Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T14:40:28.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V - Results of the Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

The results of Malaysia's elections had always been dull in one respect : the ruling coalition was so well entrenched that in the past, no observer saw a possible change of government, nor even the remote chance that the opposition could break the government's two-third majority in the national Parliament. There was the possibility of the opposition effecting a change in government only at the state level in one or two of the thirteen states. Ever since the debacle in the 1969 elections, the ruling coalition had seemed quite unshakeable. However, in 1990, the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition appeared vulnerable. The opposition had galvernized around Tengku Razaleigh and organized two fronts to take on the ruling coalition. In this election, the opposition was not only talking in terms of denying the Barisan Nasional of the two-third majority, but of forming the next government with the co-operation of some political parties in Sabah and Sarawak.

At the state level, the opposition was confident of capturing the state government in at least two states. Kelantan was not only Tengku Razaleigh's home state, but also the stronghold of PAS which had won ten state seats and lost in fourteen other constituencies by majorities of less than 1,000 votes in the previous election. In Penang, the DAP had launched its “do or die” battle to take over the state government by moving its party stalwarts from their “safe” seats to contest against the “strongmen” from the ruling coalition. Backed by the assumption that the DAP would continue to win in its traditional strongholds anyway, this step was deemed necessary for the party to gain additional seats at the expense of the ruling coalition. The calculation was that with Semangat '46 winning in a few constituencies, an opposition takeover was not an impossible target.

For months, the opposition had been campaigning on the issue of a twocoalition system and the idea seemed to have been well received by the public.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×