Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:37:30.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Derrida's reading of Heidegger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Françoise Dastur
Affiliation:
Archives Husserl de Paris; Ecole Françoise de Daseinsanalyse
Daniel O. Dahlstrom
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

As is well known, Derrida's first works – The Problem of Genesis in Husserl's Philosophy, the Introduction to Husserl's Origin of Geometry, and Speech and Phenomenon – were dedicated to Husserl's phenomenology which, together with Heidegger's analysis of existence, had been since the 1930s the major reference for most important French phi­losophers of this period: Lévinas, Ricœur, Sartre, and Merleau-Ponty. Derrida found in Husserl the main themes of thought (the role of writing in science in Origin of Geometry and the conception of soliloquy and voice as self-presence in the first Logical Investigation) that constituted the basis of his project of deconstructing logocentrism and phonocentrism, as expounded in the fundamental book published in 1967 under the title Of Grammatology. But if it is clear that Derrida discovered these themes in Husserl, it is nevertheless Heidegger's thinking that constitutes not only his major reference, but the very milieu, the “element” of his philosophical enterprise. From the middle of the 1960s, with the text dedicated to Lévinas under the title “Violence and Metaphysics,” in which we find his first reading of Heidegger, until the very end of the 1990s, with “L'animal que donc je suis,” where Heidegger's conception of animality is once more analyzed, Derrida never ceased to be engaged in a critical dialogue with Heidegger's thinking. As he explained in an interview in 1967, nothing of what he attempted in this period, which was the most decisive for his entire work, “would have been possible without the opening of the Heideggerian questions,” and especially without the attention given to what Heidegger names the ontological difference, in spite of the fact that this difference seems to him to be still retained in metaphysics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Heidegger
Critical Essays
, pp. 273 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dastur, Françoise, “Derrida and the Question of Presence,” Research in Phenomenology, 36 (2006): 45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, L'animal que donc je suis (Paris: Galilée, 2006)Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Positions (Paris: Minuit, 1972), 18Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, L'écriture et la différence (Paris: Seuil, 1967), 117–228Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Psyché: Inventions de l'autre (Paris: Galilée, 1987), 388Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, De la grammatologie (Paris: Minuit, 1967)Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Mémoires pour Paul de Man (Paris: Galilée, 1988), 38Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Politiques de l'amitié (Paris: Galilée, 1994), 370Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, La voix et le phénomène (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967), 117Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Preface to L'Origine de la Géométrie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962), 105Google Scholar
Fink, Eugen, “Philosophie als Überwindung der Naivität,” in Nähe und Distanz (Freiburg and Munich: Alber, 1976), 123Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles in his book Nietzsche et la philosophie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962)Google Scholar
Cairns, D., Conversations with Hussel and Fink (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1976), 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévinas, Emanuel, Le temps et l'autre (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1979), 47Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Qu'appelle-t-on penser?, trans. G. Granel (Paris: Gallimard, 1959), 92Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise, “Heidegger and Derrida on Trakl,” Phenomenology and Literature, ed. Pol Vandevelde (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2010), 43–57Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×