Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:43:37.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - Development and Current Status of ICD-11 Mental, Behavioral, or Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

By
Wolfgang Gaebel ,
Eva Salveridou-Hof ,
Anna Kresse ,
Radhika F. Kadakia  and
Geoffrey M. Reed
Edited by
Andrea Fiorillo ,
Peter Falkai  and
Philip Gorwood
Andrea Fiorillo
Affiliation:
University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples
Peter Falkai
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Philip Gorwood
Affiliation:
Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris
Get access

Summary

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is developed and maintained by the World Health Organization (WHO). The Eleventh Revision of the ICD (ICD-11) took effect in January 2022 and is the first major revision of the classification in 30 years. The ICD-11 reflects huge advances during this time in scientific evidence, clinical practices, and health information systems. The ICD is used for the classification and reporting of all types of diseases, disorders, and health conditions. This chapter focuses specifically on the ICD-11 classification of Mental, Behavioral or Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MBND). It covers the overall context of the development and metastructure of the MBND classification as well as the priorities and components of the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements (CDDR). The chapter considers what is new in ICD-11 MBND (e.g., the lifespan and dimensional approach, new disorders or removal of categories, coding issues). ICD-11 in the global reform of mental health and care and the role of national European and international professional organizations in education and training of ICD-11 MBND for improving quality treatment and care are constituent parts of this chapter.

Keywords

WHOICD-11ICD-10mentalbehavioral or neurodevelopmental disorders (MBND)clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements (CDDR)codingfield studiestransition and implementationeducationtraining
Type
Chapter
Information
Mental Health Research and Practice
From Evidence to Experience
 , pp. 293 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Word Health Organization. ICD-11 reference guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. https://icd.who.int/icd11refguide/en/index.html.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. ICD-11 implementation or transition guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019; icd.who.int/dev11.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. ICD-11 coding tool. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://icd.who.int/ct11/icd11_mms.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. ICD-11 user guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://icd.who.int/dev11/Help/en.Google Scholar
Reed, GM, First, MB, Kogan, CS, et al. Innovations and changes in the ICD‐11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders. A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00022.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.Google Scholar
Roberts, MC, Reed, GM, Medina-Mora, ME, et al. A global clinicians’ map of mental disorders to improve ICD-11: Analysing meta-structure to enhance clinical utility. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012;24(6):578–90. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2012.736368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, Roberts, MC, Keeley, J, et al. Mental health professionals’ natural taxonomies of mental disorders: implications for the clinical utility of the ICD‐11 and the DSM‐5. J Clin Psychol. 2013;69(12):1191–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, SC, Roberts, MC, Guler, J, Keeley, JW, Reed, GM. Taxonomy and utility in the diagnostic classification of mental disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2021;77(9):1921–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, MB, Reed, GM, Hyman, SE, Saxena, S. The development of the ICD‐11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines for mental and behavioural disorders. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(1):82–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM. Toward ICD-11: Improving the clinical utility of WHO’s International Classification of mental disorders. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2010;41(6):457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. Mental health atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240036703.Google Scholar
Gaebel, W. Status of psychotic disorders in ICD-11. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(5):895–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusar‐Poli, P, McGorry, PD, Kane, JM. Improving outcomes of first‐episode psychosis: An overview. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):251–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maj, M, van Os, J, De Hert, M, et al. The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(1):4–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, First, MB, Billieux, J, et al. Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: Complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. World Psychiatry. 2022;20(2):189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, SD, Drescher, J, Kismödi, E, et al. Proposed declassification of disease categories related to sexual orientation in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11). Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:672–9. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.135541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, Drescher, J, Krueger, RB, et al. Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD‐11: Revising the ICD‐10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(3):205–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parish, SJ, Cottler-Casanova, S, Clayton, AH, et al. The evolution of the female sexual disorder/dysfunction definitions, nomenclature, and classifications: A review of DSM, ICSM, ISSWSH, and ICD. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9(1):36–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, R, Fresán, A, Vega-Ramírez, H, et al. Removing transgender identity from the classification of mental disorders: A Mexican field study for ICD-11. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(9):850–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30165-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles, R, Keeley, JW, Vega-Ramírez, H, et al. Validity of categories related to gender identity in ICD-11 and DSM-5 among transgender individuals who seek gender-affirming medical procedures. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022;22(1):100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guler, J, Roberts, MC, Medina-Mora, ME, et al. Global collaborative team performance for the revision of the international classification of diseases: A case study of the World Health Organization field studies coordination group. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018;18(3):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.07.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, Rebello, TJ, Pike, KM, et al. WHO’s global clinical practice network for mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(5):379–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00183-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, JW, Reed, GM, Roberts, MC, et al. Developing a science of clinical utility in diagnostic classification systems: Field study strategies for ICD-11 mental and behavioral disorders. Am Psychol. 2016;71(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, SC, Roberts, MC, Keeley, JW, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015;15(2):160–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, JW, Gaebel, W, First, MB, et al. Psychotic disorder symptom rating scales: Are dichotomous or multi-point scales more clinically useful? – An ICD-11 field study. Schizophr Res. 2018;202:254–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, JW, Reed, GM, Roberts, MC, et al. Disorders specifically associated with stress: A case-controlled field study for ICD-11 mental and behavioural disorders. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16(2):109–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claudino, AM, Pike, KM, Hay, P, et al. The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1327-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, DL, Webb, CA, Keeley, JW, et al. The reliability and clinical utility of ICD-11 schizoaffective disorder: A field trial. Schizophr Res. 2019;208:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.02.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebello, TJ, Keeley, JW, Kogan, CS, et al. Anxiety and fear-related disorders in the ICD-11: Results from a global case-controlled field study. Arch Med Res. 2019;50(8):490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.12.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, CS, Stein, DJ, Rebello, TJ, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic judgments using ICD-11 vs. ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. J Affect Disord. 2020;273:328–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, CS, Maj, M, Rebello, TJ, et al. A global field study of the international classification of diseases (ICD-11) mood disorders clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. J Affect Disord. 2021;295:1138–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, SC, Roberts, MC, Keeley, JW, et al. Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth: a global field study comparing ICD‐11 with ICD‐10 and DSM‐5. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021;62(3):303–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, JW, Briken, P, Evans, SC, et al. Can clinicians use dimensional information to make a categorical diagnosis of paraphilic disorders? An ICD-11 field study. J Sex Med. 2021;18(9):1592–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaebel, W, Riesbeck, M, Zielasek, J, et al. Web-based field studies on diagnostic classification and code assignment of mental disorders: comparison of ICD-11 and ICD-10. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2018;86:163–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-100508.Google ScholarPubMed
Gaebel, W, Stricker, J, Riesbeck, M, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic classification and clinical utility assessment of ICD-11 compared to ICD-10 in 10 mental disorders: Findings from a web-based field study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;270(3):281–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, Sharan, P, Rebello, TJ, et al. The ICD‐11 developmental field study of reliability of diagnoses of high‐burden mental disorders: Results among adult patients in mental health settings of 13 countries. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):174–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20524.Google ScholarPubMed
Reed, GM, Keeley, JW, Rebello, TJ, et al. Clinical utility of ICD‐11 diagnostic guidelines for high‐burden mental disorders: Results from mental health settings in 13 countries. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(3):306–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20581.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharan, P, Zhao, M, Medina-Mora, ME, et al. Results of the ICD-11 clinic-based field study of mental and behavioural disorders in children and adolescents: reliability, clinical utility and implementation characteristics. Submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
Poznyak, V, Reed, GM, Medina-Mora, ME. Aligning the ICD-11 classification of disorders due to substance use with global service needs. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018;27(3):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796017000622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaebel, W, Kerst, A. ICD-11 mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders: innovations and managing implementation. Arch Psychiatry Psychother. 2019;3:7–12. https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/111494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisco, BE, Miller, MW, Wolf, EJ, et al. The impact of proposed changes to ICD-11 on estimates of PTSD prevalence and comorbidity. Psychiatry Res. 2016;240:226–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewin, CR, Cloitre, M, Hyland, P, et al. A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P, Crawford, M, Sanatinia, R, et al. Preliminary studies of the ICD‐11 classification of personality disorder in practice. Personal Ment Health. 2014;8(4):254–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, T, Cornelius, J, Clark, D, Martin, C. Greater prevalence of proposed ICD‐11 alcohol and cannabis dependence compared to ICD‐10, DSM‐IV, and DSM‐5 in treated adolescents. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41(9):1584–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degenhardt, L, Bharat, C, Bruno, R, et al. Concordance between the diagnostic guidelines for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the draft ICD‐11 and other classification systems: Analysis of data from the WHO’s World Mental Health Surveys. Addiction. 2019;114(3):534–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainberg, ML, Scorza, P, Shultz, JM, et al. Challenges and opportunities in global mental health: a research-to-practice perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehm, J, Mathers, C, Popova, S, et al. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. The Lancet. 2009;373(9682):2223–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, J, Dave, S. Person-centred care and psychiatry: Some key perspectives. BJPsych Int. 2020;17(3):65–8. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2020.21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, AE. Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther. 2017;88:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhugra, D, Tasman, A, Pathare, S, et al. The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(10):775–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30333-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN) The ICD-11 is here. May 25, 2019. https://gcp.network.Google Scholar
Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization and WHO Collaborating Center for Capacity Building and Training in Global Mental Health, Columbia University. Training courses on ICD-11 requirements for mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders. 2021. https://gmhacademy.dialogedu.com/icd11.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×