Book contents
- A Loud but Noisy Signal?
- Cambridge Studies in the Comparative Politics of Education
- A Loud but Noisy Signal?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Theoretical Framework
- Part I Quantitative Evidence: Attitudes, Public Opinion, and Politics
- Part II Qualitative Evidence: The Role of Public Opinion in Education Reforms in Western Europe
- 9 Comparative Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2020
Book contents
- A Loud but Noisy Signal?
- Cambridge Studies in the Comparative Politics of Education
- A Loud but Noisy Signal?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Theoretical Framework
- Part I Quantitative Evidence: Attitudes, Public Opinion, and Politics
- Part II Qualitative Evidence: The Role of Public Opinion in Education Reforms in Western Europe
- 9 Comparative Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Loud but Noisy Signal?Public Opinion and Education Reform in Western Europe, pp. 327 - 360Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Aarøe, Lene, and Petersen, Michael B.. 2014. “Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues.” Journal of Politics 76 (3): 684–97.Google Scholar
Academies Commission. 2013. Unleashing Greatness: Getting the Best from an Academised System. London: RSA.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69 (4): 1218–31.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2004. “Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?” British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 589–610.Google Scholar
Adams, James, Haupt, Andrea B., and Stoll, Heather. 2009. “What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (5): 611–39.Google Scholar
Adams, James and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. “Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies.” Journal of Politics 71 (2): 678–92.Google Scholar
Adman, Per. 2014. “Who Cares about the Democratic Mandate of Education? A Text Analysis of the Swedish Secondary Education Reform of 2009.” Working Paper 2014 (2), Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU).Google Scholar
Adonis, Andrew. 2012. Education, Education, Education: Reforming England’s Schools. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Allan, James P., and Scruggs, Lyle. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496–512.Google Scholar
Allianz für Aus und Weiterbildung. 2014. Allianz für Aus und Weiterbildung 2014–2018. Berlin: Allianz für Aus- und Weiterbildung.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, and Heien, Thorsten. 2001. “Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States.” European Sociological Review 17 (4): 337–56.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben W. 2008. “University Challenges: Explaining Institutional Change in Higher Education.” World Politics 60 (2): 189–230.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben W. 2010. From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben W., and Lindvall, Johannes. 2013. “The Political Origins of Primary Education Systems: Ideology, Institutions, and Interdenominational Conflict in an Era of Nation-Building.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 505–22.Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, and Schädel, Lisa. 2015. “Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Side of Individualisation.” West European Politics 38 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Arts, Wil, and Gelissen, John. 2001. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?” Acta Sociologica 44 (4): 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AWO, Caritas and GEW. 2014. Bundespressekonferenz, Erklärung von Arbeiterwohlfahrt (Bundesverband), Deutscher Caritasverband, Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft (Hauptvorstand): Deutschland braucht ein Bundesqualitätsgesetz für die Kindertagesbetreuung. Berlin: AWO, Caritas and GEW.Google Scholar
Ball, Stephen J., and Exley, Sonia. 2010. “Making Policy with ‘Good Ideas’: Policy Networks and the ‘Intellectuals’ of New Labour.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 151–69.Google Scholar
Bañuelos, Aida Terrón. 2015. “Coordenadas Del Asociacionismo Profesional De Los Docentes. Estado De La Cuestión En España.” Historia y Memoria de la Educación 1 (1): 93–130.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason. 2016. “Democracy’s Denominator: Reassessing Responsiveness with Public Opinion on the National Policy Agenda.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (2): 437–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael. 1997. The Learning Game: Arguments for an Education Revolution. London: Indigo.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M., Heclo, Hugh, Hero, Rodney E., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2005. “Inequality and American Governance.” In Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, edited by Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda, 88–155. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bartle, John, Dellepiane-Avellaneda, Sebastian, and Stimson, James. 2011. “The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 259–85.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2002. “Positive and Negative Feedback in Politics.” In Policy Dynamics, edited by Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., 3–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses and Why? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, John. 2008. “Governmental Professionalism: Re-professionalising or De-professionalising Teachers in England?” British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (2): 119–43.Google Scholar
Behr, Roy L., and Iyengar, Shanto. 1985. “Television News, Real-World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1): 38–57.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, eds. 2015. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2017. “Measuring Public Opinion with Surveys.” Annual Review of Political Science 20 (1): 309–29.Google Scholar
Bernal, Jose L. 2005. “Parental Choice, Social Class and Market Forces: The Consequences of Privatization of Public Services in Education.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 779–92.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Julian, Giger, Nathalie, and Rosset, Jan. 2015. “Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich?” International Political Science Review 36 (1): 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Daniela, and Hänni, Miriam. 2018. “Two Sides of the Same Coin? Congruence and Responsiveness as Representative Democracy’s Currencies.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (1): 13–47.Google Scholar
BIS. 2010a. Changes to Tuition Fees and Higher Education. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
BIS. 2010b. Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education: An Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance [the Browne report]. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
BIS. 2015. The Future of Apprenticeships in England: Guidance for Trailblazers – from Standards to Starts. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
BIS. 2016. Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
Blanck, Jonna, Edelstein, Benjamin, and Powell, Justin J. W.. 2014. “Auf dem Pfad zur inklusiven Bildung? Schulreformen in Deutschland und die UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention.” In Inklusion und Chancengleichheit: Diversity im Spiegel von Bildung und Didaktik, edited by Schuppener, Saskia, Bernhardt, Nora, Hauser, Mandy, and Poppe, Frederik, 97–104. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, Morten, and Quadagno, Jill. 2003. “Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Countries.” European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–27.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BMBF. 2016. Evaluation des Berufsbildungsgesetzes (BBiG): Evaluierungsbericht. Berlin: BMBF.Google Scholar
BMFSFJ. 2015. Fünfter Bericht zur Evaluation des Kinderförderungsgesetzes: Kurzfassung. Berlin: BMFSFJ.Google Scholar
BMFSFJ and JFMK. 2014. “Communiqué: Frühe Bildung weiterentwickeln und finanziell sichern.” Berlin: BMFSFJ, JFMK.Google Scholar
BOE. 2013. “Ley Orgánica 8/2013, De 9 De Diciembre, Para La Mejora De La Calidad Educativa.” Boletín Oficial del Estado 295.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1997. “Political Parties and the Supply Side of the Economy: The Provision of Physical and Human Capital in Advanced Economies, 1960–1990.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 814–45.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonal, Xavier. 2000. “Interest Groups and the State in Contemporary Spanish Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 15 (2): 201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonal, Xavier, and Tarabini, Aina. 2013. “The Role of PISA in Shaping Hegemonic Educational Discourses, Policies and Practices: The Case of Spain.” Research in Comparative and International Education 8 (3): 335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano. 2007. “Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay L.. 1995. “A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–94.Google Scholar
Branham, J. Alexander, Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2017. “When Do the Rich Win?” Political Research Quarterly 132 (1): 43–62.Google Scholar
Breen, Richard. 2005. “Explaining Cross-National Variation in Youth Unemployment.” European Sociological Review 21 (2): 125–34.Google Scholar
Breen, Richard, Luijkx, Ruud, Müller, Walter, and Pollak, Reinhard. 2009. “Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (5): 1475–521.Google Scholar
Breunig, Christian, and Busemeyer, Marius R.. 2012. “Fiscal Austerity and the Trade-Off between Public Investment and Social Spending.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (6): 921–38.Google Scholar
Breunig, Christian, and Koski, Chris. 2018. “Interest Groups and Policy Volatility.” Governance 31 (2): 279–97.Google Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006a. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474–94.Google Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006b. “Why Do Welfare States Persist?” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 816–27.Google Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Brunello, Giorgio, and Checchi, Daniele. 2007. “Does School Tracking Affect Equality of Opportunity? New International Evidence.” Economic Policy 22 (52): 782–861.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1998. “Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?” Social Forces 77 (1): 27–62.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2006. “Why Estimates of the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy Are Too High: Empirical and Theoretical Implications.” Social Forces 84 (4): 2273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtless, Gary. 1996. “Introduction and Summary.” In Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success, edited by Burtless, Gary, 1–42. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2005. “Pension Reform in Germany and Austria: System Change vs. Quantitative Retrenchment.” West European Politics 28 (3): 569–91.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2007. “The Determinants of Public Education Spending in 21 OECD Democracies, 1980–2001.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 582–610.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2009a. “Social Democrats and the New Partisan Politics of Public Investment in Education.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2009b. Wandel trotz Reformstau: Die Politik der beruflichen Bildung seit 1970. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., Goerres, Achim, and Weschle, Simon. 2009. “Attitudes towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures from Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 19 (3): 195–212.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Trampusch, Christine. 2011. “Review Article: Comparative Political Science and the Study of Education.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 413–43.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., Cattaneo, Maria A., and Wolter, Stefan C.. 2011. “Individual Preferences for Vocational vs. Academic Education: Microlevel Evidence for the Case of Switzerland.” Journal of European Social Policy 21 (3): 253–73.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2012. “Inequality and the Political Economy of Education: An Analysis of Individual Preferences in OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 22 (3): 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Trampusch, Christine. 2012. “Introduction: The Comparative Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, edited by Busemeyer, Marius R. and Trampusch, Christine, 1–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., Franzmann, Simon, and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2013. “Who Owns Education? Cleavage Structures in the Partisan Composition over Educational Expansion.” West European Politics 36 (3): 521–46.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Iversen, Torben. 2014. “The Politics of Opting Out: Explaining Educational Financing and Popular Support for Public Spending.” Socio-Economic Review 12 (2): 299–328.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2015. Skills and Inequality: The Political Economy of Education and Training Reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Haastert, Susanne. 2015. Kontrovers, aber erfolgreich!? Eine Zwischenbilanz grün-roter Bildungsreformen in Baden-Württemberg; Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie mit Erkenntnissen aus Expert_Innen-Interviews und Fokusgruppen. Stuttgart: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Fritz-Erler-Forum Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2017a. “Academic, Vocational or General? An Analysis of Public Opinion towards Education Policies with Evidence from a New Comparative Survey.” Journal of European Social Policy 27 (4): 373–86.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2017b. “Public Opinion on Education Policy: A Multi-Country Perspective.” In Handbook on Public Opinion on Education Policy, edited by West, Martin and Woessmann, Ludger, unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2017c. “Public Opinion on Policy and Budgetary Trade-Offs in European Welfare States: Evidence from a New Comparative Survey.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (6): 871–89.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Neimanns, Erik. 2017. “Conflictive Preferences Towards Social Investments and Transfers in Mature Welfare States: The Cases of Unemployment Benefits and Childcare Provision.” Journal of European Social Policy 27 (3): 229–46.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Haastert, Susanne. 2017. “Bildungspolitik: Nicht alles anders, aber manches.” In Das Grün-Rote Experiment in Baden-Württemberg: Eine Bilanz der Landesregierung Kretschmann 2011–2016, edited by Hörisch, Felix and Wurster, Stefan, 125–58. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Seitzl, Lina. 2018. “The Partisan Politics of Early Childhood Education in the German Länder.” Journal of Public Policy 38 (2): 243–74.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., Garritzmann, Julian L., Neimanns, Erik, and Nezi, Roula. 2018. “Investing in Education in Europe: Evidence from a Survey of Public Opinion in Eight European Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 28 (1): 34–54.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., Abrassart, Aurélien, and Nezi, Spyridoula. 2019. “Beyond Positive and Negative: New Perspectives on Feedback Effects in Public Opinion on the Welfare State.” British Journal of Political Science FirstView online advance access, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000534.Google Scholar
Caínzos, Miguel. 2015. “La Opinión Pública Sobre La Educación En España: Entre El Catastrofismo Y La Satisfacción.” Revista Española de Sociología 23: 117–50.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Karen, and Schnell, Frauke. 2001. “Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse.” Political Communication 18 (2): 183–212.Google Scholar
Cammaerts, Bart. 2013. “The Mediation of Insurrectionary Symbolic Damage: The 2010 UK Student Protests.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 18 (4): 525–48.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rosie. 2016. “Representing Women Voters: The Role of the Gender Gap and the Response of Political Parties.” Party Politics 22 (5): 587–97.Google Scholar
Carabaña, Julio. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación 21. Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1982. “The Impact of Parties on Public Expenditure.” In The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, edited by Castles, Francis G., 21–96. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1989. “Explaining Public Education Expenditure in OECD Nations.” European Journal of Political Research 17 (4): 431–48.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-War Transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G., Leibfried, Stephan, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher, eds. 2010. Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, Maria A., and Wolter, Stefan C.. 2009. “Are the Elderly a Threat to Educational Expenditures?” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (2): 225–36.Google Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2018. “Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014.” American Political Science Review 112 (2): 249–66.Google Scholar
CBI. 2010. Fulfilling Potential: The Business Role in Education. London: Confederation of British Industry.Google Scholar
CBI. 2014. A Better-Off Britain: Improving Lives by Making Growth Work for Everyone. London: Confederation of British Industry.Google Scholar
CBI. 2016. Our Response to Apprenticeship Levy Funding Rules. London: Confederation of British Industry.Google Scholar
CCOO. 2015. Valoración Del Plan Integral De Apoyo A La Familia 2015–2017. Madrid: Comisiones Obreras.Google Scholar
CDU and FDP. 2017. Koalitionsvertrag für Nordrhein-Westfalen 2017–2022. Düsseldorf: CDU, FDP.Google Scholar
CDU BW. 2013. Leistungsstarke Schulen für unsere Kinder in Baden-Württemberg: Bildungskonzept Anlage. Stuttgart: CDU Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
CDU, CSU and SPD. 2013. Deutschlands Zukunft gestalten: Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD. Berlin: CDU, CSU, SPD.Google Scholar
CDU NRW. 2017. Zuhören. Entscheiden. Handeln. Regierungsprogramm der CDU für Nordrhein-Westfalen 2017–2022. Düsseldorf: CDU Nordrhein-Westfalen.Google Scholar
CECE. 2015. “Educación Y Libertad De Educación En España – Informe De Libertades 2015.” Madrid: Confederación Española de Centros de Enseñanza.Google Scholar
Cedefop. 2016. “Governance and Financing of Apprenticeships.” Cedefop research paper 53.Google Scholar
Celador Angon, Oscar. 2016. “Derecho A La Educación Y Libertad De Enseñanza En La Lomce.” Derechos Y Libertades 35 (2): 185–214.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–26.Google Scholar
Chou, Meng-Hsuan, Jungblut, Jens, Ravinet, Pauline, and Vukasovic, Martina. 2017. “Higher Education Governance and Policy: An Introduction to Multi-issue, Multi-level and Multi-actor Dynamics.” Policy and Society 36 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Chubb, John E., and Moe, Terry M.. 1990. Politics, Markets and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Chung, Heejung, and Meuleman, Bart. 2017. “European Parents’ Attitudes towards Public Childcare Provision: The Role of Current Provisions, Interests and Ideologies.” European Societies 19 (1): 49–68.Google Scholar
CIS. 2018. “Tres Problemas Principales Que Existen Actualmente En España.” Barómetros Mensuales. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1979. “Do People Want Something for Nothing: Public Opinion on Taxes and Government Spending.” National Tax Journal 32 (2): 113–29.Google Scholar
Clark, Burton R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, Jochen, and Siegel, Nico A., eds. 2007. Investigating Welfare State Change: The “Dependent Variable Problem” in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Richard, and Pontusson, Jonas. 1998. “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies.” World Politics 51 (1): 67–98.Google Scholar
Conservatives. 2010. Invitation to Join the Government of Britain: The Conservative Manifesto 2010. London: Conservatives.Google Scholar
Conservatives. 2015. Strong Leadership: The Conservative Manifesto 2015. London: Conservatives.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David E., 206–61. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Fay L., Barabas, Jason, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2002. “Policy Elites Invoke Public Opinion: Polls, Policy Debates, and the Future of Social Security.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay L., and Page, Benjamin I., 141–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CRUE. 2016. “La Universidad Española En Cifras – 2015/2016.” Madrid: Crue Universidades Españolas.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2006. “Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (3): 365–89.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dallinger, Ursula. 2010. “Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-National Differences?” Journal of European Social Policy 20 (4): 333–49.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations.” Comparative Political Studies 18 (3): 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wattenberg, Martin. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, Rugh. 2018. “Electoral Volatility and Parties’ Ideological Responsiveness.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4): 808–28.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag. 2017. “Stellungnahme öffentliches Fachgespräch zum Thema “Berufliche Bildung – einschließlich BBiG,” Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Arbeitgeberverbände (Bda), Dr. Barbara Dorn.” Deutscher Bundestag, Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung, Ausschussdrucksache 18(18)373 a. Retrieved February 20, 2020. www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/508466/98b198bdf141b84248ae24bd252eb5ab/BDA_Stellungnahme-data.pdf.Google Scholar
Deutscher Städtetag. 2014. Kommunen wollen weitere Schritte für gute Betreuungsqualität, Pressemeldung des Deutschen Städtetags. Berlin: Deutscher Städtetag.Google Scholar
DfE. 2012. School Admission Appeals Code: Statutory Guidance for School Leaders, Governing Bodies and Local Authorities. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
DfE. 2016. Apprenticeship Funding in England from May 2017. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
DGB. 2016. DGB Einschätzung des Evaluationsberichts zum BBiG. Berlin: DGB Bundesvorstand.Google Scholar
Di Stasio, Valentina. 2017. “‘Diversion or Safety Net?’ Institutions and Public Opinion on Vocational Education and Training.” Journal of European Social Policy 27 (4): 360–72.Google Scholar
Diamond, Peter A., and Hausman, Jerry A.. 1994. “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 45–64.Google Scholar
Die Grünen and SPD. 2011. Der Wechsel beginnt: Koalitionsvertrag zwischen Bündnis 90/Die Grünen und der SPD Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, SPD.Google Scholar
Diem, Andrea, and Wolter, Stefan C.. 2013. “Who Is Afraid of School Choice?” Swiss Journal of Sociology 39 (1): 57–80.Google Scholar
Dobbins, Michael, Knill, Christoph, and Voegtle, Eva M.. 2011. “An Analytical Framework for the Cross-country Comparison of Higher Education Governance.” Higher Education 62 (5): 665–83.Google Scholar
Dobbins, Michael. 2014. “Explaining Change and Inertia in Swedish and French Education: A Tale of Two Corporatisms?” Policy Studies 35 (3): 282–302.Google Scholar
Dobbins, Michael, and Christ, Claudia. 2017. “Do They Matter in Education Politics? The Influence of Political Parties and Teacher Unions on School Governance Reforms in Spain.” Journal of Education Policy 34 (1): 61–82.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. 2002. “The Power Elite, Public Policy, and Public Opinion.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay L., and Page, Benjamin I., 124–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Döring, Holger, and Manow, Philip. 2016. “Parliaments and Governments Database (Parlgov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.”Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 729–45.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79.Google Scholar
Durazzi, Niccolo, and Geyer, Leonard. Forthcoming. “Social (Investment) Partners? Trade Unions and the Welfare State for the Knowledge Economy.” In The World Politics of Social Investment (Volume I): Welfare States in the Century of Knowledge, edited by Garritzmann, Julian, Häusermann, Silja, and Palier, Bruno. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 158–70.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, and Naumann, Elias. 2018a. “Conclusion: The Influence from Below – How Organized Interests and Public Attitudes Shape Welfare State Reforms in Europe.” In Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany, edited by Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Naumann, Elias, 273–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, and Naumann, Elias. 2018b. “Introduction: Analysing Organized Interests and Public Opinion towards Welfare Reforms.” In Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany, edited by Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Naumann, Elias, 1–23. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Egg, Maria E., and Renold, Ursula. 2015. “The Swiss Vocational Education and Training System: What Can Spain Learn from Switzerland?” KOF Working Papers, KOF Swiss Economic Institute 383.Google Scholar
Elsässer, Lisa, Hense, Svenja, and Schäfer, Armin. 2017. “‘Dem Deutschen Volke?’ Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 27 (2): 161–80.Google Scholar
Enguita, Mariano Fernández. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación 15. Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
Enguita, Mariano Fernández, Martínez, Luis Mena, and Gómez, Jaime Riviere. 2010. “Fracaso Y Abandono Escolar En España.” Colección Estudios Sociales. Obra Social Fundación “la Caixa” 29.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K. 2015. “Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (4): 1053–1064.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 2015. “Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (1): 11–29.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Lena, and Jeyman, Ulf. 2014. “Resurser för utbildning och forskning.” Sveriges universitets- och högskoleförbund, DNR 14: 1–31.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2016. “Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (6): 699–710.Google Scholar
Escardíbul, Josep‐Oriol, and Villarroya, Anna. 2009. “The Inequalities in School Choice in Spain in Accordance to PISA Data.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (6): 673–96.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. “A Child-centred Social Investment Strategy.” In Why We Need a New Welfare State, edited by Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 26–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ESPN. 2015. Thematic Report on Social Investment: Spain. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, Margarita, and León, Margarita. Forthcoming. “Different Paths to Social Investment? Democratization, Timing and Politics in North-East Asia and Southern Europe” In The World Politics of Social Investment (Volume I): The Welfare State in the Century of Knowledge, edited by Garritzmann, Julian L., Häusermann, Silja, and Palier, Bruno, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012. Spain: Memorandum of Understanding on Financial-Sector Policy Conditionality. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Eurydice. 2013. “The Structure of the European Education Systems 2013/14.” Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 1, 2018. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/facts_and_figures_en.Google Scholar
Eurydice. 2016. National Student Fee and Support Systems in European Higher Education 2016. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Eurydice. 2018b. “National Education Systems: Denmark.” Retrieved June 1, 2018. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/denmark_en.Google Scholar
Eurydice. 2018a. “National Education Systems: France.” Retrieved June 1, 2018. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/france_en.Google Scholar
FDP BW. 2013. Kern: Grün-Rot muss sich bei Inklusion den Vorwurf der unterlassenen Hilfestellung gefallen lassen. Stuttgart: FDP-Landtagsfraktion.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 268–307.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Raquel, and Rogerson, Richard. 1995. “On the Political Economy of Education Subsidies.” Review of Economic Studies 62 (2): 249–62.Google Scholar
Fernández-Albertos, José, and Kuo, Alexander. 2017. “Economic Crisis, Social Networks, and Policy Preferences.” Paper presented at the Conference of Europeanists.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.Google Scholar
Finger, Leslie. 2017. “Vested Interests and the Diffusion of Education Reforms across the States.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (2): 378–401.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, Timo, Saunders, Adam M., and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin. 2011. “The Dual Transformation of Social Protection and Human Capital: Comparing Britain and Germany.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (12): 1622–50.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, Timo, and Lee, Soohyun C.. 2014. “The Politics of Postindustrial Social Policy: Family Policy Reforms in Britain, Germany, South Korea, and Sweden.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (4): 601–30.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, Timo, and Lee, Soohyun C.. 2018. “Caught Up in the Past? Social Inclusion, Skills, and Vocational Education and Training Policy in England.” Journal of Education and Work 31 (2): 109–24.Google Scholar
Förordning. 2015/2017. “Om viss samverkan om unga och nyanlända.” Retrieved January 24, 2019. www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/2015forordning-2015502-om-viss-samverkan-om-unga_sfs-2015-502Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1955. The Role of Government in Education. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1997. “Public Schools: Make Them Private.” Education Economics 5 (3): 341–4.Google Scholar
Fuller, Alison. 2016. “The Growth of Apprenticeship in England: Doubts beneath the Numbers.” Challenge 59 (5): 422–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Viña, Jordi. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación (24). Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L. 2015. “Attitudes towards Student Support: How Positive Feedback Effects Prevent Change in the Four World of Student Finance.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (2): 139–58.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L. 2016. The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance: The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1945–2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L., and Seng, Kilian. 2016. “Party Politics and Education Spending: Challenging Some Common Wisdom.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (4): 510–30.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L. 2017. “The Partisan Politics of Higher Education.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 413–17.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L., and Schwander, Hanna. 2017. “Compensation, Social Investment, or Whatever Works? Gendered Social Policy Preferences.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Council for European Studies Conference.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian L., Häusermann, Silja, Palier, Bruno, and Zollinger, Christine. 2017. “WOPSI: The World Politics of Social Investment.” LIEPP Working Paper 64.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, Julian, Busemeyer, Marius R., and Neimanns, Erik. 2018. “Public Demand for Social Investment: New Supporting Coalitions for Welfare State Reform in Western Europe?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 844–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gava, Roy, and Varone, Frédéric. 2016. “The Enemy Within? Business Unity and Swiss Financial Regulatory Politics.” Paper presented at the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance Conference.Google Scholar
Geer, John G. 1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gensicke, Miriam, Hartmann, Josef, and Tschersich, Nikolai. 2014. INVEDUC (Investing in Education in Europe: Attitudes, Politics and Policies): Final Report. Munich: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, Andreas, and Manning, Alan. 2012. “Spend It Like Beckham? Inequality and Redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004.” Public Choice 151 (3–4): 537–63.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2006. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gift, Thomas, and Wibbels, Erik. 2014. “Reading, Writing, and the Regrettable Status of Education Research in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 291–312.Google Scholar
Giger, Nathalie, Rosset, Jan, and Bernauer, Julian. 2012. “The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective.” Representation 48 (1): 47–61.Google Scholar
Giger, Nathalie, and Nelson, Moira. 2013. “The Welfare State or the Economy? Preferences, Constituencies, and Strategies for Retrenchment.” European Sociological Review 29 (5): 1083–94.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–96.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–81.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane R. 2011. Making Markets in the Welfare State: The Politics of Varying Market Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane R., and Ansell, Ben. 2014. “Sorting for Schools: Housing, Education and Inequality.” Socio-Economic Review 12 (2): 329–51.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane R. 2015. “Varying Costs to Change? Institutional Change in the Public Sector.” Governance 28 (1): 41–60.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane R., and Häusermann, Silja. 2015. “The Decline of the Working Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1): 50–75.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2004. “Do Institutions Cause Growth?” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (3): 271–303.Google Scholar
Goerres, Achim, and Prinzen, Katrin. 2012. “Can We Improve the Measurement of Attitudes towards the Welfare State? A Constructive Critique of Survey Instruments with Evidence from Focus Groups.” Social Indicators Research 109 (3): 515–34.Google Scholar
Gortázar, Lucas. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación 33. Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
Greany, Toby, and Scott, Jean. 2014. Conflicts of Interest in Academy Sponsorship Arrangements: A Report for the Education Select Committee. London: London Centre for Leadership in Learning.Google Scholar
Green, Andy, Preston, John, and Janmaat, Jan G.. 2006. Education, Equality and Social Cohesion: A Comparative Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haberstroh, Charlotte M. 2016. “The Politics of Equal Opportunities in Education: Partisan Governments and School Choice Reform in Sweden, England, and France, 1980–2010.” European University Institute Florence (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Rehm, Philipp, and Schlesinger, Mark. 2013. “The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries, and Policy Attitudes.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (1): 23–49.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 643–62.Google Scholar
Haffert, Lukas. 2016. Die Schwarze Null: Über die Schattenseiten ausgeglichener Haushalte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hakhverdian, Armen. 2010. “Political Representation and Its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left-Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 835–56.Google Scholar
Hannah, Susan B. 1996. “The Higher Education Act of 1992: Skills, Constraints, and the Politics of Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education 67 (5): 498–527.Google Scholar
Hansen, Kasper M. 2007. “The Sophisticated Public: The Effect of Competing Frames on Public Opinion.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3): 377–96.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2012. “Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation.” Journal of Economic Growth 17: 267–321.Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel, and Rafferty, Jane A.. 1989. “The Determinants of Public Attitudes toward the Welfare State.” Social Forces 67 (4): 1027–48.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-level Preferences and Party Choice.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Heribert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 202–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, Kurer, Thomas, and Schwander, Hanna. 2015. “High-skilled Outsiders? Labor Market Vulnerability, Education and Welfare State Preferences.” Socio-Economic Review 13 (2): 235–58.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, Kurer, Thomas, and Wüest, Bruno. 2017. “Participation in Hard Times: How Constrained Government Depresses Turnout among the Highly Educated.” West European Politics 41 (2): 448–71.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, Pingeera, Michael, Ares, Macarena, and Enggist, Matthias. 2019. Class and Social Policy in the Knowledge Economy. Paper presented at the Drei-Ländertagung, Zürich.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2006. “Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.” Science 312 (5782): 1900–2.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J. 1974. “The Politics of Educational Reform: Explaining Different Outcomes of School Comprehensivization Attempts in Sweden and West Germany.” Comparative Education Review 18 (3): 388–410.Google Scholar
Helbig, Marc, and Nikolai, Rita. 2015. Die Unvergleichbaren: Der Wandel der Schulsysteme in den Deutschen Bundesländern seit 1949. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Helbig, Marcel, and Wrase, Michael. 2017. “Übersicht über die Vorgaben zur Einhaltung des Sonderungsverbots in den Bundesländern: Aktualisierte und ergänzte Fassung auf der Grundlage der in NVwZ 2016 entwickelten Kriterien.” WZB Discussion Paper 2017 (4).Google Scholar
Hemerijck, Anton, ed. 2017. The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hepp, Gerd F. 2011. Bildungspolitik in Deutschland: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2002. “How State-level Policy Managers ‘Read’ Public Opinion.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay L., and Page, Benjamin I., 171–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, Jason. 2014. Vocational Education and Training and the Great Recession: Supporting Young People in a Time of Crisis. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71 (4): 1467–87.Google Scholar
Hicks, Timothy. 2015. “Inequality, Marketisation and the Left: Schools Policy in England and Sweden.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (2): 326–42.Google Scholar
Higher Education Commission. 2014. Too Good to Fail: The Financial Sustainability of Higher Education in England. London: Higher Education Commission.Google Scholar
Hillman, Nicholas. 2013. “From Grants for All to Loans for All: Undergraduate Finance from the Implementation of the Anderson Report (1962) to the Implementation of the Browne Report (2012).” Contemporary British History 27 (3): 249–70.Google Scholar
Hillman, Nicholas. 2016. “The Coalition’s Higher Education Reforms in England.” Oxford Review of Education 42 (3): 330–45.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies 53 (2): 379–402.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 309–37.Google Scholar
Hogrebe, Nina. 2016. “Choice and Equal Access in Early Childhood Education and Care: The Case of Germany.” ICMEC International Seminar Series Working Paper 1.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole J.. 2002. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–89.Google Scholar
Hörisch, Felix, and Wurster, Stefan. 2017. “Einleitung: Das grün-rote Experiment: Politikwechsel nach 57 Jahren CDU-Regierung?” In Das Grün-Rote Experiment: Politikwechsel nach 57 Jahren CDU-Regierung?, edited by Hörisch, Felix and Wurster, Stefan, 1–13. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
House of Commons. 2018. “Higher Education Tuition Fees in England.” Briefing Paper 8151. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Urquiola, Miguel. 2006. “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (8): 1477–503.Google Scholar
Huber, John D. 1989. “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology.” European Journal of Political Research 17 (5): 599–621.Google Scholar
Hupkau, Claudia, McNally, Sandra, Ruiz-Valenzuela, Jenifer, and Ventura, Guglielmo. 2016. “Post-compulsory Education in England: Choices and Implications.” CVER Discussion Paper Series.Google Scholar
Hursh, David. 2007. “Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (3): 493–518.Google Scholar
Hutter, Swen, Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2016. Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. 1992. Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Fiscal Studies. 2014. “Payback Time? Student Debt and Loan Repayments: What Will the 2012 Reforms Mean for Graduates?”. IFS Report R93.Google Scholar
Institute for Fiscal Studies. 2017. Long-Run Comparisons of Spending Per Pupil across Different Stages of Education. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Ipsos MORI. 2012. “Survey of Newly Converted Academies for Browne Jacobson Llp.” London: Ipsos MORI.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1994. “The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (2): 155–89.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. “Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 600–37.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M., and Weaver, Kent R.. 2015. “When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change.” Governance 28 (4): 441–57.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1992. “The Recoil Effect: Public Opinion and Policymaking in the U.S. and Britain.” Comparative Politics 24 (2): 199–217.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2002. “Politics and Policymaking in the Real World: Crafted Talk and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay L., and Page, Benjamin I., 54–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 2000. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 750–67.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Mads M. 2006. “Welfare Regimes and Attitudes towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited.” European Sociological Review 22 (2): 157–70.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Mads M. 2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 25 (6): 723–37.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Mads M. 2013. “The Effect of Macroeconomic and Social Conditions on the Demand for Redistribution: A Pseudo Panel Approach.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (2): 149–63.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef. 2006. “Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development.” International Organization 60 (2): 401–31.Google Scholar
Jakobi, Anja P. 2011. “Political Parties and the Institutionalization of Education: A Comparative Analysis of Party Manifestos.” Comparative Education Review 55 (2): 189–209.Google Scholar
Jakobi, Anja P., Martens, Kerstin, and Wolf, Klaus D.. 2010. “Introduction: A Governance Perspective on Education Policy.” In Education in Political Science: Discovering a Neglected Field, edited by Jakobi, Anja P., Martens, Kerstin, and Wolf, Klaus Dieter, 1–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Tor G. 2011a. “Education and the Zeitgeist: Government Positions and Public Opinion on Income Distribution.” European Political Science Review 3 (1): 103–24.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Tor G. 2011b. “Welfare Attitudes and Social Expenditure: Do Regimes Shape Public Opinion?” Social Indicators Research 101 (3): 323–40.Google Scholar
Jann, Ben. 2013. “Coefplot: Stata Module to Plot Regression Coefficients and Other Results.” Retrieved October 10, 2019. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457686.html.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jennifer L. 2010. “School Choice or Schools’ Choice? Managing in an Era of Accountability.” Sociology of Education 83 (3): 227–47.Google Scholar
Jennings, Will, and John, Peter. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 838–54.Google Scholar
Jensen, Carsten. 2011. “Capitalist Systems, De-industrialization, and the Politics of Public Education.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (4): 412–35.Google Scholar
Jensen, Carsten. 2012. “Labour Market- versus Life Course-Related Social Policies: Understanding Cross-programme Differences.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 275–91.Google Scholar
Jensen, Carsten, and Petersen, Michael B.. 2017. “The Deservingness Heuristics and the Politics of Health Care.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 68–83.Google Scholar
Jensen, Carsten, and Lee, Seonghui C.. 2018. “Mass Media Attention to Welfare State Reform: Evidence from Britain, 1996–2014.” West European Politics 42 (1): 113–32.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jason. 2013. “Policy Feedback and Support for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (2): 134–48.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., and Napier, Jaime L.. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1): 307–37.Google Scholar
Junemann, Carolina, and Ball, Stephen J.. 2013. “Ark and the Revolution of State Education in England.” Education Inquiry 4 (3): 226–11.Google Scholar
Jungblut, Jens. 2016. “Re-distribution and Public Governance–the Politics of Higher Education in Western Europe.” European Politics and Society 17 (3): 331–52.Google Scholar
Kang, Shin-Goo, and Powell, G. Bingham. 2010. “Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1014–28.Google Scholar
Kangas, Olli. 2003. “The Grasshopper and the Ants: Popular Opinions of Just Distribution in Australia and Finland.” Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (6): 721–43.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Kauder, Björn, and Potrafke, Niklas. 2013. “Government Ideology and Tuition Fee Policy: Evidence from the German States.” CESifo Working Paper 4205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keep, Ewart. 2015. “Governance in English Vet: On the Functioning of a Fractured ‘System’.” Research in Comparative and International Education 10 (4): 464–75.Google Scholar
Keller, Eileen. 2018. “Noisy Business Politics: Lobbying Strategies and Business Influence after the Financial Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3): 287–306.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Schneer, Benjamin, and White, Ariel. 2017. “How the News Media Activate Public Expression and Influence National Agendas.” Science 358 (6364): 776–80.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “Germany: The Vanishing Opposition.” In Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, edited by Dahl, Robert A., 319–45. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleider, Hanna, Röth, Leonce, and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2018. “Ideological Alignment and the Distribution of Public Expenditure.” West European Politics 41 (3): 779–802.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, Michael B. 2007. “Do Welfare State Regimes Determine Public Sector Reforms? Choice Reforms in American, Swedish and German Schools.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (4): 444–68.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, Michael B. 2008. “School Vouchers and the New Politics of the Welfare State.” Governance 21 (4): 479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, Heike, and Sagarzazu, Inaki. 2016. “Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention.” West European Politics 39 (2): 380–98.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, Ferrarini, Tommy, and Englund, Stefan. 2013. “Women’s Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-examined.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 20 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan, and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2014. “Citizens, Policy Feedback, and European Welfare States.” In How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes, edited by Kumlin, Staffan and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, 3–16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landtag NRW. 2013. Gesetzentwurf der Landesregierung: Erstes Gesetz zur Umsetzung der VN-Behindertenrechtskonvention in den Schulen. Düsseldorf: Landtag NRW.Google Scholar
Larsen, Christian A. 2008. “The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–68.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Julian. 1982. “The Distribution of Public Expenditure on Education.” Economica 49: 63–8.Google Scholar
LEB. 2012. Stellungnahme des 16. LEB zum Gesetzentwurf zur Einrichtung der Gemeinschaftsschule. Stuttgart: Landeselternbeirat Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1979. “Liberal Corporatism and Party Government.” In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, edited by Schmitter, Phillipe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, 147–83. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
León, Margarita, and Pavolini, Emmanuele. 2014. “‘Social Investment’ or Back to ‘Familism’: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family and Care Policies in Italy and Spain.” South European Society and Politics 19 (3): 353–69.Google Scholar
Lergetporer, Philipp, Werner, Katharina, and Woessmann, Ludger. 2017. “Public Opinion on Education Policy in Germany.” CESifo Working Paper 6602.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane, and West, Anne. 2017. “Early Childhood Education and Care in England under Austerity: Continuity or Change in Political Ideas, Policy Goals, Availability, Affordability and Quality in a Childcare Market?” Journal of Social Policy 46 (2): 331–48.Google Scholar
Liberal Democrats. 2010. Change That Works for You: Building a Fairer Britain. London: Liberal Democrats.Google Scholar
Liberal Democrats. 2015. Stronger Economy. Fairer Society. Opportunities for Everyone. London: Liberal Democrats.Google Scholar
Llera, Roberto F., and Pérez, Manuel M.. 2012. “Colegios Concertados Y Selección De Escuela En España: Un Círculo Vicioso.” Presupuesto y gasto público 67: 97–118.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Eva, and Penn, Helen. 2014. “Childcare Markets in an Age of Austerity.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 22 (3): 386–96.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Eva. 2015. “Early Childhood Education and Care Policy in England under the Coalition Government.” London Review of Education 13 (2): 144–56.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice.” Public Administration Review 33 (4): 298–310.Google Scholar
Lundahl, Lisbeth. 2002a. “From Centralisation to Decentralisation: Governance of Education in Sweden.” European Educational Research Journal 1 (4): 625–36.Google Scholar
Lundahl, Lisbeth. 2002b. “Sweden: Decentralization, Deregulation, Quasi-Markets – and Then What?” Journal of Education Policy 17 (6): 687–97.Google Scholar
Lundahl, Lisbeth, Arreman, Inger E., Lundström, Ulf, and Rönnberg, Linda. 2010. “Setting Things Right? Swedish Upper Secondary School Reform in a 40-Year Perspective.” European Journal of Education 45 (1): 46–59.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. “Smaghi versus the Parties: Representative Government and Institutional Constraints.” In Politics in the Age of Austerity, edited by Schäfer, Achim and Streeck, Wolfgang, 143–68. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Margalit, Yotam. 2010. “Short-term Communication Effects or Longstanding Dispositions? The Public’s Response to the Financial Crisis of 2008.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 852–67.Google Scholar
Mancebón, María J., Calero, Jorge, Choi, Álvaro, and Ximénez-de-Embún, Domingo P.. 2012. “The Efficiency of Public and Publicly Subsidized High Schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 63 (11): 1516–33.Google Scholar
Manow, Philip, and Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2009. “Religion and the Western Welfare State: The Theoretical Context.” In Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States, edited by van Kersbergen, Kees and Manow, Philip, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay L.. 2002. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30 (6): 630–67.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Brooks, Clem. 2012. “How Sociology Lost Public Opinion: A Genealogy of a Missing Concept in the Study of the Political.” Sociological Theory 30 (2): 89–113.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2013. “Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 80–103.Google Scholar
Marhuenda-Fluixá, Fernando, Salvà, Francesca, Saurin, Almudena A. Navas, and López, Miriam Abiétar. 2015. “Twenty Years of Basic Vocational Education Provision in Spain: Changes and Trends.” International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training 2 (2): 137–51.Google Scholar
Marí-Klose, Pau, Solanas, Sandra E., and Marí-Klose, Marga. 2016. “Crisis Y Pobreza Infantil En España.” Revista española del tercer sector (32): 141–69.Google Scholar
Martens, Kerstin, Niemann, Dennis, and Teltemann, Janna. 2016. “Effects of International Assessments in Education: A Multidisciplinary Review.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (5): 516–22.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martínez-García, José S. 2009. “Fracaso Escolar, Pisa Y La Difícil Eso.” Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación (RASE) 2 (1): 56–85.Google Scholar
Martínez-García, José S. 2016. “Formación Profesional: Tensiones Y Dinámicas Sociales.” Revista Internacional de Organizaciones 17: 21–42.Google Scholar
Marx, Paul, and Nguyen, Christoph. 2018. “Political Participation in European Welfare States: Does Social Investment Matter?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 912–43.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MECD. 2017. Recursos Económicos. Gasto Público. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.Google Scholar
MECD. 2018. La Matriculación En FP Dual En España Se Multiplica Por 5. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2014. Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Sabotaged the American Dream. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Ramirez, Francisco O., and Soysal, Yasemin N.. 1992. “World Expansion of Mass Education, 1870–1980.” Sociology of Education 65 (2): 128–49.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2011. Special Interest: Teacher Unions and America´s Public Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2017. “Teachers Unions in the United States: The Politics of Blocking.” In The Comparative Politics of Education: Teacher Unions and Education Systems around the World, edited by Moe, Terry M. and Wiborg, Susanne, 24–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Wiborg, Susanne. 2017. “Introduction.” In The Comparative Politics of Education: Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World, edited by Moe, Terry M. and Wiborg, Susanne, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molina, Oscar, and Rhodes, Martin. 2007. “The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy.” In Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy, edited by Hancké, Bob, Rhodes, Martin, and Thatcher, Mark, 223–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, Alan D. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (1): 6–28.Google Scholar
Morel, Nathalie, Palier, Bruno, and Palme, Joakim. 2012. “Beyond the Welfare State as We Knew It?” In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, edited by Morel, Nathalie, Palier, Bruno, and Palme, Joakim, 1–30. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2012. “Promoting Social Investment through Work-Family Policies: Which Nations Do It and Why?” In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, edited by Morel, Nathalie, Palier, Bruno, and Palme, Joakim, 153–77. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2013. “Path Shifting of the Welfare State: Electoral Competition and the Expansion of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe.” World Politics 65 (1): 73–115.Google Scholar
Mosher, James S. 2015. “Education State, Welfare Capitalism Regimes, and Politics.” Comparative European Politics 13 (2): 240–62.Google Scholar
Mulia, Marc, and Proff, Peter. 2016. Nach dem NRW-Schulkonsens: Wie weiter auf dem Weg zu einer Schule für alle? Duisburg: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Müller, Walter, and Shavit, Yossi. 1998. “Bildung und Beruf im institutionellen Kontext: Eine vergleichende Studie in 13 Ländern.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 1 (4): 501–33.Google Scholar
National Audit Office. 2016. Financial Sustainability of Schools. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
Naumann, Elias, Buss, Christopher, and Bähr, Johannes. 2016. “How Unemployment Experience Affects Support for the Welfare State: A Real Panel Approach.” European Sociological Review 32 (1): 81–92.Google Scholar
Naumann, Ingela. 2012. “Childcare Politics in the ‘New’ Welfare State: Class, Religion, and Gender in the Shaping of Political Agendas.” In The Politics of the New Welfare State, edited by Bonoli, Giuliano and Natali, David, 158–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neimanns, Erik, Busemeyer, Marius R., and Garritzmann, Julian L.. 2018. “How Popular Are Social Investment Policies Really? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Eight Western European Countries.” European Sociological Review 43 (3): 238–53.Google Scholar
Nikolai, Rita, and Ebner, Christian. 2012. “The Link between Vocational Training and Higher Education in Switzerland, Austria, and Germany.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, edited by Busemeyer, Marius R. and Trampusch, Christine, 234–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolai, Rita, Briken, Kendra, and Niemann, Dennis. 2017. “Teacher Unionism in Germany: Fragmented Competitors.” In The Comparative Politics of Education: Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World, edited by Moe, Terry M. and Wiborg, Susanne, 114–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Lennart. 2017. “Väljare och valda om vinster i välfärden.” In Larmar och gör sig till, edited by Andersson, Ulrika, Ohlsson, Jonas, Oscarsson, Henrik, and Oskarson, Maria, 489–503. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet SOM-institutet.Google Scholar
NRWSPD and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen NRW. 2012. Koalitionsvertrag 2012–2017: Verantwortung für ein starkes NRW – Miteinander die Zukunft gestalten. Düsseldorf: NRWSPD, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen NRW.Google Scholar
NUS. 2016. “Written Evidence Submitted by the National Union of Students (Herb 08).” Higher Education and Research Bill: Public Bill Committee. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
OECD. 2013. Education Database. Paris: OECD. Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/data/education-database_edu-db-data-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2018b. Education Database. Paris: OECD. Retrieved January 1, 2018. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/data/education-database_edu-db-data-enGoogle Scholar
OECD Family Database. 2018. Paris: OECD. Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htmGoogle Scholar
OECD Labour Force Statistics. 2018. Paris: OECD. Retrieved June 1, 2018. https://data.oecd.org/emp/labour-force.htmGoogle Scholar
OECD National Accounts Statistics. 2018. Paris: OECD. Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/data/oecd-national-accounts-statistics_na-data-enGoogle Scholar
OECD PISA. 2012. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD PISA. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and Practices for Successful Schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Ofsted. 2017. The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2016/17. London: Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.Google Scholar
Olofsson, Jonas, and Panican, Alexandru. 2017. “An Education Policy Paradigm That Fails Upper Secondary School Pupils.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 69 (4): 495–516.Google Scholar
Orfield, Gary, and Frankenberg, Erica. 2013. Educational Delusions? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–90.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R.. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 23–44.Google Scholar
Papadakis, Elim. 1993. “Class Interests, Class Politics and Welfare State Regimes.” British Journal of Sociology 44 (2): 249–70.Google Scholar
Penn, Helen. 2013. “Childcare Markets: Do They Work?” In Childcare Markets: Can They Deliver an Equitable Service? edited by Lloyd, Eva and Penn, Helen, 19–24. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Pérez García, Francisco, Jiménez, Ezequiel Uriel, Tormo, Vicent Cucarella, Lahiguera, Laura Hernández, and Guillén, Ángel Soler. 2016. Cuentas De La Educación En España. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Peters, Yvette, and Ensink, Sander J.. 2015. “Differential Responsiveness in Europe: The Effects of Preference Difference and Electoral Participation.” West European Politics 38 (3): 577–600.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Fabian T. 2008. “Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and Its Institutional Context.” European Sociological Review 24 (5): 543–65.Google Scholar
Philips, Andrew Q., Rutherford, Amanda, and Whitten, Guy D.. 2016. “Dynamic Pie: A Strategy for Modeling Trade-Offs in Compositional Variables over Time.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 268–83.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–79.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1998. “Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-Industrial Welfare States Confront Permanent Austerity.” Journal of European Public Policy 5 (4): 539–60.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, ed. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2006. “Public Policies as Institutions.” In Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, edited by Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen, and Galvin, Daniel, 114–31. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Policy Exchange. 2010. Blocking the Best: Obstacles to New, Independent State Schools. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Policy Exchange. 2015. A Rising Tide: The Competitive Benefits of Free Schools. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “The Chain of Responsiveness.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 91–105.Google Scholar
Powell, Justin J. W., and Solga, Heike. 2011. “Why Are Higher Education Participation Rates in Germany So Low? Institutional Barriers to Higher Education Expansion.” Journal of Education and Work 24 (1–2): 49–68.Google Scholar
Powell, Justin J. W. 2017. “Räumliche Vielfalt der inklusiven Bildung und sonderpädagogische Fördersysteme im Vergleich.” In Inklusive Bildung und gesellschaftliche Exklusion, edited by Gercke, Magdalena, Opalinksi, Saskia, and Thonagel, Tim, 25–38. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
PP and Ciudadanos. 2016. 150 Compromisos Para Mejorar España. Madrid: PP and Ciudadanos.Google Scholar
PSLA. 2013a. “Alliance Slams Government Plans to Alter Childcare Ratios; 29th January 2013.” Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.pre-school.org.uk/alliance-slams-government-plans-alter-childcare-ratios.Google Scholar
PSLA. 2013b. “Parents Reject Government Plans to Relax Childcare Ratios; 17th May 2013.” Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.pre-school.org.uk/parents-reject-government-plans-relax-childcare-ratios.Google Scholar
PSLA. 2017. “Childcare Funding and the 30 Hours: A Pre-school Learning Alliance Media Briefing.” Retrieved June 1, 2018. www.pre-school.org.uk/sites/default/files/early_education_and_childcare_funding_-_pre-school_learning_alliance_briefing_2017_for_media_2.pdfGoogle Scholar
PSOE. 2015. El Cambio Que Une – Programa Electoral, Elecciones Generales 2015. Madrid: Partido Socialista Obrero Español.Google Scholar
Raftery, Adrian E., and Hout, Michael. 1993. “Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education.” Sociology of Education 66 (1): 41–62.Google Scholar
Rambla, Xavier, Valiente, Óscar, and Frías, Carla. 2011. “The Politics of School Choice in Two Countries with Large Private‐Dependent Sectors (Spain and Chile): Family Strategies, Collective Action and Lobbying.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (3): 431–47.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Anne, Mäder, Lars Kai, and Reher, Stefanie. 2018. “With a Little Help from the People? The Role of Public Opinion in Advocacy Success.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (2): 139–64.Google Scholar
Rauh, Christian, Kirchner, Antje, and Kappe, Roland. 2011. “Political Parties and Higher Education Spending: Who Favours Redistribution?” West European Politics 34 (6): 1185–206.Google Scholar
Raven, Judith, Achterberg, Peter, Van der Veen, Romke, and Yerkes, Mara. 2011. “An Institutional Embeddedness of Welfare Opinions? The Link between Public Opinion and Social Policy in the Netherlands (1970–2004).” Journal of Social Policy 40 (2): 369–86.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. “Risk and Redistribution: An Individual-level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 855–81.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2012. “Social Policy by Popular Demand.” World Politics 63 (2): 271–99.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp, Hacker, Jacob S., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2012. “Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 386–406.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2017. “Sweden Looking to Limit Profits of Private Sector Welfare Providers.” July 5, 2017. Retrieved March 12, 2018. www.reuters.com/article/sweden-welfare-profit/sweden-looking-to-limit-profits-of-private-sector-welfare-providers-idUSL8N1JW25L.Google Scholar
RLV. 2013. Schluss mit der ideologisch gesteuerten Bildungspolitik! RLV fordert erneut Anpassung der Sachkostenbeiträge und Lehrerstunden zur individuellen Förderung. Leingarten: Realschullehrerverband Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Roosma, Femke, Van Oorschot, Wim, and Gelissen, John. 2014. “The Preferred Role and Perceived Performance of the Welfare State: European Welfare Attitudes from a Multidimensional Perspective.” Social Science Research 44 (March): 200–10.Google Scholar
Roosma, Femke, Van Oorschot, Wim, and Gelissen, John. 2016. “The Achilles’ Heel of Welfare State Legitimacy: Perceptions of Overuse and Underuse of Social Benefits in Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (2): 177–96.Google Scholar
Rösner, Ernst. 2011. “Spiegel der Wirklichkeit: Der Schulkompromiss.” Schule NRW Sonderausgabe Schulkonsens/Sekundarschule 2011 (12): 6–9.Google Scholar
Rosset, Jan. 2013. “Are the Policy Preferences of Relatively Poor Citizens under-represented in the Swiss Parliament?”. Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (4): 490–504.Google Scholar
Rosset, Jan, Giger, Nathalie, and Bernauer, Julian. 2013. “More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation.” West European Politics 36 (4): 817–35.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 1992. “Explaining Swedish Corporatism: The Formative Movement.” Scandinavian Political Studies 15 (3): 173–90.Google Scholar
Royo, Sebastián. 2007. “Varieties of Capitalism in Spain: Business and the Politics of Coordination.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 13 (1): 47–65.Google Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Paul. 2010. “Training Markets.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by Peterson, Penelope, Baker, Eva L., and McGaw, Barry, 496–502. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sass, Katharina. 2018. “Cleavages and Coalitions: Comprehensive School Reforms in Norway and North Rhine-Westphalia/Germany (1954–1979).” University of Bergen (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Schlauch, Rezzo, and Weber, Reinhold. 2015. Keine Angst vor der Macht: Die Grünen in Baden-Württemberg. Köln: Emons Verlag.Google Scholar
Schleicher, Andreas. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación 34. Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay L., Page, Benjamin I., Verba, Sidney, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2005. “Inequalities of Political Voice.” In Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, edited by Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda, 19–87. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1980. CDU und SPD an der Regierung: Ein Vergleich ihrer Politik in den Ländern. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.” European Journal of Political Research 30 (2): 155–83.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 2007. “Testing the Retrenchment Hypothesis: Educational Spending, 1960–2002.” In The Disappearing State? Retrenchment Realities in an Age of Globalisation, edited by Castles, Francis G., 159–83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1979. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, edited by Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, 7–52. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Schueler, Beth E., and West, Martin. 2016. “Sticker Shock: How Information Affects Citizen Support for Public School Funding.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (1): 90–113.Google Scholar
Schulze-Cleven, Tobias, and Olson, Jennifer R.. 2017. “Worlds of Higher Education Transformed: Toward Varieties of Academic Capitalism.” Higher Education 73 (6): 813–31.Google Scholar
Schütz, Gabriela, West, Martin R., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2007. “School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Equity of Student Achievement. International Evidence from PISA 2003.” OECD Education Working Papers 14.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y. 2011. “Public Opinion and American Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (5): 982–1017.Google Scholar
Sharp, Elaine B. 1999. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Shavit, Yossi, and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, eds. 1993. Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Simsa, Ruth, Heinrich, Marlene, and Totter, Marion. 2015. “Von der Puerta Del Sol ins Europaparlament: Organisationale Ausdifferenzierungen der spanischen Protestbewegung.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 28 (3): 8–16.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1997. “The G.I. Bill and U.S. Social Policy: Past and Future.” Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2): 95–115.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune. 2007. “Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3): 323–44.Google Scholar
Solga, Heike. 2014. “Education, Economic Inequality and the Promises of the Social Investment State.” Socio-Economic Review 12 (2): 269–97.Google Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2015. “Everything to Everyone: The Electoral Consequences of the Broad-Appeal Strategy in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 841–54.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, and Schram, Sanford F.. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–27.Google Scholar
SOU. 2008a. Framtidsvägen: En reformerad gymnasieskola (SOU 2008:27). Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utrerningar.Google Scholar
SOU. 2008b. Högre krav och kvalitet i den nya Gymnasieskolan (Proposition 2008/09:199). Stockholm: Gymnasieutredningen.Google Scholar
SOU. 2008c. Självständiga lärosäten (SOU 2008:104). Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.Google Scholar
SOU. 2009. En akademi i tiden – Ökad frihet för universitet och högskolor (SOU 2009/10:149). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
SOU. 2016. Ordning och reda i välfärden (SOU 2016:78). Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Klüver, Heike. 2015. “Voter Polarization and Party Responsiveness: Why Parties Emphasize Divided Issues, but Remain Silent on Unified Issues.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (2): 343–62.Google Scholar
Städtetag. 2012. Gesetz zur Gemeinschaftsschule; Anhörung. Stuttgart: Städtetag Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Statement of Government Policy. 2006. “Statement of Government Policy 6 October 2006. Presented by the Swedish Prime Minister, Mr Fredrik Reinfelt, Riksdag, 6 October 2006.” Retrieved January 24, 2019. www.government.se/information-material/2006/10/statement-of-government-policy-6-october-2006/Google Scholar
Statement of Government Policy. 2010. “Statement of Government Policy 5 October 2010. Presented by the Swedish Prime Minister, Mr Fredrik Reinfelt, Riksdag, 5 October 2010.” Retrieved January 24, 2019. www.government.se/information-material/2010/10/statement-of-government-policy-5-october-2010/Google Scholar
Statement of Government Policy. 2014. “Statement of Government Policy 3 October 2014.” Retrieved March 12, 2018. www.government.se/information-material/2014/10/statement-of-government-policy-3-october-2014/.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt. 2016. Bildungsfinanzbericht 2016. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, Daniel. 2011. “How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 748–61.Google Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 620–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 2011. “The Issues in Representation.” In Who Gets Represented?, edited by Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Chrisopher, 347–60. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543–65.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (2): 368–77.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1985. “Community, Market, State – and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order.” In Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe C., 1–29. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Mertens, Daniel. 2011. “Fiscal Austerity and Public Investment: Is the Possible the Enemy of the Necessary?” MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/12.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 2004. “Class, Attitudes and the Welfare State: Sweden in Comparative Perspective.” Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 119–38.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 2010. “Policy Feedback, Generational Replacement, and Attitudes to State Intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 119–35.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 2012. “Welfare States and Welfare Attitudes.” In Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond, edited by Svallfors, Stefan, 1–24. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan, and Tyllström, Anna. 2017. “Lobbying for Profits: Private Companies and the Privatization of the Welfare State in Sweden.” Institute for Future Studies Working Paper 2017/1.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan, and Tyllström, Anna. 2018. “Resilient Privatization: The Puzzling Case of for-Profit Welfare Providers in Sweden.” Socio-Economic Review 16 (3): 685.Google Scholar
Svenskt Näringsliv. 2016. Attityder, antal och etablering. Stockholm: Svenskt Näringsliv.Google Scholar
SVT Nyheter. 2017a. “ANALYS: Ett praktfullt slag i luften.” September 3, 2017. Retrieved March 12, 2018. www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/analys-ett-praktfullt-slag-i-luften.Google Scholar
SVT Nyheter. 2017b. “Regeringen vill införa vinsttak för privata välfärdsföretag inom skolan och omsorgen.” September 3, 2017. Retrieved March 12, 2018. www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/regeringen-infor-vinsttak-for-privata-valfardsforetag-inom-skolan-och-omsorgen.Google Scholar
Tarabini, Aina, and Montes, Alejandro. 2015. “La Agenda Política Contra El Abandono Escolar Prematuro En España: La Lomce Contra Las Evidencias Internacionales.” Avances en supervisión educativa 23.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Pedro, Kim, Sungwoong, Landoni, Pablo, and Gilani, Zulfiqar. 2017. Rethinking the Public-Private Mix in Higher Education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2007. “Contemporary Challenges to the German Vocational Training System.” Regulation & Governance 1 (3): 247–60.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Busemeyer, Marius R.. 2012. “Institutional Change in German Vocational Training: From Collectivism toward Segmentalism.” In The Comparative Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation Systems, edited by Busemeyer, Marius R. and Trampusch, Christine, 68–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Titz, Sebastian. 2014. “Wankas Visionen: Vorschlag zur Grundgesetzänderung.” SPIEGEL Online. June 17. Retrieved February 20, 2020. www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/uni/grundgesetz-wanka-will-kooperationsverbot-bei-hochschulen-aufweichen-a-975702.html.Google Scholar
Toshkov, Dimiter, Mäder, Lars, and Rasmussen, Anne. 2018. “Party Government and Policy Responsiveness: Evidence from Three Parliamentary Democracies.” Journal of Public Policy Accessed online at FirstView https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000417.Google Scholar
UK Parliament. 2017. House of Commons Hansard: Free Childcare; Debate 12 October 2017. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
Universities UK. 2016. “Written Evidence Submitted by Universities UK (Herb 06).” Higher Education and Research Bill: Public Bill Committee. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
Valiente, Celia. 2009. “Child Care in Spain after 1975: The Educational Rationale, the Catholic Church, and Women in Civil Society.” In Childcare and Preschool Development in Europe, edited by Scheiwe, Kirsten and Willekens, Harry, 72–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Aelst, Peter, and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2011. “Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods.” International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (3): 295–313.Google Scholar
Van Dalen, Arjen, and Van Aelst, Peter. 2014. “The Media as Political Agenda-Setters: Journalists’ Perceptions of Media Power in Eight Western European Countries.” West European Politics 37 (1): 42–64.Google Scholar
Van de Werfhorst, Herman G., and Mijs, Jonathan J. B.. 2010. “Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 407–28.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, Wim. 2013. “Putting the Child-centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27.” European Journal of Social Security 15 (1): 4–27.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, Wim. 2014. To Whose Benefit? An Empirical and Comparative Investigation into the (Un)Intended Consequences of Family Policy in the Social Investment State. Antwerpen: Antwerpen University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, Wim, and Ghysels, Joris. 2016. “Explaining Patterns of Inequality in Childcare Service Use across 31 Developed Economies: A Welfare State Perspective.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 57 (5): 310–37.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, Wim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, Wim, and Meuleman, Bart. 2012. “Welfare Performance and Welfare Support.” In Contested Welfare States. Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond, edited by Svallfors, Stefan, 25–57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, Wim, and Meuleman, Bart. 2014. “Popular Deservingness of the Unemployed in the Context of Welfare State Policies, Economic Conditions and Cultural Climate.” In How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes, edited by Kumlin, Stafan and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, 244–68. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Van Vaerenbergh, Yves, and Thomas, Troy D.. 2012. “Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25 (2): 195–217.Google Scholar
VBE. 2015. Forsa-Lehrerbefragung im Auftrag des VBE zur inklusiven Beschulung. Dortmund: VBE Verlag NRW.Google Scholar
Vesa, Juho, Blomberg, Helena, and Kroll, Christian. 2015. “Minimal and Massive! Politicians’ Views on the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power Revisited.” International Journal of Press/Politics 20 (3): 279–96.Google Scholar
Vliegenthart, Rens, Walgrave, Stefaan, Baumgartner, Frank R., Bevan, Shaun, Breunig, Christian, Brouard, Sylvain, Bonafont, Laura Chaqués, Grossman, Emiliano, Jennings, Will, Mortensen, Peter B., Palau, Anna M., Sciarini, Pascal, and Tresch, Anke. 2016. “Do the Media Set the Parliamentary Agenda? A Comparative Study in Seven Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 283–301.Google Scholar
Voegtle, Eva M., Knill, Christoph, and Dobbins, Michael. 2011. “To What Extent Does Transnational Communication Drive Cross-national Policy Convergence? The Impact of the Bologna-Process on Domestic Higher Education Policies.” Higher Education 61 (1): 77–94.Google Scholar
Vossiek, Janis. 2018. Collective Skill Formation in Liberal Market Economies? The Politics of Training Reforms in Australia, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Walgrave, Stefaan. 2008. “Again, the Almighty Mass Media? The Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power According to Politicians and Journalists in Belgium.” Political Communication 25 (4): 445–59.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 2010. “Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders? Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change.” Journal of Public Policy 30 (2): 137–62.Google Scholar
Weijters, Bert, Schillewaert, Niels, and Geuens, Maggie. 2008. “Assessing Response Styles across Modes of Data Collection.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36 (3): 409–22.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “The ‘More for Less’ Paradox: Public Attitudes on Taxing and Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (3): 310–16.Google Scholar
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, Jerry, Billiet, Jaak, and Cambré, Bart. 2003. “Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-type Score Items.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34 (6): 702–22.Google Scholar
Wert, José Ignacio. 2017. “Comparecencia.” Subcomisión Pacto Estado Social y Político por la Educación 14. Madrid: Congreso de los Disputados.Google Scholar
West, Anne, and Nikolai, Rita. 2013. “Welfare Regimes and Education Regimes: Equality of Opportunity and Expenditure in the EU (and US).” Journal of Social Policy 42 (3): 469–93.Google Scholar
West, Anne. 2014. “Academies in England and Independent Schools (Fristående Skolor) in Sweden: Policy, Privatisation, Access and Segregation.” Research Papers in Education 29 (3): 330–50.Google Scholar
West, Martin R., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2010. “‘Every Catholic Child in a Catholic School’: Historical Resistance to State Schooling, Contemporary Private Competition and Student Achievement across Countries.” Economic Journal 120 (546): 229–55.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne. 2009. Education and Social Integration: Comprehensive Schooling in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne. 2010. “Why Is There No Comprehensive Education in Germany? A Historical Explanation.” History of Education 39 (4): 539–56.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne. 2013. “Neo-liberalism and Universal State Education: The Cases of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 1980–2011.” Comparative Education 49 (4): 407–23.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne. 2015. “Privatizing Education: Free School Policy in Sweden and England.” Comparative Education Review 59 (3): 473–97.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne. 2017. “Teachers Unions in the Nordic Countries: Solidarity and the Politics of Self-Interest.” In The Comparative Politics of Education: Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World, edited by Moe, Terry M. and Wiborg, Susanne, 144–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiborg, Susanne, Green, Francis, Taylor-Gooby, Peter, and Wilde, Rachel J.. 2018. “Free Schools in England: ‘Not Unlike Other Schools’?” Journal of Social Policy 47 (1): 119–37.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’” Electoral Studies 24 (4): 555–79.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka., Stuart N. 2012. “Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1407–32.Google Scholar
Woessmann, Ludger. 2007. “International Evidence on School Competition, Autonomy, and Accountability: A Review.” Peabody Journal of Education 82 (2–3): 473–97.Google Scholar
Woessmann, Ludger, Lüdemann, Elke, Schütz, Gabriela, and West, Martin R.. 2007. “School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Level of Student Achievement: International Evidence from Pisa 2003.” OECD Education Working Papers 13.Google Scholar
Wolbers, Maarten H. J. 2007. “Patterns of Labour Market Entry: A Comparative Perspective on School-to-work Transitions in 11 European Countries.” Acta Sociologica 50 (3): 189–210.Google Scholar
Wolf, Alison. 2015. Fixing a Broken Training System: The Case for an Apprenticeship Levy. London: Social Market Foundation.Google Scholar
Wolf, Frieder. 2006. Die Bildungsausgaben der Bundesländer im Vergleich: Welche Faktoren erklären ihre beträchtliche Variation? Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Wolf, Frieder, and Kraemer, Andreas. 2012. “On the Electoral Relevance of Education Policy in the German Länder.” German Politics 21 (4): 444–63.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar