Book contents
- Language in the Trump Era
- Language in the Trump Era
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transcription Conventions
- Note on Ethnonyms and Phenotypic Descriptors
- Introduction: The Trump Era as a Linguistic Emergency
- Part I Dividing the American Public
- Part II Performance and Falsehood
- Part III The Interactive Making of the Trumpian World
- 9 Part III Introduction: Collusion: On Playing Along with the President
- 10 Banter, Male Bonding, and the Language of Donald Trump
- 11 On Social Routines and That Access Hollywood Bus
- 12 “Cocked and Loaded”: Trump and the Gendered Discourse of National Security
- 13 Evaluator in Chief
- 14 Fake Alignments
- Part IV Language, White Nationalism, and International Responses to Trump
- Index
- References
13 - Evaluator in Chief
from Part III - The Interactive Making of the Trumpian World
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
- Language in the Trump Era
- Language in the Trump Era
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transcription Conventions
- Note on Ethnonyms and Phenotypic Descriptors
- Introduction: The Trump Era as a Linguistic Emergency
- Part I Dividing the American Public
- Part II Performance and Falsehood
- Part III The Interactive Making of the Trumpian World
- 9 Part III Introduction: Collusion: On Playing Along with the President
- 10 Banter, Male Bonding, and the Language of Donald Trump
- 11 On Social Routines and That Access Hollywood Bus
- 12 “Cocked and Loaded”: Trump and the Gendered Discourse of National Security
- 13 Evaluator in Chief
- 14 Fake Alignments
- Part IV Language, White Nationalism, and International Responses to Trump
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines what Trump might gain from perpetually evaluating others in his verbal interactions. The analysis presented here explores Trump’s evaluations of his guests at the 2017 Black History Month Listening Session. The political stakes of the event were high, as the President who had been repeatedly accused of racist and xenophobic remarks led a meeting of Black Americans in celebration of Black historical figures. Yet during the event, Trump repeatedly placed himself in the role of “evaluator” and positioned his guests as “evaluatees.” With each guest likely noticing that their own turn to be evaluated was soon at hand, each worked to provide Trump ample evidence of their fealty in exchange for his positive evaluation. Their demonstrations of commitment and loyalty to Trump garnered his praise only when the guests provided evidence that mets Trump’s implicit criteria, which he repeatedly modeled in his evaluation of others around the table. As a result, Trump and guests worked together on the fly to achieve his position as “Evaluator in Chief” and further solidify his public image as the “Boss.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language in the Trump EraScandals and Emergencies, pp. 191 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020