Structure, and Anti-Realism.” In Ethical Sentimentalism: New Perspectives, edited by Debes, Remy and Steuber, Karsten R., 66–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 2015. “Fraternity, Solidarity, and Civic Friendship.” Amity: The Journal of Friendship Studies 3 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Schwenkler, John. 2019. Anscombe’s Intention: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Cushman, Fiery A.. 2012. “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Nonphilosophers.” Mind and Language 27 (2): 135–53.Google Scholar
Setiya, Kieran. 2012. Knowing Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Joseph. 2006a. “Intention in Ethics.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2): 187–223.Google Scholar
Shaw, Joseph. 2006b. “Intentions and Trolleys.” The Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222): 63–83.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1907. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–43.Google Scholar
Singer, Tania and Klimecki, Olga M.. 2014. “Empathy and Compassion.” Current Biology 24 (18): R875–8.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1973. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, W. David. 2019. “Elizabeth Anscombe and the Late Twentieth-Century Revival of Virtue Ethics.” In Beyond the Self: Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Culture, edited by Hain, Raymond, 223–44. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., and West, Richard F.. 2000. “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 645–65.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2018a. “Bennett, Intention and the DDE – The Sophisticated Bomber as Pseudo-Problem.” Analysis 78 (1): 73–80.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2018b. “The Secret to the Success of the Doctrine of Double Effect (and Related Principles): Biased Framing, Inadequate Methodology, and Clever Distractions.” Journal of Ethics 22 (3–4): 235–63.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2019. “Wild Goose Chase: Still No Rationales for the Doctrine of Double Effect and Related Principles.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Stimson, Henry L. 1947. “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb.” Harper’s Magazine 194: 97–107.Google Scholar
Stjernø, Steinar. 2004. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–25. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–66.Google Scholar
Stuchlik, Joshua. 2012. “A Critique of Scanlon on Double Effect.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2): 178–99.Google Scholar
Stuchlik, Joshua. 2017. “The Closeness Problem for Double Effect: A Reply to Nelkin and Rickless.” Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1): 69–83.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. 1944. A Work on the Three Theological Virtues, Disputation XIII: On Charity. In Three Works by Francisco Suárez, S.J, edited by Gwladys, L. Williams, Ammi Brown, , and Waldron, John, 799–865. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Thomas D. and Atkinson, Gary. 1985. “Benevolence and Absolute Prohibitions.” International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (3): 247–59.Google Scholar
Sverdlik, Steven. 2011. Motive and Rightness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. 2015. “Wrongful Intentions without Closeness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1): 52–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The Monist 59 (2): 204–17.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1985. “The Trolley Problem.” Yale Law Review 94 (6): 1395–415.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1991. “Self-Defense.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4): 283–310.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1999. “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments.” Ethics 109 (3): 497–518.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 2008. Normativity. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher. 2006. “Is a Purely First Person Account of Human Action Defensible?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4): 441–60.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de. 2001. On the Law of War. In Francisco de Vitoria: Political Writings, edited by Padgen, Anthony and Lawrence, Jeremy, 293–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogler, Candace. 2002. Reasonably Vicious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2015. Just and Unjust Wars. 5th ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2009. “Intrinsic Values and Reasons for Action.” Philosophical Issues 19: 321–42.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2011a. “Defending Double Effect.” Ratio 24 (4): 384–401.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2011b. “Scanlon on Double Effect.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2): 464–72.Google Scholar
Weir, Peter, director. 2005. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. Beverly Hills: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. 1998. “The Right and the Good and W.D. Ross’s Criticism of Consequentialism.” Utilitas 10 (3): 261–80.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. 2009. Ethics: Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Rachael. 2016. The Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Anscombe’s Intention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zamir, Eyal and Medina, Barak. 2010. Law, Economics, and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Michael. 2019. “Solidarity, Fate-Sharing, and Community.” Philosophers’ Imprint 19 (46): 1–13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Joshua Stuchlik, University of St Thomas, Minnesota
  • Book: Intention and Wrongdoing
  • Online publication: 02 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030410.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Joshua Stuchlik, University of St Thomas, Minnesota
  • Book: Intention and Wrongdoing
  • Online publication: 02 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030410.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Joshua Stuchlik, University of St Thomas, Minnesota
  • Book: Intention and Wrongdoing
  • Online publication: 02 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030410.011
Available formats
×