Book contents
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- Hypo- and Hyperkinetic, Dyscoordinative and Otherwise Inappropriate Motor and Behavioral Movement Disorders
- Section 1: Basic Introduction
- Section 2: Hypokinetic Movement Disorders
- Section 3: Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders
- Section 4: Dyscoordinative and Otherwise Inappropriate Motor Behaviors
- Section 5: Objectifying Movement Disorders
- Chapter 54 The Art of Phenotyping
- Chapter 55 Motor and Functional Scales for Movement Disorders
- Chapter 56 Wearables
- Chapter 57 Clinical Neurophysiology in Movement Disorders
- Chapter 58 Structural Imaging
- Chapter 59 Functional Imaging
- Movement Disorders in Vivo: Video Fragments
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Index
- References
Chapter 56 - Wearables
from Section 5: - Objectifying Movement Disorders
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2025
Book contents
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders
- Hypo- and Hyperkinetic, Dyscoordinative and Otherwise Inappropriate Motor and Behavioral Movement Disorders
- Section 1: Basic Introduction
- Section 2: Hypokinetic Movement Disorders
- Section 3: Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders
- Section 4: Dyscoordinative and Otherwise Inappropriate Motor Behaviors
- Section 5: Objectifying Movement Disorders
- Chapter 54 The Art of Phenotyping
- Chapter 55 Motor and Functional Scales for Movement Disorders
- Chapter 56 Wearables
- Chapter 57 Clinical Neurophysiology in Movement Disorders
- Chapter 58 Structural Imaging
- Chapter 59 Functional Imaging
- Movement Disorders in Vivo: Video Fragments
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Index
- References
Summary
Clinical evaluation of motor dysfunction is crucial to make a correct diagnosis. The gold standard is clinical evaluation by a movement disorder specialist, relying on subjective measures and patient report. Regular clinical assessments are needed to provide long-term measures that monitor motor progression over time and therapy response, not only in clinical settings but also during daily activities at home. Wearable sensors have been developed to assess objective and quantifiable measures of motor dysfunction. Such sensors are small, light, cheap and portable, containing built-in accelerometers and gyroscopes and data storage. These new technologies are revolutionizing the field of movement disorders to improve clinical diagnosis and evaluation, treatment monitoring at home, and progression of symptoms over time. They are also of interest for adaptive therapy options, e.g. closed-loop deep brain stimulation, and are successful in quantifying and measuring tremor, showing promise in assessing bradykinesia, dyskinesia, gait impairments and prediction of therapy response. Despite device development, there is no validated clinical application yet; further research is needed.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Compendium of Movement Disorders , pp. 699 - 703Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Jalloul, N. Wearable sensors for the monitoring of movement disorders. Biomed J 2018;41(4):249–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, D, Malmgren, K, Alt Murphy, M. Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review. J Neurol 2018;265(8):1740–1752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teshuva, I, Hillel, I, Gazit, E, et al. Using wearables to assess bradykinesia and rigidity in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a focused, narrative review of the literature. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2019;126(6):699–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luinge, HJ. Inertial Sensing of Human Movement. Enschede: Twente University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
Iosa, M, Picerno, P, Paolucci, S, Morone, G. Wearable inertial sensors for human movement analysis. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016;13(7):641–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espay, AJ, Bonato, P, Nahab, FB, et al. Technology in Parkinson’s disease: challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord 2016;31(9):1272–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papapetropoulos, S, Mitsi, G, Espay, AJ. Digital health revolution: is it time for affordable remote monitoring for Parkinson’s disease? Front Neurol 2015;6:34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetz, CG, Tilley, BC, Shaftman, SR, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 2008;23(15):2129–2170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitale, C, Pellecchia, MT, Grossi, D, et al. Unawareness of dyskinesias in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases. Neurol Sci 2001;22(1):105–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weintraub, D, Burn, DJ. Parkinson’s disease: the quintessential neuropsychiatric disorder. Mov Disord 2011;26(6):1022–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, R, Xu, Y, Li, X, et al. Evaluation of wearable sensor devices in Parkinson’s disease: a review of current status and future prospects. Parkinsons Dis 2020;2020:4693019.Google ScholarPubMed
Del Din, S, Godfrey, A, Mazzà, C, Lord, S, Rochester, L. Free-living monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: lessons from the field. Mov Disord 2016;31(9):1293–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Memar, S, Delrobaei, M, Pieterman, M, McIsaac, K, Jog, M. Quantification of whole-body bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease participants using multiple inertial sensors. J Neurol Sci 2018;387:157–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, H, Lin, H, Lueth, TC. Quantitative assessment of parkinsonian bradykinesia based on an inertial measurement unit. Biomed Eng Online 2015;14:68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, H, Zhang, P, Lueth, TC. Quantitative assessment of parkinsonian tremor based on an inertial measurement unit. Sensors 2015;15(10):Art. no. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldman, DA, Giuffrida, JP, Chen, R, et al. The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson’s disease: Reliability and comparison with kinematic measures. Mov Disord 2011;26(10):1859–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heldman, DA, Filipkowski, DE, Riley, DE, et al. Automated motion sensor quantification of gait and lower extremity bradykinesia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;2012:1956–1959.Google ScholarPubMed
Salarian, A, Russmann, H, Wider, C, et al. Quantification of tremor and bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease using a novel ambulatory monitoring system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54(2):313–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, RI, Kotschet, K, Arfon, S, et al., Automated assessment of bradykinesia and dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2012;2(1):47–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rincón, D, Valderrama, J, González, MC, et al. Wristbands containing accelerometers for objective arm swing analysis in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20(15):4339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
di Biase, L, Di Santo, A, Caminiti, ML, et al. Gait analysis in Parkinson’s disease: an overview of the most accurate markers for diagnosis and symptoms monitoring. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20(12):3529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirelman, A, Bonato, P, Camicioloi, R, et al. Gait impairments in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2019;18(7):697–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pistacchi, M, Gioulis, M, Sanson, F, et al. Gait analysis and clinical correlations in early Parkinson’s disease. Funct Neurol 2017;32(1):28–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washabaugh, EP, Kalyanaraman, T, Adamczyk, PG, Claflin, ES, Krishnan, C. Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters. Gait Posture 2017;55:87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maetzler, W, Domingos, J, Srulijes, K, Ferreira, JJ, Bloem, BR. Quantitative wearable sensors for objective assessment of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2013;28(12):1628–1637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonora, G, Mancini, M, Carpinella, I, et al. Gait initiation is impaired in subjects with Parkinson’s disease in the OFF state: evidence from the analysis of the anticipatory postural adjustments through wearable inertial sensors. Gait Posture 2017;51:218–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghislieri, M, Gastaldi, L, Pastorelli, S, Tadano, S, Agostini, V. Wearable inertial sensors to assess standing balance: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel) 2019;19(19):4075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tao, W, Liu, T, Zheng, R, Feng, H. Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12(2):2255–2283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alam, MN, Garg, A, Munia, TTK, Fazel-Rezai, R, Tavakolian, K. Vertical ground reaction force marker for Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0175951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
di Biase, L, Brittain, JS, Shah, SA, et al. Tremor stability index: a new tool for differential diagnosis in tremor syndromes. Brain 2017;140(7):1977–1986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibb, WR, Lees, AJ. The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51(6):745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S, Lo, SE, Louis, ED. Common misdiagnosis of a common neurological disorder: how are we misdiagnosing essential tremor? Arch Neurol 2006;63(8):1100–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, KP, Bain, P, Bajaj, N, et al. Consensus statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Mov Disord 2018;33(1):75–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deuschl, G, Bain, P, Brin, M. Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor. Mov Disord 1998;13(S3):2–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthuraman, M, Hossen, A, Heute, U, Deuschl, G, Raethjen, J. A new diagnostic test to distinguish tremulous Parkinson’s disease from advanced essential tremor. Mov Disord 2011;26(8):1548–1552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rüegge, D, Mahendran, S, Stieglitz, LH, et al. Tremor analysis with wearable sensors correlates with outcome after thalamic deep brain stimulation. Clin Park Relat Disord 2020;3:100066.Google ScholarPubMed
Hallett, M. Functional (psychogenic) movement disorders – clinical presentations. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016;22:S149–S152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeuner, KE, Schmidt, R, Schwingenschuh, P. Klinische und kognitive Neurologie des funktionellen (psychogenen) Tremors. Nervenarzt 2018;89(4):400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahimi, F, Bee, C, Duval, C, et al. Using ecological whole body kinematics to evaluate effects of medication adjustment in Parkinson disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2014;4(4):617–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, S, Mancinelli, C, Hughes, R, et al. Optimizing deep brain stimulation settings using wearable sensing technology. In: 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, April 2009, pp. 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar