Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:49:59.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Education for primary goods or for capabilities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Harry Brighouse  and
Elaine Unterhalter
Edited by
Harry Brighouse  and
Ingrid Robeyns
Harry Brighouse
Affiliation:
Professor of Philosophy at University of Wisconsin, Madison
Elaine Unterhalter
Affiliation:
Professor of Education and International Development at the Institute of Education, University of London
Harry Brighouse
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Ingrid Robeyns
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Imagine that you are a newly appointed education minister for a revolutionary government. The old order is done away with and there is no significant resistance. You have, therefore, a free hand to reconstruct the education system at will. You are committed to justice, so will want to ensure that educational opportunities are distributed justly. But what should those educational opportunities consist in? In so far as it is within your power to influence their content, what theory of the metric of justice should you turn to?

Our contention in this paper is that both Rawls's social primary goods theory and Sen and Nussbaum's capabilities approach offer some resources to guide your thinking. But neither will do on its own, and even jointly they leave a good deal undetermined. We do not have alternative proposals to hand; our conclusion is the rather prosaic one that the two approaches can complement each other, but that more work needs to be done.

EDUCATION AS A PRIMARY GOOD?

Let's turn first to the social primary goods. One natural move is to say that education is a social primary good in Rawls's sense. Rawls does not say this himself, so what is the basis on which one might make the move? His theory of justice applies at the level of ideal theory and, importantly, is designed in a model which assumes that no one is chronically and severely impaired.

Keywords

Amartya Sencapabilities approacheducationprimary goods approachsocial primary good
Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Justice
Primary Goods and Capabilities
 , pp. 193 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikman, S. 1999. Intercultural Education and Literacy: An Ethnographic Study of Indigenous Knowledge and Learning in the Peruvian Amazon. London: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H. 2002. “What Rights (if any) do Children Have?” in Archard, D. and Macleod, C. (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 2005. Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Gasper, D. 2003. “Human Well-Being: Concepts and Conceptualizations.” Paper delivered at Seminar on Capabilities, Sustainable Development and Freedom: University of Pavia, September 2003.
Gasper, D. 2004. “Capability Approach and Subjective Well-Being.” Paper delivered at Seminar on Capabilities and Happiness: St. Edmund's College, University of Cambridge, March 2004.
Gutmann, A. 1980. “Children, Paternalism, and Education: A Liberal Argument,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 4: 338–58.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. and McPherson, M. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2006. “The Capability Approach in Practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14, 3: 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. 2003. “Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration,” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37, 1: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1985. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom,” Journal of Philosophy 82: 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. April 1992. “Race and the Schooling of Black Americans,” The Atlantic Monthly, 284: 68–78.Google Scholar
Unterhalter, E. 2003. “The Capabilities Approach and Gendered Education: An Examination of South African Complexities,” Theory and Research in Education 1: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unterhalter, E. 2005. “Global Inequality, Capabilities, Social Justice and the Millennium Development Goal for Gender Equality in Education,” International Journal of Educational Development 25, 2: 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×