Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:46:06.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - The Social Life of Simulated Markets: A Market Studies Approach

from Part II - Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

By
Stefan Schwarzkopf
Edited by
Susi Geiger ,
Katy Mason ,
Neil Pollock ,
Philip Roscoe ,
Annmarie Ryan ,
Stefan Schwarzkopf  and
Pascale Trompette
Susi Geiger
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Katy Mason
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Neil Pollock
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Philip Roscoe
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Annmarie Ryan
Affiliation:
University of Limerick
Stefan Schwarzkopf
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Pascale Trompette
Affiliation:
Université de Grenoble
Get access

Summary

Simulated markets are a fascinating paradox for Market Studies. They are markets organized around nothing. No real property rights get exchanged when markets are “only” simulated. They are unproductive in the sense that simulated markets produce no surplus for anyone. They are markets that do not actually exist. Yet, simulations of market processes play an increasingly important role in market practices as well as in wider business pedagogy. This chapter uses historical and contemporary evidence on the development and uses of market simulations in various settings – ranging from business schools to Wall Street – to test the post-performativity paradigm in Market Studies. The chapter shows that real-world market arrangements are changed not with the help of economic models, economic theories or economists themselves, but rather through business school teachers, family accountants, software tinkerers and designs that emerged completely outside the sphere of economic theory and modelling. By studying the early uses of electronic spreadsheets for market simulations, we can see that market arrangements require calculative communities rather than economists.

Keywords

Performativitysimulated marketsmarkets in the makingcalculative communities
Type
Chapter
Information
Market Studies
Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action
 , pp. 144 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspers, P. (2011) Markets. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, P. (2019) The Unmasking Style in Social Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1981) Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Bellman, R. (1958) Top management decision and simulation processes, talk given at the National Convention of the American Institute of Industrial Engineers, Los Angeles, 12 June.Google Scholar
Bellman, R., et al. (1957) On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game. Operations Research, 5(4), 469–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blue Chip Journal (1987), 1(2).Google Scholar
Burns, J. (2019) How the invention of spreadsheet software unleashed Wall Street on the world. Gizmodo, 14 August. Available at https://gizmodo.com/how-the-invention-of-spreadsheet-software-unleashed-wal-1837177232.Google Scholar
Bush, R. F., and Carlson, M. S. (1988) Microcomputers in marketing education, in Bahn, K. (ed.), Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference. Cham: Springer, 319–323.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2021) Markets in the Making: Rethinking Competition, Goods and Innovation. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., and Roth, A. E. (2021) The design and performation of markets: a discussion. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIO Magazine (1999) Daniel S. Bricklin. 15 December, 140.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F. (2007) A sociology of market-things: on tending the garden of choices in mass retailing, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Munesia, F. (eds.), Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell, 109–129.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F., and Hagberg, J. (2016) Win, earn, gain: gamification in the history of retailing, in Dymek, M., and Zackariasson, P. (eds.), The Business of Gamification: A Critical Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 81–98.Google Scholar
Coombs, N. (2022) Narrating imagined crises: how central bank storytelling exerts infrastructural power. Economy and Society, 51(4), 679–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J., and Curtis, H. (2020) Noise as information: finance economics as second-order observation. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(5), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. (2020) Post-liberal competitions? Pragmatics of gamification and weaponization, in Stark, D. (ed.), The Performance Complex: Competition and Competitions in Social Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deringer, W. (2020) Michael Milken’s spreadsheets: computation and charisma in finance in the go-go ’80s. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 42(3), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, W., and Sauder, M. (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, E. (2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, A. J. (2001) The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: a brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, A. J., and Schumacher, M. (1984) The use of decision simulations in management training programs: current perspectives. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 11, 228–231.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1985) Fun and games in the corporation. Macworld, August, 144–147.Google Scholar
Fleck, J. (1988) Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological developments in robotics, Programme on Information and Communication Technologies Working Paper 4. Edinburgh: Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Greenlaw, P., Frey, W., and Vernon, I. (1979) Finansim: A Management Simulation, 2nd ed. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1986) Dan Bricklin Demo speeds prototyping via simulation. Computerworld, 20(7 April), 33, 36.Google Scholar
Hines, T. F. (1985) Hey, big spender! MacUser, November, 84–88, 153.Google Scholar
Ingleby, E. (2021) Neoliberalism, secondary and tertiary education, in Neoliberalism across Education: Policy and Practice from Early Childhood through Adult Learning. Cham: Springer, 53–71.Google Scholar
Jagoda, P. (2020) Playing through a serious crisis: on the neoliberal art of video games. Post45, 31 August. Available at https://post45.org/2020/08/playing-through-a-serious-crisis-on-the-neoliberal-art-of-video-games.Google Scholar
Khurana, R. (2007) From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibbee, J. M., Craft, C. J., and Nanus, B. (1961) Management Games. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Komporozos-Athanasiou, A. (2022) Speculative Communities: Living with Uncertainty in a Financialized World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler, P., and Schultz, R. L. (1970) Marketing simulations: review and prospects. Journal of Business, 43(3), 237–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1994) Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2002) Risk: A Sociological Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mace, S. (1986) Business simulations graduate into the real world. InfoWorld, 17 February, 37–38.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRaith, J. R., and Goeldner, C. R. (1962) A survey of marketing games. Journal of Marketing, 26(3), 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markulis, P., and Strang, D. (1985) The use of decision support systems (DSS) and operations management science (OR/MS) techniques to enhance the learning experience of students participating in computerized simulations. Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Exercises, 12, 30–34.Google Scholar
Martin, E. W. (1959) Teaching executives via simulation. Business Horizons, 2(2), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millionaire (1983) PC Magazine, June, 207.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, W., and Sims, J. T. (1974) Simulations: methods and applications, in Ferber, R. (ed.), Handbook of Marketing Research. New York: McGraw Hill, 2-518–2-546.Google Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2014) The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2020) Business education and anxiety in the performance of value, in Stark, D. (ed.), The Performance Complex: Competition and Competitions in Social Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., and Callon, M. (2007) Economic experiments and the construction of markets, in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 163–189.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. T. (2016) Struggling with simulations: decoding the neoliberal politics of digital games. PhD thesis, Ryerson University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Newbery, R., Lean, J., Moizer, J., and Haddoud, M. (2018) Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: the influence of simulation feedback and existing identity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osteryoung, J. S., McCarthy, D. E., and McDaniel, W. R. (1983) The use of VisiCalc in the teaching of corporate finance. Journal of Financial Education, 12, 82–91.Google Scholar
Perec, G. (1989) L’Infra-ordinaire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Reality Development Corp. (1986) What they do teach you at Wharton Business School. InfoWorld, 17 February, 43.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, F. M., et al. (1957) Top Management Decision Simulation: The AMA Approach. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Rilinger, G. (2023) Conceptual limits of performativity: assessing the feasibility of market design blueprints. Socio-Economic Review, 21(2), 885–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. (2012) Anticipatory Systems. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzkopf, S. (2019) Magic towns: creating the consumer fetish in market research test sites, in Bajde, D., Kjeldgaard, D., and Belk, R. W. (eds.), Consumer Culture Theory. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfert, R. (2016) Bugs, predations or manipulations? Incompatible epistemic regimes of high-frequency trading. Economy and Society, 45(2), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small ads (1983) PC Magazine, March, 527.Google Scholar
Stanger, K. (1986) Dan Bricklin’s Demo program. College & Research Libraries News, 47(9), 582–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrink, J. E., and Helmer, J. W. (2004) Intervention: simulating the war on global terrorism, Journal of Geography, 103(6), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Švelch, J. (2022) Normalizing player surveillance through video game infographics. New Media & Society, DOI: 10.1177/14614448221097889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touzet, L., and Corbeil, P. (2015) Vital Roux, forgotten forerunner of modern business games. Simulation & Gaming, 46(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkenbach, J. (1986) Dan Bricklin crafts a Demo program. Infoworld, 31 March, 41–43.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. (1993) A history of business teaching games in English-speaking and post-socialist countries: the origination and diffusion of a management education and development technology. Simulation & Gaming, 24(4), 446–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaloom, C. (2006) Out of the Pits: Traders and Technology from Chicago to London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×