Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:40:53.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Disciplinarity and the Modes of Legal Design

from III - How Legal Design Works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2024

Miso Kim
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Dan Jackson
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Jules Rochielle Sievert
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the emerging field of legal design through a critical reflection on the literature on academic disciplines and disciplinarity and argues that legal design does meet the criteria for recognition as an emerging academic subdiscipline. Its central contention is that legal design academics (together with their collaborative partners) have a timely opportunity to intentionally design the modalities of their nascent discipline. Academic disciplines can be understood in various ways. Whether this is, for example, from a sociological or an anthropological perspective, legal design has the chance to examine the human experience of disciplinarity and to consciously build an academic discipline that promotes dignity and value for its users, be they academic practitioners, students, or wider professional communities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Legal Design
Dignifying People in Legal Systems
, pp. 327 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becher, Tony, and Trowler, Paul R.. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. 2002. “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review.” Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures 12, no. 1: 1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045722022000003435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglan, Anthony. 1973. “The Characteristics of Subject Matters in Different Academic Areas.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57, no. 3: 195203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Elaine. 2016. “Exploring Autoethnography as a Method and Methodology in Legal Education Research.” Asian Journal of Legal Education 3, no. 1 (January): 95105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005815607141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cownie, Fiona. 2012. “Law, Research and the Academy.” In Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, edited by Trowler, Paul, Saunders, Murray, and Bamber, Veronica, 5767. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Design Council. n.d. “The Double Diamond.” Accessed May 20, 2023. www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/.Google Scholar
Doherty, Michael. 2019. “Is It Time for a Legal Design Journal?” Legal Design and Innovation (blog), August 5. https://medium.com/legal-design-and-innovation/is-it-time-for-a-legal-design-journal-63340b92eae.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1975] 1991. Discipline and Punish. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 2000. The Governance of Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter, and Trow, Martin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hagan, Margaret. n.d. “Law by Design.” Accessed August 5, 2023. www.lawbydesign.co/.Google Scholar
Hagan, Margaret. 2018. “A Human-Centered Design Approach to Access to Justice: Generating New Prototypes and Hypotheses for Intervention to Make Courts User-Friendly.” Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality 6, no. 2 (Spring): 199239. www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse/vol6/iss2/2.Google Scholar
Jackson, Dan. 2016. “Human-Centered Legal Tech: Integrating Design in Legal Education.” Law Teacher 50, no. 1 (April): 8297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1146468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Tom, and Kelley, David. 2013. Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Armin. 2009. “What are Academic Disciplines?” ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper series 03/09. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/.Google Scholar
Legal Design Alliance. n.d. “The Legal Design Manifesto.” Accessed May 19, 2023. www.legaldesignalliance.org/.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, Donald, MacIntosh, Robert, and Grant, S.. 2002. “Mode 2 Management Research.” British Journal of Management 13, no. 3 (December): 189207. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Walter P. 1987. “The Academic Profession in the United States.” In The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings, edited by Clark, Burton L., 123208. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, Helga, Scott, Peter, and Gibbons, Michael. 2003. “Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41, no. 3 (September): 179–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Kessaris, Amanda. 2021. Doing Sociolegal Research in Design Mode. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickdorn, Marc, Lawrence, Adam, Hormess, Markus, and Schneider, Jakob. 2018. This Is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World. Boston, MA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Susskind, Richard E. 2013. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trowler, Paul. 2012. “Disciplines and Academic Practices.” In Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, edited by Trowler, Paul, Saunders, Murray, and Bamber, Veronica, 3038. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trowler, Paul, Saunders, Murray, and Bamber, Veronica, eds. 2012. Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Richard. 1995. “The University of Life plc: The ‘Industrialization’ of Higher Education?” In Academic Work: The Changing Labour Process in Higher Education, edited by Smyth, John, 129–43. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×