References

Esmé Shirlow

doi:10.1017/9781108867108.015

Aalberts, TE and Venzke, I (2017), ‘Moving beyond Interdisciplinary Turf Wars: Towards an Understanding of International Law as Practice’ in d’Aspremont, et al. (eds.), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Abbott, KW (2008), ‘Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law’, University of Illinois Law Review 5Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, G (1996), ‘The International Court as a World Court’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Adede, AO (1977a), ‘International Law and Property of Aliens: The Old Order Changeth’, 19 Malaya Law Review 175Google Scholar

Adede, AO (1977b), ‘A Survey of Treaty Provisions on the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies’, 18 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Adler, MH (1990), ‘The Exhaustion of the Local Remedies Rule after the International Court of Justice’s Decision in ELSI’, 39 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 641Google Scholar

Ahdieh, R (2004), ‘Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts’, 79 New York University Law Review 2029Google Scholar

Ajevski, M (2014), ‘Unstable Identities: The European Court of Human Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper Series, Paper No. 2014-34Google Scholar

Akinsanya, AA (1980), The Expropriation of Multinational Property in the Third World (Praeger)Google Scholar

Alexander, L and Schauer, F (1997), ‘On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation’, 110 Harvard Law Review 1359Google Scholar

Alexy, R (2009), A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alford, R (2002), ‘Federal Courts, International Tribunals, and the Continuum of Deference’, 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 675Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2006), ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2010), ‘Deference, Defiance, and Doctrine: Defining the Limits of Judicial Review’, 60 University of Toronto Law Review 41CrossRef Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2011), ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’, 127 Law Quarterly Review 96Google Scholar

Allars, M (1994), ‘On Deference to Tribunals, with Deference to Dworkin’, 20 Queen’s Law Journal 163Google Scholar

Allen, T (2005a), Property and the Human Rights Act 1998 (Hart)Google Scholar

Allen, T (2005b), ‘Transitional Justice and the Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Stellenbosch Law Review 413Google Scholar

Allen, T (2007), ‘Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 287Google Scholar

Allen, T (2010), ‘Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1055CrossRef Google Scholar

Allison, JWF (1994), ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’, 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367CrossRef Google Scholar

Allott, P (1999), ‘International Law and the Idea of History’, 1 Journal of the History of International Law 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Alschner, W (2014), ‘The Return of the Home State and the Rise of ‘Embedded’ Investor-State Arbitration’ in Lalani, and Lazo, (eds.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Alter, K (2008a), ‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context’, 14 European Journal of International Relations 33CrossRef Google Scholar

Alter, K (2008b), ‘Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation’, 71 Law & Contemporary Problems 37Google Scholar

Alter, K (2011), ‘The Evolving International Judiciary’, 7 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 387Google Scholar

Alter, K (2014), The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton University Press)CrossRef Google Scholar

Alter, K, Helfer, L and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE (2006), International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE (2016), ‘Is Investor-State Arbitration “Public”?’, 7 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 534CrossRef Google Scholar

Alvik, I (2010), ‘The Hybrid Nature of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Straddling the National/International Divide’ in Eriksen, and Emberland, (eds.), The New International Law: An Anthology (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Alvik, I (2018), ‘Protection of Private Property in the Early Law of Nations’, 20 Journal of the History of International Law 217Google Scholar

Amaza, IP (2012), ‘Multiplicity of International Dispute Settlement Forums: Avoiding the Risk of Parallel Proceedings’, 6 Dispute Resolution International 149Google Scholar

Ambrus, M (2013), ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Standards of Proof in Religion Cases’, 8 Religion and Human Rights 107CrossRef Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, CF (2008), Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press)CrossRef Google Scholar

American Bar Association (2016), Investment Treaty Working Group: Task Force Report on the Investment Court System ProposalGoogle Scholar

Anand, RP (1963), ‘The International Court of Justice and Impartiality between Nations’, 12 Indian Year Book of International Affairs 12Google Scholar

Anand, RP (1965), ‘The Role of Individual and Dissenting Opinions in International Adjudication’, 14 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 788CrossRef Google Scholar

Anand, RP (1969), Studies in International Adjudication (Oceana Publications Inc.)Google Scholar

Anthony, R (1998), ‘Which Agency Interpretations Should Get Judicial Deference? A Preliminary Inquiry’, 40 Administrative Law Review 121Google Scholar

Anzilotti, D (1928), Corso Di Diritto Internazionale (3rd edn, Athenaeum)Google Scholar

Arai, Y (1998), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 41Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y (2002), The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia)Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G (1990), ‘Le Domaine Reserve: L’Organisation Internationale et Le Rapport Entre Droit International et Droit Interne’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 225Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G (1996), ‘The Plea of Domestic Jurisdiction before the International Court of Justice: Substance or Procedure?’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Arato, J (2014), ‘The Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’, 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 2Google Scholar

Arendt, H (2006), Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Penguin Books)Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, OM (2015), ‘Organised Retreat? The Move from “Substantive” to “Procedural” Review in the ECtHR’s Case Law on the Margin of Appreciation’, European Society of International Law Conference Paper No. 4/2015Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, OM (2017), ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9Google Scholar

Arndt, JD (1959), ‘International Court of Justice – Legal Effect, Constitutional and International, of the Connally Reservation’, 28 University of Kansas Law Review 1Google Scholar

Ashforth, BE and Gibbs, BW (1990), ‘The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation’, 1 Organization Science 177CrossRef Google Scholar

Atik, J (2003), ‘Repenser NAFTA Chapter 11: A Catalogue of Legitimacy Critiques’, 3 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law 215Google Scholar

Austin, J (1885), Lectures on Jurisprudence: Or, the Philosophy of Positive Law, vol. 2 (5th edn, Lawbook Exchange Ltd)Google Scholar

Ayres, L, Kavanaugh, K and Knafl, K (2003), ‘Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis’, 13 Qualitative Health Research 871Google Scholar

Baker, P (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis (Continuum)Google Scholar

Balcerzak, M (2004), ‘The Doctrine of Precedent in the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights’, 27 Polish Yearbook of International Law 131Google Scholar

Balkin, JM (1996), ‘A Night in the Topics: The Reason of Legal Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Legal Reason’ in Brooks, and Gewirtz, (eds.), Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Banakar, R and Travers, M (eds.) (2013), Law and Social Theory (2nd edn, Hart)Google Scholar

Bankowski Z, MacCormick N, Summers R, and Jerzy W (1991), ‘On Method and Methodology’, in N MacCormick and R Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Dartmouth)Google Scholar

Banks, K (1999), ‘NAFTA’s Article 1110 – Can Regulation Be Expropriation?’, 5 NAFTA: Law & Business Review of the Americas 499Google Scholar

Barkhuysen, T and van Emmerik, M (2009), ‘Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural Aspects’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Barnett, M and Finnemore, M (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press)Google Scholar

Barrie, G (1995), ‘International Human Rights Conventions: Public International Law Applicable to the Protection of Rights’, Journal of South African Law 66Google Scholar

Beck, G (2007), ‘The Idea of Human Rights between Value Pluralism and Conceptual Vagueness’, 25 Penn State International Law Review 615Google Scholar

Bedjaoui, M (1991), ‘The “Manufacture” of Judgments at the International Court of Justice’, 3 Pace Yearbook of International Law 29CrossRef Google Scholar

Behn, D, Langford, M and Laudal Berge, T (2018), ‘Development or Democracy? Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 38(3) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 333Google Scholar

Bellamy, R (2014), ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 25 European Journal of International Law 1019Google Scholar

Bemelmans-Videc M (2011), ‘Guaranteeing the Authority and Effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights’ AS/Jur 44 Committee on Legal Affairs and Human RightsGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, S (2009), ‘Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty’, 103 American Political Science Review 691Google Scholar

Bennouna, M (2014), ‘The International Court of Justice: Bestriding Past and Present’ in Gaja, Grote Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (1999), ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 843Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (2013), ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’, 107 American Journal of International Law 295Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (2018), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity and Global Challenges to Democracy’, 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E and Harel, A (2017), ‘Embracing the Tension between National and International Human Rights Law: The Case for Discordant Parity’, 15(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 36Google Scholar

Berg, BL and Lune, H (2014), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th edn, Pearson)Google Scholar

Bergbohm, C (1877), Staatsverträge Und Gesetze Als Quellen Des Völkerrechts (Mattiesen)Google Scholar

Berman, F (2013a), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis’ EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2007), ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, 32 Yale Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2008), ‘Federalism and International Law Through the Lens of Legal Pluralism’, 73 Missouri Law Review 1149Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2012), Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2013), ‘Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism’, 20 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 665Google Scholar

Bernhardt, R (1993), ‘The Convention and Domestic Law’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Besson, S (2009), ‘The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil’, 31 Sydney Law Review 343Google Scholar

Besson, S (2011), ‘International Judges as Dispute-Settlers and Law-Enforcers: From International Law without Courts to International Courts without Law; A Reply to Anna Spain’, 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 33Google Scholar

Bickel, AM (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Bilder, R (1982), ‘Some Limitations of Adjudication as an International Dispute Settlement Technique’, 23 Virginia Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Bilder, R (2007), ‘Adjudication: International Arbitral Tribunals and Courts’ in Zartman, (ed.), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques (United States Institute of Peace)Google Scholar

Bilkova, V (2014), ‘The Standard of Equivalent Protection as a Standard of Review’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bjørge, E and Miles, CA (eds.) (2017), Landmark Cases in Public International Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A (2004), ‘Waiver and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in NAFTA Jurisprudence’ in Weiler (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future ProspectsGoogle Scholar

Bjorklund, A (2007), ‘Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working’, 59 Hastings Law Journal 241Google Scholar

Blades, BW (2006) ‘The Exhausting Question of Local Remedies: Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11’, Oregon Review of International Law 31Google Scholar

Block-Lieb, S and Halliday, T (2007), ‘Incrementalisms in Global Lawmaking’, 32(3) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 851Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (1999), ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’, 93 American Journal of International Law 596Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2006), ‘International Law in Black and White’, 34 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 285Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2007), ‘The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law’ in Wolfrum, and Röben, (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer)Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2012), ‘Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bodie, TJ (1995), Politics and the Emergence of an Activist International Court of Justice (Greenwood Publishing Group)Google Scholar

Bodin J (1576), Six Books of the Commonwealth (translated by M.J. Tooley) (Blackwell Oxford)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, J (2010), ‘Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse’, 4 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 109Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J (2014), Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Borchard, E (1919), The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (Banks Law Publishing Co.)Google Scholar

Boyatzis, RE (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Bradley, C and Kelley, J (2008), ‘The Concept of International Delegation’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar

Brems, E (1996), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 56 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Volkerrecht 230Google Scholar

Brems, E (2017), ‘The “Logics” of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Brems, E and Gerards, J (eds.) (2017), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2013), ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights’, 35 Human Rights Quarterly 176Google Scholar

Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2015), ‘“Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut”: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 139Google Scholar

Brierly, JL (1925), ‘Matters of Domestic Jurisdiction’, 6 British Yearbook of International Law 8Google Scholar

Briggs, H (1960), ‘Confidence, Apprehension and the International Court of Justice’, 54 American Society of International Law Proceedings 25Google Scholar

Bring, OE (1980), ‘The Impact of Developing States on International Customary Law Concerning Protection of Foreign Property’, 24 Scandinavian Studies in Law 97Google Scholar

Brisbane Telegraph (1927), ‘League of Nations: How It Can Fail - University Lecture’ (Trove)Google Scholar

Brölmann, C (2007), ‘Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide Between National and International Law’ in Nijman, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Brölmann, C (2013), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Rights of Groups and Individuals’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Broude, T (2012), ‘The Constitutional Function of Contemporary International Tribunals, or Kelsen’s Visions Vindicated’, 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 519Google Scholar

Broude, T (2016), ‘Selective Subsidiarity and Dialectic Deference in the World Trade Organization’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 53Google Scholar

Brown, C (2002), ‘Review Essay – The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Finding Your Way through the Maze’, 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 453Google Scholar

Brown, MB (2014), ‘Expertise and Deliberative Democracy’ in Elstub, and McLaverty, (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Edinburgh University Press)Google Scholar

Brownlee, K (2004), ‘Obedience, Conformity, and Deference’, 10 Res Publica 267Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1963), ‘The Relations of Nationality in Public International Law’, 39 British Yearbook of International Law 284Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1967),‘The Justiciability of Disputes and Issues in International Relations’, 42 British Yearbook of International Law 123Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1998), Principles of Public International Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2000), ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law’, 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 19Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2010), Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bryman, A and Burgess, RG (eds.) (2000), Analyzing Qualitative Data (Routledge)Google Scholar

Buchanan, A (2003), Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Buchanan, A and Keohane, RO (2006), ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, 20 Ethics & International Affairs 405Google Scholar

Buchanan, R (2009), ‘Reconceptualising Law and Politics in the Transnational Constitutional and Legal Pluralist Approaches’, 5 Socio-Legal Review 21Google Scholar

Bücheler, G (2015), Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bultrini, A (2010), ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in International Law’, 20 Italian Yearbook of International Law 101Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW (2008a), ‘The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System’, 3 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 199Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW (2008b), ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’, 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2008), ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, 48 Virginia Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2010), ‘Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations’, 35 Yale Journal of International Law 283Google Scholar

Butler, N (2013), ‘Possible Improvements to the Framework of International Investment Arbitration’, 14 Journal of World Investment & Trade 613Google Scholar

Calvert, C and Hayes, J (2012), ‘To Defer or Not to Defer? Deference and Its Differential Impact on First Amendment Rights in the Roberts Court’, 63 Case Western Reserve Law Review 13Google Scholar

Candia, G (2014), ‘Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Law School Working Paper Series, Paper No. 2014/01Google Scholar

Caporaso, JA (2000), ‘Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty’, 2 International Studies Review 1Google Scholar

Cardozo, B (1947), ‘Law and Literature’ in Hall, and Patterson, (eds.), Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (Fallon Publications)Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2009), The New Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1991), ‘Comparative Analysis of International Dispute Resolution Institutions’, 85 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 65Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1992), ‘Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction between Annulment and Appeal’, 7 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 21Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1993), ‘The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council’, 87 American Journal of International Law 552Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2000), ‘War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference’, 94 American Journal of International Law 4Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2007a), ‘Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals’, 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law 401Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2007b), ‘The Iran-US Claims Tribunal and Investment Arbitration: Understanding the Claims Settlement Declaration as a Retrospective BIT’ in Drahozal, and Gibson, (eds.), The Iran-US Claims Tribunal at 25 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2012), ‘Framing the Work of ICSID Annulment Committees’, 6 World Arbitration & Mediation Review 173Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2014), ‘International Claims and Compensation Bodies’ in Romano et al. (eds.), International Claims and Compensation Bodies 279Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2015), ‘The United Nations Compensation Commission: Understanding an Institution and the Three Phases of Its Work’ in Feighery, et al. (eds.), War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Designing Compensation After Conflict (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2015), ‘Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Substantive Protection’ in Kinnear, et al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Wolters Kluwer)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2018), ‘Dissecting Backlash: The Unarticulated Causes of Backlash and its Unintended Consequences’ in Ulfstein, and Føllesdal, (eds.), The Judicialization of International Law – A Mixed Blessing? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2019), ‘Article 25(2)(b)’ in Fouret, et al. (eds.), The ICSID Convention, Rules and Regulations: A Practical Commentary (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Carter, Jr W (2008), ‘Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication’, 30 Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 319Google Scholar

Casas, M (2016), ‘Nationalities of Convenience, Personal Jurisdiction, and Access to Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 49 International Law and Politics 63Google Scholar

Casini, L (2014), ‘“Down the Rabbit-Hole”: The Projection of the Public/Private Distinction beyond the State’, 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 402Google Scholar

Cass, D (1996), ‘Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law’, 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 341Google Scholar

Cass, D (2001), ‘The “Constitutionalisation” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’, 12 European Journal of International Law 39Google Scholar

Cassese, A (1990), ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (Dedoublement Fonctionnel) in International Law’, 1 European Journal of International Law 210Google Scholar

Caudle, S (2010), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis’ in Wholey, et al. (eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (Jossey-Bass)Google Scholar

Charlotin, D (2017), ‘US Court Declines to Set Aside Mesa v. Canada Award’ IAReporterGoogle Scholar

Chen, T (2012), ‘The Standard of Review and the Roles of ICSID Arbitral Tribunals in Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 5 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 23Google Scholar

Cheng, B (2006), General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Chesney, R (2006), ‘Disaggregating Deference: The Judicial Power and Executive Treaty Interpretations’, 92 Iowa Law Review 1723Google Scholar

Cheyne, I (2014), ‘Deference and the Use of the Public Policy Exception in International Courts and Tribunals’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christiano, T (2010), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press) 119Google Scholar

Christiano, T (2012), Authority (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Google Scholar

Christie, GC (1962), ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’, 38 British Yearbook of International Law 307Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (eds.) (2011), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (2013), ‘Postscript: Understanding the Past, Present, and Future of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, and Madsen, (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christol, C (1959), ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 33 Southern California Law Review 378Google Scholar

Clark, I (2007), International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Clayton, R (2004), ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 33Google Scholar

Clayton, R (2006), ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 109Google Scholar

Clayton, R and Ghaly, K (2007), ‘Shifting Standards of Review’, 12 Judicial Review 210Google Scholar

Coe, Jr JJ (2003), ‘Taking Stock of NAFTA Chapter 11 in Its Tenth Year: An Interim Sketch of Selected Themes, Issues, and Methods’, 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1381Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2009), ‘Can International Law Work? A Constructivist Expansion’, 27 Berkeley Journal of International Law 636Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2010), ‘From International Law to International Conflicts of Law: The Fragmentation of Legitimacy’, 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 49Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2012a), ‘Finding International Law, Part II: Our Fragmenting Legal Community’, 44 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1049Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2012b), ‘From Fragmentation to Constitutionalization’, 24 Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 381Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2015), ‘International Precedent and the Practice of International Law’ in Helfand, (ed.) (Cambridge University Press)172Google Scholar

Cohen, J (2010), ‘Sovereignty in the Context of Globalization: A Constitutional Pluralist Perspective’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Cohen, M (1927), ‘Property and Sovereignty’, 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I (2011), ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, 59 American Journal of Comparative Law 463Google Scholar

Colangelo, AJ (2009), ‘Universal Jurisdiction as an International “False Conflict” of Laws’, 30 Michigan Journal of International Law 881Google Scholar

Colangelo, AJ (2016), ‘A Systems Theory of Fragmentation and Harmonization’, 49 International Law and Politics 1Google Scholar

Collins, D (2016), ‘The Line of Equilibrium: Improving the Legitimacy of Investment Treaty Arbitration through the Application of the WTO’s General Exceptions’, 32 Arbitration International 575Google Scholar

Colwell, B (2007), ‘Deference or Respect? Status Management Practices Among Prison Inmates’, 70 Social Psychology Quarterly 442Google Scholar

Contreras, P (2012), ‘National Discretion and International Deference in the Restriction of Human Rights: A Comparison Between the Jurisprudence of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 11 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 28Google Scholar

Coquiz, J (1977), ‘The Problem of Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 52 Philippine Law Journal 154Google Scholar

Costa, J-P (2011), ‘On the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments’, 7 European Constitutional Law Review 173Google Scholar

Cottier, T et al., (2017) ‘The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 628CrossRef Google Scholar

Cotula, L (2015), ‘Property in a Shrinking Planet: Fault Lines in International Human Rights and Investment Law’, 11 International Journal of Law in Context 113Google Scholar

Cotula, L (2017), ‘Democracy and International Investment Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 351Google Scholar

Craven, M (2003), ‘Unity, Diversity and the Fragmentation of International Law’, 14 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 3Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2002), International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2005), The International Law Commission’s articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2006), ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 319 (Brill)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2013), State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2014), ‘Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course on Public International Law’ in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 365 (Hague Academy of International Law)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Brownlie, I (2012), Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crema, L (2010), ‘Disappearance and New Sighting of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’, 21 European Journal of International Law 681Google Scholar

Creswell, JW and Plano Clark, VL (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Croquet, N (2010), ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Norm-Creation and Norm-Limiting Processes: Resolving a Normative Tension’, 17 Columbia Journal of European Law 307Google Scholar

Cross, FB (2007), Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press)Google Scholar

Crow, K (2017), ‘A Taxonomy of Proportionality in International Courts’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 107Google Scholar

Cunliffe, J and Reeve, A (1999), ‘Dialogic Authority’, 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 453Google Scholar

Cutler, AC (2001), ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, 27 Review of International Studies 133Google Scholar

Czapiewska, M (1990), ‘General Principles of International Responsibility of the State for Nationalization of Foreign Investments as One of the Means of Their Protection’, 2 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 59Google Scholar

Ҫali, B (2016), ‘From Flexible to Variable Standards of Judicial Review: The Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights’ in Arnardóttir, and Buyse, (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders (Routledge)Google Scholar

Ҫali, B (2018), ‘Explaining Variation in the Intrusiveness of Regional Human Rights Remedies in Domestic Orders’, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 214Google Scholar

Çoban, AR (2004), Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention on Human Rights (Ashgate)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J (2012), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and Domestic Courts: A Variation in Roles’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J (2020), ‘The Control over Knowledge by International Courts and Arbitral Tribunals’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J and de Brabandere, E (2011), ‘The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise’, 34 Fordham International Law Journal 190Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J and Mbengue, MM (2014), ‘Strategies of Engagement with Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’, 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240Google Scholar

D’Alterio, E (2011), ‘From Judicial Comity to Legal Comity: A Judicial Solution to Global Disorder?’, 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 394Google Scholar

D’Amato, A (1983), ‘Legal Uncertainty’, 71 California Law Review 1Google Scholar

D’Ascoli, S and Scherr, KM (2007), ‘The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the International Law Doctrine and Its Application in the Specific Context of Human Rights Protection’ 16(1) Italian Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar

Daly P (2011), ‘Deference on Questions of Law’, 74 Modern Law Review 694Google Scholar

Daly, P (2012), A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dan-Cohen, M (1994), ‘In Defense of Defiance’, 23 Philosophy and Public Affairs 24Google Scholar

Daniel, J (2017), ‘Scrutinizing Deference to Administrative Agencies’, The Regulatory ReviewGoogle Scholar

Danilowicz, W (1983), ‘The Relation between International Law and Domestic Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice’, 12 Polish Yearbook of International Law 153Google Scholar

Davis, H (1996), ‘Democratic Disablement and the Right to Property in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights’, 1 Journal of Civil Liberties 125Google Scholar

de Brabandere, E (2012), ‘Arbitral Decisions as a Source of International Investment Law’ in Gazzini, and de Brabandere, (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

de Brabandere, E (2015), Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

de Bustamente y Sirven, AS (1924), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 9 Minnesota Law Review 122Google Scholar

De Dycker, S (2010), ‘Private International Law Disputes before the International Court of Justice’, 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 475Google Scholar

de Londras, F and Dzehtsiarou, K (2015), ‘Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 523Google Scholar

de Schutter, O and Tulkens, F (2008), ‘Rights in Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution’ in Brems, (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Intersentia)Google Scholar

de Vattel, E (1797), The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (GG & J Robinson)Google Scholar

De Ville, JR (2004), ‘Deference as Respect and Deference as Sacrifice’, 20 South African Journal on Human Rights 577Google Scholar

De Ville, JR (2006), ‘Deference and Différance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift’, 9 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1Google Scholar

de Visscher, C (1956), ‘Reflections on the Present Prospects of International Adjudication’, 50 American Journal of International Law 467Google Scholar

de Visscher, C (1968), Theory and Reality in Public International Law (PE Corbett tr., Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

de Wet, E (2007), ‘The Emerging International Constitutional Order: The Implications of Hierarchy in International Law for the Coherence and Legitimacy of International Decision-Making’, 10 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 7Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M (2009), Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Hart)Google Scholar

Demirkol, B (2018), Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Deneen, C (1930), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 Commercial Law League Journal 178Google Scholar

Desierto, DA (2012), Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Dick, JC (1978), ‘The Bounds of Authority’, 4 Social Theory and Practice 375Google Scholar

Dixon, MJ (1996), ‘Fairness in International Laws and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’, 55 Cambridge Law Journal 617Google Scholar

Dodge, W (2006), ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement’, 39 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1Google Scholar

Dolzer, R (2002), ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 64Google Scholar

Donoghue, J (2012), ‘The Role of the World Court Today’, 47 Georgia Law Review 181Google Scholar

Donoho, DL (2001), ‘Autonomy, Self-Governance, and the Margin of Appreciation: Developing a Jurisprudence of Diversity within Universal Human Rights’, 15 Emory International Law Review 391Google Scholar

Dothan, S (2018), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Democracy: Human Rights and Deference to Political Bodies’, 9(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 145Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2003), ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2009), The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2014a), ‘Property, Investment and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2014b), ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’, 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 867Google Scholar

Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds.) (2014), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Drezner, D (2001), ‘On the Balance between International Law and Democratic Sovereignty’, 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 321Google Scholar

Dugard, J (2004), ‘Fifth Report on Diplomatic Protection’ UN Doc. A/CN.4/538Google Scholar

Dugard, J (2005), ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights: The Draft Articles of the International Law Commission’, 24 Australian Year Book of International Law 75Google Scholar

Duguit, L (1917), ‘The Law and the State’, 31 Harvard Law Review 119Google Scholar

Duhaime, B (2014), ‘Subsidiarity in the Americas: What Room Is There for Deference in the Inter-American System?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dumberry, P and Stone, J (2014), ‘International Law, Whether You Like It or Not: An Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal Practice Regarding the Applicable Law in Deciding State Contracts Disputes under the ICSID Convention in the Twenty-First Century’, 5 Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy 477Google Scholar

Duncan, K (2004), ‘Revisiting the Rights of Man: Georg Jellinek on Rights and the State’, 22 Law and History Review 493Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (2012), ‘International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL (2006), ‘Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s “Constitution” and the Discipline of International Law’, 17 European Journal of International Law 647Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL and Trachtman, J (1999), ‘Economic Analysis of International Law’, 24 Yale Law Journal Online 1Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (1997), ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (1999), ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 791Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (2007), ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’, 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 25Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (2009), ‘Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law’ in Dupuy, et al. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2012), ‘Human Rights and Investment Disciplines: Integration in Progress’ in Bungenberg, et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Nomos)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2013), ‘The Challenge of “Proliferation”: An Anatomy of the Debate’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1977), Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1986), Law’s Empire: Legal Theory (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1996), Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dye, VD (2013), ‘“Deference as Respect” in WTO Standard of Review’, 12 Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Information 23Google Scholar

Dyson, LJ (2006), ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 103Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1997), ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1998), ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’, 14 South African Journal on Human Rights 11Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2003), ‘Humpty Dumpty Rules or the Rule of Law: Legal Theory and the Adjudication of National Security’, 28 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2011), ‘Positivism and the Pesky Sovereign’ 22 European Journal of International Law 363Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K and Greene, A (2011), ‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’, 12 German Law Journal 1707Google Scholar

Ederington, LB (1997), ‘Property as a Natural Institution: The Separation of Property from Sovereignty in International Law’, 13 American University of International Law Review 263Google Scholar

Edwards, R (2002), ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’, 65 Modern Law Review 859Google Scholar

Egger, P and Pfaffermayr, M (2004), ‘The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment’, 32 Journal of Comparative Economics 788Google Scholar

Ehlermann, C-D and Lockhart, N (2004), ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 491Google Scholar

El Boudouhi, S (2015), ‘A Comparative Approach of the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine before the ECtHR, Investment Tribunals and WTO Dispute Settlement Bodies’ RSCAS Global Governance Programme Paper No. 2015/27Google Scholar

El Hayek, I and Gilles, A (2014), ‘Multifaceted Settlement of International Investments Disputes: Thoughts about the Variety of Instruments Claiming Their Applicability to the Investment Dispute’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 567Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, P (2010), ‘The Law of Laws’, 1(4) Transnational Legal Theory 597Google Scholar

Elias, T (1983), The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems: Essays on International Law (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2010), ‘Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach’ in Forsyth, et al. (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015a), ‘Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place’ in Wilberg, and Elliott (eds.), , The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015b), ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration: Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification’ in Wilberg, and Elliott, (eds.), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar

Ellis, J (2011), ‘General Principles and Comparative Law’, 22 European Journal of International Law 949Google Scholar

Ely, JH (1980), Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2004), ‘The Corporate Veil in the Jurisprudence of the Human Rights Committee and the Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights’, 4 Human Rights Law Review 257Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2006), The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2007), ‘The International Court of Justice and Companies: Is It Possible to Discern a “Structural Bias” at the Court Regarding Private Economic Enterprise?’, 9 International Community Law Review 187Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2001), ‘International Meaning: Comity in Fundamental Rights Adjudication’, 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 280Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2015), ‘Comity among Authorities’, 68 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar

Engle, E (2012), ‘The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview’, 10 Dartmouth Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Enoch, D (2014), ‘A Defense of Moral Deference’, 111 Journal of Philosophy 229Google Scholar

Esty, D (2006), ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’, 115 Yale Law Journal 1490Google Scholar

Evenson, E (2001), ‘Reforms Ahead: Enlargement of the Council of Europe and the Future of the Strasbourg System’, 1 Human Rights Law Review 219Google Scholar

Ewing-Chow, M (2001), ‘Investor Protection in Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from North America’, 5 Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 748Google Scholar

Eyffinger, A (2007a), The 1907 Hague Peace Conference (JudiCap)Google Scholar

Eyffinger, A (2007b), ‘A Highly Critical Moment: Role and Record of the 1907 Hague Peace Conference’, 54 Netherlands International Law Review 197Google Scholar

Fachiri, AP (1932), The Permanent Court of International Justice: Its Constitution, Procedure and Work (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fahner, JH (2013), ‘Margin of Appreciation in Investor-State Arbitration: The Prevalence and Desirability of Discretion and Deference’, 26 Hague Year Book of International Law 422Google Scholar

Fahner, JH (2016), ‘From Dispute Settlement to Judicial Review? The Deference Debate in International Investment Law’ in Duchateau, et al. (eds.), Evolution in Dispute Resolution: From Adjudication to ADR? (Eleven International Publishing)Google Scholar

Falk, RA (1964), The Role of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order (Syracuse University Press)Google Scholar

Falk, RA (1967), ‘New Approaches to the Study of International Law’, 61 American Journal of International Law 477Google Scholar

Fassbender, B (2003), ‘Sovereignty and Constitutionalism in International Law’ in Walker, (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Hart)Google Scholar

Fauchald, OK (2008), ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’, 19 European Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar

Fawcett, JES (1954), ‘The Exhaustion of Local Remedies: Substance or Procedure?’, 31 British Yearbook of International Law 452Google Scholar

Feldman, M (2017), ‘Investment Arbitration Appellate Mechanism Options: Consistency, Accuracy, and Balance of Power’, 32 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 528Google Scholar

Feller, AH (1935), The Mexican Claims Commissions: 1923–1934, A Study in the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (Macmillan)Google Scholar

Fereday, J and Muir-Cochrane, E (2006), ‘Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development’, 5 International Journal of Qualitative Methods 80Google Scholar

Ferrari-Bravo, L (1983), ‘International and Municipal Law: The Complementarity of Legal Systems’ in Macdonald, and Johnston, (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Ferrero, G (1942), The Principles of Power: The Great Political Crises of History (Putnam’s)Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2011), Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A and Teubner, G (2004), ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999Google Scholar

Fish, S (1989), Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Clarendon)Google Scholar

Fish, S (2000), Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (11th edn, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Flanders, CW (2009), ‘Toward a Theory of Persuasive Authority’, 62 Oklahoma Law Review 55Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2009), ‘Why the European Court of Human Rights Might Be Democratically Legitimate – A Modest Defense’ 27 Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter 289Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2013a) ‘Much Ado About Nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well-Functioning Democracies’ in Føllesdal, et al., The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2013b), ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 37Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2016), ‘Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights – Or Neither?’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 147Google Scholar

Foster, C (2010), ‘Burden of Proof in International Courts and Tribunals’, 29 Australian Year Book of International Law 27Google Scholar

Foster, GK (2011), ‘Striking a Balance between Investor Protections and National Sovereignty: The Relevance of Local Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 49 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 201Google Scholar

Foucault, M (2007), The Politics of Truth (MIT Press)Google Scholar

Fragale, AR et al. (2012), ‘Appeasing Equals: Lateral Deference in Organizational Communication’, 57 Administrative Science Quarterly 373Google Scholar

Francioni, F (1999), ‘Customary International Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 Italian Yearbook of International Law 11Google Scholar

Franck, S (2006), ‘The Role of International Arbitrators’, 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 499Google Scholar

Franck, S (2009), ‘Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 435Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1988), ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, 82 American Journal of International Law 705Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1990), The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1998), Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Franck, TM (2006b), ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium’, 100 American Journal of International Law 88CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, TM (2008), ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’, 102 American Journal of International Law 715Google Scholar

Fredman, S (2006), ‘From Deference to Democracy: The Role of Equality under the Human Rights Act 1998’, 122 Law Quarterly Review 53Google Scholar

Freeman, E (2003), ‘Regulatory Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11: Some Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights’, 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 117Google Scholar

Friedheim, RL and Kadane, JB (1970), ‘Quantitative Content Analysis of the United Nations Seabed Debate: Methodology and a Continental Shelf Case Study’, 24 International Organization 479Google Scholar

Friedman, S (1953), Expropriation in International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Friedmann, W (1964), The Changing Structure of International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Frigo, M (2000), ‘Peaceful Enjoyment of Possessions, Expropriation and Control of the Use of Property in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 10 Italian Year Book of International Law 45Google Scholar

Frowein, JA (1993), ‘The Protection of Property’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Fry, JD (2007), ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law’s Unity’, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 77Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Y (2012), ‘Standard of Review and “Scientific Truths” in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Investment Arbitration’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 559Google Scholar

Gaillard, E (2010), Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Gaja, G (1992), ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’, 3 European Journal of International Law 123Google Scholar

Gallie, WB (1956), ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Harrison & Sons)Google Scholar

Galligan, DJ (2010), ‘Legal Theory and Empirical Research’ in Cane, and Kritzer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2009), ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’ in Dunoff, and Trachtman, (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Government (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Garner, JW (1929), ‘The New Arbitration Treaties of the United States’, 23 American Journal of International Law 595Google Scholar

Garrity-Rokous, G and Brescia, RH (1993), ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, 18 Yale Journal of International Law 559Google Scholar

Gathii, JT (2009), ‘War’s Legacy in International Investment Law’, 11 International Community Law Review 353Google Scholar

Gelinas, F (2005), ‘Investment Tribunals and the Commercial Arbitration Model: Mixed Procedures and Creeping Institutionalisation’ in Gehring, and Cordonier, Segger, (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Trade Law (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2004), ‘Intensity of Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases, 51 Netherlands International Law Review 135Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2009), ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings (TMC Asser Institute)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2011), ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, 17 European Law Journal 80Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2014), ‘Diverging Fundamental Rights Standards and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Claes, and de Visser, (eds.), Constructing European Constitutional Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2017), ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2018a), ‘The Draft Copenhagen Declaration and the Court’s Dual Role – the Need for a Different Definition of Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation’ Strasbourg ObserversGoogle Scholar

Gerards, J (2018b), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ 18 Human Rights Law Review 495Google Scholar

Gerards, J and Senden, H (2009), ‘The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 619Google Scholar

Gerbic, P and Stacey, E (2005), ‘A Purposive Approach to Content Analysis: Designing Analytical Frameworks’, 8 Internet and Higher Education 45Google Scholar

Ghosh, VN (2015), ‘An Uncertain Shield – Res Judicata in Arbitration’, 31 Arbitration International 661Google Scholar

Ghouri, A (2014), ‘On Genealogy of Proposals to Reform Investor-State Arbitration’, 11 Transnational Dispute Management 1Google Scholar

Gibson, C (2015), ‘Beyond Self-Judgment: Exceptions Clauses in US BITs’, 1 Fordham International Law Journal 38Google Scholar

Gibson, JL, Caldeira, GA and Baird, V (1998), ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’, 92 American Political Science Review 343Google Scholar

Gilmore, G (1945), ‘The International Court of Justice’, 55 Yale Law Journal 1049Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2004), ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’, 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 631Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2005), ‘International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance’, 25 International Review of Law and Economics 107Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2016), ‘The Interaction between Domestic and International Law’ in Kontorovich, and Parisi, (eds.), Economic Analysis of International Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Giorgetti, C (2013), ‘Is the Truth in the Eyes of the Beholder? The Perils and Benefits of Empirical Research in International Investment Arbitration’, 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 263Google Scholar

Giustini, A (1986), ‘Compulsory Adjudication in International Law: The Past, the Present, and Prospects for the Future’, 9 Fordham International Law Journal 213Google Scholar

Glashausser, A (2005), ‘Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpretation’, 50 Villanova Law Review 25Google Scholar

Glenn, HP (1987), ‘Persuasive Authority’, 32 Revue de droit de McGill 261Google Scholar

Goldhaber, M (2016), ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’, 5 Global Constitutionalism 48Google Scholar

Goldsmith III, JL and Levinson, D (2009), ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ 122(7) Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar

Gordillo, LI (2011), Interlocking Constitutions: Towards an Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Graham, DE (1970), ‘The Calvo Clause: Its Current Status as a Contractual Renunciation of Diplomatic Protection’, 6 Texas International Law Forum 289Google Scholar

Grant, JA (2017), ‘Reason and Authority in Administrative Law’, 76 Cambridge Law Journal 507Google Scholar

Grant, K (2015), ‘ICSID’s Reinforcement?: UNASUR and the Rise of a Hybrid Regime for International Investment Arbitration’, 52 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1115 Google Scholar

Green, A (2010), ‘An Absolute Theory of Convention Rights: Why the ECHR Gives Rise to Legal Rights That Cannot Conflict with Each Other’, 16 UCL Jurisprudence Review 75Google Scholar

Green, L (1988), The Authority of the State (Clarendon)Google Scholar

Greene, RD (1927), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 7 B.U.L. Review 181Google Scholar

Greene, RD (1931), ‘The Progress of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 6 St. John’s Law Review 226Google Scholar

Greener, J (2002), ‘Constructive Expropriation and the Framework of Deferential Progressivism’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 725Google Scholar

Greer, S (2000), The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe Publishing)Google Scholar

Greer, S (2004), ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’, 63 Cambridge Law Journal 412Google Scholar

Greer, S (2010), ‘The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?’, 3 UCL Human Rights Review 1Google Scholar

Greer, S and Wildhaber, L (2012), ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Human Rights Law Review 655Google Scholar

Grieves, FL (1969), Supranationalism and International Adjudication (University of Illinois Press)Google Scholar

Griffey, B (2011), ‘The “Reasonableness” Test: Assessing Violations of State Obligations under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, 11 Human Rights Law Review 275Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2014a), ‘Precedent in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Compound Interest’, 2 Peking University Transnational Law Review 217Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2014b), ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2017), ‘Competition and Cooperation in International Commercial Arbitration: The Birth of a Transnational Legal Profession’, 51 Law & Society Review 790Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2020), ‘Marginals and Elites in International Arbitration’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gross, O and Ni Aolain, F (2001), ‘From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 23 Human Rights Quarterly 652Google Scholar

Grossman, N (2009), ‘Legitimacy and International Adjudicative Bodies’. 41 George Washington International Law Review 107Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, L and Vadi, V (2014) ‘Standard of Review and Scientific Evidence in WTO Law and International Investment Arbitration – Converging Parallels?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, L and Werner, W (eds.) (2014), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Guillaume, G (1995), ‘The Future of International Judicial Institutions’, 44 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 848Google Scholar

Guillaume, G (2011), ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’, 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5Google Scholar

Guthrie, G (2010), Basic Research Methods an Entry to Social Science Research (Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Guzman, AT (2008), ‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis’, 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 171Google Scholar

Guzman, AT and Meyer, T (2008), ‘International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals’, 9 Chicago Journal of International Law 515Google Scholar

Habermas, J (2015), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Polity Press)Google Scholar

Haesler, T (1968), The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the Case Law of International Courts and Tribunals (AW Sijthoff)Google Scholar

Hall, M and Wright, R (2008), ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’, 96 California Law Review 63Google Scholar

Han, SWD (2006), ‘Decentralized Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies’, 16 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 101Google Scholar

Harbo, T-I (2017), ‘Introducing Procedural Proportionality Review in European Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 25Google Scholar

Harding, J (1962), ‘The Nationalization of Canadian Property in Cuba under International Law’, 2 Western Law Review 50Google Scholar

Harowitz, P (2008), ‘Three Faces of Deference’, 83 Notre Dame Law Review 1061Google Scholar

Harris, B (2003), ‘Judicial Review, Justiciability and the Prerogative of Mercy’, 62 Cambridge Law Journal 631Google Scholar

Hart, HLA (1994), The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Clarendon)Google Scholar

Hart, Jr HM and Sacks, AM (1994), The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (Foundation Press)Google Scholar

Hathaway, O (2008), ‘International Delegation and State Sovereignty’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 115Google Scholar

Hayward, B (2017), Conflict of Law and Arbitral Discretion: The Closest Connection Test (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heise, M, (2000) ‘Preliminary Thoughts on the Virtues of Passive Dialogue’, 34 Akron Law Review 73Google Scholar

Heiskanen, V (1994), ‘Jurisdiction v. Competence: Revisiting a Frequently Neglected Distinction’, 5 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Helfer, L (2003), ‘Constitutional Analogies in the International Legal System’, 37 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 193Google Scholar

Helfer, L (2008), ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, 19 European Journal of International Law 125Google Scholar

Helfer, L and Alter, KJ (2009), ‘The Andean Tribunal of Justice and Its Interlocutors: Understanding Preliminary Reference Patterns in the Andean Community’, 41 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 871Google Scholar

Helfer, L and Slaughter, A-M (1997), ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, 107 Yale Law Journal 273Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2012), ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 223Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2013), ‘Balancing Investment Protection and the Public Interest: The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’, 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 197Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2014), ‘The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2015), Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Henkin, L (1990), ‘International Law: Politics, Values and Functions’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 4 (Brill)Google Scholar

Henrard, K (2012), ‘A Critical Appraisal of the Margin of Appreciation Left to States Pertaining to “Church-State Relations” under the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Vrielink, et al. (eds.), A Test of Faith? Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace (Ashgate)Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2014), ‘Comparative Public Law at the Dawn of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Saar Papier Vertriebs GmbH v. Republic of Poland’, 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 705Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2016), ‘Applicable Law in TPP Investment Disputes’, 17 Melbourne Journal of International Law 368Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2017), Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heringa, AW (1996), ‘The “Consensus Principle” – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, 3 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 108Google Scholar

Hernández, GI (2014), The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hershovitz, S (2003), ‘Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority’ 9 Legal Theory 201Google Scholar

Herz, J (1941), ‘Expropriation of Foreign Property’, 35 American Journal of International Law 243Google Scholar

Hess, G (2013), ‘Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers’, 51 Alberta Law Review 925Google Scholar

Hey, E and Mak, E (2009), ‘Introduction: The Possibilities of Comparative Law Methods for Research on the Rule of Law in a Global Context’, 2 Erasmus Law Review 287Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2005), ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 306Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1968), ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’, 17 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 58Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1981), ‘Reality and Hope in International Human Rights: A Critique’, 9 Hofstra Law Review 1485Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1982), ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 176 (Brill)Google Scholar

Higgins, R (2009), Themes and Theories (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hill, N (1931), ‘National Judges in the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 25 American Journal of International Law 670Google Scholar

Hill, N (1932), ‘The Extension of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice by Treaties’, 10 New York University Law Quarterly Review 484Google Scholar

Hilson, C (2013), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Domestic Irregularity and Domestic Court Rulings in ECHR Environmental Jurisprudence: Global Legal Pluralism in Action’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 262Google Scholar

Hirsch, M (2005), ‘The Sociology of International Law: Invitation to Study International Rules in Their Social Context’, 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 891Google Scholar

Hobbes, T (1996), Leviathan (Tuck, R ed., Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Hoexter, C (2000), ‘The Future of Judicial Review in South African Administrative Law’, 117 South African Law Journal 484Google Scholar

Holmes, OW (1991), The Common Law (Dover Publications)Google Scholar

Holstein, J and Gubrium, J (2000), ‘The Constructionist Analytics of Interpretive Practice’ in Denzin, and Lincoln, (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Holtermann, J v. H and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘What Is Empirical in Empirical Studies of Law? A European New Legal Realist Conception’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 77Google Scholar

Hovius, B (1985), ‘The Limitation Clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide for the Application of Section 1 of the Charter?’, 17 Ottawa Law Review 213Google Scholar

Howell, J (2006), ‘Book Reviews: Property and the Human Rights Act 1998’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 728Google Scholar

Hsieh, H-F (2005), ‘Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’, Qualitative Health Research 1277Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1928), ‘The World Court: 1922–1928’ World Peace Foundation Pamphlet Series 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1930), ‘The Eighth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 13 International Conciliation 193Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1931), ‘The Independence of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 17 American Bar Association Journal 430Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1941), ‘The Nineteenth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1945), ‘The Twenty-Third Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice and Its Future’, 39 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1957), ‘The Succession of the International Court of Justice to the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 51 American Journal of International Law 569Google Scholar

Huijbers, L (2017), ‘Procedural-Type Review: A More Neutral Approach to Human Rights Protection by the European Court of Human Rights?’ European Society of International Law, Conference Paper No. 6/2017Google Scholar

Huiping, C (2008), ‘The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Where to Go in the 21st Century?’, 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 467Google Scholar

Hull, WI (1970), The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contributions to International Law (Kraus)Google Scholar

Hurd, I (1999), ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, 53 International Organization 379Google Scholar

Hurrelmann, A and others (2005), ‘Is There a Legitimation Crisis of the Nation-State?’, 13 European Review 119Google Scholar

Hurst, CJB (1943), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 59 Law Quarterly Review 312Google Scholar

Hussain, I (1984), Dissenting and Separate Opinions at the World Court (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Hyde, CC (1930), ‘The Interpretation of Treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 24 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

ICJ Registry (1976), The International Court of Justice (International Court of Justice)Google Scholar

Iluyomade, BO (1977), ‘Dual Claim and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in International Law’, 10 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 83Google Scholar

International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017), Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Investment LawGoogle Scholar

International Law Association (2000), ‘Committee on Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 69 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 604Google Scholar

International Law Association (2006), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 72 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 353Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T (2010), ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 373Google Scholar

Isiksel, T (2013), ‘Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 160Google Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, M and Krisch, N (2016), ‘Subsidiarity in Global Governance’, Law & Contemporary Problems 79Google Scholar

Jackson, JH (2003), ‘Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’, 97 American Journal of International Law 782Google Scholar

Jackson, JL (2006), ‘Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court’, 39 Connecticut Law Review 759Google Scholar

Jacob, M (2011), ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’, 12 German Law Journal 1005Google Scholar

Jacoby, S (1936), ‘Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 30 American Journal of International Law 233Google Scholar

Janzen, H (1935), ‘The Legal Monism of Alfred Verdross’, 29 American Political Science Review 387Google Scholar

Jellinek, G (1968), Die Rechtliche Natur Der Staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag Zur Juristischen Construction Des Völkerrechts (Keip)Google Scholar

Jenks, CW (1938), ‘The Interpretation and Application of Municipal Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 19 British Yearbook of International Law 67Google Scholar

Jenks, CW (1964), The Prospects of International Adjudication (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (1996), ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’, 45 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (1998), ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice’, British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (2002), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’ in Kreijen, et al. (eds.), State, Sovereignty, and International Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Jessup, PC (1956), Transnational Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Jhabvala, F (1978), ‘Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice’, 72 American Journal of International Law 830Google Scholar

Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1965), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Shareholders in International Law’, 4 Philippine International Law Journal 71Google Scholar

Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1978), ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 159 (Brill)Google Scholar

Johns, F (2009), ‘International Legal Theory: Snapshots from a Decade of International Legal Life’, 10 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Johnson, OT and Gimblett, J (2011), ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 649Google Scholar

Johnstone, I (1990), ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’, 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 371Google Scholar

Jones, JW (1935), ‘The “Pure” Theory of International Law’, 16 British Yearbook of International Law 5Google Scholar

Jowell, J (2003), ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights: A Question of Competence’ in Craig, et al. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Juss, SS (1994), ‘Nationality Law, Sovereignty, and the Doctrine of Exclusive Domestic Jurisdiction’, 9 Florida Journal of International Law 227Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J (2005), ‘Unearthing Structural Uncertainty through Neo-Kelsenian Consistency: Conflicts of Norms in International Law’ Papers of the European Society of International LawGoogle Scholar

Kammerhofer, J (2009), ‘Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law’, 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 225Google Scholar

Kanetake, M (2016a), ‘The Interfaces between the National and International Rule of Law: A Framework Paper’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanetake, M (2016b), ‘Subsidiarity in the Practice of International Courts’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanetake, M and Nollkaemper, A (eds.) (2016), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanto, M (2017), ‘The Status of Municipal Law before the World Court in the Light of Recent Cases’ in Maluwa, et al. (eds.), The Pursuit of a Brave New World in International Law (Brill)Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, D (2010), ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’, 96 Cornell Law Review 47Google Scholar

Katselas, A (2012), ‘Do Investment Treaties Prescribe a Deferential Standard of Review?’, 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 87Google Scholar

Kaushal, A (2009), ‘Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash Against the Foreign Investment Regime’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 491Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A (2008), ‘Deference of Defiance?: The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A (2014), ‘Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory’, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 443Google Scholar

Kawano, M (2014), ‘Decisions of the International Court of Justice on Disputes Concerning Internal Law’ in Gaja, and Grote, Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (1943), ‘Compulsory Adjudication of International Disputes’, 37 American Journal of International Law 397Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (1960), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’, 48 Georgetown Law Journal 627Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (2003), Principles of International Law (Lawbook Exchange)Google Scholar

Kennedy, D (2005), ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’, 27 Sydney Law Review 5Google Scholar

Keohane, RO, Moravcsik, A and Slaughter, A-M (2003),‘Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational’ in Keohane, (ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (Routledge)Google Scholar

King, DB and Moloo, R (2014), ‘International Arbitrators as Lawmakers’, 46 International Law and Politics 875Google Scholar

King, JA (2008), ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint: Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature’, 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 409Google Scholar

King, JA (2012), Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B (1997), ‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law’, 19 Michigan Journal of International Law 345Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B (2011), ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order’ in Crawford, and Koskenniemi, (eds.), Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2010), ‘The Evolution of the Right of Individuals to Seise the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Journal of the History of International Law 267Google Scholar

Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2014), ‘The Influence of the Concept of International Legal Personality on the Drafting of the PCIJ Statute’, 16 Journal of the History of International Law 9Google Scholar

Kjos, HE (2013), Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kjos, HE (2016), ‘Domestic Courts under Scrutiny: The Rule of Law as a Standard (of Deference) in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J (2009), ‘The Bridge Crack’d: A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations’, 23 International Relations 119Google Scholar

Klabbers, J and Piiparinen, T (2013), ‘Normative Pluralism: An Exploration’ in Klabbers, and Piiparinen, (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, Peters, A and Ulfstein, G (2009), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Klager, R (2010), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’, 11 Journal of World Investment & Trade 435Google Scholar

Kleinlein, T (2011), ‘Judicial Lawmaking by Judicial Restraint? The Potential of Balancing in International Economic Law’, 12 German Law Journal 1141Google Scholar

Knight, D (2018), Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koessler, M (1947), “Subject”, “Citizen”, “National”, and “Permanent Allegiance”’, 64 South African Law Journal 350Google Scholar

Koh, HH (1996), ‘Transnational Legal Process’, 75 Nebraska Law Review 181Google Scholar

Koh, HH (1997), ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, 106 Yale Law Journal 2599Google Scholar

Koh, HH (2003), ‘On American Exceptionalism’, 55 Stanford Law Review 1479Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2007), ‘German Legal Scholarship as Reflected in Hague Academy Courses on Public International Law’, 50 German Yearbook of International Law 201Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2013), The International Court of Justice (Hart)Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2015), ‘The Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice Between Utilitas Publica and Utilitas Singulorum’, 14 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16Google Scholar

Korowicz, MS (1956), ‘The Problem of the International Personality of Individuals’, 50 American Journal of International Law 533Google Scholar

Korzun, V (2017), ‘The Right to Regulate in Investor-State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs’, 50 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 355Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (1997), ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’, 8 European Journal of International Law 566Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2001), The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2006), From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2014), ‘What Is International Law For?’ in Evans, (ed.), International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kratochvil, J (2011), ‘The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 324Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F (1982), ‘On the Notion of “Interest” in International Relations’, 36 International Organization 1Google Scholar

Kriebaum, U (2007), ‘Regulatory Takings: Balancing the Interests of the Investor and the State’, 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade 717Google Scholar

Kriebaum, U (2014), ‘The Nature of Investment Disciplines’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Krisch, N (2006), ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, 17 European Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Krisch, N (2010), Beyond Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Krisch, N (2017), ‘Pluralism in International Law and Beyond’ in d’Aspremont, and Singh, (eds.), Fundamental Concepts for International Law: The Construction of a Discipline (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Krotoszynski, Jr R (1998) ‘Constitutional Flares: On Judges, Legislatures, and Dialogue’, 83 Minnesota Law Review 1Google Scholar

Krotoszynski, Jr R (2002), ‘Why Deference? Implied Delegations, Agency Expertise, and the Misplaced Legacy of Skidmore’, 54 Administrative Law Review 735Google Scholar

Kulick, A (2010), ‘The Integration of International Investment Law’, 23 Hague Year Book of International Law 171Google Scholar

Kulick, A (2012), Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kumm, M (2016), ‘Sovereignty and the Right to Be Left Alone: Subsidiarity, Justice-Sensitive Externalities, and the Proper Domain of the Consent Requirement in International Law’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 239Google Scholar

Kunz, J (1934), ‘The “Vienna School” and International Law’, 11 New York University Law Quarterly Review 370Google Scholar

Kunz, J (1938), ‘The Theory of International Law’, 32 American Society of International Law Proceedings 23Google Scholar

Kunz, J (1960), ‘The Nottebohm Judgment’, 54 American Journal of International Law 536Google Scholar

Kuo, M-S (2010), ‘On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 437Google Scholar

Kurtz, J (2013), ‘Building Legitimacy Through Interpretation in Investor-State Arbitration: On Consistency, Coherence and the Identification of Applicable Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kurtz, J (2015), ‘Balancing Investor Protection and Regulatory Freedom in International Investment Law: The Necessary, Complex, and Vital Search for State Purpose’ in Bjorklund, (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2013–2014 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kwiecien, R (2004), ‘In Defence of the Idea of State Sovereignty in International Law’, 27 Polish Yearbook of International Law 87Google Scholar

Kwiecien, R (2011), ‘Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty – Is It Still Alive?’, 13 International Community Law Review 23Google Scholar

Kwiecien, R (2012), ‘Does the State Still Matter? Sovereignty, Legitimacy and International Law’, 32 Polish Yearbook of International Law 45Google Scholar

Kyriakou, N (2007), ‘Reform of the Reform: The European Court of Human Right’s Endless Quest for Efficient Justice’, 5 Hellenic Review of European Law 385Google Scholar

Lamm, V (2014), Compulsory Jurisdiction in International Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Land, M (2015), ‘Justice as Legitimacy in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Grant, Cohen, and Grossman, (eds.), Legitimacy and International Courts (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Landes, W and Posner, EA (1976), ‘Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’, 19 Journal of Law and Economics 249Google Scholar

Langford, M and Behn, D (2017), ‘Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator?’, 29(2) European Journal of International Law 551Google Scholar

Larouer, CJ (2009), ‘In the Name of Sovereignty? The Battle over In Dubio Mitius Inside and Outside the Courts’ Cornell Law School, Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers, Paper No. 22Google Scholar

Larson, A and Jenks, CW (1965), Sovereignty within the Law (Dobbs Ferry)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E (1962), ‘The Drafting of Treaties for the Protection of Investment’, 3 International & Comparative Law Quarterly Supplementary Publication 18Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E (1991), Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (1928), ‘The Doctrine of Non-Justiciable Disputes in International Law’, 24 Economica 277Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (1930), ‘The Absence of an International Legislature and the Compulsory Jurisdiction of International Tribunals’, 11 British Yearbook of International Law 134Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (1933), The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford Clarendon)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (1946), ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’, 23 British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (1949), ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, 26 British Yearbook of International Law 48Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H (2010), The Development of International Law by the International Court (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Lavranos, N (2008), ‘Towards a Solange-Method between International Courts and Tribunals?’ in Broude, and Shany, (eds.), The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity (Hart)Google Scholar

Lazarus, L and Simonsen, N (2015), ‘Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference’ in Hunt, et al. (eds.), Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart)Google Scholar

Leech, NL and Onwuegbuzie, AJ (2007), ‘An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation’, 22 School Psychology Quarterly 557Google Scholar

Leech, NL and Onwuegbuzie, AJ (2008), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: A Compendium of Techniques and a Framework for Selection for School Psychology Research and Beyond’, 23 School Psychology Quarterly 587Google Scholar

Legg, A (2012), The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Legg, A (2016), ‘Human Rights, the Margin of Appreciation, and the International Rule of Law’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Legrand, P (1998), ‘On the Singularity of Law’, 47 Harvard International Law Journal 517Google Scholar

Lehavi, A (2010), ‘The Global Law of the Land’, 81 University of Colorado Law Review 425Google Scholar

Lehavi, A (2015), ‘Unbundling Harmonization: Public versus Private Law Strategies to Globalize Property’, 15 Chicago Journal of International Law 452Google Scholar

Leigh, GIF (1971), ‘Nationality and Diplomatic Protection’, 20 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 453Google Scholar

Leonhardsen, EM (2012), ‘Looking for Legitimacy: Exploring Proportionality Analysis in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 95Google Scholar

Leonhardsen, EM (2013), ‘Navigating International Waters: Standards of Review in Investment Treaty Arbitration as Adjudicative Response’ SSRNGoogle Scholar

Leonhardsen, EM (2014), ‘Treaty Change, Arbitral Practice and the Search for a Balance: Standards of Review and the Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Letsas, G (2006), ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705Google Scholar

Letsas, G (2007), A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Letsas, G (2013), ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Føllesdal, et al. (eds.), Constituting Europe (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Levit, JK (2005), ‘A Bottom-Up Approach to International Lawmaking: The Tale of Three Trade Finance Instruments’, 30 Yale Journal of International Law 125Google Scholar

Lillich, R and Weston, BH (1988), ‘Lump Sum Agreements: Their Continuing Contribution to the Law of International Claims’, 82 American Journal of International Law 69Google Scholar

Lim, E (2014), ‘Of “Landmark” or “Leading” Cases: Salomon’s Challenge’, 41 Journal of Law and Society 523Google Scholar

Lissitzyn, OJ (1951), ‘The International Court of Justice: Its Role in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security’, in United Nations Studies (Carnegie Endowment)Google Scholar

Little, L (2009), ‘Empowerment through Restraint: Reverse Preemption or Hybrid Lawmaking’, 59 Case Western Reserve Law Review 955Google Scholar

Llewelyn, K (1930), ‘A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next Step’, 30 Columbia Law Review 431Google Scholar

Locke, J (1988), Two Treatises of Government (Laslett, P ed., Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

López Escarcena, S (2014), Indirect Expropriation in International Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Lourie, G (2015), ‘Diplomatic Protection under the State-to-State Arbitration Clauses of Investment Treaties’, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 511Google Scholar

Lowe, V (1996), ‘Res Judicata and the Rule of Law in International Arbitration’, 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 38Google Scholar

Lugato, M (2013), ‘The Margin of Appreciation and Freedom of Religion: Between Treaty Interpretation and Subsidiarity’, 52 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49Google Scholar

Madsen, MR (2013), ‘Towards a Sociology of International Courts’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 1Google Scholar

Madsen, MR (2014), ‘The International Judiciary as Transnational Power Elite’, 8 International Political Sociology 332Google Scholar

Madsen, MR (2015), ‘The Legitimization Strategies of International Judges’ in Bobek, (ed.), Selecting Europe’s Judges (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Madsen, MR (2016), ‘The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 141Google Scholar

Madsen, MR (2018), ‘Who Rules the World? The Educational Capital of the International Judiciary’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 127Google Scholar

Madsen, MR and Dezalay, Y (2002), ‘The Power of the Legal Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Law’ in Banakar, and Travers, (eds.), An Introduction to Law and Social Theory (Hart)Google Scholar

Maduro, MP (2013), ‘In Search of a Meaning and Not in Search of the Meaning: Judicial Review and the Constitution in Times of Pluralism’, Wisconsin Law Review 541Google Scholar

Magnaye, J and Reinisch, A (2016), ‘Revisiting Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 264Google Scholar

Mahoney, B (2010), ‘The Greater Good or Property Rights? Resolving the Tension between Positive and Negative Civil Rights in Eminent Domain’, SSRNGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, P (1990), ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’, 11 Human Rights Law Journal 5Google Scholar

Makela, F (2013), ‘Acquired Expertise of Administrative Tribunals and the Standard of Judicial Review: The Case of Grievance Arbitrators and Human Rights Law’, 17 Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal 345Google Scholar

Malintoppi, L (2006), ‘Methods of Dispute Resolution in Inter-State Litigation: When States Go to Arbitration Rather than Adjudication’, 5 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 133Google Scholar

Mamolea, A (2014), ‘Good Faith Review’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Mann, FA (1987), ‘The Proper Law in the Conflict of Laws’, 36 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 437Google Scholar

Mardikian, L (2018), ‘The Right to Property as Regional Custom in Europe’, 9 Transnational Legal Theory 56Google Scholar

Margolis, E (1955), ‘Soviet Views on the Relationship between National and International Law’, 4 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 116Google Scholar

Martin, A (1947), ‘Private Property, Rights, and Interests in the Paris Peace Treaties’, 24 British Yearbook of International Law 273Google Scholar

Martinez-Fraga, P and Reetz, R (2015), Public Purpose in International Law: Rethinking Regulatory Sovereignty in the Global Era (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Martinkute, I (2016), ‘The Delimitation of Contractual Rights and Property in International Investment Law’, 1 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online 1Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R (2006), ‘International Community and State Sovereignty: An Uneasy Symbiotic Relationship’ in Warbrick, and Tierney, (eds.), Towards an ‘International Legal Community’? The Sovereignty of States and the Sovereignty of International Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R (2013), ‘Pluralism, Global Law and Human Rights: Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 287Google Scholar

McCrudden, C (2007), ‘Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights’ in Örücü, and Nelken, (eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Hart)Google Scholar

McGoldrick, D (2010), ‘The Boundaries of Justiciability’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 981Google Scholar

McGoldrick, D (2016), ‘A Defence of the Margin of Appreciation and an Argument for Its Application by the Human Rights Committee’, 65 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 21Google Scholar

McHarg, A (1999), ‘Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 62 Modern Law Review 671Google Scholar

McLachlan, C (2005), ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, 54 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279Google Scholar

McLachlan, C (2008), ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’, 57 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 361Google Scholar

McLachlan, C (2009), Lis Pendens in International Litigation (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

McRae, DM (1971), ‘Sovereignty and the International Legal Order’, 10 Western Ontario Law Review 56Google Scholar

Meagher, D (2011), ‘The Brennan Conception of the Implied Freedom: Theory, Proportionality and Deference’, 30 University of Queensland Law Review 119Google Scholar

Melish, T (2009), ‘From Paradox to Subsidiarity: The United States and Human Rights Treaty Bodies’, 34 Yale Journal of International Law 389Google Scholar

Menon, PK (1989), ‘Primary, Subsidiary and Other Possible Sources of International Law’, 1 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 113Google Scholar

Merges, RP (2011), Justifying Intellectual Property (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Merrills, JG (1969), ‘The Justiciability of International Disputes’, 47 Canadian Bar Review 240Google Scholar

Merrills, JG (1988), The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar

Merry, SE (1988), ‘Legal Pluralism’, 22 Law & Society Review 869Google Scholar

Michaels, R and Pauwelyn, J (2010), ‘Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws? Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Broude, and Shany, (eds.), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Mik, C (2014), ‘Book Review: Lukasz Gruscyznski, Wouter Werner (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation’, 34 Polish Yearbook of International Law 305Google Scholar

Milano, E (2005), ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights before the International Court of Justice: Re-Fashioning Tradition?’ in Curtin, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 35 (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Miles, K (2010), ‘International Investment Law: Origins, Imperialism and Conceptualizing the Environment’, 21 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 1Google Scholar

Miller, N (2002), ‘An International Jurisprudence? The Operation of “Precedent” Across International Tribunals’, 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 483Google Scholar

Milner, D (2014),‘Protocols No. 15 and 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights in the Context of the Perennial Process of Reform’, 17 Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 19Google Scholar

Mitchell, A, Munro, J and Voon, T (2018), ‘Importing WTO General Exceptions into International Investment Agreements: Proportionality, Myths and Risks’, in Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2016–2017 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Moloo, R and Jacinto, J (2012), ‘Standards of Review and Reviewing Standards: Public Interest Regulation in International Investment Law’, Yearbook of International Law and Policy 539Google Scholar

Montt, S (2012), State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Hart)Google Scholar

Moon, WJ (2012), ‘Essential Security Interests in International Investment Agreements’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 481Google Scholar

Moore, JB (1922), ‘The Organization of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 22 Columbia Law Review 497Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H (1940), ‘Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law’, 34 American Journal of International Law 260Google Scholar

Mosk, RM (2003),‘The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 304 (Hague Academy of International Law)Google Scholar

Mosler, H (1963), ‘The Protection of Human Rights by International Legal Procedure’, 52 Georgetown Law Journal 800Google Scholar

Mountfield, H (2002), ‘Regulatory Expropriations in Europe: The Approach of the European Court of Human Rights’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 136Google Scholar

Mowbray, A (2010), ‘A Study of the Principle of Fair Balance in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 10 Human Rights Law Review 289Google Scholar

Mowbray, A (2015), ‘Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 313Google Scholar

Mulhern, JP (1988), ‘In Defense of the Political Question Doctrine’, 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 97Google Scholar

Mullan, DJ (2006), ‘Deference: Is It Useful Outside Canada?’, Acta Juridica 42Google Scholar

Müller, E and Schneider, P (2007), ‘The ICJ 1945–2001: Empirical Findings about its Performance and Recommendations for an Improvement of its Efficiency’, 3 Review of International Law & Politics 71Google Scholar

Mureinik, E (1994), ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’, 10 South African Journal on Human Rights 31Google Scholar

Murphy, S (1991), ‘The ELSI Case: An Investment Dispute at the International Court of Justice’, 16 Yale Journal of International Law 391Google Scholar

Murphy, S (2013), ‘International Judicial Bodies for Resolving Disputes between States’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Nafziger, JAR (1984), ‘Some Remarks on the Writing Style of the International Court of Justice’ in Buergenthal, (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Law: Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (N P Engel)Google Scholar

Nelken, D (2004), ‘Using the Concept of Legal Culture’, 29 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1Google Scholar

Nelken, D (2013), ‘Comparative Sociology of Law’ in Banakar, and Travers, (eds.), Law and Social Theory (2nd edn, Hart)Google Scholar

Newcombe, A (2005), ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’, 20 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Ngulube, P (2015), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis and Interpretation: Systematic Search for Meaning’ in Mathipa, and Gumbo, (eds.), Addressing Research Challenges: Making Headway for Developing Researchers (Mosala-MASEDI Publishers & Booksellers)Google Scholar

Nicholson, F (1965), ‘The Protection of Foreign Property under Customary International Law’, 6 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 391Google Scholar

Niedlispacher, I (2018), The Developing Remedial Practice of the European Court of Human Rights (Speaking Notes) (Council of Europe)Google Scholar

Niedlispacher, I et al. (2018), The Developing Remedial Practice of the European Court of Human Rights (Handout) (Council of Europe)Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A (2006), ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice’, 5 Chinese Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A (2009), ‘The Reception by the International Court of Justice of Decisions of Domestic Courts’, 7(15)Federalismi.it: Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano 1Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A (2011), National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A (2013a), ‘Conversations Among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators’ in Romano, and Shany, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A (2013b), ‘Inside or Out’ in Klabbers, and Piiparinen, (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Nourse, V and Shaffer, G (2014), ‘Empiricism, Experimentalism, and Conditional Theory’, 67 Southern Methodist University Law Review 141Google Scholar

O’Connell, D (1960), ‘The Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law’, 48 Georgetown Law Journal 431Google Scholar

O’Donnell, T (1982), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 4 Human Rights Quarterly 474Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, A (2013), ‘International Constitutionalism and the State’, 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1021Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, K (2001), ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions’, 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 67Google Scholar

Oesch, M (2003), ‘Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 635Google Scholar

Oldfather, C, Bockhorst, J and Dimmer, B (2012), ‘Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness: Automated Content Analysis, Judicial Opinions, and the Methodology of Legal Scholarship’, 64 Florida Law Review 1189Google Scholar

Olivier, M (1988), ‘Aspects of the Establishment of Sovereignty and the Transfer of Government Authority’, 14 African Year Book of International Law 85Google Scholar

Olynyk, S (2012), ‘A Balanced Approach to Distinguishing between Legitimate Regulation and Indirect Expropriation in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 International Trade & Business Law Review 254Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L (1908), ‘The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method’, 2 American Journal of International Law 313Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L, Jennings, RY and Watts, A (1996)Oppenheim’s International Law: Volume 1, Peace (9th edn, Longman)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A (2003), ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, 14 European Journal of International Law 529Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A (2008), The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Origgi, G (2018), Reputation: What it Is and Why it Matters (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Ortino, F (2005), ‘From “Non-Discrimination” to “Reasonableness”: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?’ Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 01/05Google Scholar

Ortino, F (2014), ‘The Investment Treaty System as Judicial Review’ Dickson Poon School of Law Research Paper No. 2014–23Google Scholar

Ortino, F (2017), ‘Investment Treaties, Sustainable Development and Reasonableness Review: A Case Against Strict Proportionality Balancing’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 71Google Scholar

Ostrovsky, A (2005), ‘What’s So Funny about Peace, Love, and Understanding? How the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Preserves Core Human Rights within Cultural Diversity and Legitimises International Human Rights Tribunals’, 1 Hanse Law Review 47Google Scholar

Owen, H (1968), ‘Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: A Study of Its Acceptance by Nations’, 3 Georgia Law Review 704Google Scholar

Paine, J (2015), ‘The Project of System-Internal Reform in International Investment Law: An Appraisal’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1Google Scholar

Paine, J (2019), ‘Standard of Review (Investment Arbitration)’ in Ruiz-Fabri, (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Pandya, APG and Moody, A (2010), ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Unclear Future’, 15 Tilburg Law Review 93Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M (2014), ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Pappas, M (2008), ‘No Two-Stepping in the Laboratories: State Deference Standards and Their Implications for Improving the Chevron Doctrine’, 39 McGeorge Law Review 977Google Scholar

Parker, D (2013), ‘Policing Procedure before Substance: Reforming Judicial Review of the Factual Predicates to Legislation’, 99 Virginia Law Review 1327Google Scholar

Parlett, K (2011), The Individual in the International Legal System (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Paul, JR (1991), ‘Comity in International Law’, 32 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Paulsson, J (2005), Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J (2014), ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 372Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J and Elsig, M (2012), ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J and Salles, LE (2009), ‘Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)Possible Solutions’, 42 Cornell International Law Journal 77Google Scholar

Peaslee, AJ (1931), ‘Obligatory Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 25 American Society of International Law Proceedings 48Google Scholar

Peat, D (2013), ‘The Normative Authority of Domestic Laws in International Law’ ASIL Midyear Research ForumGoogle Scholar

Pendas, DO (2012), ‘Toward a New Politics? On the Recent Historiography of Human Rights’, 21 Contemporary European History 95Google Scholar

Perry, MJ (2003), ‘Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy: What Role for the Courts?’, Wake Forest Law Review 635Google Scholar

Perry, SR (1989), ‘Second-Order Reasons, Uncertainty and Legal Theory’, 62 Southern California Law Review 913Google Scholar

Peter, F (2019), ‘Legitimate Political Authority and Expertise’ in Sadurski, et al. (eds.), Legitimacy: The State and Beyond (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Peters, A (2006), ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’, 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 579Google Scholar

Peters, A (2013), ‘Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Endeavour’, 24 European Journal of International Law 533Google Scholar

Peters, B (2016), ‘The Rule of Law Effects of Dialogues between National Courts and Strasbourg: An Outline’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Peters, B and Schaffer, JK (2013), ‘The Turn to Authority beyond States’, 4 Transnational Legal Theory 315Google Scholar

Peters, P (1997), ‘Exhaustion of Local Remedies: Ignored in Most Bilateral Investment Treaties’, 44 Netherlands International Law Review 233Google Scholar

Petersen, N (2009), ‘The Reception of International Law by Constitutional Courts through the Prism of Legitimacy’, 39 Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective GoodsGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, E-U (2014), ‘Judicial Standards of Review and Administration of Justice in Trade and Investment Law and Adjudication’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Petzold, H (1993), ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’ in Macdonald, , Matscher, and Petzold, (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Pinto, M (2008), ‘National and International Courts – Deference or Disdain?’, 30 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 247Google Scholar

Pirker, B (2014), ‘Democracy and Distrust in International Law: The Procedural Democracy Doctrine and the Standard of Review Used by International Courts and Tribunals’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Plato, (2011), The Republic (Baker & Taylor)Google Scholar

Pocock, JGA (1976), ‘The Classical Theory of Deference’, 81 American Historical Review 516Google Scholar

Poirier, M (2002), ‘The Virtue of Vagueness in Takings Doctrine’, 24 Cardozo Law Review 93Google Scholar

Pollack, MA (2014), ‘Political Science and International Courts’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Poole, T (2009), ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’, 68 Cambridge Law Journal 142Google Scholar

Popelier, P and Van De Heyning, C (2017), ‘Subsidiarity Post-Brighton: Procedural Rationality as Answer?’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 5Google Scholar

Posner, EA (2004), ‘The Decline of the International Court of Justice’ University of Chicago, John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper Series, Paper No. 233Google Scholar

Posner, EA and de Figueiredo MFP (2005), ‘Is the International Court of Justice Biased?’, 34 Journal of Legal Studies 599Google Scholar

Poulsen, LNS and Aisbett, E (2013), ‘When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning’, 65 World Politics 273Google Scholar

Pratt, T (2018), ‘Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes’, 72(3) International Organization 561Google Scholar

Price, D (2000), ‘Chapter 11 – Private Party vs Government, Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Frankenstein or Safety Valve?’, 26 Canada-United States Law Journal 107Google Scholar

Prost, M (2006), ‘All Shouting the Same Slogans: International Law’s Unities and the Politics of Fragmentation’, 17 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 131Google Scholar

Prott, LV (1970),‘The Style of Judgment in the International Court of Justice’, Australian Year Book of International Law 75Google Scholar

Puig, S and Brown, C (2012), ‘The Secretary-General’s Power to Refuse to Register a Request for Arbitration under the ICSID Convention’, 27 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 172Google Scholar

Puthuppally, C (2014), ‘Science, Expertise and Due Deference’, 5 King’s Student Law Review 83Google Scholar

Radin, M (1982), ‘Property and Personhood’, 34 Stanford Law Review 957Google Scholar

Ragni, C (2014), ‘Standard of Review and the Margin of Appreciation before the International Court of Justice’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Raine, T (2013), ‘Judicial Review under the Human Rights Act: A Culture of Justification’, 1 North East Law Review 81Google Scholar

Ramsey, MD (1997), ‘Escaping “International Comity”’, 83 Iowa Law Review 893Google Scholar

Ratner, S (2008), ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’, 102 American Journal of International Law 475Google Scholar

Raz, J (1979), The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Raz, J (1986), The Morality of Freedom (Clarendon)Google Scholar

Raz, J (1999), Practical Reason and Norms (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Raz, J (2009), Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Re, E (1951), ‘The Nationalization of Foreign-Owned Property’, 36 Minnesota Law Review 323Google Scholar

Reid, J (1972), ‘The Judge as Law Maker’, 12 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 22Google Scholar

Reinisch, A (2011), ‘Necessity in Investment Arbitration’ in Dekker, and Hey, (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 41 (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Rivers, J (2006), ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 174Google Scholar

Rivers, J (2014), ‘The Presumption of Proportionality’, 77 Modern Law Review 409Google Scholar

Roberts, A (2011),‘The Next Battleground: Standards of Review in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 16 International Council for Commercial Arbitration Congress Series 170Google Scholar

Roberts, A (2013), ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’, 107 American Journal of International Law 45Google Scholar

Roberts, A and Braddock, R (2016), ‘Protecting Public Welfare Regulation Through Joint Treaty Party Control: A ChAFTA Innovation’ EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar

Rogers, C (2013), ‘The Politics of International Investment Arbitrators’, 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 223Google Scholar

Rogge, K (1993), ‘Fact-Finding’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Romano, C (2002), ‘International Justice and Development Countries: A Quantitative Analysis’, 1 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 367Google Scholar

Romano, C (2007), ‘The Shift from the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent’, 39(4) NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 791Google Scholar

Romano, C (2013), ‘The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies: Theory and Practice in International Human Rights Procedures’ in Boschiero, et al. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Romano, C, Alter, K and Shany, Y (2014), ‘Mapping International Adjudicative Bodies, the Issues, and Players’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Rook, D (2001), Property Law and Human Rights (Blackstone Press)Google Scholar

Root, E (1910), ‘Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’, 4 American Journal of International Law 517Google Scholar

Root, E (1920), ‘Permanent Court of International Justice’, 6 American Bar Association Journal 181Google Scholar

Rosenau, JN (1997), Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M (2013), ‘Rethinking the Boundaries between Public Law and Private Law for the Twenty First Century: An Introduction’, 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 125Google Scholar

Rosenne, S (1993), ‘The International Court of Justice and International Arbitration’, 6 Leiden Journal of International Law 297Google Scholar

Rosenne, S (1995), The World Court: What It Is and How It Works (5th edn, Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Rosenne, S (1997), The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–1996, vol. 1 (3rd edn, Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Roth-Isigkeit, D (2017), ‘The Blinkered Discipline? – Martti Koskenniemi and Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Law’, 9 International Theory 410Google Scholar

Ruse-Khan, HG (2013), ‘A Conflict-of-Laws Approach to Competing Rationalities in International Law. The Case of Plain Packaging between IP, Trade, Investment and Health’ 9 Journal of Private International Law 309Google Scholar

Sabahi, B (2011), Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Sacerdoti, G (2011), ‘Precedent In The Settlement Of International Economic Disputes: The WTO and Investment Arbitration Models’, in Rovine, (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers (2010) (Brill)Google Scholar

Sacriste, G and Vauchez, A (2007), ‘The Force of International Law: Lawyers’ Diplomacy on the International Scene in the 1920s’, 32 Law & Social Inquiry 83Google Scholar

Sadl, U and Olsen, HP (2014), ‘Empirical Studies of the Webs of International Case Law: A New Research Agenda’ iCourts Working Paper No. 8Google Scholar

Sadl, U and Olsen, HP (2017), ‘Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 327Google Scholar

Sadl, U and Panagis, Y (2015), ‘What Is a Leading Case in EU Law? An Empirical Analysis’, 40 European Law Review 15Google Scholar

Sadurski, W (2009), ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, 9 Human Rights Law Review 397Google Scholar

Salacuse, JW (2010), ‘The Emerging Global Regime for Investment’, 51 Harvard International Law Journal 427Google Scholar

Salacuse, JW and Sullivan, E (2005), ‘Do BITs Really Work?: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’, 46 Harvard International Law Journal 67Google Scholar

Salazar, A (2010), ‘NAFTA Chapter 11, Regulatory Expropriation, and Domestic Counter-Advertising Law’, 27 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 31Google Scholar

Saldaña, J (2009), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Sales, P (2006), ‘Property and Human Rights: Protection, Expansion and Disruption’, 11 Judicial Review 141Google Scholar

Salgado, RA (1986), ‘Protection of Nationals’ Rights to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights: Lithgow v. United Kingdom’, 27 Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 865Google Scholar

Samuel, G (2009), ‘Interdisciplinarity and the Authority Paradigm: Should Law Be Taken Seriously by Scientists and Social Scientists?’, 36 Journal of Law and Society 431Google Scholar

Sands, P (2002), ‘Searching for Balance: Concluding Remarks’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 198Google Scholar

Sassen, S (2015), Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization (New York University Press)Google Scholar

Sasson, M (2010), Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Unsettled Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law (Kluwer)Google Scholar

Saul, M (2016), ‘Structuring Evaluations of Parliamentary Processes by the European Court of Human Rights’, 20 International Journal of Human Rights 1077Google Scholar

Sauvant, KP and others (2016), ‘The Rise of Self-Judging Essential Security Interest Clauses in International Investment Agreements’ Columbia FDI Perspectives on Topical Foreign Direct Investment Issues, No. 188Google Scholar

Sayeed, S (2005), ‘Beyond the Language of “Deference”’, 10 Judicial Review 111Google Scholar

Scelle, GAJ (1943), Manuel Élémentaire de Droit International Public (Loviton)Google Scholar

Scelle, GAJ (1984), Précis de droit des gens (Editions du CNRS)Google Scholar

Schabas, WA (2015), The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Scharpf, FW (2002), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Schauer, F (1977), ‘Article 10 and Freedom of Expression: An Examination of Deference to National Authority under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 3 Poly Law Review 25Google Scholar

Schauer, F (2004), ‘Deferring’, 103 Michigan Law Review 1567Google Scholar

Schauer, F (2008), ‘Authority and Authorities’, Virginia Law Review 1931Google Scholar

Schermers, HG and Blokker, N (2011), International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Schill, SW (2010a), ‘Crafting the International Economic Order: The Public Function of Investment Treaty Arbitration and Its Significance for the Role of the Arbitrator’, 23 Leiden Journal of International Law 401Google Scholar

Schill, SW (2010b), ‘The Multilateralization of International Investment Law: Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds’, 2 Trade, Law and Development 59Google Scholar

Schill, SW (2011), ‘System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking’, 12 German Law Journal 1083Google Scholar

Schill, SW (2012), ‘Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Reconceptualizing the Standard of Review through Comparative Public Law’ Society of International Economic Law, Online Proceedings Working Papers, Paper No. 2012/33Google Scholar

Schill, SW (2016), ‘The European Commission’s Proposal of an “Investment Court System” for TTIP: Stepping Stone or Stumbling Block for Multilateralizing International Investment Law?’, 20 ASIL InsightsGoogle Scholar

Schill, SW and Briese, R (2009), ‘“If the State Considers”: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement’, 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 61Google Scholar

Schmitt, C (2005), Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (G Schwab tr., University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D (1996), ‘NAFTA’s Takings Rule: American Constitutional Comes to Canada’, 46 University of Toronto Journal 499Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D (2008), Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D (2010), ‘Judicial Politics and International Investment Arbitration: Seeking an Explanation for Conflicting Outcomes’, 30 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 383Google Scholar

Schreuer, C (1996), ‘International and Domestic Law in Investment Disputes. The Case of ICSID’, 1 Austrian Review of International and European Law 89Google Scholar

Schreuer, C et al. (2009) The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Schrijver, N (2000), ‘The Changing Nature of State Sovereignty’, 70 British Yearbook of International Law 65Google Scholar

Schultz, T and Dupont, C (2015), ‘Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-Empowering Investors? A Quantitative Empirical Study’, 25 European Journal of International Law 1147Google Scholar

Schultz, T and Ridi, N (2017), ‘Comity and International Courts and Tribunals’, 50 Cornell International Law Journal 577Google Scholar

Schwebel, SM (1996), ‘The Treatment of Human Rights and of Aliens in the International Court of Justice’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Schweigman, D (2001), The Authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Schwobel, CEJ (2012), ‘Whither the Private in Global Governance?’, 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1106Google Scholar

Scott, C (2008), ‘Diverse Persuasion(s): From Rhetoric to Representation (and Back Again to Rhetoric) in International Human Rights Interpretation’ Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Research Paper No. 04/2008Google Scholar

Scott, JB (1926), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice – Its Origin and Nature’, 15 Georgetown Law Journal 297Google Scholar

Seidman, LM (2004), ‘The Secret Life of the Political Question Doctrine’, John Marshall Law Review 441Google Scholar

Semertzi, A (2014), ‘The Preclusion of Direct Effect in the Recently Concluded EU Free Trade Agreements’, 51 Common Market Law Review 1125Google Scholar

Sepúlveda-Amor, B (2013), ‘International Law and National Sovereignty: The NAFTA and the Claims of Mexican Jurisdiction’, 14 Journal of World Investment & Trade 613Google Scholar

Shaffer, G (2008), ‘A New Legal Realism: Method in International Economic Law Scholarship’ in Picker, et al. (eds.), International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline (Hart)Google Scholar

Shaffer, G and Ginsburg, T (2012), ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship’, 106 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2003), The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2005), ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’, 16 European Journal of International Law 907Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2006), ‘Jurisdictional Competition between National and International Courts: Could International Jurisdiction-Regulating Rules Apply?’, in Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 37 (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2007), Regulating Jurisdictional Relations between National and International Courts (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2009a), ‘No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary’, 20 European Journal of International Law 73Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2009b),‘National Courts as International Actors: Jurisdictional Implications’, 15 federalismi.it 1Google Scholar

Shany, Y (2016) ‘Stronger Together? Legitimacy and Effectiveness of International Courts as Mutually Reinforcing or Undermining Notions’ in Grossman, et al. (eds.), Legitimacy and International Courts (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Shelton, D, (2003) ‘The Boundaries of Human Rights Jurisdiction in Europe’, 13 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 95Google Scholar

Shelton, D (2007) ‘An Introduction to the History of International Human Rights Law’ George Washington Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series, Paper No. 346Google Scholar

Shelton, D (2008) ‘Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts’, 9 Chicago Journal of International Law 537Google Scholar

Sherwood Dunn, F (1932), The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (Johns Hopkins Press)Google Scholar

Shirlow, E (2014a), ‘Taking Stock: Assessing the Implications of the Kadi Saga for International Law and the Law of the European Union’, 15 Melbourne Journal of International Law 534Google Scholar

Shirlow, E (2014b), ‘Deference and Indirect Expropriation Analysis in International Investment Law: Observations on Current Approaches and Frameworks for Future Analysis’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 595Google Scholar

Shirlow, E (2014c), ‘Les Laboratoires Servier, S.A.A., and others v. Republic of Poland: Defining the Nature of the Police Powers ‘Defence’ and the Deference Applicable in Regulatory Expropriation Cases’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 559Google Scholar

Sik, KS (1982), ‘Nationality and (Public) International Law’, 29 Netherlands International Law Review 100Google Scholar

Silverman, D (2011), Interpreting Qualitative Data: A Guide to the Principles of Qualitative Research (4th edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Simma, B (1985), ‘Self-Contained Regimes’, in Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 16 (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Simma, B (1995), ‘The Contribution of Alfred Verdross to the Theory of International Law’, 6 European Journal of International Law 33Google Scholar

Simma, B (2011), ‘Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights?’, 60 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 573Google Scholar

Simma, B (2012), ‘The International Court of Justice and Scientific Expertise’, 106 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 230Google Scholar

Simma, B and Alston, P (1988) ‘The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles’, 12 Australian Year Book of International Law 82Google Scholar

Simma, B and Pulkowski, D (2006), ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, 17 European Journal of International Law 483Google Scholar

Singh, N (1989), The Role and Record of the International Court of Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M (1994), ‘Liberal International Relations Theory and International Economic Law’, 10 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 717Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M (2003), ‘A Global Community of Courts’, 44 Harvard International Law Journal 191Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M (2005) A New World Order (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Sloane, R (2009a), ‘Breaking the Genuine Link: The Contemporary International Legal Regulation of Nationality’, 50 Harvard International Law Review 1Google Scholar

Sloane, R (2009b), ‘More Than What Courts Do: Jurisprudence, Decision and Dignity – In Brief Encounters and Global Affairs’, 34 Yale Journal of International Law 517Google Scholar

Smith, AM (2004), ‘“Judicial Nationalism” in International Law: National Identity and Judicial Autonomy at the ICJ’, 40 Texas International Law Journal 197Google Scholar

Sohn, L and Baxter, RR (1961), ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens’, 55 American Journal of International Law 545Google Scholar

Somek, A (2007), ‘Kelsen Lives’, 18 European Journal of International Law 409Google Scholar

Soper, P (2002), The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law’s Morals (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M (1994), The International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M (2011), ‘Mutations of Neo-Liberalism in International Investment Law’, 3 Trade, Law and Development 203Google Scholar

Spano, R (2018a), ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law’, Human Rights Law Review 1Google Scholar

Spano, R (2018b), The Evolving Remedial Practice of the European Court of Human Rights (Speaking Notes) (Council of Europe)Google Scholar

Spiermann, O (2003), ‘A Permanent Court of International Justice’, 72 Nordic Journal of International Law 399Google Scholar

Spiermann, O (2005), International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Sprankling, JG (2012), ‘The Emergence of International Property Law’, 90 North Carolina Law Review 461Google Scholar

Sprankling, JG (2013), ‘The Global Right to Property’, 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44Google Scholar

Sprankling, JG (2014), The International Law of Property (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Sunstein, C (2007), ‘If People Would be Outraged by their Ruling, Should Judges Care?’, 60 Stanford Law Review 155Google Scholar

Starke, JG (1936), ‘Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law’, 17 British Yearbook of International Law 66Google Scholar

Staton, JK and Moore, WH (2011), ‘Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics’, 65 International Organization 553Google Scholar

Steiner, A (1936), ‘Fundamental Conceptions of International Law in the Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 30 American Journal of International Law 414Google Scholar

Steinhardt, R (1991), ‘The Privatization of Public International Law’, 25 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 523Google Scholar

Steininger, S (2018), ‘What’s Human Rights Got to do with It? An Empirical Analysis of Human Rights References in Investment Arbitration’, 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 33Google Scholar

Stephan, PB (2002), ‘Courts, Tribunals, and Legal Unification – The Agency Problem’, 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 333Google Scholar

Steyn, JvZ (2005),‘Deference: A Tangled Story’, Public Law 346Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A (2009), ‘Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes’, 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 621Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A and Brunell, T (2013), ‘Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes’, 1 Journal of Law and Courts 61Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A and Grisel, F (2009), ‘Transnational Investment Arbitration: From Delegation to Constitutionalization?’ in Dupuy, et al. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A and Grisel, F (2014), ‘The Evolution of International Arbitration: Delegation, Judicialization, Governance’ in Mattli, and Dietz, (eds.), International Arbitration and Global Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A and Grisel, F (2017), The Evolution of International Arbitration: Judicialization, Governance, Legitimacy (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A and Mathews, J (2008), ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’, 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 72Google Scholar

Story, J (1834), Commentaries of the Conflicts Law, Foreign and Domestic (Hiliard Gray)Google Scholar

Sucker, F (2014], ‘Including a General Public Interest Clause in WTO Agreements: A Way Forward in Trade Linkage Debates’ Society of International Economic Law Conference Paper Series, Working Paper No. 2014/19Google Scholar

Sumption, J (2011), ‘Judicial and Political Decision-Making: The Uncertain Boundary’, 16 Judicial Review 301Google Scholar

Sumption, J (2013), ‘27th Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture: The Limits of Law’ www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131120.pdf Google Scholar

Sylvest, C (2010), ‘Realism and International Law: The Challenge of John H. Herz’, 2 International Theory 410Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B (2008), ‘Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global’, 30 Sydney Law Review 375Google Scholar

Tams, CJ (2013), ‘The Contentious Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court’ in Tams, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Tarrow, S (2010),‘Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide’ in Brady, and Collier, (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (2nd edn, Rowman & Littlefield)Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J (2010), ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Teitelbaum, R (2007), ‘Recent Fact-Finding Developments at the International Court of Justice’, 6 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 119Google Scholar

Telman, DAJ (2014), ‘International Legal Positivism and Legal Realism’ in Kammerhofer, and d’Aspremont, (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Thayer, J (1893), ‘The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’, 7 Harvard Law Review 129Google Scholar

Thierry, H (1990), ‘The Thought of Georges Scelle’, 1 European Journal of International Law 193Google Scholar

Thirlway, H (2006), ‘The Drafting of ICJ Decisions: Some Personal Recollections and Observations’, 5 Chinese Journal of International Law 15Google Scholar

Thomas, CA (2013), ‘The Concept of Legitimacy and International Law’ London School of Economics and Political Science, Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, Paper No. 12/2013Google Scholar

Thomas, CA (2014), ‘The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law’, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 729Google Scholar

Tierney, B (2004), ‘The Idea of Natural Rights – Origins and Persistence’, 2 Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights 2Google Scholar

Tipson, F (1977), ‘From International Law to World Public Order: Who Studies What, How, Why’, 4 Yale Studies in World Public Order 39Google Scholar

Titi, A (2014), The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (1st edn, Nomos)Google Scholar

Titi, C (2017), ‘Refining the Expropriation Clause: What Role for Proportionality?’ in Chaisse, (ed.), China-European Union Investment Relationships: Towards a New Leadership in Global Investment Governance? (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Tomka, P, Howley, J and Proulx, V-J (2015), ‘International and Municipal Law before the World Court: One or Two Legal Orders?’, Polish Yearbook of International Law 11Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C (2001), International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Trakman LE (2012), ‘Choosing Domestic Courts over Investor-State Arbitration: Australia's Repudiation of the Status Quo’, 35 UNSW Law Journal 979Google Scholar

Trakman, LE (2014), ‘Investor-State Arbitration: Evaluating Australia’s Evolving Position’, 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 152Google Scholar

Tremblay, LB (2005), ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’, 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 617Google Scholar

Triepel, H (1899), Völkerrecht und landesrecht (CL Hirschfeld)Google Scholar

Triepel, H (1923), ‘Les Rapports Entre Le Droit Interne et Le Droit International’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Brill)Google Scholar

Tryon, JL (1912), ‘A Permanent Court of International Justice’, 22 Yale Law Journal 203Google Scholar

Tumonis, V (2012), ‘Judicial Creativity and Constraint of Legal Rules: Duelling Cannons of International Law’, 20 University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 93Google Scholar

Tyler, TR (2006), ‘Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 57 Annual Review of Psychology 375Google Scholar

Tzanakopoulos, A (2012), ‘Judicial Dialogue in Multi-Level Governance: The Impact of the Solange Argument’ in Fauchald, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Ulfstein, G (2012), ‘The Relationship between Constitutionalism and Pluralism’, 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 575Google Scholar

Ulfstein, G (2013), ‘International Courts and Judges: Independence, Interaction, and Legitimacy’, 46 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 849Google Scholar

Ulmer, SS (1963), ‘Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Processes: Some Practical and Theoretical Applications’, Law and Contemporary Problems 164Google Scholar

Vadi, V (2010), ‘Critical Comparisons: The Role of Comparative Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 39 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 67Google Scholar

Vadi, V (2015), ‘Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Standards of Review in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Bjorklund, (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2013–2014 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Vadi, V (2016), Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Vadi, V (2018), Proportionality, Reasonableness and Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Vadi, V and Gruszczynski, L (2013), ‘Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Multilevel Governance and the Commonweal’, 16 Journal of International Economic Law 613Google Scholar

Vaismoradi, M, Turunen, H and Bondas, T (2013), ‘Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study’, 15 Nursing and Health Sciences 398Google Scholar

Valcke, C (2004), ‘Comparative Law as Comparative Jurisprudence – the Comparability of Legal Systems’, 52 American Journal of Comparative Law 713Google Scholar

van Aaken, A (2008), ‘Between Commitment and Flexibility: The Fragile Stability of the International Investment Protection Regime’ University of St. Gallen Law School, Law and Economics Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 2008-23Google Scholar

van Asselt, H (2014), ‘Review Essay: Pluralism, Informality and Transnational Environmental Law Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law’, 3 Transnational Environmental Law 173Google Scholar

van Banning, TRG (2002), The Human Right to Property (Intersentia)Google Scholar

van Coller, EH (2006), ‘Proportionality Review – the Battle between Community Standards and English Domestic Law’, 39 Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 469Google Scholar

van den Hout, T (2008), ‘Resolution of International Disputes: The Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration – Reflections on the Centenary of the 1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes’, 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 643Google Scholar

van der Vyver, JD (1998), ‘Universality and Relativity of Human Rights: American Relativism’, 4 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 43Google Scholar

Van Harten, G (2007a), International Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Van Harten, G (2007b), ‘The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State’, 56 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 371Google Scholar

Van Harten, G (2012), ‘Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 50 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 211Google Scholar

Van Harten, G (2013), Sovereign Choices and Sovereign Constraints: Judicial Restraint in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Van Harten, G (2014), ‘Judicial Restraint in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Restraint Based on Relative Suitability’, 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5Google Scholar

Van Harten, G and Loughlin, M (2006), ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’, 17 European Journal of International Law 121Google Scholar

van Reenen, TP (1995a), ‘Major Theoretical Problems of Modern Comparative Legal Methodology (2); the Comparability of Positive Legal Phenomena’, 28 Comparative and International Law Journal of South Africa 407Google Scholar

van Reenen, TP (1995b), ‘Major Theoretical Problems of Modern Comparative Legal Methodology (1): The Nature and Role of the Tertium Comparationis’, 28 Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 175Google Scholar

van Schooten, H and Sweeney, J (2003), ‘Domestic Judicial Deference and the ECHR in the UK and Netherlands’, 11 Tilburg Foreign Law Review 439Google Scholar

Vandevelde, K (2011), ‘Model Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Way Forward’, 18 Southwestern Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar

Vandevelde, K (2013), ‘Rebalancing through Exceptions’, 17 Lewis & Clark Law Review 449Google Scholar

Vaughan, A (2013), ‘Minimum Interference Versus Rationality: The New Battleground in HRA Proportionality?’, 18 Judicial Review 416Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2011), ‘The Role of International Courts as Interpreters and Developers of the Law: Working out the Jurisgenerative Practice of Interpretation’, 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 99Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2012), How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Authority and Normative Twists (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2013a), ‘Understanding the Authority of International Courts and Tribunals: On Delegation and Discursive Construction’, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 381Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2013b), ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law’, 4(3) Transnational Legal Theory 354Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2014), ‘Post-Modern Perspectives on Orthodox Positivism’ in d’Aspremont, and Kammerhofer, (eds.), International Law Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Venzke, I (2016), ‘Contemporary Theories and International Law-Making’ in Brölmann, and Radi, , Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Verdross, A (1923), Die Einheit des rechtlichen Weltbildes auf Grundlage der Völkerrechtsverfassung (Mohr)Google Scholar

Verdross, A (1930), ‘Die Rechtstheorie Hans Kelsens’, 59 Juristische Blätter 423Google Scholar

Verdross, A (1971), ‘Domestic Jurisdiction under International Law’, 3 University of Toledo Law Review 119Google Scholar

Vermeer-Künzli, A (2007), ‘The Protection of Individuals by Means of Diplomatic Protection: Diplomatic Protection as a Human Rights Instrument’ (PhD thesis, Leiden University)Google Scholar

Verzijl, JHW (1965), The Jurisprudence of the World Court: A Case by Case Commentary (A W Sijthoff)Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE (2008), ‘State of Necessity and Peremptory Norms in International Investment Law’, 14 Law & Business Review of the Americas 79Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE (2014), ‘Sovereignty in Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE (2016), ‘International Investment Law and Natural Resource Governance’ in Kulovesi, and Morgera, (eds.), Research Handbook on International Law and Natural Resources (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE (2017), ‘Seven Ways of Escaping a Rule: Of Exceptions and Their Avatars in International Law’ in Bartels, and Paddeu, (eds.), Exceptions in International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Voeten, E (2011), ‘Politics, Judicial Behaviour, and Institutional Design’ in Christoffersen, and Madsen, (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Voeten, E (2012), ‘International Judicial Independence’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Von Bernstorff, J (2012), ‘Georg Jellinek and the Origins of Liberal Constitutionalism in International Law’, 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 659Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A (2006), ‘Constitutionalism in International Law: Comment on a Proposal from German’, 47 Harvard International Law Journal 226Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I (2011), ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’, 12 German Law Journal 979Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I (2014), In Whose Name?: A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

von Papp, K (2013), ‘Clash of “Autonomous Legal Orders”: Can EU Member State Courts Bridge the Jurisdictional Divide between Investment Tribunals and the ECJ? – A Plea for Direct Referral from Investment Tribunals to the ECJ’, 50 Common Market Law Review 1039Google Scholar

von Rosenvinge, DA (2010), ‘Creating a Working Vocabulary of Sovereignty: Language at the International Court of Justice’ Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Paper No. 05/2010Google Scholar

von Staden, A (2012), ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’, 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1023Google Scholar

von Staden, A (2016a), ‘Subsidiarity, Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies, and the Margin of Appreciation in the Human Rights Jurisprudence of African Sub-Regional Courts’, 20 International Journal of Human Rights 1113Google Scholar

von Staden, A (2016b), ‘Subsidiarity in Regional Integration Regimes in Latin America and Africa’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 27Google Scholar

Voon, T (1999), ‘Multinational Enterprises and State Sovereignty under International Law’, 21 Adelaide Law Review 219Google Scholar

Waldock, H (1965), ‘Human Rights in Contemporary International Law and the Significance of the European Convention’, 11 International & Comparative Law Quarterly Supplementary Publication 1Google Scholar

Waldron, J (1994), ‘Vagueness in Law and Language: Some Philosophical Issues’, 82 California Law Review 509Google Scholar

Waldron, J (2006), ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, 115 Yale Law Journal 1346Google Scholar

Waldron, J (2013), ‘Democracy and Human Rights: Good Companions’ in Kinley, et al. (eds.), Human Rights (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Walker, N (2002), ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ 65 Modern Law Review 317Google Scholar

Walker, N (2013), ‘Universalism and Particularism in Human Rights: Trade-Off or Productive Tension?’ in Kinley, and others, Human Rights: Old Problems, New Possibilities (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Walliman, N (2011), Research Methods: The Basics (Routledge)Google Scholar

Wang, S (1937), ‘The Relation of International Law to Municipal Law’, 10 China Law Review 179Google Scholar

Waschefort, G (2012), ‘Beyond Fragmentation: An Issues-Based Approach to “Human Rights”’, 37 South African Yearbook of International Law 61Google Scholar

Watts, A (1996), ‘Nationality of Claims: Some Relevant Concepts’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Webb, P (2013), International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Webber, GCN (2010), ‘Proportionality, Balancing and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’, 23 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 179Google Scholar

Weber, M (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Weber, M and Roth, G (1979), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press)Google Scholar

Webley, L (2010), ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research’ in Cane, and Kritzer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Weeramantry, C (1996), ‘Some Practical Problems of International Adjudication’, 17 Australian Year Book of International Law 1Google Scholar

Wehland, H (2019), ‘Domestic Courts and Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Effect of Local Recourse Against Administrative Measures on the Breach of Investment Protection Standards’, 36 Journal of International Arbitration 207Google Scholar

Weiner, A (2003), ‘Indirect Expropriations: The Need for a Taxonomy of “Legitimate” Regulatory Purposes’, 5 International Law FORUM du droit international 166Google Scholar

Wellens, K (1996), Economic Conflicts and Disputes before the World Court (1922–1995): A Functional Analysis (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Wellhausen, RL (2016), ‘Recent Trends in Investor–State Dispute Settlement’, 7 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 117Google Scholar

Westlund, AC (2013), ‘Deference as a Normative Power’, 166 Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 455Google Scholar

Wheatley, S (2011), ‘A Democratic Rule of International Law’, 22 European Journal of International Law 525Google Scholar

White, G (1961), Nationalisation of Foreign Property (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

White, GE (1986), ‘From Realism to Critical Legal Studies: A Truncated Intellectual History’, 40 Southwestern Law Journal 819Google Scholar

White, MD and Marsh, EE (2006), ‘Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology’, 55 Library Trends 22Google Scholar

White, N (2000), ‘The United Nations System: Conference, Contract or Constitutional Order?’, 4 Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 281Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L (1983), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’ in Macdonald, and Johnston, (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Wilson, MM (1977), ‘Federal Court Stays and Dismissals in Deference to Parallel State Court Proceedings: The Impact of Colorado River’, 44 University of Chicago Law Review 641Google Scholar

Winham, GR (1969), ‘Quantitative Methods in Foreign Policy Analysis’, 2 Canadian Journal of Political Science 187Google Scholar

Wismer, P (2006), ‘Bring Down the Walls! – On the Ever-Increasing Dynamic between the National and International Domains’, 5 Chinese Journal of International Law 511Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L (2010), Philosophical Investigations (Michael, P, Hacker, S and Schulte, J eds., GEM Anscombe tr., 3rd edn, Wiley-Blackwell)Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R (ed.) (2008), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer)Google Scholar

Wolitz, D (2014), ‘Indeterminacy, Value Pluralism, and Tragic Cases’, 62 Buffalo Law Review 529Google Scholar

Worster, WT (2008), ‘Competition and Comity in the Fragmentation of International Law’, 34 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 119Google Scholar

Wortley, BA (1956), ‘Observations on the Public and Private International Law Relating to Expropriation’, 5 American Journal of Comparative Law 577Google Scholar

Wouters, J and Hachez, N (2009), ‘When Rules and Values Collide: How Can a Balanced Application of Investor Protection Provisions and Human Rights Be Ensured?’, 3 Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 301Google Scholar

Yackee, JW (2012), ‘Controlling the International Investment Law Agency’, 53 Harvard International Law Journal 391Google Scholar

Yalkin, T (2009), ‘International Investment Arbitration: Poisoned at the Root?’, British Institute of International and Comparative Law Annual Conference on Business and LawGoogle Scholar

Young, AL (2009), ‘In Defence of Due Deference’, 72 Modern Law Review 554Google Scholar

Young, AL (2010), ‘Deference, Dialogue and the Search for Legitimacy’, 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 815Google Scholar

Young, AL (2014), ‘Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 375Google Scholar

Young, AL (2017), Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Young, E (2005), ‘Institutional Settlement in a Globalizing Judicial System’, Duke Law Journal 103Google Scholar

Yourow, HC (1996), The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Zammit Borda, A (2013), ‘A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals’, 24 European Journal of International Law 649Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, F (2012), ‘Judicial Activism in International Law – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 247Google Scholar

Zeitler, HE (2005), ‘Good Faith’ in the WTO Jurisprudence – Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism?’, 8 Journal of International Economic Law 721Google Scholar

Zglinski, J (2018), ‘The Rise of Deference: The Margin of Appreciation and Decentralized Judicial Review in EU Free Movement Law’, 55 Common Market Law Review 1341Google Scholar

Zyberi, G (2013), ‘The International Court of Justice and the Rights of Peoples and Minorities’ in Tams, and Sloan, (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive