Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: social minds, mental cultures – weaving together cognition and culture in the study of religion
- 2 Explanatory pluralism and the cognitive science of religion: why scholars in religious studies should stop worrying about reductionism
- 3 Early cognitive theorists of religion: Robin Horton and his predecessors
- 4 The opium or the aphrodisiac of the people? Darwinizing Marx on religion
- 5 Immortality, creation and regulation: updating Durkheim's theory of the sacred
- 6 Non-ordinary powers: charisma, special affordances and the study of religion
- 7 Malinowski's magic and Skinner's superstition: reconciling explanations of magical practices
- 8 Towards an evolutionary cognitive science of mental cultures: lessons from Freud
- 9 Piaget on moral judgement: towards a reconciliation with nativist and sociocultural approaches
- 10 Building on William James: the role of learning in religious experience
- 11 Explaining religious concepts: Lévi-Strauss the brilliant and problematic ancestor
- 12 The meaningful brain: Clifford Geertz and the cognitive science of culture
- 13 Cognitive science and religious thought: the case of psychological interiority in the Analects
- 14 Conclusion: moving towards a new science of religion; or have we already arrived?
- Bibliography
- Index
6 - Non-ordinary powers: charisma, special affordances and the study of religion
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: social minds, mental cultures – weaving together cognition and culture in the study of religion
- 2 Explanatory pluralism and the cognitive science of religion: why scholars in religious studies should stop worrying about reductionism
- 3 Early cognitive theorists of religion: Robin Horton and his predecessors
- 4 The opium or the aphrodisiac of the people? Darwinizing Marx on religion
- 5 Immortality, creation and regulation: updating Durkheim's theory of the sacred
- 6 Non-ordinary powers: charisma, special affordances and the study of religion
- 7 Malinowski's magic and Skinner's superstition: reconciling explanations of magical practices
- 8 Towards an evolutionary cognitive science of mental cultures: lessons from Freud
- 9 Piaget on moral judgement: towards a reconciliation with nativist and sociocultural approaches
- 10 Building on William James: the role of learning in religious experience
- 11 Explaining religious concepts: Lévi-Strauss the brilliant and problematic ancestor
- 12 The meaningful brain: Clifford Geertz and the cognitive science of culture
- 13 Cognitive science and religious thought: the case of psychological interiority in the Analects
- 14 Conclusion: moving towards a new science of religion; or have we already arrived?
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Max Weber's (1978) Economy and Society embeds religion, or, more precisely, religious behaviour in a sociology of social action, grounded in the subjective meaning that actors implicitly or explicitly attach to their behaviour. Although his approach is sometimes referred to as “interpretive sociology”, Weber was equally concerned with interpretation and explanation (1978: 4—5). He began with action as understood from the point of view of the actor or actors, then sought to situate it within “an understandable sequence of motivation”, taking into account a range of factors (e.g. biological, psychological, social, environmental), many of them outside of subjective awareness and largely devoid of conscious meaning. He then attempted to determine the relative weight of the various factors in relation to the action in question. He assumed that hypotheses regarding the weight that should be assigned to various causal factors required testing. In some cases, hypotheses could be tested by means of psychological experimentation, and in others through statistical analysis of large data sets. In still others, “there remains only the possibility of comparing the largest possible number of historical or contemporary processes which, while otherwise similar, differ in the one decisive point of their relation to the particular motive or factor the role of which is being investigated. This [Weber argued] was the fundamental task of comparative sociology” (ibid.: 9—10).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mental CultureClassical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, pp. 80 - 97Publisher: Acumen PublishingPrint publication year: 2013