Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T06:08:00.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Screenplays as a Pedagogical Medium for Cultivating EFL Learners’ Metapragmatic Awareness of Speech Acts in Spoken English

from Part I - Literature and Spoken Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

By
Yan Zhao  and
Jiangfeng Liu
Edited by
Christian Jones
Christian Jones
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

This chapter reports a thirteen-week action research project that was conducted with sixty-seven first-year non-English-major students taking a mandatory general English course in a Chinese state university. Using English professional screenplays as the source of authentic conversations, we designed and implemented an intervention that enabled the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students to consider how the realisation of a speech act is mediated by a range of contextual factors. We achieved this by: (1) selecting screenplay extracts that reflect varied communication situations, (2) using conversation analysis and Hymes’ () SPEAKING model as guiding frameworks, (3) combining awareness-raising tasks with explicit instruction and (4) setting up weekly group work. From two iterative cycles of research, the following qualitative data were collected: (1) two open-ended questionnaires, (2) audio recordings of classroom interaction, (3) our own observation and reflective notes and (4) the conversations and self-reflection created by the students each week. The results show that English screenplays helped to develop the Chinese EFL students’ metapragmatic awareness by providing rich conversational, social and literary contexts to a speech act. The screenplays also enabled the students’ resourcefulness as social actors, fans of pop culture or creative individuals in their interpretation and formulation of varied second language (L2) speech acts. This holds implications particularly for EFL teachers in challenging circumstances such as the one where this study took place: large class sizes, limited class time and students having only limited access to naturally occurring English conversations. The findings also hold implications for the establishment of an interactional learning space facilitated by English screenplays and teacher scaffolding.

Keywords

action researchconversation analysismetapragamatic awarenessspeech actsscreenplays
Type
Chapter
Information
Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning , pp. 118 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwright, D. 2003. ‘Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching’, Language Teaching Research 7(2): 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Z. I. 2014. ‘Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics’, System 46: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Z. I. 2016. ‘Creating a social context through film: Teaching L2 pragmatics as a locally situated process’, L2 Journal 8(3): 23–45.Google Scholar
Baker, D. J. 2016. ‘The screenplay as text: Academic scriptwriting as creative research’, New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing 13(1): 71–84.Google Scholar
Barraja-Rohan, A. 1997. ‘Teaching conversation and sociocultural norms with conversation analysis’, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 14: 71–88.Google Scholar
Barraja-Rohan, A. 2011. ‘Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence’, Language Teaching Research 15(4): 479–507.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. 2017. Doctor Foster: The Scripts. London: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar
Bella, S., Sifianou, M. and Tzanne, A. 2015. ‘Teaching politeness?’, in Pizziconi, B. and Locher, M. (eds.), Teaching and Learning (Im)Politeness. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J. 2014. ‘Preference and the conversation analytic endeavor’, Journal of Pragmatics 64: 52–71.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. ‘The economics of linguistic exchanges’, Social Science Information 16(6): 645–668.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruti, S. 2016. ‘Teaching compliments and insults in the EFL classroom through film clips’, in Bianchi, F. and Gesuato, S. (eds.), Pragmatic Issues in Specialized Communicative Contexts. Leiden: Brill, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, W. and Hübler, A. (eds.) 2007. Metapragmatics in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, A. 2005. ‘Action research: An evolving paradigm?’, Language Teaching 38(2): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. 2010. ‘“I no say you say is boring”: The development of pragmatic competencein L2 apology’, Language Sciences 32(3): 408–424.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. and Goh, C. 2010. ‘Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers’, Teaching in Higher Education 16(3): 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, T. 2016. ‘Authentic L2 interactions as material for a pragmatic awareness-raisingactivity’, Language Awareness 25(3): 159–178.Google Scholar
Cianfrance, D., Delavigne, C. and Curtis, J. 2010. Blue Valentine. Available at: www.raindance.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/03/blue-valentine.pdf (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Cohen, L. and Manion, L. 1994. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Language, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, R. 2002. Love Actually. Available at: http://screenplaysandscripts.com (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Guerra, A. B. 2008. ‘Requests in TV series and in naturally occurring discourse: A comparison’, in Alcón Soler, E. (ed.), Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context. Bern: Peter Lang, 111–126.Google Scholar
Fernández-Guerra, A. B. 2013. ‘Using TV series as input source of refusals in the classroom’, in Martí-Arnándiz, O. and Salazar-Campillo, P. (eds.), Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipi, A. and Barraja-Rohan, A. 2015. ‘An interaction-focused pedagogy based on conversation analysis for developing L2 pragmatic competence’, in Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F. and Chen, W. (eds.), Teaching, Learning and Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods and Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 231–252.Google Scholar
Fogelman, D. 2010. Crazy, Stupid, Love. Available at: www.imsdb.com (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Glatzer, R. and Westmoreland, W. 2012. Still Alice. Available from: www.sonyclassics.com/awards-information/stillalice_screenplay.pdf (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Goldenberg, M. 2007. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Available at: www.dailyscript.com (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Halenko, N. 2016. ‘Evaluating the explicit pragmatic instruction of requests and apologies in a study abroad setting: The case of Chinese ESL learners at a UK Higher Education institution’, PhD thesis, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Halenko, N. and Jones, C. 2011. ‘Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective?’, System 39(2): 240–250.Google Scholar
Halenko, N. and Jones, C. 2017. ‘Explicit instruction of spoken requests: An examination of pre-departure instruction and the study abroad environment’, System 68: 26–37.Google Scholar
Heller, M. and Martin-Jones, M. 2001. ‘Introduction: Symbolic domination, education and linguistic difference’, in Heller, M. and Martin-Jones, M. (eds.), Voices of Authority: Education and Linguistic Differences. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing, 1–28.Google Scholar
Henery, A. 2015. ‘On the development of metapragmatic awareness abroad: Two case studies exploring the role of expert-mediation’, Language Awareness 24(4): 316–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, N. 2008. An Education. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/writersroom/scripts/an-education (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. and Barnett, S. (2005). ‘Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation’, Discourse Studies 7(2): 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, T. and Taleghani-Nikazm, C. 2006. ‘How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?’ Language Teaching Research 10(1): 53–79.Google Scholar
Hüttner, J. 2014. ‘Agreeing to disagree: “Doing disagreement” in assessed oral L2 interactions’, Classroom Discourse 5(2): 194–215.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. ‘Models of interaction of language and social life’, in Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. 2007. Web-based curriculum for pragmatics instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness 16(1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. and Cohen, A. D. 2010. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ishino, M. 2017. ‘Subversive questions for classroom turn-taking traffic management’, Journal of Pragmatics 117: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. 2008. Sherlock Holmes. Available at: www.raindance.co.uk/site/scripts (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Jones, C. and Horak, T. 2014. ‘Leave it out! The use of soap operas as models of spoken discourse in the ELT classroom’, The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning 4(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. and Shibahara, C. 2014. ‘Film as source material in advanced foreign language classes’, L2 Journal 6(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Kambara, W. 2011. ‘Teaching Japanese pragmatic competence using film clips’, L2 Journal 3(2): 144–157.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. 2015. ‘Other-initiated repair in English’, Open Linguistics 1: 164–190.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. and Silverstein, M. 2007. He’s Just Not that into You … Available at: www.dailyscript.com (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Kreutel, K. 2007. ‘“I’m not agree with you”: ESL learners’ expressions of disagreement’, TESL-EJ 11(3): 1–35.Google Scholar
Kruger, E. 2001. The Ring. Available at: www.horrorlair.com (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Lambrou, M. 2015, ‘Pedagogical stylistics in an ELT teacher training setting: A case study’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales, K. (eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 298–315.Google Scholar
Li, C. and Gao, X. 2017. ‘Bridging “what I said” and “why I said it”: The role of metapragmatic awareness in L2 request performance’, Language Awareness 26(3): 170–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, C. 2018. Literature, by A. Paran and P. Robinson. Reviewed in ELT Journal 72(2): 226–227.Google Scholar
Mason, M. 2004. ‘Referential choices and the need for repairs in covertly-taped conversations’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. 2003. ‘Talking back: “Small” interactional response tokens in everyday conversation’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(1): 33–63.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. and McCarten, J. 2018. ‘Now you’re talking! Practising conversation in second language learning’, in Jones, C. (ed.), Practice in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.Google Scholar
McConachy, T. 2009. ‘Raising sociocultural awareness through contextual analysis: Some tools for teachers’, ELT Journal 63(2): 116–125.Google Scholar
McConachy, T. 2013. ‘Exploring the meta-pragmatic realm in English language teaching’, Language Awareness 22(2): 100–110.Google Scholar
McConachy, T. and Hata, K. 2013. ‘Addressing textbook representations of pragmatics and culture’, ELT Journal 67(3): 294–301.Google Scholar
McLaren, R. M. and Solomon, D. H. 2015. ‘Relational framing theory: Drawing inferences about relationships from interpersonal interactions’, in Braithwaite, D. O. and Schrodt, P. (eds.), Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Los Angeles: Sage, 115–127.Google Scholar
McNiff, J. 2013. Action Research: Principles and Practice (3rd edn). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neustadter, S. and Weber, M. H. 2006. 500 Days of Summer. Available at: www.cinefile.biz/script/500daysofsummer.pdf (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. H. and Pham, M. T. 2012. ‘The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 416–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, A. 2015. ‘A concept-based approach to teaching speech acts in the EFL classroom’, ELT Journal 69(4): 383–394.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, E. 2015. ‘Comparing textbooks and TV series as sources of pragmatic input for learners of Italian as a second language: The case of compliments and invitations’, in Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F. and Cheng, W. (eds.), Teaching, Learning and Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods and Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 85–108.Google Scholar
Peele, J. 2014. Get out. Available at: https://scriptpipeline.com/get-out-and-call-me-by-your-name-screenplays (Accessed 3 July 2018).Google Scholar
Ren, J. and Gao, X. 2012. ‘Negative pragmatic transfer in Chinese students’ complimentary speech acts’, Psychological Reports 110(1): 149–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, W. and Han, Z. 2016. ‘The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks’, ELT Journal 70(4): 424–434.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E. 2011. ‘Enticing a challengeable in arguments: sequence, epistemics and preference organisation’, Pragmatics, 21(3): 411–430.Google Scholar
Rose, K. R. 2001. ‘Compliments and compliment responses in film: Implications for pragmatics research and language teaching’, IRAL 39(4): 309–326.Google Scholar
Sayer, P. 2005. ‘An intensive approach to building conversation skills’, ELT Journal 59(1): 14–22.Google Scholar
Stim, R. 2016. Getting Permission: Using & Licensing Copyright-Protected Materials Online & Off (6th edn). Berkeley, CA: Nolo.Google Scholar
Su, I. 2010. ‘Transfer of pragmatic competences: A bi-directional perspective’, The Modern Language Journal 94(1): 87–102.Google Scholar
Sukhina, E. 2011. ‘Enhancing heritage speakers’ communication skills through drama and improvisation’, in Ryan, C. and Marini-Maio, N. (eds.), Dramatic Interactions: Teaching Language, Literature, and Culture through Theatre–Theoretical Approaches and Classroom Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 244–269.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. 2011. ‘Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 289–310.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. 2015. ‘Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going’, Language Teaching 48(1): 1–50.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Naganuma, N. and Budding, C. 2015. ‘Does instruction alter the naturalistic pattern of pragmatic development? A case of request speech act’, TESL-EJ 19(3): 1–25.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z. and Pezeshki, M. 2014. ‘Acquisition of politeness markers in an EFL context: Impact of input enhancement and output tasks’, RELC Journal 45(3): 269–286.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. 2010. ‘The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance’, in Martínez-Flor, A. and Usó-Juan, E. (eds.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–142.Google Scholar
Talandis, G. Jr and Stout, M. 2015. ‘Getting EFL students to speak: An action research approach’, ELT Journal 69(1): 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuki, D. and Nishizawa, M. 2005. ‘A comparison of compliments and compliment responses in television interviews, film, and naturally occurring data’, in Tatsuki, D. (ed.), Pragmatics in Language Learning, Theory, and Practice. Tokyo: Pragmatics Special Interest Group of the Japan Association for Language Teaching, 87–97.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A. and Kinginger, C. 2013. ‘Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development’, Language Teaching Research 17(3): 282–302.Google Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., Weber, A. and Gomez-Laich, M. P. 2016. ‘Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study’, The Modern Language Journal 100(1): 341–361.Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, E. and Martínez-Flor, A. 2008. ‘Teaching learners to appropriately mitigate requests’, ELT Journal 62(4): 349–357.Google Scholar
Waring, H. Z. 2013. ‘“How was your weekend?”: Developing the interactional competence in managing routine inquiries’, Language Awareness 22(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Wang, S. 2016. ‘daxue yingyu jiaoxue zhinan yaodian jiedu [Interpretation of the key points in the Guidelines on College English Teaching]’, Foreign Language World 174: 2–10.Google Scholar
Warner, C. 2012. ‘Literary pragmatics in the advanced foreign language literature classroom: The case of Young Werther’, in Burke, M., Csabi, S., Week, L. and Zerkowitz, J. (eds.), Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT. London: Continuum, 142–157.Google Scholar
Washburn, G. N. 2001. ‘Using situation comedies for pragmatic language teaching and learning’, TESOL Journal 10(4): 21–26.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A. and Edmonds, D. M. 2018. ‘Speakers formulating their talk as interruptive’, Journal of Pragmatics 123: 11–23.Google Scholar
Welch, I. 2015. ‘Building interactional space in an ESL classroom to foster bilingual identity and linguistic repertoires’, Journal of Language, Identity & Education 14(2): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J. and Waring, H. Z. 2010. Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. and Takahashi, T. 2016. ‘Developmental patterns of interlanguage pragmatics in Taiwanese EFL learners: Compliments and compliment response’, The Asian EFL Journal 18(1): 130–166.Google Scholar
Yu, M. 2011. ‘Learning how to read situations and know what is the right thing to say or do in an L2: A study of socio-cultural competence and language transfer’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1127–1147.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×