Book contents
- It Takes More Than a Candidate
- It Takes More Than a Candidate
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Still a Man’s World?
- 2 Gender and Candidate Emergence
- 3 The Gender Gap in Political Ambition
- 4 Family Dynamics and Running for Office
- 5 Gender, Party, and Political Recruitment
- 6 Gendered Self-Perceptions of Candidate Viability
- 7 Taking the Plunge
- 8 The Persistent Gender Gap in Political Ambition
- Book part
- Works Cited
- Index
6 - Gendered Self-Perceptions of Candidate Viability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2025
- It Takes More Than a Candidate
- It Takes More Than a Candidate
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Still a Man’s World?
- 2 Gender and Candidate Emergence
- 3 The Gender Gap in Political Ambition
- 4 Family Dynamics and Running for Office
- 5 Gender, Party, and Political Recruitment
- 6 Gendered Self-Perceptions of Candidate Viability
- 7 Taking the Plunge
- 8 The Persistent Gender Gap in Political Ambition
- Book part
- Works Cited
- Index
Summary
Drawing heavily on both survey data and interviews with potential candidates, this chapter argues that men are more likely than women to look in the mirror and see a qualified candidate, someone who has what it takes to run for office. Women are more likely than men to see someone who doesn’t quite embody the credentials, skills, and traits they think a candidate should possess. Differences in potential candidates’ self-appraisals are strong evidence of a gendered psyche, whose imprint leaves women feeling far less efficacious than men to envision themselves as candidates and, consequently, far less likely to consider running for office.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- It Takes More Than a CandidateWhy Women Don't Run for Office, pp. 79 - 99Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025