Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:48:51.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Issues in inter-basin water transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2009

Fereidoun Ghassemi
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Ian White
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A significant portion of the world's limited freshwater resources have already been developed to supply the increasing world population with water for drinking, sanitation, production of food and fibre, flood control and hydro-power generation. Developments have included inter-basin water transfer, construction of dams, canals, pipelines, pumping stations, and well fields for groundwater extraction. As the world approaches the limits of its finite freshwater resources, efforts are being increasingly directed towards their better management through improving water use efficiency, recycling of used water, improved laws and the establishment of a water market.

Globally, many water resources development projects have been criticised for their negative environmental, social and cultural impacts, as well as their poor economic performances (Petts, 1984; Goldsmith and Hildyard, 1984; Blackwelder and Carlson, 1986; Pearce, 1992). The World Bank also has been criticised for funding numerous large-scale water resources development projects around the world, resulting in environmental degradation, population displacements, and unrealised economic outcomes. Following these criticisms, the World Bank developed policies and guidelines for the environmental and social assessment of its various projects, including water resources development prior to any future funding (World Bank, 1991a, b, c).

The World Commission on Dams (WCD) has undertaken the most recent critical review of the large dams around the world. It started its activities in May 1998 by:

  1. (1) creating a 68 member stakeholder forum;

  2. (2) drawing on the wider stakeholder community of experts and analysts in developing the WCD knowledge base;

  3. (3) undertaking a programme of four regional consultations in different parts of the world with participation of 1400 individuals from 59 countries;

  4. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Inter-Basin Water Transfer
Case Studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China and India
, pp. 22 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altinbilek, H. D., Bayram, M. and Hazar, T. (1999). The new approach to development project-induced resettlement in Turkey. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15(3): 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. P. and Woessner, W. W. (1992). Applied Groundwater Modelling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport. San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Annandale, G. W. (1987). Reservoir Sedimentation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and Lind, R. C. (1994). Risk and uncertainty: uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decision. In Layard, R. and Glaister, S. eds. Cost-Benefit Analysis. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthington, A. H., King, J. M., O'Keeffe, J. H., Bunn, S. E., Day, J. A., Pusey, B. J., Bluhdorn, D. R. and Tharme, R. E. (1992). Development of a holistic approach for assessing environmental flow requirements of riverine ecosystems. In Pigram, J. J. and Hooper, B. P. eds. Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop on Water Allocation for the Environment. Centre for Water Policy Research, University of New England, Armidale, pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H. and Pusey, B. J. (1993). In-stream flow management in Australia: methods, deficiencies and future directions. Australian Biologist 6: 52–60.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H. (1998). Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Holistic Methodologies. Occasional Paper No. 26/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H. and Zalucki, J. M. eds. (1998). Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. Occasional Paper No. 27/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H., Pausy, B. J., Brizga, S. O., McCosker, R. O., Bunn, S. E. and Growns, I. O. (1998a). Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: R and D Requirements. Occasional Paper No. 24/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H., Brizga, S. O. and Kennard, M. J. (1998b). Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Best Practice Framework. Occasional Paper No. 25/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Arthington, A. H. and Pusey, B. J. (2003). Flow restoration and protection in Australian Rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthington, A. H., Brizga, S. O., Choy, S. C., Kennard, M. J., Mackay, S. J., McCosker, R. O., Ruffini, J. L. and Zalucki, J. M. (2000). Environmental Flow Requirements of the Brisbane River Downstream From Wivenhoe Dam. Brisbane: Centre for Catchment and In-stream Research, Griffith University.Google Scholar
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (2002a). Onshore Water Rights Discussion Booklet. Broome, Western Australia: Lingiari Foundation.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (2002b). Background Briefing Papers. Broome, Western Australia: Lingiari Foundation.
Bates, G. (2002). Environmental Law in Australia. Chatswood, New South Wales: LexisNexis Butterworth.Google Scholar
Beach, H. L., Hammer, J., Hewitt, J. J., Kaufman, E., Kurki, A., Oppenheimer, J. A. and Wolf, A. T. (2000). Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Resolution: Theory, Practice, and Annotated References. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Best, E. (1984). Dams, engineering geology. In. Finkl, C. W. Jnr ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Geology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, pp. 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, A. K. (1992). Indus water treaty: the negotiating process. Water International 17(4): 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, A. (1999). Management of international waters: opportunities and constraints. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15(4): 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwelder, B. and Carlson, P. (1986). Disasters in International Water Development. Washington D. C.: Environmental Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Bovee, K. D. (1982). A Guide to Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12, FWS/OBS-82/26. Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Brizga, S. O. (1998). Methods addressing flow requirements for geomorphological purposes. In Arthington, A. H. and Zallucki, J. M. eds. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. Occasional Paper No. 27/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, pp. 8–46.Google Scholar
Brizga, S. and Finlayson, B. (2000). River Management: The Australian Experience. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Brizga, S. O., Arthington, A. H., Choy, S., Craigie, N. M., Kennard, M. J., Mackay, S. J., Pusey, B. J. and Werren, G. L. (2002). Benchmarking, a ‘top-down’ methodology for assessing environmental flows in Australian rivers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Flows for Rivers. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town (Published on CD).Google Scholar
Bruns, B. R. and Meinzen-Dick, R. S. eds. (2000). Negotiating Water Rights. London: ITDG Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunn, S. T and Arthington, A. H. (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30(4): 492–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christen, E. W. and Hornbuckle, J. W. eds. (2001). Subsurface Drainage Design and Management Practices in Irrigated Areas of Australia. Canberra: Land & Water Australia.Google Scholar
Clark, W. A. and Wang, G. A. (2003). Conflicting attitudes toward inter-basin water transfers in Bulgaria. Water International 28(1): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claydon, G . ed. (1995). Water Allocations and Entitlements: Towards a National Framework for Property Rights in Water, Review of Policy Issues and Options. Canberra: Department of Primary Industries and Energy.Google Scholar
COAG (1994). Communiqué from the COAG Meeting, Hobart, 25 February 1994. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
Committee on Western Water Management (1992). Water Transfer in the West: Efficiencies, Equity and Environment. National Research Council. The National Academies Press.
Cottingham, P., Thoms, M. C. and Quinn, G. P. (2002). Scientific panels and their use in environmental flow assessment in Australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources 5: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croke, B. F. W. and Jakeman, A. J. (2001). Predictions in catchment hydrology: an Australian Perspective. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, B. R. (1984). A preliminary benefit cost analysis of the inland diversion of the coastal rivers of New South Wales. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 52(1): 23–47.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. A., Talbot, L. M. and Moigne, , Guy, J.-M. (1989). Dams and the Environment: Considerations in World Bank Projects. Technical Paper No. 110. Washington D. C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. A.Scura, L. F., Carpenter, R. A. and Sherman, P. B. (1994). Economic Analysis of Environmental Impacts. Second Edition. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
DWAF (1999). Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources. Volume 2: Integrated Manual (Version 1.0). Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Institute for Water Quality Studies.
Fearnside, P. M. (1993). Resettlement plans for China's Three Gorges Dam. In Barber, M. and Ryder, G. eds. Damming the Three Gorges: What Dam Builders Don't Want You to Know. Second edition. London: Earthscan, pp. 34–58.Google Scholar
Fetter, C. W. (1993). Contaminant Hydrogeology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fetter, C. W. (2001). Applied Hydrogeology. Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. E. (2000). Water Law. Sydney: LBC Information Services.Google Scholar
Ghadiri, H. and Rose, C. W. (1992). Modeling Chemical Transport in Soils: Natural and Applied Contaminants. Boca Raton, Florida: Cooperative Research Centre Press.Google Scholar
Ghassemi, F., Jakeman, A. J. and Nix, H. A. (1995). Salinisation of Land and Water Resources: Human Causes, Extent, Management and Case Studies. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Gippel, C. J. and Stewardson, M. J. (1998). Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 53–67.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P. H. ed. (1993). Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World's Freshwater Resources. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. and Hildyard, N. (1984). The Social and Environmental Effects of Large Dams. Volume 1: Overview; Volume 2 (1986): Case studies; and Volume 3 (1992): A Review of the Literature. Worthyvale Manore, Camelford, U.K.: Wadebridge Ecological Centre.Google Scholar
Grafton, R. Q., Adamowicz, W. A., Dupont, D., Nelson, H., Hill, R. J. and Renzetti, S. (2004). The Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources. Malden, M.A.: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulhati, N. D. (1973). Indus Waters Treaty: An Exercise in International Mediation. Bombay: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Hamblin, A. (2001). Land, Australia State of the Environment Report 2001. Collingwood, Victoria: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Publishing.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C. and McDonald, M. G. (2000). MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model – user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. U.S. Geological Survey. Open File Report 00–92.Google Scholar
Harrop, D. O. and Nixon, J. A. (1999). Environmental Assessment in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heggelund, G. (2004). Environment and Resettlement Politics in China: The Three Gorges Project. Hants, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Hill, M. C., Banta, E. R., Harbough, A. W. and Anderman, E. R. (2000). MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model – user guide to observation, sensitivity, and parameter estimation processes and three post-processing programs. U.S. Geological Survey. Open File Report 00–184.Google Scholar
Holzbecher, E. (2002). Groundwater Modeling: Computer Simulation of Groundwater Flow and Pollution. Fermont, California: FiatLux Publications (Electronic Book Series). Published on CD.Google Scholar
Howe, C. W. and Easter, K. W. (1971). Interbasin Transfer of Water: Economic Issues and Impacts. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. (1995). Soil Conservation. Third edition. London: Bastford.Google Scholar
International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, ed. (2003). Resolution of International Water Disputes. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Jakeman, A. J. and Letcher, R. A. (2003). Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling and Software 18: 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A. and Cuddy, S. M. (2003). Linking science and social science for sustainable catchment management: a modelling perspective. Development Bulletin 63: 24–27.Google Scholar
Jansen, , R. B. ed. (1988). Advance Dam Engineering for Design, Construction, and Rehabilitation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, D. and Byrne, P. (2003). Airborne Laser Scanning: Beyond its Formative Years.Google Scholar
Jowett, I. G. (1997). Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 115–127.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kheel, T. W. (1999). The Keys to Conflict Resolution. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
King, J. M. and Louw, D. (1998). Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Restoration 1: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M. and Tharme, R. E. (1994). Assessment of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and Initial Development of Alternative Instream Flow Methodologies for South Africa. Water and Rivers Commission Report No. 295/1/94. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Tharme, R. E. and Brown, C. A. (1999). Definition and Implementation of Instream Flows. Thematic Report for the World Commission on Dams. Cape Town, South Africa: Southern Waters Ecological Research and Consulting.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Tharme, R. E. and Villiers, M. S. eds. (2002). Environmental Flow Assessments for Rivers: Manual for the Building Block Methodology. Water Research Commission Technology Transfer Report No. TT131/00. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Brown, C. A. and Sabet, H. (2003). A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, K. L. (1987). HST3D: a computer code for simulation of heat and solute transport in three dimensional ground-water flow system. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation. Report 86–4095.Google Scholar
Kondolf, G. M. (1997). Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 21(4): 533–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovach, K. K. (1994). Mediation: Principles and Practices. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Layard, R. and Glaister, S. eds. (1994). Cost-Benefit Analysis. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letcher, R. A. and Jakeman, A. J. (2002). Catchment hydrology. In El-Shaarawi, A. H. and Piegorsch, W. W. eds. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 281–290.Google Scholar
Loneragan, N. R. and Bunn, S. E. (1999). River flows and estuarine ecosystems: implications for coastal fisheries from a review and a case study of the Logan River, southeast Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 24(4): 431–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, K. J. (1991). A Handbook of Dispute Resolution: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Action. London: Routledge and Sweet & Maxwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magowan, F. (2002). Negotiating indigenous water knowledge in a global water crisis. Cultural Survival Quarterly 26(2): 18–20.Google Scholar
Mahmood, K. (1987). Reservoir Sedimentation: Impact, Extent and Mitigation. World Bank Technical Paper No. 71. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. J., Holmes, J. W. and Rose, C. W. (1996). Soil Physics. Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W. (1984). A Modular Three-dimensional Finite Difference Ground-water Flow Model. Open File Report 83–875. U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). A Modular Three-dimensional Finite Difference Ground-water Flow Model. U.S. Geological Survey. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D., Kinzelbach, W. and Ghassemi, F. (1993). Modelling subsurface flow and transport. In Jakeman, A. J., Beck, M. B. and McAleer, M. J. eds. Modelling Change in Environmental Systems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 133–161.Google Scholar
Mekong River Commission (2004). Annual Report 2004: Mekong River Commission. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
Milhous, R. T. (1998). A review of the physical habitat simulation system. In Blažková, Ŝ., Stalnaker, C. and Novický, O. eds. Hydroecological Modelling: Research, Practice, Legislation and Decision-making. Report by U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Research Division and Water Research Institute. Fort Collins: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Research Division, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
Milson, J. (1989). Field Geophysics. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C. (1986). Soil Erosion and Conservation. Essex, England: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Nakayama, M., Gunawan, B., Yoshida, T. and Asaeda, T. (1999). Resettlement issues of Cirata Dam Project: A post-project review. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15(4): 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancarrow, B. E. ed. (1994). International and National Trends in Public Involvement: Where to Next for the Australian Water Industry? Proceedings of a Review sponsored by Australian Research Centre for Water in Society and International Association of Public Participation Practitioners, Sydney, 11 April 1994. Canberra: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Division of Water Resources.Google Scholar
Nielsen, D. M. ed. (1991). Practical Handbook of Ground-water Monitoring. Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
New South Wales Treasury (1997). Guidelines for Economic Appraisal. Treasury Policy and Guideline Paper TPP97–2. Sydney: New South Wales Treasury, Office of Financial Management.
O'Keeffe, J. H. and Hughes, D. A. (2002). The Flow Stress-Response method for analysing flow modifications: applications and developments. In Proceedings of International Conference on Environmental Flows for Rivers. Cape Town: University of Cape Town (published on CD).Google Scholar
Olive, L. J., Loughran, R. J. and Kesby, J. A. (1994). Variability in Stream Erosion and Sediment Transport. Wallingford: International Association of Hydrological Sciences. Publication no. 224.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. (2004). River at Risk: The Mekong and the Water Politics on China and Southeast Asia. Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
Parasnis, D. S. (1986). Principles of Applied Geophysics. Fourth Edition. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, F. (1992). The Dammed: Rivers, Dams, and the Coming World Water Crisis. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Petts, G. E. (1984). Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Petts, G. E., Bickerton, M. A., Crawford, C., Lerner, D. N. and Evans, D. (1999). Flow management to sustain groundwater-dominated stream ecosystems. Hydrological Processes 13: 497–513.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E. and Stromberg, J. C. (1997). The natural flow regime. BioScience 47: 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Palmer, M. A., Hart, D. D., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Rogers, K. H., Meyer, J. L. and Stanford, J. A. (2003). River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecological and the Environment 1(6): 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pusey, B. J. (1998). Methods addressing the flow requirements of fish. In Arthington, A. H. and Zalucki, J. M. eds. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. Occasional Paper 27/98. Canberra: Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, pp. 64–103.Google Scholar
Ray, A. (1984). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Issues and Methodologies. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J. and Braun, D. P. (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riquier, J. (1982). A world assessment of soil degradation. Nature and Resources 18(2): 18–21.Google Scholar
Rose, C. W. (1993). Soil erosion by water. In McTainsh, G. H. and Boughton, W. C. eds. Land Degradation Processes in Australia. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, pp. 149–187.Google Scholar
Rose, D. B. (2005). Indigenous water philosophy in an uncertain land. In Botterill, L. C. and Wilhite, D. A. eds. From Diaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rural Water Commission of Victoria (1988). Irrigation and Drainage Practice. Armadale, Victoria: Rural Water Commission of Victoria.
Schwartz, F. W. and Zhang, H. (2003). Fundamentals of Ground Water. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Schwass, R. D. (1985). Public Information and Public Participation in Water Resources Policy. Toronto: Inquiry on Federal Water Policy.Google Scholar
Scott, A. (1985). The Economics of Water Export Policy. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Economics, The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Scott, A. and Coustalin, G. (1995). The evolution of water rights. Natural Resources Journal 35(4): 821–979.Google Scholar
Smith, D. I. (1998). Water in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sombatpanit, S., Zöbisch, M. A., Sanders, D. W. and Cook, M. G. (1997). Soil Conservation Extension From Concepts to Adoption. Enfield, New Hampshire: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. E. (1992). Risks of altering the hydrologic regime of large rivers. In Cairns, J., Niederlehner, B. R. and Orvos, D. R. eds. Predicting Ecosystem Risk, v. xx. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Scientific Publication, pp. 119–152.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. E. (1995). Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and floodplains. BioScience 45: 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitz, K. and Moreno, J. (1996). A Practical Guide to Groundwater and Solute Transport Modeling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, C. B., Lamb, B. L., Henriksen, J., Bovee, K. D. and Bartholow, J. (1994). The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology : A Primer for IFIM. National Ecology Research Centre, Internal publication. Fort Collins: National Biological Service.Google Scholar
Steward, H. J., Madamombe, E. K. and Topping, C. C. (2002). Adapting Environmental Flow Methodologies for Zimbabwe. In Unpublished Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Flows for Rivers, 3–8 March 2002, Cape Town, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Stewardson, M. (2001). The flow events method for developing environmental flow regimes. In Rutherfurd, I., et al. eds. The Value of Healthy Rivers. Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Stream Management Conference, 27–29 August 2001, Brisbane, Queensland. pp. 577–582.Google Scholar
Stewardson, M. J. and Cottingham, P. (2002). A demonstration of the flow events method: environmental flow requirements of the Broken River. Australian Journal of Water Resources 5: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P. L. (2001). Dividing the Waters: A Critical Analysis of Law Reform in Water Allocation and Management in Australia from 1989–1990. PhD Thesis. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tharme, R. E. (1996). Review ofInternational Methodologies for the Quantification of the Instream Flow Requirements of Rivers. Water law review final report for policy development, for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Cape Town, South Africa: Freshwater Research Unit, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Tharme, R. E. and King, J. M. (1998). Development of the Building Block Methodology for Instream Flow Assessments, and Supporting Research on the Effects of Different Magnitude Flows on Riverine Ecosystems. Report No. 576/1/98. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
Tharme, R. E. (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 379–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkler, K. J. and Wohl, E. E. eds. (1998). Rivers Over Rock: Fluvial Processes in Bedrock Channels. Geophysical Monograph 107. Washington D.C.: American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (1990). The Impact of Large Water Projects on the Environment. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1987). Design of Small Dams. Third Edition. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
Utton, A. E. (1996). Which rule should prevail in international water disputes: that of reasonableness or that of no harm?Natural Resources Journal 36(3): 635–41.Google Scholar
Voss, C. I. (1984). SUTRA, Saturated-Unsaturated TRAnsport: A Finite Element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated Fluid Density Dependent Groundwater Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically Reactive Single-Species Solute Transport. Report 84–4369. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation.Google Scholar
Voss, C. I, Boldt, D. and Shapiro, A. M. (1997). SUTRA-GUI: A Graphical-User Interface for U.S. Geological Survey's SUTRA Code Using Argus ONE for Simulation of Variable-Density Saturated-Unsaturated Ground-Water Flow with Solute or Energy Transport. Report 87–421. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Walhstrom, E. E. (1974). Developments in Geotechnical Engineering 6: Dams, Dam Foundations, and Reservoir Sites. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ward, J. V., Tockner, U., Uehlinger, U. and Malard, F. (2001). Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 117: 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterloo Hydrogeologic (2000). Visual MODFLOW User's Manual. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Waterloo Hydrogeologic.
Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists (2002). Blueprint for a Living Continent: A Way Forward from the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists. Sydney: World Wide Fund for Nature, Australia.
Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J. and Beven, K. J. (1993). Processes and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling. In Jakeman, A. J., Beck, M. B. and McAleer, M. J. eds. Modelling Change in Environmental Systems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 101–132.Google Scholar
Withers, B. and Vipond, S. (1974). Irrigation Design and Practice. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. T., Natharius, J. A., Danielson, J. J., Ward, B. S. and Pender, J. K. (1999). International river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15(4): 387–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1991a). Environmental Assessment Sourcebook. Volume I: Policies, Procedure, and Cross-Sectoral Issues. Technical Paper No. 139. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
World Bank (1991b). Environmental Assessment Sourcebook. Volume II: Sectoral Guidelines. Technical Paper No. 140. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
World Bank (1991c). Environmental Assessment Sourcebook. Volume III: Guidelines for Environmental Assessment of Energy and Industry Projects. Technical Paper No. 154. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
World Commission on Dams (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. London: Earthscan Publications.
Yevjevich, V. (2001). Water diversions and interbasin transfers. Water International 26(3): 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. A. and Haveman, R. H. (1985). Economics of water resources: a survey. In Kneese, A. V. and Sweeney, J. L.Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics, Volume II. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 465–529.Google Scholar
Yunus Khan, M. (1990). Boundary water conflict between India and Pakistan. Water International 15(4): 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, C. and Bennett, G. D. (1995a). Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling: Theory and Practice. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Zheng, C. and Bennett, G. D. (1995b). MT3D: A Modular Three Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Ground-water Systems. Bethesda, Maryland: S.S. Papadopulos and Associate Inc.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×