Book contents
- Korean
- Korean
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Background
- Part II Language Structure
- 4 Phonology and Phonetics
- 5 Morphology
- 6 Morphosyntax: Case, Grammatical Relations, and Nominalization
- 7 Syntax
- 8 Syntax–Semantics Interface
- Part III Language in Context
- Index
- References
6 - Morphosyntax: Case, Grammatical Relations, and Nominalization
from Part II - Language Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2019
Book contents
- Korean
- Korean
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Background
- Part II Language Structure
- 4 Phonology and Phonetics
- 5 Morphology
- 6 Morphosyntax: Case, Grammatical Relations, and Nominalization
- 7 Syntax
- 8 Syntax–Semantics Interface
- Part III Language in Context
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 6 focuses on the interface between morphology and syntax. We discuss case, postpositions, delimiters, nominalization, and numerals. We look at nominative, accusative, and genitive cases, describing their distribution and allomorphy and devote special attention to contexts where nominative and accusative usage is interchangeable or nearly so. We introduce the case marking postpositions: dative, locative, direction, goal, source, conjunctive, and disjunctive. The three most common delimiters – particles marking association with focus – are introduced with their properties. We discuss three nominalization processes, derived from four distinct parts of speech. We present constructions related to numerality, including cardinal numbers, ordinal numbers, numeral classifier phrases, and the marking of plurality. As Korean speakers have been using Chinese characters from early in the Common Era, the Sino-Korean stratum has heavily impacted Korean morphosyntax, and we see this impact particularly in numerality. We describe the well-known “ubiquitous” nature of the Korean plural marker tul, which appears not only on pluralized NPs, but on other parts of speech as well.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- KoreanA Linguistic Introduction, pp. 146 - 189Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Readings
Young-Ran, An. 2008. Korean tul and English all. In Boeckx, Cedric and Ulutas, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL4). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 55. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungeun. 2003. A conditioning factor in possessor agreement constructions. In Clancy, Pat (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 11, 343–351. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hong, Jongseon. 2004. Myengsahwa [Nominalizing]. Say Kwuke Saynghwal 14 (2): 167–185. National Institute of Korean Language.Google Scholar
Kang, Beommo. 2002. Pemcwu munpep: Hankwuke-uy hyeongthaylon, thongsalon, thaip-nonlicek uymilon [Categorial grammar: The morphology, syntax, and typo-logical semantics of Korean]. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo. 1989. Inalienable possession as a semantic relationship underlying predication: The case of multiple-accusative constructions. In Kuno, Susumo et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, Vol. 3, 445–468. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Young-Kun, Ko. 1995. Tane, Mwuncang, Theyksuthu [Word, Sentence, Text]. Seoul: Hankuk Publisher.Google Scholar
Nam, Ki-Shim and Young-Kun, Ko. 2013. Phyocwun Kwuke Mwunpeplon [Grammar of Standard Korean], 3rd ed. Seoul: TOP Publisher.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2011. Nominalization and stance markings in Korean. In Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen, and Wrona, Jack (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 393–422. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi and Sim, Chang-Yong. 2007. The event semantic root of inalienable possession. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Yang, Dong-Whee. 1999. Case features and case particles. In Bird, et al. (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 18, 626–639. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jong Yurl. 1989. On the multiple ka and lul constructions in Korean. In Takubo, Yukinori et al. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 16, 64–83. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
References
Chun, Sun-Ae. 1985. Possessor ascension for multiple case sentences. In Kuno, Susumo et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Vol. 1, 30–39. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 1993. Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 167–211.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias and Hnin Tun, San San. 2013. Burmese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kang, Youngse. 1985. Korean syntax and universal grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok and Sells, Peter. 2007. Two types of multiple nominative construction: A constructional approach. In Muller, Stephen (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stanford Department of Linguistics and CSLI’s LingGo Lab, 364–372. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, E. and Shimojo, M.. 2016. Mismatch of topic between Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 81.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan and Kim, Soowon. 1992. Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korea. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 37–68.Google Scholar
Park, Chongwon. 2013. Metonymy in grammar: Korean multiple object constructions. Functions of Language 20: 31–63.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris and Barshi, Immanuel. 1999. External Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–555.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2001. On Korean case stacking: The varied functions of the particles Ka and Lul. The Linguistic Review 18: 193–232.Google Scholar
Whitman, John. 2001. Kayne 1994: p. 143, fn. 3. In Alexandrova, G. and Artunova, O. (eds.), The Minimalist Parameter, 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jae Hoon. 2010. Constraints on double-accusative external possession constructions in Korean: A cognitive approach. In Yeon, J. and Kaiser, Jieun (eds.), Selected Papers of 2nd European Conference on Korean Linguistics. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 1986. Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean. Studies in Linguistic Science 16: 215–236.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case-stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.), Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2, 265–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James. 2015. Double nominative and double accusative constructions. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Youn, Cheong. 1990. A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar