Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:13:19.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Evidence-based treatment for justice-involved youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

By
Eric Trupin
Edited by
Carol L. Kessler  and
Louis James Kraus
Eric Trupin
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Public Behavioral Health, 146 North Canal Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 USA
Carol L. Kessler
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Louis James Kraus
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

The past ten years have seen a rapid increase in the development of evidence-based interventions for youth; however, many challenges remain. These factors include the challenges associated with service delivery, the importance of initial engagement, and the complex nature of the problem (Wasserman et al., 2000). On the other hand, treatment research in this area (and the more global child and adolescent treatment research) has moved considerably toward recognizing the need for “empirically supported” treatment. In 1995, the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures was charged with the task of identifying treatment approaches with demonstrated “efficacy.” Efficacy refers to the ability to bring about the desired change under ideal conditions, and an efficacious program is one with scientific evidence demonstrating positive changes among those who receive the treatment. This term is contrasted with the word “effective,” which refers to the likelihood that a person will comply with a given treatment. An effective program has the ability to produce positive change in the general population. In a comprehensive review of the literature, the APA's Task Force (Levant, 1995) established the validity of numerous treatment approaches. They applied the terms “empirically validated” or “empirically supported” and “probably efficacious” to represent therapeutic approaches with varying degrees of scientific evidence.

The list of therapies deemed valid or “well-established” and probably efficacious was updated in 1998 (Chambless et al., 1998) and again in 2001 (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001).

Keywords

community-based treatment programsdiversion programsevidence-based programsjustice-involved youthjuvenilesmentoring programs
Type
Chapter
Information
The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders
Forging Paths toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation
 , pp. 340 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J. F. & Parsons, B. V. (1982). Functional Family Therapy: Principles and Procedures. Carmel, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Alexander, J. F., Pugh, C., Parsons, B. V., & Sexton, T. L. (2000). Functional family therapy. In Elliott, D. S., ed., Blueprints for Violence Prevention (Book 3), 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
Bandura, A. (1985). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New York, NY: Plenum.
Barnoski, R. (1997). Fast Tracking Youth to Diversion in Thurston County: A Preliminary Analysis. Washington State Institute of Public Policy.
Barnoski, R. (2002a). Preliminary Findings for the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration's Mentoring Program. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Barnoski, R. (2002b). Preliminary Findings for the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration's Dialectical Behavior Therapy Program.
Borduin, C. M., Mann, B. J., Cone, L. T.et al. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569–578.Google Scholar
Brunk, M., Henggeler, S. W. & Whelan, J. P. (1987). A comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in the brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 311–318.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P. (1998). Treatment Foster Care: Family Strengthening Series. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice (OJJDP Bulletin, NCJ 1734211).
Chamberlain, P. & Mihalic, S. F. (1998). Blueprints for Violence Prevention, Book Eight: Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Chamberlain, P. & Reid, J. (1998). Comparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 6(4), 624–633.Google Scholar
Chambless, D. L. & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 52, 685–716.Google Scholar
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H.et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16.Google Scholar
Cummings, S. & Clark, R. W. (1993). Juvenile diversion programs. Journal of Extension, 31(1).Google Scholar
Davidson, W. S. II, Redner, R., Admur, R., & Mitchell, , C. (1990). Alternative treatments for troubled youth: The case of diversion from the justice system. New York, NY: Plenum.
Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at Risk: Prevalence and Prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Duchnowski, A. J., Kutash, K. & Friedman, R. M. (2002). Community-based interventions in a system of care and outcomes research. In Burns, B. and Hoagwood, K., eds., Community Treatment for Youth: Evidence-Based Interventions for Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. New York: NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–116.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D. & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Evans, K., Tyrer, P., Catalan, J.et al. (1999). Manual assisted cognitive-behaviour therapy (MACT): a randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention with bibliotherapy in the treatment of recurrent deliberate self-harm. Psychological Medicine, 29, 19–25.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. A. & Chamberlain, P. (2000). Multidimensional treatment foster care: a program for intensive parenting, family support, and skill building. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(3), 155–164.Google Scholar
Grossman, J. B. & Garry, E. M. (1997, April). Mentoring – a proven delinquency prevention strategy. OJJDP Bulletin, NCJ.
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P. et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. OJJDP Bulletin, NCJ.
Henggeler, W. W., Rodick, J. D., Borduin, C. M.et al. (1986). Multisystemic treatment of juvenile offenders: effects on adolescent behavior and family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 22, 132–141.Google Scholar
Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B. & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 953–961.Google Scholar
Henggler, S. W. & Borduin, C. M. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders and their families. In Schwartz, I. M., ed., Family- and Home-Based Services. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Kandel, E. & Mednick, S. A. (1991). Perinatal complications predict violent offending. Criminology, 29, 519–529.Google Scholar
Koons, C. R., Robins, C. J., Tweed, J. L.et al. (2001). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy in women veterans with borderline personality disorder. Behavior Therapy, 32, 371–390.Google Scholar
Levant, R. F. (2005). Evidenced-based practice in psychology. Monitor in Psychology, 36(2), 5.Google Scholar
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive Behavior Therapy for the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M., Armstrong, H., Suarez, A., Almon, D. & Heard, H. (1991). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 1060–1064.Google Scholar
Linehan, M. M., Schmidt, H. & Dimeff, L. A. (1999) Dialectical behavior therapy for patients with borderline personality disorder and drug dependence. American Journal of Addictions, 8, 279–292.Google Scholar
McGill, D. E., Mihalic, S. F. & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Blueprints for Violence Prevention, Book Two: Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Miller, A. L. & Rathus, J. H. (2000). Dialectical behavior therapy: adaptations and new applications. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 7, 420–425.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., Linehan, M. M., Wetzler, S. & Leigh, E. (1997). Dialectical behavior therapy adapted for suicidal adolescents. Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, 3, 78–86.Google Scholar
Myers, W. C., Burton, P. R. S., Sanders, P. D.et al. (2000). Project Back-on-Track at 1 year: A delinquency treatment program for early-career juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1127–1134.Google Scholar
Novotney, L. C., Mertinko, E., Lange, J. & Baker, T. K. (2000, September). Juvenile mentoring programs: a progress review. ODDJP Bulletin, NCJ 182209.
O'Donohue, W., Buchanan, J. A. & Fisher, J. E. (2000). Characteristics of empirically supported treatments. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9(2), 69–74.Google Scholar
Polk, K. (1995). Juvenile diversion: a look at the record. In Sharp, P. M. and Hancock, B. W., eds., Juvenile Delinquency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Schoenwald, S. K. & Rowland, M. D. (2002). Multisystemic therapy. In Burns, B. and Hoagwood, K., eds., Community Treatment for Youth: Evidence-Based Interventions for Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. New York: NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–116.
Schoenwald, S. K., Ward, D. M., Henggeler, S. W., Pickrel, S. G. & Patel, , H. (1996). MST treatment of substance abusing or dependent adolescent offenders: costs of reducing incarceration, inpatient, and residential placement. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 431–444.Google Scholar
Schur, E. (1971). Labeling Deviant Behavior: Its Sociological Implications. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Sexton, T. L. & Alexander, J. F. (2000). Functional Family Therapy (Bulletin). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention.
Shelden, R. G. (1999, September). Detention diversion advocacy: an evaluation. OJJDP Bulletin, NCJ 171155.
Sulzer-Azaroff, B. & Mayer, G. R. (1977). Applying Behavior-analysis Procedures with Children and Youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Swenson, C. R., Torrey, W. C. & Koerner, K. (2002). Implementing dialectical behavior therapy. Psychiatric Services, 53(2), 171–177.Google Scholar
Trupin, E. W., Stewart, D. G., Beach, B. & Boesky, L. (2002). Effectiveness of a dialectical behaviour therapy program for incarcerated female juvenile offenders. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 121–127.Google Scholar
Washington Institute for Public Policy (1998). Watching the Bottom Line: Cost-Effective Interventions for Reducing Crime in Washington. Olympia, WA: Evergreen State College.
Wasserman, G. A., Miller, L. S. & Cothern, L. (2000, April). Prevention of serious and violent juvenile offending. OJJDP Bulletin, NCJ 178898.
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995). Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 450–468.Google Scholar
Weisz, J. R., Doss, J. R., Jensen, A. & Hawley, K. M. (2005). Youth psychotherapy outcome research: a review and critique of the evidence base. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 337–363.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×