Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T19:50:14.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Sociological Jurisprudence – Impossible but Necessary

The Case of Contractual Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

By
Gunther Teubner
Edited by
Robert W. Gordon  and
Morton J. Horwitz
Gunther Teubner
Affiliation:
International University College, Torino; Goethe University
Robert W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Morton J. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE – AN OXYMORON

“Network is not a legal concept.” If Richard Buxbaum's apodictic judgment is true, then lawyers have little to say about networks. Should they wish to make appropriate judgments when business networks, franchising arrangements, just-in-time-systems, or virtual enterprises do cross their paths, then they must consult social scientists, such as economists, organizational theorists, and sociologists. For better or for worse, they must engage in law, in action, and in sociological jurisprudence.

Lawrence Friedman would agree with such a realistic approach. Already in his first major monograph on contract law, he explored the law in action rather than the law in the books. In his later works he demonstrated the responsiveness of the legal order to the manifold forces of economic, technological, and social change. From Friedman's perspective, the legal system functions largely as a dependent variable, with lawmakers responding to underlying developments in science, medicine, technology, economic organization, and shifting moral beliefs. In his recent book, American Law in the Twentieth Century, he states his case quite clearly: “The main theme of this book is that law is a product of society.”

Yet, “sociological jurisprudence” is a pipe dream. After a heated debate for almost a century, lawyers know that, logically speaking, it is an oxymoron – like a white raven. Practically speaking, it necessarily falters in the face of the normative closure of the legal system.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Society, and History
Themes in the Legal Sociology and Legal History of Lawrence M. Friedman
 , pp. 367 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abegg, Andreas (2009). Legislation and Self-Regulation of Hybrid Networks at the Intersection between Governmental Administration and Economic Self-Organization, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Amstutz, Marc (2009). The Constitution of Contractual Networks, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds. (2009). Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Bieber, Daniel (1992) Systemische Rationalisierung und Produktionsnetzwerke, in Thomas Malsch and Ulrich Mill, eds., ArBYTE: Modernisierung der Industriesoziologie?Berlin: 1992.Google Scholar
Böhner, Reinhard (2009). Profit Sharing within the Network: Duty to Transfer Network Benefits, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bräutigam, Peter (1994). Deliktische Außenhaftung im Franchising. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Brickley, James and Dark, Frederick (1987). The Choice of the Organizational Form: The Case of Franchising, 18 Journal of Financial Economics401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, George Spencer (1972). Laws of Form. New York: Julian.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, Richard (1993). Is “Network” a Legal Concept? 149 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics698.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio, (2008). Contractual Networks and the Small Business Act: Towards European Principles? 2008/15 EUI Working Paper LAW.
Cameron, Kim and Quinn, Robert (1988). Organizational Paradox and Transformation, in Cameron, Kim and Quinn, Robert, eds., Paradox and Transformation: Towards a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Casper, Steve (1995). How Public Law Influences Decentralized Supplier Network Organization: The Case of BMW and Audi, WZB-Discussion Paper FS I.
Casper, Steve. (2001). The Legal Framework for Corporate Governance: Explaining the Development of Contract Law in Germany and the United States, in Hall, Peter and Soskice, David, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, Hugh (1999). Regulating Contracts. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert (1994). Decentralized Law for a Complex Economy, 23 International Review of Law and Economics443.Google Scholar
Dnes, Antony (1991). The Economic Analysis of Franchising and its Regulation, in Joerges, Christian, ed., Franchising and the Law: Theoretical and Comparative Approaches in Europe and the United States. Baden Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, Kathleen and Westcott, Brian (1988). Paradoxical Demands and the Creation of Excellence: The Case of Just-in-Time Manufacturing, in Cameron, Kim and Quinn, Robert, eds., Paradox and Transformation: Towards a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert W. (1992). Franchisors' Liability When Franchisees Are Apparent Agents, 20 Hofstra Law Review609.Google Scholar
Esser, Josef and Schmidt, Mike (1995). Schuldrecht: Ein Lehrbuch. Allgemeiner Teil I 1. 8th ed., Heidelberg: Müller.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George (1985). Paradoxes in Legal Thought, 85 Columbia Law Review1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1965). Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. (1985). Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. (1990). The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority and Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. (1999a). The Horizontal Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. (1999b). Taking Law and Society Seriously, 74 Chicago-Kent Law Review529.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. (2002). American Law in the Twentieth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger and Alford, Robert (1992). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions, in DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, eds., The New Institutionalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1969). The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gernhuber, Joachim (1989). Das Schuldverhältnis: Begründung und Änderung, Pflichten und Strukturen, Drittwirkungen. Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert (1994). Hayek and Cooter on Custom and Reason, 23 Southwestern University Law Review453.Google Scholar
Stefan, Grundmann, ed. (2010). From Exchange to Cooperation: Networks and Long-Term Relationships in European Contract Law. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich and Pfeiffer, Ludwig, eds. (1991). Paradoxien, Dissonanzen, Zusammenbrüche: Situationen offener Epistemologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habersack, Matthias (2007) Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume 1: Rules and Order. London: Routledge & Paul.Google Scholar
Heermann, Peter (2009). The Status of Multilateral Synallagmas in the Law of Connected Contracts, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Heldt, Cordula (2009). Internal Relations and Semi-spontaneous Order: The Case of Franchising and Construction Contracts, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf (1999). The Network Metaphor as Key to the Analysis of Complex Production and Service Relation in a Global Economy. Stuttgart: Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut (2002). Unternehmensnetzwerke – revisited, 31 Zeitschrift für Soziologie106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarillo, Jose (1993). Strategic Networks: Creating the Borderless Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian (1991). Status and Contract in Franchising Law, in Joerges, Christian, ed., Franchising and the Law: Theoretical and Comparative Approaches in Europe and the United States. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
King, Joseph H. (2005). Limiting the Vicarious Liability of Franchisors for the Torts of Their Franchisees, 62 Washington and Lee Law Review417.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Christian (1996). Symbiotic Arrangements as a Challenge to Antitrust, 152 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics226.Google Scholar
Klein, Benjamin and Saft, Lester F. (1985). The Law and Economics of Franchise Tying Contracts, 28 Journal of Law and Economics345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus (1984). Paradox and Information, in Dervin, Brenda and Voigt, Melvin, eds., 5 Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kulms, Rainer (2000). Schuldrechtliche Organisationsverträge in der Unternehmenskooperation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Larenz, Karl and Wolf, Manfred (2004). Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. 9th ed. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark and McGowan, David (1998). Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects, 86 California Law Review479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littmann, Peter and Jansen, Stephan (2000). Oszillodox: Virtualisierung – die permanente Neuerfindung der Organisation. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1965). Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. (1990). Sthenography, 7 Stanford Literature Review133.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martinek, Michael (1987). Franchising: Grundlagen der zivil- und wettbewerbsrechtichen Behandlung der vertraglichen Gruppenkooperation beim Absatz von Waren und Dienstleistungen. Heidelberg: Decker & Schenck.Google Scholar
Möschel, Wernhard (1986). Dogmatische Strukturen des bargeldlosen Zahlungsverkehrs, 186 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis211.Google Scholar
Nagel, Bernhard, Riess, Birgit, and Theis, Gisela (1989). Der faktische Just-in-Time-Konzern: Unternehmensübergreifende Rationalisierungskonzepte und Konzernrecht am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie, 42 Der Betrieb1505.Google Scholar
Nagel, Bernhard, Riess, Birgit, and Theis, Gisela. (1990). Just-in-Time-Strategien: Arbeitsbeziehungen, Gestaltungspotentiale, Mitbestimmung. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Neuberger, Oswald (2000). Dilemmata und Paradoxa im Managementprozess in: Schreyögg, Georg, ed., Funktionswandel im Management: Wege jenseits der OrdnungBerlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Norton, Seth (1988). An Empirical Look at Franchising as an Organisational Form, 61 Journal of Business197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsruhe, OLG (1989). 2 Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 434.
Palandt, Otto, ed., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, München: Beck.
Pasderski, Edgar (1998). Die Außenhaftung des Franchisegebers. Aachen: Mainz.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, Hans-Martin (1999). Methodenlehre für Juristen: Theorie der Norm und des Gesetzes. Ein Lehrbuch. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Picker, Eduard (1987). Vertragliche und deliktische Schadenshaftung: Überlegungen zu einer Neustrukturierung der Haftungssysteme, 42 Juristenzeitung1041.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (1987). The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1982–1987, 100 Harvard Law Review761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization, 12 Research in Organizational Behavior295.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckhard (1969). Konzernaußenrecht und allgemeines Privatrecht: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung nach deutschem und amerikanischem Recht. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckhard. (1997). Neues zum Durchgriff unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der höchstrichterlichen Rechtsprechung, in Rehbinder, Eckhard and Assman, Heinz-Deter, eds., Wirtschafts- und Medienrecht in der offenen Demokrative: Freundesgabe für Friedrich Kübler, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Rohe, Mathias (1998). Netzverträge: Rechtsprobleme komplexer Vertragsverbindungen. Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck.Google Scholar
Roth, Herbert (1989). Anmerkung zu OLG Karlsruhe, 2 Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht435.Google Scholar
Schanze, Erich (1991). Symbiotic Contracts: Exploring Long-Term Agency Structures Between Contract and Corporation, in Joerges, Christian, ed., Franchising and the Law: Theoretical and Comparative Approaches in Europe and the United States. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Schanze, Erich. (1993). Symbiotic Arrangements, 149 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics691.Google Scholar
Sciulli, David (1992). Theory of Societal Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sciulli, David. (2001). Corporate Power in Civil Society: An Application of Societal Constitutionalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1992). The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip et al. (1969). Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Semlinger, Klaus (1993). Effizienz und Autonomie in Zulieferungsnetzwerken: Zum strategischen Gehalt von Kooperation, in Staehle, Wolfgang and Sydow, Jörg, eds., 3 Managementforschung. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Semlinger, Klaus. (2000). Kooperation und Konkurrenz in japanischen Netzwerkbeziehungen, in Sydow, Jörg and Windeler, Arnold, eds., Steuerung von Netzwerken. Opladen: Westdeutscher.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1998). Globalization and Freedom of Contract, in Scheiber, Harry, ed., The State and Freedom of Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil and Swedberg, Richard, eds. (1994). The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Steindorff, Ernst (1973). Politik des Gesetzes als Auslegungsmasstab im Wirtschaftsrecht, in Paulus, Gottard, ed., Festschrift für Karl Larenz. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Suber, Peter (1990). The Paradox of Self-Amendment: A Study of Logic, Law, Omnipotence and Change. New York: Lang and available at http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/writing/psa/index.htm.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain (2000). Les nouveaux visages de la subordination, 63 Droit Social131.Google Scholar
Sydow, Jörg (1999). Management von Netzwerkorganisationen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, Jörg and Windeler, Arnold. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks, 9 Organization Science. Special Issue: Managing Partnership and Strategic Alliances265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacke, Veronika (2000). Netzwerk und Adresse, 6 Soziale Systeme291.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (1991). Beyond Contract and Organization? The External Liability of Franchising Systems in German Law, in Joerges, Christian, ed., Franchising and the Law: Theoretical and Comparative Approaches in Europe and the United States. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (1993a). The Many-Headed Hydra: Networks as Higher-Order Collective Actors, in McCahery, Joseph, Picciotto, Sol, and Scott, Colin, eds., Corporate Control and Accountability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (1993b). Piercing the Contractual Veil: The Social Responsibility of Contractual Networks, in Wilhelmson, Thomas, ed., Perspectives of Critical Contract Law. Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Steindorff, Ernst. (1997). Altera Pars Audiatur: Law in the Collision of Discourses, in Rawlings, Richard, ed., Law, Society and Economy. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (2002). Hybrid Laws: Constitutionalizing Private Governance Networks, in Kagan, Robert, Krygier, Martin, and Winston, Kenneth, eds., Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick. Berkeley: Berkeley Public Policy.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (2008). Netzwerk als Vertragsverbund: Virtuelle Unternehmen, Franchising, Just in Time in sozialwissenschaftlicher und juristischer Sicht. Baden-Baden: Nomos. (Networks as Connected Contracts. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1233545.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. (2009a). “And if I by Beelzebub Cast out Devils,…”: An Essay on the Diabolics of Network Failure, 10 German Law Journal, Special Issue: The Law of the Network Society: A Tribute to Karl-Heinz Ladeur, 115; also available at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=1099, and in Grundmann, Stefan, ed. (2010). From Exchange to Cooperation: Networks and Long-Term Relationships in European Contract Law. Amsterdam; Kluwer.
Teubner, Gunther. (2009b). Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks beyond Contract and Organisation, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther, eds., Contractual Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor (1986). Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F. A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution, 2 Economics and Philosophy75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet, and Don, Jackson (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Weber, Max (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives, 36 Administrative Science Quarterly269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windeler, Arnold (2001). Unternehmungsnetzwerke: Konstitution und Strukturation. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Ernst (1978). Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts. Zweiter Band: Besonderer Teil. Köln: Heymanns.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×