Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:47:58.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Ernst Mach’s Piano and the Making of a Psychophysical Imaginarium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

By
Alexandra Hui
Edited by
John Preston
John Preston
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

Psychophysics as Mach understood it could be explained in several ways. This reflects the central conundrum that psychophysics held the potential to resolve: the communication of an individual’s subjective experience. This chapter surveys the many ways in which Mach described psychophysical experiences, from demonstrations on his Bösendorfer grand piano to differential equations. These descriptions were often multi-modal, using sound and images in tandem. Mach also employed analogies, mathematical derivations, and descriptions of the subjective experience of such phenomena as accommodation, acceleration, and visual after-images. A comparison of how Mach discusses psychophysics in popular lectures, scientific publications, and personal correspondence suggests that he made a number of assumptions about how best to communicate scientific ideas to different audiences. Further, this chapter argues that Mach’s techniques of presentation/argumentation, celebrated both in his time and subsequently, went far towards cultivating a psychophysical imaginarium similar to a mind’s eye. That is, by asking his readers or listeners to imagine specific psychophysical experiences, Mach established the broad outlines of a new way of thinking about subjectivity.

Keywords

Ernst MachPsychophysicsExperiencesMusicSoundTechniques of presentationImaginarium
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Mach
Critical Essays
 , pp. 10 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohlman, Philip 2000. ‘Composing the Cantorate: Westernizing Europe’s Other Within’, in Born, Georgina and Hesmondhalgh, David (eds.), Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. University of California Press, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen 1968. ‘Mach and Atomism’, Synthese 18: 192–215.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (ed.) 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fechner, Gustav T. 1851. Zend-Avesta oder über die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseits. Vom Standpunkt der Naturbetrachtung. Leopold Voß.Google Scholar
Fechner, Gustav T. 1860a. Elemente der Psychophysik 1. E. J. Bonset.Google Scholar
Fechner, Gustav T. 1860b. Elemente der Psychophysik 2. Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Fechner, Gustav T. 1879/1994. Die Tagesansicht gegenüber die Nachtansicht. Klotz.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas 2002. ‘Masters and Their Critics: Wagner, Hanslick, Beckmesser, and Die Meistersinger’, in Vazsonyi, Nicholas (ed.), Wagner’s Meistersinger: Performance, History, Representation. University of Rochester Press, pp. 165–189.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas (ed.) 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Wagner. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas (ed.) 2009. Richard Wagner and His World. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidelberger, Michael 2004. Nature from Within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview. Translated by Klohr, Cynthia. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina and Hesmondhalgh, David (eds.), Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christoph 2003. ‘The Pocket Schedule’, in Holmes, Frederic, Renn, Jürgen, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Reworking the Bench: Research Notebooks in the History of Science. Springer, pp. 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Frederic and Olesko, Kathryn 1995. ‘The Images of Precision: Helmholtz and the Graphical Method in Physiology’, in Wise, M. Norton (ed.), The Values of Precision. Princeton University Press, pp. 198–221.Google Scholar
Hui, Alexandra 2012. The Psychophysical Ear. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, Alexandra 2013. ‘Changeable Ears: Ernst Mach’s and Max Planck Studies of Accommodation in Hearing’, Osiris 28: 119–145.Google Scholar
Hui, Alexandra 2014. ‘Origin Stories of Listening, Melody, and Survival at the End of the Nineteenth Century’, in Kennaway, James (ed.), Music and the Nerves, 1700–1900. Palgrave, pp. 170–190.Google Scholar
Kessel, Johann 1874. ‘Ueber den Einfluss der Binnenmuskeln der Paukenhöhle auf die Bewegung und Schwingungen des Trommelfels am todten Ohre’, Archiv for Ohrenheilkunde 2: 80–92.Google Scholar
Kulke, Eduard 1884. Über die Umbildung der Melodie: Ein Beitrag zur Entwickelungslehre. J. G. Calve’sche K. K. Hof- und Univ.-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kulke, Eduard 1906. Kritik der Philosophie des Schönen. Deutsche Verlagactiengesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kursell, Julia 2018. Epistemologie des Hörens: Helmholtz’ physiologische Grundlegung der Musiktheorie. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landecker, Hannah 2007. Culturing Life. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1861. ‘Ueber die Kontroverse Zwischen Doppler und Petzval, bezüglich der Aenderung des Tones und der Farbe durch Bewegung’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 6: 120–126.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1863. Vorträge über Psychophysik. Leopold Sommer.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1864a/1896. ‘Über die Cortischen Fasern des Ohres’, reprinted in Mach, Populär-Wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen. J. A. Barth, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1864b/1896. ‘Die Erklärung der Harmonie’, reprinted in Mach, Populär-Wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen. J. A. Barth, pp. 32–47.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1865. ‘Bemerkungen über die Accommodation des Ohres’, Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 51: 343–346.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1866. Einleitung in die Helmholtz’sche Musiktheorie: Populär für Musiker dargestellt. Leuschner & Lubensky.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1870. Notizbuch 505. Ernst Mach Nachlass, Deutsches Museum, Munich.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1871a/1896. ‘Die Symmetrie’, reprinted in Mach, Populär-Wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen, J. A. Barth, pp. 101–118.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1871b. Notizbuch 12. Konstanzer Abgabe, Deutsches Museum, Munich.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1872a. Letter to Eduard Kulke. 30 May, letter no. 4. Ernst Mach Papers, Dibner Library of the History of Science and Technology, Smithsonian Institution Special Collections, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1872b. ‘Über die stroboskopische Bestimmung der Tonhöhe’, Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 66: 67–74.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1886. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1891. ‘Some Questions of Psycho-Physics. Sensations and the Elements of Reality’, The Monist 1: 393–400.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1896. Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre historische-kritisch entwickelt. J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1906. ‘Eduard Kulke’, in Kulke, Eduard, Kritik der Philosophie des Schönen. Deutsche Verlagactiengesellschaft, pp. x–xiii.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst and Kessel, Johann 1872. ‘Versuche über die Accommodation des Ohres’, Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 66: 337–43.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst and Kessel, Johann 1874. ‘Beiträge zur Topographie und Mechanik des Mittelohres’, Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 69: 221–43.Google Scholar
Radano, Ronald, Bohlman, Philip, and Baker, Houston (eds.) 2000. Music and the Racial Imagination. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg and Fruton, Joseph 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Ernst Heinrich 1834. De Pulsu, Resorptione, Auditu, et Tactu. Prostate Apud C. F. Kohler.Google Scholar
Weber, Ernst Heinrich 1846. ‘Der Tastsinn und Gemeingefühl’, in Wagner, R. (ed.), Handwörterbuch der Physiologie, 3. Vieweg, pp. 481–588.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×