Book contents
- International Law and Weapons Review
- International Law and Weapons Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and Other Selected Instruments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Article 36: Background and Historical Development
- 3 Interpretative Methodology
- 4 Interpreting Article 36: The Object of Review
- 5 Interpretation of Article 36: The Process and Standard of Review
- 6 Weapons Review Obligation under Customary International Law
- 7 Weapons Reviews under the System of AP I
- 8 Challenges to Article 36 Reviews Posed by Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS)
- 9 Challenges to Article 36 Reviews Posed by (Autonomous) Cyber Capabilities
- 10 Concluding Remarks
- Index
9 - Challenges to Article 36 Reviews Posed by (Autonomous) Cyber Capabilities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2021
- International Law and Weapons Review
- International Law and Weapons Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and Other Selected Instruments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Article 36: Background and Historical Development
- 3 Interpretative Methodology
- 4 Interpreting Article 36: The Object of Review
- 5 Interpretation of Article 36: The Process and Standard of Review
- 6 Weapons Review Obligation under Customary International Law
- 7 Weapons Reviews under the System of AP I
- 8 Challenges to Article 36 Reviews Posed by Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS)
- 9 Challenges to Article 36 Reviews Posed by (Autonomous) Cyber Capabilities
- 10 Concluding Remarks
- Index
Summary
Chapter 9 focuses on an Article 36 review of (autonomous) cyber capabilities. As in the case of autonomous weapons systems, the most burning questions for a weapons review in the cyber context remain: How to meaningfully incorporate advice on the law of targeting as part of the weapons review? How to determine when a given capability is ‘new’ for review purposes and when to initiate a review? How and when can testing and evaluation processes meaningfully inform the review outcome? Furthermore, some challenges distinct to cyber capabilities also exist. Most importantly, cyber capabilities test the underlying assumptions of the law of armed conflict. The effects of their use may be more deleterious than the consequences produced by traditional weaponry, and yet they may fall outside the legal review requirement because the effects produced do not constitute an ‘attack’ in its conventional interpretation. [142 words]
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Law and Weapons ReviewEmerging Military Technology under the Law of Armed Conflict, pp. 239 - 270Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021