Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:41:25.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Teaching Words, Socializing Affect, and Social Identities

Negotiating a Common Ground in a Swedish as a Second Language Classroom

from Part II - Socializing Identities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2020

Matthew J. Burdelski
Affiliation:
Osaka University
Kathryn M. Howard
Affiliation:
California State University, Channel Islands
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines vocabulary explanations during Swedish as a second language (L2) lessons for beginner learners in a primary school classroom, attended by 10- to 12-year-old children with immigrant backgrounds. It shows how teachers elaborated word meanings through short narratives and descriptions that demonstrated uses of words to students as prospective users. It argues that vocabulary-related explanations were dynamic activities in which teachers mediated not only linguistic forms but also culturally appropriate meanings and values, ways of thinking and behaving in new communities of practice, and provided affordances for shaping the lifeworlds and identities of the second language learners. The students’ responses reveal that, rather than simply appropriating the teachers’ norms and values, they engaged in a process of actively negotiating, disagreeing, and even resisting the teachers’ narrative exemplifications. The findings show how vocabulary explanations are a locus for socializing children into appropriate language use and cultural membership in the target-language community, attesting to the negotiated and, at times, resistant process of becoming an L2 speaker.

Type
Chapter
Information
Language Socialization in Classrooms
Culture, Interaction, and Language Development
, pp. 112 - 131
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronsson, K. and Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse in Society, 22(2), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 91, 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, A. (2012). Affective stances in teacher–novice student interactions: language, embodiment, and willingness to learn. Language in Society, 41, 641670.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A. (2017). Emotional stances and interactional competence: learning to disagree in a second language. In Kasper, G. and Prior, M. (eds.) Talking Emotion in Multilingual Settings, (pp. 133154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A. and Aronsson, K. (2004). Repetition and joking in children’s second language conversations: playful recyclings in an immersion classroom. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 373392.Google Scholar
Churchill, E. (2008). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: from ecology to form relations. Applied Linguistics, 29, 339358.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stance in Discourse: Subjectivity in Interaction (pp. 13182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2011). Second language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 564586). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. (2010). Speaking correctly: error correction as a language socialization practice in a Ukrainian classroom. Applied Linguistics, 31, 346367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. and Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care and Creativity. Milton Park, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., and Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In Peräkylä, A. and Sorjonen, M-L. (eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 1641). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, O. (2010). The English you need to know: the language ideology in a citizenship classroom. Linguistics and Education, 22, 406418.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
He, A. (2011). Heritage language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Language Socialization. pp. 587609. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2016). Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. and Schieffelin, B. B. (2004). Language socialization. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic Anthropology: A Companion Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kusserow, A. (2004). American Individualisms: Child Rearing and Social Class in Three Neighborhoods. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher. Language Learning, 54, 79117.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Aspects to Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, E. (2014). “You are children but you can always say …”: hypothetical direct reported speech and child–parent relationships in a Heritage language classroom. Text and Talk, 34, 591621.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. and Kellogg, G. (2010). “I had a stereotype that American were fat”: becoming a speaker of culture in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 94, 5673.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1996). Resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 407437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (2002). Becoming a speaker of culture. In Kramsch, C. (ed.) Language Acquisition and Language Socialization (pp. 99120). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001). Living Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9, 725.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (2011). The theory of language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 122). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Persson Thunqvist, D. and Axelsson, B. (2012). “Now it’s not school, it’s for real!”: negotiated participation in media vocational training, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 2950.Google Scholar
Poole, D. (1992). Language socialization in the second language classroom. Language Learning, 42(2), 593616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymes, B. and Pash, D. (2001). Questioning identity: the case of one second-language learner. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32, 276300.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1970). On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Edited and with an introduction by Wagner, H. R.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, S. (2015). A language socialization perspective on identity work of ESL youth in a superdiverse high school classroom. In Markee, N. (ed.), The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction (pp. 353368). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watanabe, A. (2016). Engaging in an interactional routine in an EFL classroom. Novitas-Royal, 10, 4870.Google Scholar
Willet, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: an ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S. (1992). Participant examples and classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 4, 195217.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×