References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mechanisms in ScienceMethod or Metaphysics?, pp. 255 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. & Walters, P. (2014). Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6th ed. New York: Garland Science.Google Scholar
Allen, G. E. (2005). Mechanism, vitalism and organicism in late nineteenth and twentieth-century biology: the importance of historical context. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 261–83.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (2012). The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation. Synthese, 189, 415–32.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (2014a). A field guide to mechanisms: part I. Philosophy Compass, 9, 274–83.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (2014b). A field guide to mechanisms: part II. Philosophy Compass, 9, 284–93.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1983).What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1997). Singular causation and laws of nature. In Earman, J. and Norton, J., eds., The Cosmos of Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 498–511.Google Scholar
Baetu, T. M. (2019). Mechanisms in Molecular Biology, Cambridge Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartholomew, M. (2002). James Lind’s treatise of the scurvy (1753). Postgraduate Medical Journal, 78, 695–6.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. & Casini, L. (2017). An abductive theory of constitution. Philosophy of Science, 84, 214–33.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. & Gebharter, A. (2016). Constitutive relevance, mutual manipulability, and fat-handedness. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 731–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2017). Explicating top-down causation using networks and dynamics. Philosophy of Science, 84, 253–74.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: a mechanistic alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–41.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. & Richardson, R. C. (2010) [1993]. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2003). A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D. (2019). Mechanism: A Visual, Lexical, and Conceptual History. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. (2005). Regularities and causality; generalizations and causal explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boniolo, G. & Campaner, R. (2018). Molecular pathways and the contextual explanation of molecular functions. Biology and Philosophy, 33, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539–018-9634-2.Google Scholar
Bork, A. (1967). Maxwell and the electromagnetic wave equation. American Journal of Physics, 35, 83–9.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1991). Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. Stewart, M. A. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N. (1984). Grene on mechanism and reductionism: more than just a side issue. In Asquith, P and Kitcher, P, eds., PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 345–53.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, A. (2006). Mechanical explanation of nature and its limits in Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 694–711.Google Scholar
Brown, S. R. (2003). Scurvy: How a Surgeon, a Mariner, and a Gentleman Solved the Greatest Medical Mystery of the Age of Sail. Chichester: Summersdale Publishers.Google Scholar
Bugianesi, E., McCullough, A. & Marchesini, G. (2005). Insulin resistance: a metabolic pathway to chronic liver disease. Hepatology, 42, 987–1000.Google Scholar
Cairrão, F. & Domingos, P. M. (2010). Apoptosis: molecular mechanisms. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Campaner, R. (2006). Mechanisms and counterfactuals: a different glimpse of the (secret?) connexion. Philosophica, 77, 15–44.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (2012). The discovery of vitamin C. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 61, 259–64.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. D. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Casini, L. (2016). Can interventions rescue Glennan’s mechanistic account of causality? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 1155–83.Google Scholar
Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F. & Williamson, J. (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33, 339–60.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. G. H. & Clarke, S. (1996). Nineteenth century research on naturally occurring cell death and related phenomena. Anatomy and Embryology, 193, 81–99.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1986). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 963–4.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1992). Causality: some statistical aspects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 155, 291–301.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R & Wermuth, N. (2001). Some statistical aspects of causality. European Sociological Review, 17, 65–74.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science, 68, 31–55.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007a). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007b). Constitutive explanatory relevance. Journal of Philosophical Research, 32, 3–20.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2013). Functions and mechanisms: a perspectivalist view. In Huneman, P., ed., Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 133–58.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–63.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. & Darden, L. (2005). Introduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 233–44.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. & Darden, L. (2013). In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craver, C. & Tabery, J. (2015). Mechanisms in science. In E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/science-mechanisms/.Google Scholar
Darden, L. (2002). Strategies for discovering mechanisms: schema instantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward chaining. Philosophy of Science, 69, S354–S365.Google Scholar
Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawid, P. (2000). Causal inference without counterfactuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 407–24.Google Scholar
DesAutels, L. (2011). Against regular and irregular characterizations of mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 78, 914–25.Google Scholar
DesAutels, L. (2018). Mechanisms in evolutionary biology. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 296–307.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1982). Principles of Philosophy, trans. Miller, V. R and Miller, R. P. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (2004). René Descartes: The World and Other Writings, ed. Gaukroger, S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. M. & Horvitz, H. R. (1986). Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell, 44, 817–29.Google Scholar
Eronen, M. I. (2015). Levels of organization: a deflationary account. Biology and Philosophy, 30, 39–58.Google Scholar
Eronen, M. I. & Brooks, D. S. (2018). Levels of organization in biology. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/levels-org-biology/.Google Scholar
Fink, S. L. & Cookson, B. T. (2005). Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infection and Immunity, 73, 1907–16.Google Scholar
Franklin-Hall, L. (2016). New mechanistic explanation and the need for explanatory constraints. In Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C., eds., Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
Funk, C. (1912). The etiology of the deficiency diseases. The Journal of State Medicine, 20, 341–68.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. G. & Shoback, D. (2017). Greenspan’s Basic & Clinical Endocrinology, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Garson, J. (2013). The functional sense of mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 80, 317–33.Google Scholar
Garson, J. (2018). Mechanisms, phenomena, and functions. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 104–15.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F. (2010). Developmental Biology, 9th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. (2006). The metaphysics of mechanisms and the challenge of the new reductionism. In Schouten, M. and de Jong, H. L., eds., The Matter of the Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 76–100.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. (2013). Constitution, and multiple constitution, in the sciences: using the neuron to construct a starting framework. Minds and Machines, 23, 309–37.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. (2016). Reduction and Emergence in Science and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gillies, D. (2011). The Russo-Williamson thesis and the question of whether smoking causes heart disease. In Illari, P., Russo, F. and Williamson, J., eds., Causality in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–25.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (2004). Two kinds of mechanical inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42, 33–65.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. (1992). Mechanisms, models and causation. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. (2010). Ephemeral mechanisms and historical explanation. Erkenntnis, 72, 251–66.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. (2011). Singular and general causal relations: a mechanist perspective. In Illari, P., Russo, F. and Williamson, J., eds., Causality in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 789–817.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. & Illari, P., eds. (2018a). The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glennan, S. & Illari, P. (2018b). Introduction: mechanisms and mechanical philosophies. In Glennan, S and Illari, P, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1947). The problem of counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Philosophy, 44, 113–28.Google Scholar
Grene, M. (1971). Reducibility: another side issue? In Grene, M, ed., Interpretations of Life and Mind. New York: Humanities Press, pp. 14–37 (reprinted in R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky, eds., The Understanding of Nature, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 23 [Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974], pp. 53–73).Google Scholar
Hall, N. (2004). Two concepts of causation. In Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–76.Google Scholar
Harbecke, J. (2010). Mechanistic constitution in neurobiological explanations. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24, 267–85.Google Scholar
Harinen, T. (2018). Mutual manipulability and causal inbetweenness. Synthese, 195, 35–54.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1972). The Philosophies of Science: An Introductory Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (2001). Active powers and powerful actors. In O’Hear, A., ed., Philosophy at the New Millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. & Woodward, J. (1999). Independence, invariance and the Causal Markov condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 521–83.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1832/1991). The Encyclopaedia Logic, Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze, trans. Geraets, T. F, Suchting, W. A and Harris, H. S. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. (1894/1955)]. The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form, first English trans. 1899, reprinted by Dover. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hill, B. (1965). The environment of disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300.Google Scholar
Hogben, L. (1930). The Nature of Living Matter. London: Kegan Paul, Tranch, Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–60.Google Scholar
Holland, P. (1988). Comment: causal mechanism or causal effect: which is best for statistical science? Statistical Science, 3, 186–8.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. E. (1983). From ignose to hexuronic acid to vitamin C. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 8, 146–7.Google Scholar
Huygens, C. (1690/1997). Discourse on the Cause of Gravity, trans. K. Bailey. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Illari, P. & Williamson, J. (2010). Function and organization: comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41, 279–91.Google Scholar
Illari, P. & Williamson, J. (2011). Mechanisms are real and local. In Illari, P., Russo, F. and Williamson, J., eds., Causality in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 818–44.Google Scholar
Illari, P. & Williamson, J. (2012). What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 2, 119–35.Google Scholar
Illari, P. & Williamson, J. (2013). In defense of activities. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 44, 69–83.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, S. & Psillos, S. (2017). In defense of methodological mechanism: the case of apoptosis. Axiomathes, 27, 601–19.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. I. (2018). The components and boundaries of mechanisms. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 116–30.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. & Craver, C. F. (2013). Mechanisms and laws: clarifying the debate. In Chao, H. K., Chen, S. T. and Millstein, R. L., eds., Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 125–45.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. I. & Krickel, B. (2017). The metaphysics of constitutive mechanistic phenomena. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68, 745–79.Google Scholar
Kanduc, D., Mittelman, A., Serpico, R., Sinigaglia, E., Sinha, A. A., Natale, C., Santacroce, R., Di Corcia, M. G., Lucchese, A., Dini, L., Pani, P., Santacroce, S., Simone, S., Bucci, R. & Farber, E. (2002). Cell death: apoptosis versus necrosis. International Journal of Oncology, 21, 165–70.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790/2008). Critique of Judgement, trans. Walker, N and Meredith, J. C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 545–70.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. F. R. (1971). Shrinkage necrosis: a distinct mode of cellular death. Journal of Pathology, 105, 13–20.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. F. R. (2002). History of the events leading to the formulation of the apoptosis concept. Toxicology, 181–2, 471–4.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. F. R., Wyllie, A. H. & Currie, A. R. (1972). Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. British Journal of Cancer, 26, 239–57.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and causal structure. In Kitcher, P and Salmon, W, eds., Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 13. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and design. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18, 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. J. (1972). Mechanical explanation at the end of the 19th century. Centaurus, 17, 58–82.Google Scholar
Kluve, J. (2004). On the role of counterfactuals in inferring causal effects. Foundations of Science, 9, 65–101.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. (2004). Hegel’s critique of pure mechanism and the philosophical appeal of the Logic project. European Journal of Philosophy, 12, 38–74.Google Scholar
Krickel, B. (2018). The Mechanical World: The Metaphysical Commitments of the New Mechanistic Approach. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Lakhani, S., Dilly, S. & Finlayson, C. (2009). Basic Pathology: An Introduction to the Mechanisms of Disease, 4th ed. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Lange, M. (2000). Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larmor, J. (1894). A dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium (part I). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 185, 719–822 (reprinted in J. Larmor, Mathematical and Physical Papers, vol. 1, [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929]).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, ed. Ariew, R and Garber, D. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leuridan, B. (2010). Can mechanisms really replace laws of nature? Philosophy of Science, 77, 317–40.Google Scholar
Leuridan, B. (2012). Three problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63, 399–427.Google Scholar
Levin, S., Bucci, T. J., Cohen, S. M., Fix, A. S., Hardisty, J. F., LeGrand, E. K., Maronpot, R. R. & Trump, B. F. (1999). The nomenclature of cell death: recommendations of an ad hoc committee of the society of toxicologic pathologists. Toxicologic Pathology, 27, 484–90.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1986b). Causation. In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–213.Google Scholar
Lind, J. (1753). A Treatise of the Scurvy, in Three Parts, Containing an Inquiry into the Nature, Causes, and Cure of That Disease. Together with a Critical and Chronological View of What Has Been Published on the Subject. Edinburgh: Sands, Murray and Cochran.Google Scholar
Linster, C. L. & Van Schaftingen, E. (2007). Vitamin C biosynthesis, recycling and degradation in mammals. FEBS Journal, 274, 1–22.Google Scholar
Lockshin, R. A. (2008). Early work on apoptosis, an interview with Richard Lockshin. Cell Death and Differentiation, 15, 1091–5.Google Scholar
Lockshin, R. A. (2016). Programmed cell death 50 (and beyond). Cell Death and Differentiation, 23, 10–17.Google Scholar
Lockshin, R. A. & Williams, C. M. (1964). Programmed cell death – II. Endocrine potentiation of the breakdown of the intersegmental muscles of silkmoths. Journal of Insect Physiology, 10, 643–9.Google Scholar
Lockshin, R. A. & Zakeri, Z. (2001). Programmed cell death and apoptosis: origins of the theory. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 545–50.Google Scholar
Machamer, P. (2004). Activities and causation: the metaphysics and epistemology of mechanisms. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18, 27–39.Google Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L. & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.Google Scholar
Magiorkinis, E., Beloukas, A. & Diamantis, A. (2011). Scurvy: past, present and future. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 22, 147–52.Google Scholar
Majno, G. & Joris, I. (1995). Apoptosis, oncosis, and necrosis. An overview of cell death. American Journal of Pathology, 146, 3–15.Google Scholar
Maldonado, G. & Greenland, S. (2002). Estimating causal effects. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 422–9.Google Scholar
Matthews, L. J. & Tabery, J. (2018). Mechanisms and the metaphysics of causation. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 131–43.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1959). Typological versus population thinking. In Meggers, B. J., ed., Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 409–12.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, P. (1990). Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation. Lewiston, NY : Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
McManus, F. (2012). Development and mechanistic explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 532–41.Google Scholar
Menzies, P. (2012). The causal structure of mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 796–805.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2000). Dimensions of scientific law. Philosophy of Science, 67, 242–65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2008). Causal knowledge in evolutionary and developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 75, 697–706.Google Scholar
Neander, K. (1991). Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science, 58, 168–84.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. L., Lehninger, A. L. & Cox, M. M. (2008). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 5th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (2004). Philosophical Writings, ed. Janiak, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. J. (2011). The concept of mechanism in biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 152–63.Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. J. (2019). Is the cell really a machine? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 477, 108–26.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). The unity of science as a working hypothesis. In Feigl, H., Scriven, M. and Maxwell, G., eds., Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 428–31.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1890/1901). Électricité et optique: la lumière et les théories électromagnétiques, 2nd ed. Paris: Gathier-Villairs.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1897). Les idées de Hertz sur la mécanique. Revue Générale des Sciences, 8, 734–43 (reprinted in Ouevres de Henri Poincaré [Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1952], vol. 7, 231–50).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1900). Relations entre la physique expérimentale et de la physique mathématique. Revue Générale des Sciences, 11, 1163–5.Google Scholar
Povich, M. & Craver, C. F. (2018). Mechanistic levels, reduction and emergence. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 185–97.Google Scholar
Proskuryakov, S. Y. & Gabai, V. L. (2010). Mechanisms of tumor cell necrosis. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 16, 56–68.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (1995). Poincaré’s conception of mechanical explanation. In Greffe, J.-L, Heinzmann, G and Lorenz, K, eds., Henri Poincaré: Science and Philosophy. Berlin: Academie Verlag; Paris: Albert Blanchard.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and Explanation. Chesham Acumen; Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2004). A glimpse of the secret connexion: harmonising mechanisms with counterfactuals. Perspectives on Science, 12, 288–319.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2007). Causal explanation and manipulation. In Person, J. and Ylikoski, P., eds., Rethinking Explanation, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 252. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2014). Regularities, natural patterns and laws of nature. Theoria, 79, 9–27.Google Scholar
Rang, H. P., Ritter, J. M., Flower, R. J. & Henderson, G. (2016). Rang & Dale’s Pharmacology, 8th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956). The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Romero, F. (2015). Why there isn’t interlevel causation in mechanisms. Synthese, 192, 3731–55.Google Scholar
Ross, L. N. (2021). Causal concepts in biology: how pathways differ from mechanisms and why it matters. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72, 131–58.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Peretó, J. & Moreno, A. (2004). A universal definition of life: autonomy and open-ended evolution. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 34, 323–46.Google Scholar
Russo, F. & Williamson, J. (2007). Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 157–70.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1997). Causality and explanation: a reply to two critiques. Philosophy of Science, 64, 461–77.Google Scholar
Schiemann, G. (2008). Hermann von Helmholtz’s Mechanism: The Loss of Certainty. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. E. (1970). Mechanism and Materialism: British Natural Philosophy in An Age of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. (2002). The Discovery of Vitamin C by Albert Szent-Gyögyi. American Chemical Society National Historic Chemical Landmarks. www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/szentgyorgyi.html (accessed February 11, 2019).Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1958). Counterfactuals, dispositions, and the causal modalities. In Feigl, H., Scriven, M. and Maxwell, G., eds., Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 225–308.Google Scholar
Shiozaki, E. N. & Shi, Y. (2004). Caspases, IAPs and Smac/DIABLO: mechanisms from structural biology. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 39, 486–94.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. & Rescher, N. (1966). Cause and counterfactual. Philosophy of Science, 33, 323–40.Google Scholar
Skipper, R. & Millstein, R. (2005). Thinking about evolutionary mechanisms: natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 327–47.Google Scholar
Slack, J. M. W. (2005). Essential Developmental Biology, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sloviter, R. S. (2002). Apoptosis: a guide for the perplexed. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 23, 19–24.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In Rescher, N., ed., Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–112.Google Scholar
Stone, R. (1993). The assumptions on which causal inferences rest. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 55, 455–66.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1999). How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, W. (1964). Counterfactual conditionals and the presuppositions of induction. Philosophy of Science, 31, 101–10.Google Scholar
Tortora, G. J. & Derrickson, B. (2012). Principles of Anatomy & Physiology, 13th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
von Dassow, G. & Munro, E. (1999). Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for evo-devo. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 285, 307–25.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. (2006). Organisms as natural purposes: the contemporary evolutionary perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 771–91.Google Scholar
Waters, C. K. (1998). Causal regularities in the biological world of contingent distributions. Biology and Philosophy, 13, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. (2011). Mechanistic theories of causality part II. Philosophy Compass, 6, 433–44.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. & Wilde, M. (2016). Evidence and epistemic causality. In Wiedermann, W. and von Eye, A., eds., Statistics and Causality: Methods for Applied Empirical Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. D. (1999). Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1976). Reductionism, levels of organization, and the mind–body problem. Ιn Globus, G, Savodnik, I and Maxwell, G, eds., Consciousness and the Brain. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 199–267.Google Scholar
Wolpert, L., Beddington, R., Jessell, T., Lawrence, P., Meyerowitz, E. & Smith, J. (2002). Principles of Development, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, R. S. Y. (2011). Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, 30, 87.Google Scholar
Woodger, J. H. (1929). Biological Principles: A Critical Study, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1997). Explanation, invariance and intervention. Philosophy of Science, 64, S26–S41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2000). Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 197–254.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2002). What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science, 69, S366–S377.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003a). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003b). Counterfactuals and causal explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18, 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2013). Mechanistic explanation: its scope and limits. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 87, 39–65.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2014). A functional account of causation; or, a defense of the legitimacy of causal thinking by reference to the only standard that matters – usefulness (as opposed to metaphysics or agreement with intuitive judgment). Philosophy of Science, 81, 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism and causal exclusion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91, 303–47.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2020). Levels: What are they and what are they good for?. In Kendler, K. S., Parnas, J. and Zachar, P., eds., Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 424–49.Google Scholar