Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:29:21.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eight - Amphibians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2023

By
Phillip J. Bishop† ,
Sally Wren ,
Ariadne Angulo  and
Richard A. Griffiths
Edited by
Norman Maclean
Norman Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

Amphibians are the most threatened vertebrate class on Earth. They play important roles in ecosystems and are often cited as sentinels of environmental health. Around 84% of the 8208 amphibian species have been assessed by The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, with 41% categorised as threatened with extinction. As is the case with other species, the main threatening process for many amphibians is habitat destruction, disturbance and fragmentation. However, amphibians are also highly vulnerable to emerging infectious diseases, climate change, invasive species and pollution. These threats often interact, resulting in complex impacts on amphibian populations. Fortunately, there are several initiatives (IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (ASG), Amphibian Survival Alliance (ASA) and the Amphibian Ark(AArk)) focused on understanding and protecting the many threatened species through global coordination, conservation planning, habitat protection, supporting conservation action, fundraising, emergency rescues and captive breeding for conservation. Diverse amphibian lifestyles, coupled with the complexity of threats, means that different species will respond in different ways and in different places. Consequently there are likely to be ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in a changing world, rather than complete extinction of a class. Amphibian conservation therefore remains one of the greatest challenges of our times.

Keywords

AmphibiansFrogToadSalamanderTadpoleSeasonal changesHibernationRain forestClimate change
Type
Chapter
Information
The Living Planet
The State of the World's Wildlife
 , pp. 153 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araújo, M.B., Thuiller, W. and Pearson, R.G. (2006) Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J Biogeogr 33(10): 1712–1728.Google Scholar
Auliya, M., García-Moreno, J., Schmidt, B.R., et al. (2016) The global amphibian trade flows through Europe: the need for enforcing and improving legislation. Biodivers Conserv 25: 2581–2595.Google Scholar
Baker, N.J., Bancroft, B.A. and Garcia, T.S. (2013) A meta-analysis of the effects of pesticides and fertilizers on survival and growth of amphibians. Sci Total Environ 449: 150–156.Google Scholar
Barata, I.M., Silva, E.P. and Griffiths, R.A. (2018) Predictors of abundance of a rare bromeliad-dwelling frog (Crossodactylodes itambe) in the Espinhaço Mountain range of Brazil. J Herpetol 52: 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, T.J.C. and Griffiths, R.A. (2005). The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv 125(3): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, L., Speare, R., Daszak, P., et al. (1998) Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(15): 9031–9036.Google Scholar
Bishop, P.J., Daglish, L.A., Haigh, A.J.M., et al. (2013) Native Frog (Leiopelma spp.) Recovery Plan, 2013–2018. Threatened Species Recovery Plan 63. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
Boone, M.D., Davidson, C. and Bridges-Britton, C. (2009) Evaluating the impact of pesticides in amphibian declines. In: Heatwole, H. and Wilkinson, J.W. (Eds.), Amphibian Decline: Diseases, Parasites, Maladies and Pollution. Vol. 8 in Amphibian Biology. Baulkham Hills, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons.Google Scholar
Bosch, J., Sanchez-Tomé, E., Fernández-Loras, A., et al. (2015) Successful elimination of a lethal wildlife infectious disease in nature. Biol Lett 11(11): 21050874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, C.M. and Semlitsch, R.D. (2001) Genetic variation in insecticide tolerance in a population of southern leopard frogs (Rana sphenocephala): implications for amphibian conservation. Copeia 2001: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, O., Lees, C., Wilcken, J. and Schwitzer, C. (2013) The One Plan approach: the philosophy and implementation of CBSG’s approach to integrated species conservation planning. WAZA Magazine, 14: 2–5.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A.I., Andreone, F., Moore, R.D. and Griffiths, R. A. (2014) A review of the international trade in amphibians: the types, levels and dynamics of trade in CITES-listed species. Oryx 48(4): 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foden, W.B., Butchart, S.H.M., Stuart, S.N., et al. (2013) Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a trait-based assessment of birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS One 8(6): e65427.Google Scholar
Ford, J., Hunt, D.A.G.A., Haines, G.E., et al. (2020) Adrift on a sea of troubles: can amphibians survive in a human-dominated world? Herpetologica 76(2): 251–256.Google Scholar
Gascon, C., Collins, J.P., Moore, R.D., et al. (2007) Amphibian Conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Gomes, A, Giri, B., Saha, A., et al. (2007) Bioactive molecules from amphibian skin: their biological activities with reference to therapeutic potentials for possible drug development. Indian J Exp Biol 45: 579–593.Google Scholar
Grant, E.H.C., Muths, E.L., Katz, R.A., et al. (2016) Salamander Chytrid Fungus (Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans) in the United States: Developing Research, Monitoring, And Management Strategies (No. 2015-1233). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Greer, A.L., Brunner, J.L. and Collins, J.P. (2009) Spatial and temporal patterns of Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) prevalence in tiger salamanders Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum. Dis Aquat Org 85: 1–6.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R.A., Sewell, D. and McRea, R. (2010) Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: survival, dispersal and the impact of climate. Biol Conserv 143: 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, T.B., Case, P., Chui, D. et al. (2006) Pesticide mixtures, endocrine disruption, and amphibian declines: are we underestimating the impact? Environ Health Perspect 114: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hocking, D.J. and Babbitt, K.J. (2014) Amphibian contributions to ecosystem services. Herpetol Conserv Biol 9(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., et al. (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330(6010): 1503–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, W.A. (2007) Amphibians as models for studying environmental change. ILAR J 48: 270–277.Google Scholar
Hudson, M.A., Griffiths, R.A., Martin, L., et al. (2019) Reservoir frogs: seasonality of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection in robber frogs in Dominica and Montserrat. PeerJ 7: e7021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC. (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm (accessed October 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN. (2020) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020–2. www.iucnredlist.org (accessed October 2022).Google Scholar
Johnson, K., Baker, A., Buley, K., et al. (2018) A process for assessing and prioritizing species conservation needs: going beyond the Red List. Oryx 54(1): 125–132.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Cohen, J.M. and Rohr, J.R. (2013) Review and synthesis of the effects of climate change on amphibians. Integr Zool 8: 145–161.Google Scholar
Lips, R.K. and Donnelly, M.A. (2005) Lessons from the tropics. In: Lanoo, M.J. (Ed.). Amphibian Declines: the Conservation Status of United States Species. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Menéndez-Guerrero, P.A., Davies, T.J. and Green, D.M. (2020) Extinctions of threatened frogs may impact ecosystems in a global hotspot of anuran diversity. Herpetologica 76: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmesan, C. (2007) Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob Change Biol 13: 1860–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilliod, D.S., Griffiths, R.A. and Kuzmin, S.K. (2012) Ecological impacts of non-native species. In: Heatwole, H. and Wilkinson, J.W. (Eds.), Conservation and Decline of Amphibians: Ecological Aspects, Effect of Humans, and Management. Vol. 10 in Amphibian Biology. Baulkham Hills, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons.Google Scholar
Pounds, J.A., Fogden, M.P.L and Campbell, J.H. (1999) Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611–615.Google Scholar
Pounds, J.A., Bustamante, M.R., Coloma, L.A., et al. (2006) Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439: 161–167.Google Scholar
Price, S.J., Garner, T.W.J., Nichols, R.A., et al. (2014) Collapse of amphibian communities due to an introduced ranavirus. Curr Biol 24: 2586–2591.Google Scholar
Raxworthy, C.J., Pearson, R.G., Rabibisoa, N., et al. (2008) Extinction vulnerability of tropical montane endemism from warming and upslope displacement: a preliminary appraisal for the highest massif in Madagascar. Glob Change Biol 14: 1703–1720.Google Scholar
Relyea, R.A., Schoeppner, N.P. and Hoverman, J.T. (2005) Pesticides and amphibians: the importance of community context. Ecol Appl 15: 1125–1134.Google Scholar
Scheele, B.C., Pasmans, F., Skerratt, L.F. et al. (2020) Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363: 1459–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semlitsch, R.D., O’Donnell, K.M. and Thompson, F.R. (2014) Abundance, biomass production, nutrient content, and the possible role of terrestrial salamanders in Missouri Ozark forest ecosystems. Can J Zool 92(12): 997–1004.Google Scholar
Shoo, L.P., Olson, D.H., McMenamin, S.K., et al. (2011) Engineering a future for amphibians under climate change. J Appl Ecol 48: 487–492.Google Scholar
Spitzen-van der Sluijs, A., Canessa, S., Martel, A. and Pasmans, F. (2017) Fragile coexistence of a global chytrid pathogen with amphibian populations is mediated by environment and demography. Proc Royal Soc. B 284: 20171444.Google Scholar
Stuart, S.N., Chanson, J.S., Cox, N.A., et al. (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306(5702): 1783–1786.Google Scholar
Stuart, S.N. Hoffmann, M., Chanson, J.S., et al. (Eds.) (2008) Threatened Amphibians of the World. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions; Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; Arlington, VA: Conservation International.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. and Knight, T.M. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 305–308.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J., Mitchell, R. and Prior, S.V. (2012) The role of ‘Conservation Evidence’ in improving conservation management. Conserv Evid 9: 1–2.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J., Dicks, L.V., Ockendon, N., Petrovan, S.O. and Smith, R.K. (2019) What Works in Conservation 2019. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Tapley, B., Michaels, C.J., Gumbs, R., et al. (2018) The disparity between species description and conservation assessment: a case study in taxa with high rates of species discovery. Biol Conserv 220: 209–214.Google Scholar
Teacher, A.G.F., Cunningham, A.A. and Garner, T.W.J. (2010) Assessing the long-term impact of ranavirus infection in wild common frog populations. Animal Conserv 13: 514–522.Google Scholar
Teng, Q., Hu, X-F., Luo, F., et al. (2016) Influences of introducing frogs in the paddy fields on soil properties and rice growth. J Soils Sediments 16: 51–61.Google Scholar
Valiente, E., Tovar, A., Gonzalez, H., Eslava-Sandoval, D. and Zambrano, L. (2010) Creating refuges for the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Ecol Restor 28: 257–259.Google Scholar
Voyles, J., Woodhams, D.C., Saenz, V., et al. (2018) Shifts in disease dynamics in a tropical amphibian assemblage are not due to pathogen attenuation. Science 358: 1517–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddle, J.H., Grear, D.A., Mosher, B.A., et al. (2020) Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) not detected in an intensive survey of wild North American amphibians. Sci Rep 10: 13012.Google Scholar
Wake, D.B. and Vredenburg, V.T. (2008) Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(1): 11466–11473.Google Scholar
Ward, R.J., Liddiard, T., Goetz, M. and Griffiths, R.A. (2016) Head-starting, re-introduction and conservation management of the agile frog on Jersey, British Channel Isles. In: Soorae, P.S. (Ed.), Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2016. Case-Studies from Around the Globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Re- introduction Specialist Group; Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
Whiles, M.R., Lips, K.R., Pringle, C.M., et al. (2006) The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of Neotropical stream ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 4(1): 27–34.Google Scholar
Zambrano, L., Valiente, E. and Vander Zanden, M.J. (2010) Food web overlap among native axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) and two exotic fishes: carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Xochimilco, Mexico City. Biol Invasions 12: 3061–3069.Google Scholar
Zipkin, E.F., DiRenzo, G.V., Ray, J.M., Rossman, S. and Lips, K.R. (2020) Tropical snake diversity collapses after widespread amphibian loss. Science 367: 814–816.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×