Part I - Pooling Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language ChangeThe Impact of English as a Lingua Franca, pp. 11 - 174Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Aarts, Bas. 1992. Small Clauses in English. The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were variation in non-standard British English today. English World-Wide 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(s1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Bossomaier, Terry R. J. & Green, David G. (eds.). 2000. Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2006–2007. Geolinguistic patterns in a vast speech community. Linguistica Atlantica 27(28), 27–36.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1994. Standardization and the English irregular verbs. In Stein, Dieter & van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, 115–133. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (ed.) 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue. 2012. Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Hundt & Gut 2012, 35–53.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 2013. Grammar and Complexity: Language at the Intersection of Competence and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2008. The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92(2), 232–249.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2011. The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In Simpson, James (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 666–679. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane (eds.). 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & van der Wurff, Wim. 2006. Syntax. In Hogg, Richard & Denison, David (eds.), A History of the English Language, 109–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana (eds.). 2017. Changing English. Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastello, Stephen J., Koopmans, Matthijs & Pincus, David (eds.) 2009. Chaos and Complexity in Psychology. The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander (eds.), The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and Beyond, 160–180. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 2014. Complexity. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Gut, Ulrike (eds.). 2012. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Neil. 2009. Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
KASELL (Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics). Dec. 2013. Proceedings. Seoul: KASELL.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, Christopher, Lange, Claudia & Leuckert, Sven. 2016. “This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”: The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2), 151–176.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W. et al. (eds.). 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English. 2 vols. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2012. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R., Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R., Jr. 2015. Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Cambridge, MA, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2018. Placing ELF among the varieties of English. In Deshors, Sandra C. (ed.), Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties, 109–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2016. The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English. World Englishes 35(1), 133–146.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2), 141–165.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2013. Complexity Theory/Dynamic systems theory. In Robinson, Peter (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, 103–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, MacNeilage, Peter & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1984. Self-organizing processes and the explanation of language universals. In Butterworth, B., Comrie, Bernard & Dahl, Östen (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, 181–203. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh. 2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred (eds.). 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Milroy, Jim & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley & Llamas, Carmen. 2013. Social networks. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 409–427. Malden, MA, Osford: Wiley-Blackwell,Google Scholar
Mobus, George E. & Kalton, Michael C.. 2015. Principles of Systems Science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Coupé, Christophe & Pellegrino, Francois. 2017. Complexity in Language. Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27, 147–173Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederic J. & Preston, Laurel B. (eds.). 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina (ed.), Can We Predict Linguistic Change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16). http://helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/.Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise & Osimk-Teasdale, Ruth (eds.). 2016. English as a Lingua Franca: Perspectives and Prospects. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter (eds.). 2009. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1989. American Earlier Black English. Morphological and Syntactic Variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997a. Chaos theory as a model for dialect variability and change? In Thomas, Alan R. (ed.), Issues and Methods in Dialectology, 22–36. Bangor: Department of Linguistics, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997b. As as “is”. Is as “is”? In Fries, Udo et al. (eds.), From Aelfric to the New York Times. Studies in English Corpus Linguistics, 33–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2011a. English around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2011b. English into Asia: From Singaporean ubiquity to Chinese learners’ features. In Curzan, Anne & Adams, Michael (eds.), Contours of English and English Language Studies: In Honor of Richard W. Bailey, 135–156. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. On the relationship between the cognitive and the communal: a complex systems perspective. In Filppula, et al. (eds.), 277–310.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina (eds.). 2016. Re-Assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1996a. Areas of multilingualism in northern South America. In Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell T. Tryon (eds.), Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas 1345. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1996b. The Tupí-Guaraní languages of Atlantic South America, and Línguas Gerais. In Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell T. Tryon (eds.), Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas, 1333–1334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry & Nash, David. 1999. Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19, 5–56.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1988. Center and periphery: adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Grant, Anthony P.. 1996. Interethnic communication in Canada, Alaska and adjacent areas. In Wurm, et al. (eds.), 1107–1169.Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard A. & Croft, William. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88, 269–304.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire, Epps, Patience, Gray, Russell, Hill, Jane, Hunley, Keith, McConvell, Patrick & Zentz, Jason. 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages? PLoS ONE 6, e25195.Google Scholar
Clackson, James & Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James M. 1978. The Mobilian Trade Language. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Evans, Vyvyan & Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2010. The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics 48, 1–48.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity (Studies in Language Companion Series, 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Östen Dahl, Viveka Velupillai. 2013. The past tense. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at http://wals.info/chapter/66, accessed on January 28, 2019.)Google Scholar
Donald, Leland. 1984. The slave trade on the Northwest Coast of North America. Research in Economic Anthropology 6, 121–158.Google Scholar
Drechsel, Emanuel J. 1996. Native American contact languages of the contiguous United States. In Wurm, et al. (eds.), 1213–1239.Google Scholar
Drechsel, Emanuel J. 1997. Mobilian Jargon: Linguistic and Sociohistorical Aspects of a Native American Pidgin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Tom. 1983. Birds of a feather: a pair of rare pidgins from the Gulf of Papua. In Woolford, Ellen & Washabaugh, William (eds.), The Social Context of Creolization, 77–105. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 1988. Language birth: the processes of pidginization and creolization. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. IV, 162–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1997. Pidgin Delaware. In Thomason, Sarah G. (ed.), Contact Languages: A Wider Perspective, 43–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred (ed.). 2001. A Dictionary of European Anglicisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Currie, Thomas E. & Gray, Russell D.. 2009. Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276, 2299–2307.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Wilson, Robert. 1971. Convergence and creolization: a case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 1987. Cultural efflorescence and political evolution on the Sepik River. American Ethnologist 14, 491–507.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966a/1972. Semicommunication: the language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36, 280–297. Reprinted in Dil, Anwar S., The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, 215–236. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966b/1972. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68, 922–935. Reprinted in Dil, Anwar S., The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, 237–254. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1970. Status and Use of African Lingua Francas. München/New York: Weltforum Verlag/Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John. 1989. Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. II: Reference Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John. 2004. Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010. Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1980. Commentary. In Valdman, A. & Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies, 389–423. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allen W. & Earle, Timothy. 2000. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State, 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. 1993. Growing up monolingual in a multilingual community: how language socialization patterns are leading to language shift in Gapun (Papua New Guinea). In Hyltenstam, Kenneth & Viberg, Åke (ed.), Progression and Regression in Language, 94–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Peter C. 1979/1980. Dual lingualism: passive bilingualism in action. Te Reo 22/23, 65–72.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1), e8559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, Paul. 2017. Political anthropology: a cross-cultural comparison. In Brown, Nina, de González, Luara Tubelle & McIlwraith, Thomas (eds.), Perspectives: An Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology. Portland, OR: Lumen Learning. Available at www.perspectives.americananthro.org/Chapters/Political_Anthropology.pdf, accessed August 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2005. Créole, écologie sociale, évolution linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, Dutton, Tom, Hovdhaugen, Even, Williams, Jerry & Wurm, Stephen A.. 1996. Precolonial patterns of intercultural communication in the Pacific Islands. In Wurm, et al. (eds.), 401–437.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Breivik, Leiv Egil & Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of Its Causes, 173–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Oram, Nigel. 1982. Pots for sago: the hiri trading network. In Dutton, Tom (ed.), The Hiri in History: Further Aspects of Long Distance Motu Trade in Central Papua, 3–33. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: cases from Papua New Guinea. In Durie, Mark & Ross, Malcolm D. (ed.), The Comparative Method Reviewed: Irregularity and Regularity in Language Change, 180–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1982. Colonization and pidginization on the Ubangi River. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 4, 1–42.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1986. Chinook Jargon and pidgin historiography. Canadian Journal of Anthropology/Revue canadienne d’anthropologie 5, 23–34.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1987. Demythologizing Plains Sign Language history. International Journal of American Linguistics 53, 65–73.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1988. Jargonization before Chinook Jargon. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 22, 219–238.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1990/1991. The origins of Kituba and Lingala. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 12, 47–77.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1996. Dynamics of linguistic contact. In Goddard, Ives (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. XVII: Language, 117–136. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Taylor, Allan R. 1975. Nonverbal communications systems in native North America. Semiotica 4, 329–374.Google Scholar
Taylor, Allan R. 1981. Indian lingua francas. In Ferguson, Charles A. & Heath, Shirley Brice (eds.), Language in the USA, 175–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ten Thije, Jan D. & Zeevaert, Ludger (eds.). 2007. Receptive Multilingualism: Linguistic Analyses, Language Policies and Didactic Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1987. Processes of Change in the Languages of North-Eestern New Britain (Pacific Linguistics, Series B, No. 99). Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: esoterogeny in West New Britain. In Harlow, R. & Hooper, R. (ed.), VICAL 1, Oceania Languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Tria, Francesca, Sevedio, Vito D. P., Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Loreto, Vittorio. 2015. Modeling the emergence of contact languages. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120771.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean. 1994. International English, 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stephen, Mühlhäusler, Peter & Tryon, Darrell T. (eds.). 1996. Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
References
Adrián, José Antonio, Alegria, Jesus & Morais, José. 1995. Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology 30, 329–353.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol & Sandler, Wendy. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9, 131–150.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik. 2012. Three languages from America in contact with Spanish. In Sackel, Jeanette & Stolz, Thomas (eds.), Amerindiana: Neue Perspektiven auf die indigenen Sprachen Amerikas, 171–195. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik & Hekking, Ewald. 2012. Clause combining in Otomi before and after contact with Spanish. Linguistic Discovery 10(1), 42–61.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2007. Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In Hoff, Erika & Shatz, Marilyn (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development, 347–367. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In Olson, David R. & Torrance, Nancy (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Hared, Mohamed. 1991. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12, 260–282.Google Scholar
Biemiller, Andrew. 2003. Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology 24, 323–335.Google Scholar
Bürki, Audrey, Spinelli, Elsa & Gaskell, Gareth. 2012. A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production. Journal of Memory and Language 67, 449–467.Google Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Noble, Claire. 2013. A comparison of book text and Child Directed Speech. First Language 33, 268–279.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, Petersson, Karl Magnus, Reis, Alexandra, Stone-Elander, Sharon & Ingvar, Martin. 1998. The illiterate brain: Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 121(6), 1053–1063.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2014. Is there really a syntactic category of subordination? In Kalliokoski, Jyrki, Visapää, Laura & Sorva, Helena (eds.), Contexts of Subordination, 73–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Anne E. & Stanovich, Keith E.. 1997. Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology 33(6), 934.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Anne E., and Stanovich, Keith E.. 1998. What reading does for the mind. American Educator 22, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2009. Words as constructions. In Evans, Vyvyan & Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 201–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178, 222–235.Google Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth & Merikle, Philip M.. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 422–433.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Pegado, Felipe, Braga, Lucia W., Ventura, Paulo, Filho, Gilberto Nunes, Jobert, Antoinette, Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Kolinsky, Régine, Morais, José & Cohen, Laurent. 2010. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330(6009), 1359–1364.Google Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Dehaene, Stanislas & Hertz-Pannier, Lucie. 2002. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science 298(5600), 2013–2015.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim. 2003. Standard languages: Taxonomies and histories. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2000. Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2010. Through the Language Glass. Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2016. Are Some Languages Better than Others? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. 1985. Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy & Hildyard, Angela (eds.), Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, 333–367. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46, 621–646.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 2, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Joshua K., Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Pinker, Steven. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Donald P. & Ahrens, Margaret G.. 1988. Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of “motherese”? Journal of Child Language 15, 395–410.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy & Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick. 1999. The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, Erika. 2009. Language development at an early age: Learning mechanisms and outcomes from birth to five years. Encyclopedia of Early Childhood Development. www.child-encyclopedia.com/sites/default/files/textes-experts/en/622/language-development-at-an-early-age-learning-mechanisms-and-outcomes-from-birth-to-five-years.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2013.Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk, Singh, Niharika & Mishra, Ramesh K.. 2011. Language-mediated visual orienting behavior in low and high literates. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2, 285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00285.Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk. 2015. Literacy influences cognitive abilities far beyond the mastery of written language. In van de Craats, Ineke, Kurvers, Jeanne & van Hout, Roeland (eds.), Adult Literacy, Second Language, and Cognition. LESLLA Proceedings 2014, 115–128. Nijmegen: Centre for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Hunt, Kellog W. 1977. Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In Cooper, Charles L. & Lee, Odell (eds.), Evaluating Writing, 91–104. Buffalo, NY: State University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 2012. The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution II, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakimik, Jola, Cole, Roland A. & Rudnicky, Alexander I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 165–178.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Ivan. 1985. Are there really no primitive languages? In Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy & Hildyard, Angela (eds.), Literacy, Language and Learning, 148–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Dafna & Berman, Ruth. 2015. Developing linguistic flexibility across the school years. First Language 35, 27–53.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2007. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43, 365–392.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2009. Origin and maintenance of clausal embedding complexity. In Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, 192–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kurvers, Jeanne, Vallen, Ton & van Hout, Roeland. 2006. Discovering features of language: Metalinguistic awareness of adult illiterates. In van de Craats, Ineke, Kurvers, Jeanne & Young-Scholten, Martha (eds.), Low-Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition: Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium Tilburg 2005, 69–68. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick A.. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1), e8559.Google Scholar
Martowicz, Anna. 2011. Origin and Functioning of Circumstantial Clause Linkers: A Crosslinguistic Study. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2004. Talking academic: A corpus approach to academic speech. In Aijmer, Karin (ed.), Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue, 201–217. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol & Aronoff, Mark. 2010. Emerging sign languages. In Marschark, Marc & Spencer, Patricia Elizabeth (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, vol. 2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh K., Singh, Niharika, Pandey, Aparna & Huettig, Falk. 2012. Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye-movements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research 5(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marienne. 1984. How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10, 493–509.Google Scholar
Montag, Jessica L. & MacDonald, Maryellen C.. 2015. Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 447–468.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-Examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Morais, José, Alegria, Jesus & Content, Alain. 1986. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 24, 45–64.Google Scholar
Morais, José, Cary, Luz, Alegria, Jesus & Bertelson, Paul. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition 7, 415–438.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David & Rodrigues, Cilene. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85, 355–404.Google Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A. 1998. Later Language Development: The School-Age and Adolescent Years. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A., Mansfield, Tracy C. & Billow, Jesse L.. 2007. Peer conflict explanations in children, adolescents, and adults: Examining the development of complex syntax. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 16, 179–188.Google Scholar
Pakulak, Eric & Neville, Helen. 2010. Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(12), 2728–2744.Google Scholar
Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Morais, José, Ventura, Paulo & Kolinsky, Régine. 2007. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 700–726.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki. 2006. Vähemmistökielestä varioivaksi valtakieleksi. In Juusela, Kaisu & Nisula, Katariina (eds.), Helsinki Kieliyhteisönä, 13–99. Helsinki: Suomen kielen Ja kotimaisen kirjallisuuden laitos.Google Scholar
Perre, Laetitia, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Montant, Marie & Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2009. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research 1275, 73–80.Google Scholar
Petersson, Karl Magnus, Silva, Carla, Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, Ingvar, Martin & Reis, Alexandra. 2007. Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left–right differences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 26, 791–799.Google Scholar
Philp, Jenefer. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1), 99–126.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1995. Language acquisition. In Gleitman, Lila R. & Liberman, Mark (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 1: Language. 2nd ed., 135–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Read, Charles A., Zhang, Yun-Fei, Nie, Hong-Yin & Ding, Bao-Qing. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24, 31–44.Google Scholar
Reis, Alexandra & Castro-Caldas, Alexandre. 1997. Illiteracy: A cause for biased cognitive development. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3(5), 444–450.Google Scholar
Scott, Cheryl M. 1988. Spoken and written syntax. In Nippold, Marilyn A. (ed.), Later Language Development: Ages 9 through 19, 49–95. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S. & Tanenhaus, Michael K.. 1979. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5(6), 546–554.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca: A Complete Introduction to the Theoretical Nature and Practical Implications of English Used as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. & Cunningham, Anne E.. 1992. Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition 20, 51–68.Google Scholar
Street, James & Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120, 2080–2094.Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine, Bigelow, Martha & Hansen, Kit. 2007. The impact of alphabetic print literacy level on oral second language acquisition. In Faux, Nancy (ed.), Low-Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition: Proceedings of the Second Annual Forum, The Literacy Institute at Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006, 99–122. Richmond, Virginia: The Literacy Institute.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2015. Societies of intimates and linguistic complexity. In De Busser, Rik & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), Language Structure and Environment: Social, Cultural, and Natural Factors, 133–147. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & Grace, George W.. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117, 543–578.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C., Petrova, Ana & Fernand, Ludovic. 2008. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 34, 643–661.Google Scholar
References
Aijmer, Karin, Altenberg, Bengt & Johansson, Stig (eds.) 1996. Languages in Contrast. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Granger, Sylviane. 2002. The grammatical and lexical patterning of make in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2), 173–189.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona. 1993. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. In Baker, Mona, Francis, Gill & Tognini-Bonelli, Elena (eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, 233–250. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Becher, Victor. 2010. Abandoning the notion of ‘translation-inherent’ explicitation. Against a dogma of translation studies. Across Languages and Cultures 11(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Bestgen, Yves, Granger, Sylviane & Thewissen, Jennifer. 2012. Error patterns and automatic L1 identification. In Jarvis, Scott & Crossley, Scott A. (eds.), Approaching Language Transfer through Text Classification, 127–153. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University Language. A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In Olson, David R. & Torrance, Nancy (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1(19), 2–20.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Edward, Finegan E. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Rampton, Ben. 2011. Language and superdiversity: a position paper. Available at www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/Research-Centres/ldc/publications/workingpapers/abstracts/WP070-Language-and-superdiversity-a-position-paper-.aspx.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1986. Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation. In House, Juliane & Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (eds.), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies, 17–35. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 2013. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carey, Ray. 2013. On the other side: Formulaic organizing chunks in spoken and written academic ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2(2), 207–228.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 2004. Beyond the particular. In Mauranen, & Kujamäki, (eds.), 33–49.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 1991. The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research 7(2), 103–117.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 2003. Introduction: The changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind. In Cook, Vivian (ed.), Effects of the Second Language on the First, 1–18. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian (ed.). 2003b. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian & Bassetti, Benedetta. 2011. Relating language and cognition: The second language user. In Cook, Vivian & Bassetti, Benedetta (eds.), Language and Bilingual Cognition, 143–190. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Scott A., Salsbury, Tom & McNamara, Danielle S.. 2015. Assessing lexical proficiency using analytical ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics 36(5), 570–590.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2004. Language, Mind and Brain. Some Psychological and Neurological Constraints on Theories of Grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Djikstra, Ton & Van Heuven, Walter J. B.. 2002. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: from identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(3), 51–66.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick. 2007. Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED AILA Review 19(1), 100–121.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick. 2017. Chunking in language usage, learning and change: I don’t know. In Hundt, Marianne, Sandra Mollin & Simone Pfenninger (eds.), The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eskola, Sari. 2002. Syntetisoivat rakenteet käännössuomessa. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Eskola, Sari. 2004. Untypical frequencies in translated language. In Mauranen, Anna & Pekka Kujamäki (eds.) 2004. Translation universals – Do they exist? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–99.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Adriano & Bernardini, Silvia. 2019. Lexical simplification in English and Italian Eurolects: (con/di)vergences. Presentation at the AIA conference, 5–7 September 2019, Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana (eds.) 2017. Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, Alan & Wagner, Johannes. 1997. On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal 81, 285–300.Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957. General linguistics and descriptive grammar. In Firth, John Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951, 216–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, Ofelia & Wei, Li. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gellerstam, Martin. 1996. Translation as a source for cross-linguistic studies. In Aijmer, , Altenberg, & Johansson, (eds.), 53–62.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 33, 27–42.Google Scholar
Gilner, Leah & Morales, Franc. 2011. The ICE-CORE word list: The lexical foundation of 7 varieties of English. Asian Englishes 14(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2008. Combining contrastive and interlanguage analysis to apprehend transfer: Detection, explanation, evaluation. In Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Papp, Szilivia & Diez-Bedmar, Maria Belén (eds.), Linking Up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, 3–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Granger, Sylviane. 2011. From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes, 55–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Hung, Joseph & Petch-Tyson, Stephanie (eds.). 2002. Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Meunier, Fanny (eds.). 2008. Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grosjean, François. 2008. Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hari, Riitta, Sams, Mikko & Nummenmaa, Lauri. 2016. Attending to and neglecting people: bridging neuroscience, psychology and sociology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 20150365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0365.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde & Johansson, Stig. 2011. Learner corpora and contrastive interlanguage analysis. In Meunier, Fanny, De Cock, Sylviane, Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali (eds.), A Taste for Corpora. A Tribute to Professor Sylviane Granger, 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Filipović, Luna. 2012. Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming. A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2011. Translation and bilingual cognition. In Cook, Vivian & Bassetti, Benedetta (eds.), Language and Bilingual Cognition, 519–527. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Mollin, Sandra & Pfenninger, Simone (eds.) 2017. The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hynninen, Niina. 2016. Language Regulation in English as a Lingua Franca. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Pavlenko, Aneta. 2007. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a lingua franca. Englishes in Practice 2(3), 49–85.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Käännössuomen korpus (Corpus of Translated Finnish). Käännössuomen sähköinen tutkimusaineisto. Käännössuomi ja kääntämisen universaalit –hankkeessa koostanut Joensuun yliopiston kansainvälisen viestinnän laitos 1997–. Availability: Anna Mauranen, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kujamäki, Pekka. 2000. Seitsemän veljen saksannokset ja romaanin saksankielinen vastaanotto – kaksi eri maailmaako? In Paloposki, Outi & Makkonen-Craig, Henna (eds.), Käännöskirjallisuus ja sen kritiikki, 199–227. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
Kujamäki, Pekka. 2004. What happens to ‘unique items’ in learners’ translations? ‘Theories’ and ‘concepts’ as a challenge for novices’ views on ‘good translation’. In Mauranen, & Kujamäki, (eds.), 187–204.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2016. Ongoing changes in English modals: On the developments in ELF. In Timofeeva, Olga, Gardner, Anne-Christine, Honkapohja, Alpo & Chevalier, Sarah (eds.), New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building Bridges, 175–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2018. Placing ELF among the varieties of English. In Deshors, Sandra C. (ed.), Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties, 109–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lanstyák, Istvan & Heltai, Pal. 2012. Universals in language contact and translation. Across Languages and Cultures 13(1), 99–121. doi.org/10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.6.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2018. Complexity and ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will and Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 51–60. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laviosa-Braithwaite, Sara. 1996. The English Comparable Corpus (ECC): A Resource and a Methodology for the Empirical Study of Translation, unpublished PhD thesis. Manchester: University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
LePage, Robert B. & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 2018. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Low, Ee-Ling. 2016. A features-based description of phonological patterns in English as a lingua franca in Asia: Implications for standards and norms. JELF 5(2), 309–332.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2005. A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, Judith & De Groot, Annette M.B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, 49–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1998. Käännössuomi ja kääntämisen universaalit: tutkimus korpusaineistolla. [Translated Finnish and Translation Universals: A Corpus Study], project research plan, MS, Savonlinna School of Translation Studies.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1999. Will ‘Translationese’ ruin a contrastive study? Languages in Contrast 2(2), 161–185.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2000. Strange strings translated language: A study on corpora. In Olohan, Maeve (ed.), Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies 1: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, 119–141. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2004a. Corpora, universals, and interference. In Mauranen, & Kujamäki, (eds.), 65–82.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2004b. Talking academic: A corpus approach to academic speech. In Aijmer, Karin (ed.), Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue, 201–217. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Signalling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 177, 123–150.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2007. Hybrid voices: English as the lingua franca of academics. In Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd (eds.), Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse, 244–259. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2013. Lingua franca discourse in academic contexts: shaped by complexity. In Flowerdew, John (ed.), Discourse in Context, 225–246. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2018. Second language acquisition, World Englishes, and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF). World Englishes 37, 106–119.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2019. Academically speaking. English as the lingua franca. In Hyland, Ken & Wong, Lillian L. C. (eds.), Specialised English: New Directions in ESP and EAP Research and Practice, 9–21. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Jantunen, Jarmo (eds.). 2005. Käännössuomeksi. Tutkimuksia suomennosten kielestä. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Kujamäki, Pekka (eds.). 2004. Translation Universals – Do They Exist?. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Tiittula, Liisa. 2005. MINÄ käännössuomessa ja supisuomessa. In Mauranen, & Jantunen, (eds.), 35–70.Google Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea, Paulasto, Heli & Rautionaho, Paula. 2017. Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In Filppula, et al. (eds.), 191–221.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh. 2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, Jim & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384.Google Scholar
Nattinger, James R. & DeCarrico, Jeannette S.. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Sampo. 2005. Köyhtyykö kieli käännettäessä? Mitä taajuuslistat kertovat suomennosten sanastosta. In Mauranen, & Jantunen, (eds.), 139-162.Google Scholar
Nitschke, Sanjo, Kidd, Evan & Serratrice, Ludovica. 2010. First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(1), 94–114.Google Scholar
Odlin, Terence. 2003. Cross-linguistic influence. In Doughty, Catherine J. & Long, Michael H. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 436–486. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve & Baker, Mona. 2000. Reporting THAT in translated English. Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation? Across Languages and Cultures 1(2), 141–158.Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Øverås, Linn. 1998. In search of the third code: An investigation of norms in literary translation. Meta 43, 571–588.Google Scholar
Paradis, Michel. 2004. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances H.. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, Jack C. & Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and Communication, 191–225. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2004. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 27(2), 169–225.Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2017. Priming and language change. In Hundt, et al. (eds.), 173–190.Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2010. English as a Lingua Franca in International Business: Resolving Miscommunication and Reaching Shared Understanding. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
Ranta, Elina. 2006. The ‘attractive’ progressive – why use the -ing form in English as a Lingua Franca? Nordic Journal of English Studies 5(2), 95–116.Google Scholar
Ranta, Elina. 2013. Universals in a Universal Language? Exploring Verb-Syntactic Features in English as a Lingua Franca, PhD thesis. University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette & Sinclair, John McH.. 1991. Collocational frameworks in English. In Aijmer, Karin & Altenberg, Bengt (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 128–143. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Håkan. 1992. On L1 transfer in L2 comprehension and production. Language Learning 42, 85–112.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language (50), 696–735.Google Scholar
Sajavaara, Kari. 1996. New challenges for contrastive linguistics. In Aijmer, , Altenberg, & Johansson, (eds.), 7–36.Google Scholar
Schmid, Monika. 2019. When is a bilingual an attriter? – Bilingualism as a two-way street. Presentation at the 5th International Conference of Applied Linguistics in Lithuania, 26–28 September 2019, Vilnius University, Lithuania.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997. Chaos theory as a model for dialect variability and change? In Thomas, Alan R. (ed.), Issues and Methods in Dialectology, 22–36. Bangor: Department of Linguistics, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Daniel, Schreier & Hundt, Marianne (eds.). 2013. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2004. Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 209–239.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalan, Carmen. 1998. On borrowing as a mechanism of syntactic change. In Schwegler, Armin, Tranel, Bernard & Etcxebarria, Myriam Uribe- (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives, 225–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, Michael & Truscott, John. 2014. The Multilingual Mind: A Modular Processing Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9(1), 75–106. Reprinted in Sinclair, John McH. 2004. Trust the Text, 24–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suviniitty, Jaana. 2012. Lectures in English as a Lingua Franca: Interactional Features, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. HELDA E-thesis. [Online]. Available from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-8540-6.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. & Burke, Amy. 2003. ‘It’s really fascinating work’: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In Meyer, Charles & Leistyna, Pepi (eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Use, 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang. 1996. Comparable or parallel corpora? International Journal of Lexicography 9(3), 238–264.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Thomas. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. 2004. Unique items – over-or under-represented in translated language?. In Mauranen, & Kujamäki, (eds.), 207–220.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. 2005. Häviävätkö uniikkiainekset käännössuomesta?. In Mauranen, & Jantunen, (eds.), 123–137.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1997. Translating hybrid political texts. In Trosborg, Anna (ed.), Analysing Professional Genres, 145–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Assche, Ewa, Wouter, Duyck & Hartsuiker, Robert. J.. 2012: Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00174.Google Scholar
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. On the relationship between the cognitive and the communal: a complex systems perspective. In Filppula, et al. (eds.), 277–310.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle. Reprinted: 1963. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ELFA. 2008. The Corpus of English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. Director: Anna Mauranen. www.helsinki.fi/elfa/elfacorpus (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
FECC. Finnish-English Contrastive Corpus. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J. & Swales, J. M. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/ (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version POS XML 2.0). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer. www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/download_voice_xml (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with Digital Computers (Brown). 1964, 1971, 1979. Compiled by Francis, W. N. and Kučera, H.. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University.Google Scholar
ELFA. 2008. The Corpus of English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. Director: Anna Mauranen. www.helsinki.fi/elfa/elfacorpus (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
FECC. Finnish-English Contrastive Corpus. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J. & Swales, J. M. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/ (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version POS XML 2.0). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer. www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/download_voice_xml (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with Digital Computers (Brown). 1964, 1971, 1979. Compiled by Francis, W. N. and Kučera, H.. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University.Google Scholar
Corpora
ELFA. 2008. The Corpus of English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. Director: Anna Mauranen. www.helsinki.fi/elfa/elfacorpus (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
FECC. Finnish-English Contrastive Corpus. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J. & Swales, J. M. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/ (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version POS XML 2.0). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer. www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/download_voice_xml (25 February 2013).Google Scholar
A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with Digital Computers (Brown). 1964, 1971, 1979. Compiled by Francis, W. N. and Kučera, H.. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University.Google Scholar
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2016. Language between Description and Prescription: Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 1989. Variation in subject–verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. 1997. Early Modern English. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Britton, Derek. 2000. Henry Machyn, Axel Wijk and the case of the wrong Riding: The south-west Yorkshire character of the language of Henry Machyn’s diary. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 101(4), 571–596.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen P., Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick & Maguire, Warren. 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17(1), 85–128.Google Scholar
Bullokar, William. 1586. William Bullokarz Pamphlet for Grammar. London: Edmund Bollifant.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon. 2004. Gil [Gill], Alexander, the elder. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/10729.Google Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2019. Subject and adjacency effects in the Old Northumbrian gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. English Language and Linguistics 23(1), 131–154. doi: 10.1017/S1360674317000338.Google Scholar
Danielsson, Bror. 1955, 1963. John Hart’s Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation (1551, 1569, 1570), Part 1, Biographical and Bibliographical Introductions – Texts and Index Verborum; Part 2, Phonology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Danielsson, Bror & Gabrielson, Arvid (eds.). 1972. Alexander Gill’s Logonomia Anglica (1619). 2 vols. (Stockholm Studies in English 26, 27). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Dobson, Eric J. 1957. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1996. Variation and drift: Loss of agreement in Germanic. In Huebner, T. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives: Papers on Language in Society, 1959–1994, 241–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Adam. 2003. Oral and Literate Culture in England, 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, John. 1551. The Opening of the Unreasonable Writing of Our Inglish Toung, ed. by Danielsson, Bror (1963). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hart, John. 1570. Methode or Comfortable Beginning for All Vnlearned. London: Henrie Denham.Google Scholar
Hodges, Richard. 1643. A Special Help to Orthographie: Or, The True-vvriting of English. London: Richard Cotes.Google Scholar
Hodges, Richard E. 2004. Hodges, Richard. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/65660.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Erik. 1922. On the History of the English Present Inflections, Particularly ‑th and ‑s. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. 2000. Rats, bats, sparrows and dogs: biology, linguistics and the nature of Standard English. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, 46–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hynninen, Niina & Solin, Anna. 2017. Language norms in ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 267–278. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2017. The future of English as a lingua franca? In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 594–605. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin. 2011. Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching 44(3), 281–315. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000115.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, 329–346. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://ewave-atlas.org (Accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1993. Third-person present singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5, 113–139.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4), 715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1977. On the use of the present to explain the past. In Makkai, Adam, Makkai, Valerie Becker & Heilmann, Luigi (eds.), Linguistics at the Crossroads, 226–261. Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Leithead, Howard. 2009. Cromwell, Thomas, Earl of Essex. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/6769.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2017. Conceptualising ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 7–24. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael. 1986. A Linguistic Stlas of Late Mediaeval English. Vol. I. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. 3rd ed., repr. 2012. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Ian. 2008. Machyn [Machin], Henry. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/17531.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1996. Gender difference. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 77–91. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2003. English. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18), 127–156. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2014. Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In Rutten, Gijsbert, Vosters, Rik & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective, 103–128. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. What are historical sociolinguistics? Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2), 243–269. doi: 10.1515/jhsl-2015-0014.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2018. Going to completion: The diffusion of verbal -s. In Nevalainen, Terttu, Palander-Collin, Minna & Säily, Tanja (eds.), Patterns of Change in 18th-Century English: A Sociolinguistic Approach (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2000a. The changing role of London on the linguistic map of Tudor and Stuart England. In Kastovsky, Dieter & Mettinger, Arthur (eds.), The History of English in a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics, 279–337. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2000b. The third-person singular -(e)s and -(e)th revisited: The morphophonemic hypothesis. In Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Ritt, Nikolaus (eds.), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (Trends in Linguistics 130), 235–248. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2017. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Chapters in the social history of East Anglian English: The case of the third-person singular. In Fisiak, Jacek & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), East Anglian English, 187–204. Cambridge: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. Variable Grammars: Verbal Agreement in Northern Dialects of English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Power, M. J. 1985. John Stow and his London. Journal of Historical Geography 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. 1589. The arte of English poesie contriued into three bookes: The first of poets and poesie, the second of proportion, the third of ornament. London: Printed by Richard Field. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service 2011 April (TCP phase 2).Google Scholar
Rappaport, Steve. 1989. Worlds within Worlds: Structures of Life in Sixteenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Apparent time. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 93–109. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 2004a. Bullokar, William. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/3926.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 2004b. Hart, John. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/12482.Google Scholar
Schendl, Herbert. 1996. The 3rd plural present indicative in Early Modern English: Variation and linguistic contact. In Britton, Derek (ed.), English Historical Linguistics, 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 143–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schendl, Herbert. 2000. The third person present plural in Shakespeare’s First Folio: A case of interaction of morphology and syntax? In Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Ritt, Nikolaus (eds.), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (Trends in Linguistics 130), 263–276. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Stiglbauer, Margit. 2013. Whose language is it anyway?. Scilog: Culture and Society 4(13). https://scilog.fwf.ac.at/en/humanities-and-social-sciences/728/whose-language-is-it-anyway (Accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2017. Standard English and the dynamics of ELF variation. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), 85–100. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3), 193–229.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. James (ed.). 2018. Founding Families: Digital Editions of the Papers of the Winthrops and the Adamses. Vol. 10. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society. www.masshist.org/publications/adams-papers/index.php/volume/ADMS-06-10 (Accessed 21 January 2019).Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2009. Vernacular universals and the sociolinguistic typology of English dialects. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Paulasto, Heli (ed.), Vernacular Universals and Language Contact, 304–322. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, Terry. 2017. ‘he saith yt he thinkes yt’: Linguistic factors influencing third person singular present tense verb inflection in Early Modern English depositions. Studia Neophilologica 89(1), 133–146. doi: 10.1080/00393274.2016.1190298.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 2017. Historical perspectives on ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 101–112. Abingdon, UK & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary. 6 vols. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2002. Third-person plural present tense markers in London prisoners’ depositions, 1562–1623. American Speech 77(3), 242–263.Google Scholar
References
ACE. 2014. The Asian Corpus of English. Director: Andy Kirkpatrick; researchers: Wang Lixun, John Patkin, Sophiann Subhan. http://corpus.ied.edu.hk/ace/.Google Scholar
Airey, John, Lauridsen, Karen M., Räsänen, Anne, Salö, Linus & Schwach, Vera. 2017. The expansion of English-medium instruction in the Nordic countries: Can top-down university language policies encourage bottom-up disciplinary literacy goals? Higher Education 73(4), 561–576.Google Scholar
Altbach, Philip G., Reisberg, Liz & Rumbley, Laura E.. 2009. Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001831/183168e.pdf (June 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, 3–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bull, Tove. 2004. Dagens og gårsdagens akademiske lingua franca. Eit historisk tilbakeblikk og eit globalt utsyn. In Simonsen, Dag F. (ed.), Språk i kunnskapssamfunnet. Engelsk – elitenes nye latin?, 35–45. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin. 2012. Analysing English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Driven Investigation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley. 1987. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of Mods and Rockers. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Stylization, authenticity and TV news review. Discourse Studies 3(4), 413–442.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2009. Dialects, standards and social change. In Maegaard, Marie, Gregersen, Frans, Quist, Pia & Normann Jørgensen, Jens (eds.), Language Attitudes, Standardization, and Language Change, 27–49. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2010a. Language, ideology, media and social change. In Junod, Karen & Maillât, Didier (eds.), Performing the Self (SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 24), 127–152. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2010b. Introduction: Sociolinguistics in the global era. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization, 1–27. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization and broadcast British media. In Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, 67–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 2009. Danish under pressure: Use it or lose it. In Harder, Peter (ed.), English in Denmark: Language Policy, Internationalization and University Teaching (Angles on the English-Speaking World 9), 138–140. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 2017. Ti minutter over tolv. Kristeligt Dagblad, sec. Kultur.Google Scholar
De Wit, Hans. 2011. Globalization and internationalisation of higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal 8(2), 77–164 (Spanish), 241–325 (English).Google Scholar
De Wit, Hans & Hunter, Fiona. 2015. Understanding internationalisation of higher education in the European context. In De Wit, Hans, Hunter, Fiona, Howard, Laura & Egron-Polak, Eva (eds.), Internationalisation of Higher Education, 41–58. Brussels: European Parliament. https://op.europa.eu/s/n60d.Google Scholar
De Wit, Hans & Hunter, Fiona. 2016. Trends, issues and challenges in internationalisation of higher education: Where have we come from and where are we going? In McGrath, Simon and Gu, Qing (eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Education and Development, 340–358. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewey, Martin. 2012. Towards a post-normative approach: learning the pedagogy of ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(1), 141–170.Google Scholar
ELFA. 2008. The Corpus of English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. Director: Anna Mauranen. www.helsinki.fi/elfa/elfacorpus.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H., Mortensen, Janus & Haberland, Hartmut. 2017. The lure of internationalization: paradoxical discourses of transnational student mobility, linguistic diversity and cross-cultural exchange. Higher Education 73(4), 577–595.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society 4(2), 133–168.Google Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph & Torras, Maria-Carme. 2001. Language versus medium in the study of bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism 5(2), 195–219.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 2005. Domains and domain loss. In Preisler, Bent, Fabricius, Anne H., Haberland, Hartmut, Kjærbeck, Susanne & Risager, Karen (eds.), The Consequences of Mobility: Linguistic and Sociocultural Contact Zones, 227–237. Roskilde: Roskilde University, Department of Language and Culture.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 2009. English – The language of globalism? RASK. Internationalt tidskrift for sprog og kommunikation 30, 17–45.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut & Mortensen, Janus. 2012. Language variety, language hierarchy and language choice in the international university. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2012(216), 1–6.Google Scholar
Hazel, Spencer. 2016. Why native English speakers fail to be understood in English – and lose out in global business. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/why-native-english-speakers-fail-to-be-understood-in-english-and-lose-out-in-global-business-54436.Google Scholar
Holmen, Anne. 2017. Parallel language strategy. In Van Deusen-Scholl, Nelleke (ed.), Second and Foreign Language Education (Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd ed., Vol. 4), 301–311. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Hult, Francis M. & Källkvist, Marie. 2016. Global flows in local language planning: articulating parallel language use in Swedish university policies. Current Issues in Language Planning 17(1), 56–71.Google Scholar
Hultgren, Anna Kristina. 2013. Lexical borrowing from English into Danish in the Sciences: An empirical investigation of ‘domain loss.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics 23(2), 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1989. When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2), 248–267.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2014. English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2017. Mobility and English language policies and practices in higher education. In Canagarajah, Suresh (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language, 502–518. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2018. The future of English as a lingua franca?. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 594–605. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer & Mauranen, Anna. 2018. Linguistic diversity on the international campus. ResearchGate. www.researchgate.net/project/Linguistic-diversity-on-the-international-campus (May 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karakaş, Ali. 2015. Orientations towards English among English-medium instruction students. Englishes in Practice 2(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Knight, Jane. 2008. Higher Education in Turmoil: The Changing World of Internationalisation (Global Perspectives on Higher Education 13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol 1: Internal Factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol 2: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Page, R. B. & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lønsmann, Dorte, Hazel, Spencer & Haberland, Hartmut. 2017. Introduction to special issue on transience: Emerging norms of language use. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(3), 264–270.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2012. Exploring ELF. Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2016. ELF corpora: Design, difficulties and triumphs. In Pitzl, Marie-Luise & Osimk-Teasdale, Ruth (eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Perspectives and Prospects: Contributions in Honour of Barbara Seidlhofer, 19–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2018. Conceptualising ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 7–24. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Scott L. 2013. MOOCs and the language barrier: Is open education not so open after all?. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/moocs-and-the-language-barrier-is-open-education-not-so-open-after-all-17423 (June 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus. 2013. Notes on the use of English as a lingua franca as an object of study. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus. 2014. Language policy from below: Language choice in student project groups in a multilingual university setting. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 35(4), 425–442.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus. 2017. Transient multilingual communities as a field of investigation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(3), 271–288.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus. 2018. Language regulation in collaborative student writing: a case study. Language and Education 32(6), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Janus, Coupland, Nikolas & Thøgersen, Jacob. 2017. Introduction: Conceptualizing style, mediation, and change. In Mortensen, Janus, Coupland, Nikolas & Thøgersen, Jacob (eds.), Style, Mediation, and Change: Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Talking Media, 1–24. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus & Fabricius, Anne H.. 2014. Language ideologies in Danish higher education: Exploring student perspectives. In Kristina Hultgren, Anna, Gregersen, Frans & Thøgersen, Jacob (eds.), English in Nordic Universities: Ideologies and Practices, 193–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus & Haberland, Hartmut. 2012. English – The new Latin of academia? Danish universities as a case. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (216), 175–197.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Janus & Hazel, Spencer. 2017. Lending bureaucracy voice: Negotiating English in institutional encounters. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana (eds.), Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives, 255–275. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. 2006. Deklaration om nordisk språkpolitik [Declaration on Nordic Language Policy]. DIVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-607 (June 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Popular cultures, popular languages, and global identities. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization, 592–607. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Piippo, Irina. 2012. Viewing norms dialogically: An action-oriented approach to sociolinguistic metatheory. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2018a. Creativity, idioms and metaphorical language in ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 233–243. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2018b. Transient international groups (TIGs): exploring the group and development dimension of ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 7(1), 25–58.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent. 2005. Deconstructing ‘the domain of science’ as a sociolinguistic entity in EFL societies: The relationship between English and Danish in higher education and research. In Preisler, Bent, Fabricius, Anne H., Kjærbeck, Susanne & Risager, Karen (eds.), The Consequences of Mobility: Linguistic and Sociocultural Contact Zones, 238–248: Roskilde: Roskilde University, Department of Language and Culture.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent. 2009. Complementary Languages: The national language and English as working languages in European universities. In Harder, Peter (ed.), English in Denmark: Language Policy, Internationalization and University Teaching (Angles on the English-Speaking World 9), 10–28. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent. 2014. Lecturing in one’s first language or in English as a lingua franca: The communication of authenticity. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(2), 218–242.Google Scholar
Ranta, Elina. 2018. Grammar in ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 244–254. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salö, Linus. 2015. The linguistic sense of placement: Habitus and the entextualization of translingual practices in Swedish academia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(4), 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salö, Linus. 2016. Languages and Linguistic Exchanges in Swedish Academia: Practices, Processes, and Globalising Markets. PhD dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Centre for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Salö, Linus. 2017. The Sociolinguistics of Academic Publishing: Language and the Practices of Homo Academicus. Cham: Springer/Palgrave.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2004. Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 209–239.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonsen, Dag F. 2002. Å velge bort norsk: Om begrepene ‘domene’ og ‘domenetap’ anvendt på skandinaviske land. Norsklæreren 2, 5–17.Google Scholar
Söderlundh, Hedda. 2012. Global policies and local norms: Sociolinguistic awareness and language choice at an international university. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (216), 87–109.Google Scholar
Suviniitty, Jaana. 2012. Lectures in English as a Lingua Franca: Interactional Features (Aalto University Publication Series SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY 19). Aalto: Aalto University, School of Chemical Technology. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/7725 (February 23, 2019).Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation (Language in Society 40). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Per Bang. 2015. DF-ordfører: Ja, jeg er blevet banket på plads. News article published on dr.dk, the website of the Danish Broadcasting Corporation, June 4, 2015. www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/valg2015/df-ordfoerer-ja-jeg-er-blevet-banket-paa-plads (June 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 2001. Metaculture: How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
VOICE. 2009. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English. Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk-Teasdale, Marie-Luise Pitzl, Michael Radeka. www.univie.ac.at/voice.Google Scholar
Wang, Ying. 2013. Non-conformity to ENL norms: A perspective from Chinese English users. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2(2), 255–282.Google Scholar