Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:48:38.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Rick Anthony Furtak
Affiliation:
Colorado College
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. Kierkegaard: Construction of the Aesthetic. Trans. Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, Sara, and Rachana, Kamtekar, eds. A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
Allison, Henry E. “Christianity and Nonsense.” In Kierkegaard: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Thompson, Josiah, 289–323. New York: Doubleday, 1972.Google Scholar
Alter, Robert. The Book of Psalms: A Translation with Commentary. New York: W. W. Norton, 2007.Google Scholar
,Aristotle. Physics. Trans. Waterfield, Robin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
,Aristotle. Prior Analytics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan, 2 vols., vol. i. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Barrett, Lee. “The Uses and Misuses of the Comic: Reflections on the Corsair Affair.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: The Corsair Affair, ed. Perkins, Robert L., 123–139. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Beck, Frederik. Review ofPhilosophical Crumbs, originally published in 1845. Reprinted in Kierkegaardiana 8 (1971): 212–216.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. “The Enlightenment and Idealism.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. Ameriks, Karl, 18–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. The Life of Samuel Johnson. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert F. Schelling's Treatise on The Deities of Samothrace: A Translation and an Interpretation. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. I and Thou. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Touchstone, 1996.Google Scholar
Burgess, Andrew. “The Bilateral Symmetry of Kierkegaard's Postscript.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Concluding Unscientific Postscript, ed. Perkins, Robert L, 329–345. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Burgess, Andrew. “Kierkegaard's Climacus as Author.” Journal of Religious Studies 7 (1979): 1–14.Google Scholar
Burgess, Andrew. “Kierkegaard's Climacus on Christianity and Laughter.” In Kierkegaard and Christianity, ed. Kralik, Romanet al., 24–34. Sala: Kierkegaard Society in Slovakia, 2008.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. “Subjectivity and Emotion.” In Thinking about Feeling, ed. Solomon, Robert C., 107–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. Kierkegaard's Philosophy of Becoming: Movements and Positions. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. “Kierkegaard's Repetition: The Possibility of Motion.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2005): 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Come, Arnold B. Trendelenburg's Influence on Kierkegaard's Modal Categories. Montreal: Inter Editions, 1991.Google Scholar
Conant, James. “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and Nonsense.” In Pursuits of Reason: Essays in Honor of Stanley Cavell, ed. Cohen, Tedet al., 195–224. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Conant, James. “Must We Show What We Cannot Say?” In The Senses of Stanley Cavell, ed. Fleming, R. and Payne, M., 242–283. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Conant, James. “Putting Two and Two Together: Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and the Point of View for Their Work as Authors.” In Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief, ed. Tessin, Timothy and Ruhr, Mario von, 248–331. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Harvey. The Feast of Fools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daise, Benjamin. “The Will to Truth in Kierkegaard'sPhilosophical Fragments.” Philosophy of Religion 31 (1992): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, John J. Will as Commitment and Resolve: An Existential Account of Creativity, Love, Virtue, and Happiness. New York: Fordham University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. Cress, Donald A.. 4th edition. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Meditations on First Philosophy in Focus, ed. Tweyman, Stanley. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. Collected Poems. Philadelphia: Courage Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Notes from Underground. Trans. Pevear, Richard and Volokhonsky, Larissa. New York: Vintage Classics, 1994.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Faith Beyond Reason: A Kierkegaardian Account. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. “Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox, and Faith.” Religious Studies 25 (1989): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript: The Religious Philosophy of Johannes Climacus. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. “Kierkegaard's View of Humor: Must Christians Always Be Solemn?” Faith and Philosophy 4 (1987): 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. Passionate Reason: Making Sense of Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. “Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard's Dialectic.” In A Kierkegaard Critique, ed. Johnson, Howard and Thulstrup, Niels, 156–206. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. Jamie. Transforming Vision: Imagination and Will in Kierkegaardian Faith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Flay, Joseph C. Hegel's Quest for Certainty. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Frazier, Brad. Rorty and Kierkegaard on Irony and Moral Commitment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtak, Rick Anthony. “Kierkegaard and the Passions of Hellenistic Philosophy.” Kierkegaardiana 24 (2007): 68–85.Google Scholar
Furtak, Rick Anthony. Wisdom in Love: Kierkegaard and the Ancient Quest for Emotional Integrity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald. 2nd edition. London and New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Trans. Drake, Stillman. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Gilhus, Ingvild Saelid. Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Dario. “Trendelenburg: An Ally against Speculation.” In Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries, vol. i: Philosophy, ed. Stewart, Jon, 309–334. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Gouwens, David J. Kierkegaard as Religious Thinker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Ronald M. Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Grimsley, Ronald. “Kierkegaard and Descartes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (1966): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. What Is Ancient Philosophy? Trans. Chase, Michael. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair. Kierkegaard. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1991.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair. Kierkegaard: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Alastair. Kierkegaard and Philosophy: Selected Essays. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair. “Kierkegaard on Melancholy and Despair.” In Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard: Philosophical Engagements, ed. Mooney, Edward F, 147–152. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Härle, Wilfried. Dogmatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Hegel's Science of Logic. Trans. Miller, A. V.. New York: Humanities Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Ed. Hodgson, Peter C.. 3 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Heiberg, J. L.Om Philosophiens Betydning for den Nuvaerende Tid. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel, 1833.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. Stambaugh, Joan. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Phenomenological Research. Trans. Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Howland, Jacob. Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hügli, Anton. Die Erkenntnis der Subjektivität und die Objektivität des Erkennens bei Søren Kierkegaard [Knowledge of Subjectivity and the Objectivity of Knowing]. Basel: Editio Academica, 1973.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. Carr, David. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich H. The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill. Trans. di Giovanni, George. Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph Henry. The Concept of Existence in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. Rasselas and Other Tales. Ed. Kolb, Gwin J.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Kekes, John. “Wisdom.” In The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. Honderich, Ted, 912. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kirmmse, Bruce. Kierkegaard in Golden Age Denmark. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. The Romantic Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lear, Jonathan. Therapeutic Action: An Earnest Plea for Irony. New York: The Other Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Philosophical Writings. Ed. Parkinson, G. H. R.. London: J. M. Dent, 1973.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Lessing's Theological Writings. Trans. Chadwick, Henry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Werke. 8 vols. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1970–1979.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S.The Last Battle. New York: Macmillan, 1956.Google Scholar
Lippitt, John. Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard's Thought. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippitt, John. “Is a Sense of Humour a Virtue?” The Monist 88 (2005): 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louth, Andrew. The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, Martin. Luther's Works, vol. xxv: Lectures on Romans. Ed. Oswald, Hilton C.. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1972.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. A Short History of Ethics. 2nd edition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mackey, Louis. Kierkegaard: A Kind of Poet. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Alastair. “Kierkegaard: ‘Paradox’ and Irrationalism.” In Essays on Kierkegaard, ed. Gill, Jerry, 102–112. Minneapolis: Burgess, 1969.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Alastair. “Kierkegaard's Irrationalism RevisitedInternational Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1969): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malabou, Cathérine. The Future of Hegel. Trans. During, Lisabeth. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Marino, Gordon. Kierkegaard in the Present Age. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Erotic Phenomenon. Trans. Lewis, Stephen E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: An Abridged Edition. Ed. McLellan, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Smith, Colin. 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Monro, D. H.Argument of Laughter. Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Mooney, Edward F. Lost Intimacy in American Thought: Recovering Personal Philosophy from Thoreau to Cavell. London and New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Mooney, Edward F. On Søren Kierkegaard: Dialogue, Polemics, Lost Intimacy, and Time. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Muench, Paul. “Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View.” Kierkegaardiana 24 (2007): 132–162.Google Scholar
Muench, Paul. “The Socratic Method of Kierkegaard's Pseudonym Johannes Climacus: Indirect Communication and the Art of ‘Taking Away’.” In Kierkegaard and the Word(s), ed. Houe, Poul and Marino, Gordon, 139–150. Copenhagen: Reitzel, 2003.Google Scholar
Muench, Paul. “Understanding Kierkegaard's Johannes Climacus in the Postscript: Mirror of the Reader's Faults or Socratic Exemplar?” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 12 (2007): 424–440.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Faith and Reason. London: Duckworth, 1994.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. “God's Plagiarist: The Philosophical Fragments of Johannes Climacus.” Philosophical Investigations 22 (1999): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynster, J. P.Blandede Skrifter [Miscellaneous Writings]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1852.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Human, All Too Human. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Ed. Caro, Adrian Del and Pippin, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Oden, Thomas C., ed. The Humor of Kierkegaard: An Anthology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Olesen, Michael Hjersing. “The Climacean Alphabet: Reflections on Religiousness A and B from the Perspective of the Edifying.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 10 (2005): 282–293.Google Scholar
Olesen, Tonny Aagaard. “Schelling: A Historical Introduction to Kierkegaard's Schelling.” In Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries, vol. i: Philosophy, ed. Stewart, Jon, 229–275. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. “Kierkegaard and the Sublime.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 3 (1998): 245–275.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. The Philosophy of Kierkegaard. Chesham: Acumen, 2005.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. ‘Poor Paris!’: Kierkegaard's Critique of the Spectacular City. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. Review of Lippitt, Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard's Thought. Søren Kierkegaard Newsletter 43 (2002): 20–22.Google Scholar
Perkins, Robert L. “Kierkegaard, a Kind of Epistemologist.” History of European Ideas 12 (1990): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Robert L. Review of Stewart, Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (2004): 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Robert L., ed. International Kierkegaard Commentary: The Corsair Affair. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Piety, M. G.Repetition and Philosophical Crumbs. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Piety, M. G.Ways of Knowing: Kierkegaard's Pluralist Epistemology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
,Plato. Symposium. Ed. Howatson, M. C. and Sheffield, Frisbee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Poole, Roger. Kierkegaard: The Indirect Communication. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Anders Moe. “René Descartes: Kierkegaard's Understanding of Doubt and Certainty,” in Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions, vol. i: Philosophy, ed. Stewart, Jon, 11–22. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. Existential Epistemology: A Heideggerian Critique of the Cartesian Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Trans. Ballard, Edward and Embree, Lester. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. “Existence, Emotion, and Virtue: Classical Themes in Kierkegaard.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, ed. Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon D, 177–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. “Humor and the Virtues.” Inquiry 31 (1988): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. “Smiling with God: Reflections on Christianity and the Psychology of Humor.” Faith and Philosophy 4 (1987): 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz. The Star of Redemption. Trans. Hallo, William W.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rudd, Anthony. “‘Believing All Things’: Kierkegaard on Knowledge, Doubt, and Love.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Works of Love, ed. Perkins, Robert L., 121–136. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, Genia. A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotty, Martin. “Die Erkenntnislehre S. A. Kierkegaards.” PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität, 1915.
Söderquist, K. Brian. “Irony and Humor in Kierkegaard's Early Journals: Two Responses to an Emptied World.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 8 (2003): 143–167.Google Scholar
Söderquist, K. Brian. The Isolated Self: Truth and Untruth in Søren Kierkegaard's On the Concept of Irony. Copenhagen: Reitzel, 2007.Google Scholar
Søe, N. H. “Kierkegaard's Doctrine of the Paradox.” In A Kierkegaard Critique, ed. Johnson, Howard and Thulstrup, Niels, 207–227. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. Works, vol. ii. Trans. Elwes, R. H. M.. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Stack, George. “Aristotle and Kierkegaard's Existential Ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1974): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jon. Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jon, ed. Texts from Golden Age Denmark, vol. iii: Heiberg's Introductory Lecture to the Logic Course and Other Texts. Copenhagen: Reitzel, 2007.
Stokes, Patrick. Kierkegaard's Mirrors: Interest, Self, and Moral Vision. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Michelle. Behind the Mask: Kierkegaard's Pseudonymic Treatment of Lessing in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Swenson, David. Something About Kierkegaard. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1945.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred. “Flower in the Crannied Wall.” In Selected Poems, ed. Ricks, Christopher, 283. London: Penguin Classics, 2007.Google Scholar
Thulstrup, Niels. Kierkegaard's Relation to Hegel. Trans. Stengren, George L.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Tiles, Mary. Bachelard: Science and Objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolstoy, Ivan. “The Death of Ivan Ilyich.” In The Death of Ivan Ilyich and Other Stories, ed. Cook, Tim. Ware: Wordsworth Editions, 2004.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeremy. “Ethical Beliefs: A Theory of Truth without Truth Values.” Thought 55 (1980): 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, David. The Modern Philosophical Revolution: The Luminosity of Existence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Sylvia. “Subjectivity versus Objectivity: Kierkegaard's Postscript and Feminist Epistemology.” In Feminist Interpretations of Søren Kierkegaard, ed. León, Céline and Walsh, Sylvia, 267–285. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “Johannes and Johannes: Kierkegaard and Difference.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, ed. Perkins, Robert L., 13–32. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “Kierkegaard's Climacus – a Kind of Postmodernist.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, ed. Perkins, Robert L., 53–71. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Kierkegaard's Critique of Reason and Society. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “L'Autre critique kierkegaardienne de Hegel,” in L'Idéalisme allemand et la religion, ed. Soual, Philippe and Vetö, Miklos, 189–211. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2008.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Review of Stewart, Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. Soren Kierkegaard Newsletter 48 (2004): 10–15.Google Scholar
Widenmann, Robert J. “Kierkegaard's Concept of a Confine.” In Irony and Humor in Søren Kierkegaard, ed. Thulstrup, N. and Thulstrup, M. M., 27–41. Copenhagen: Reitzel, 1988.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. New York: Penguin Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Prototractatus: An Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Ed. McGuinness, B. F.et al. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. Ogden, C. K.. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2003.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. “Philosophy, Thinkers, and Heidegger's Place in the History of Being.” In Appropriating Heidegger, ed. Faulconer, James E. and Wrathall, Mark A, 9–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zwart, Hub. Ethical Consensus and the Truth of Laughter. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1996.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rick Anthony Furtak, Colorado College
  • Book: Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript'
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782008.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rick Anthony Furtak, Colorado College
  • Book: Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript'
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782008.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rick Anthony Furtak, Colorado College
  • Book: Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript'
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782008.014
Available formats
×