Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: the deaths of Michel Leiris
- PART I TEXTS AND CONTEXTS
- 1 Unities and identities: Leiris and surrealism
- 2 Recasting the self: from surrealism to ethnography
- 3 Autobiographical frameworks: from ethnography to L'Age d'homme
- 4 Positional play: La Règle du jeu
- 5 Secreting the self: Journal 1922–1989
- PART II THE QUEST FOR PRESENCE IN LA RÈGLE DU JEU
- Conclusion: locating Leiris
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Secreting the self: Journal 1922–1989
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: the deaths of Michel Leiris
- PART I TEXTS AND CONTEXTS
- 1 Unities and identities: Leiris and surrealism
- 2 Recasting the self: from surrealism to ethnography
- 3 Autobiographical frameworks: from ethnography to L'Age d'homme
- 4 Positional play: La Règle du jeu
- 5 Secreting the self: Journal 1922–1989
- PART II THE QUEST FOR PRESENCE IN LA RÈGLE DU JEU
- Conclusion: locating Leiris
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
On first reading, Leiris's posthumously published Journal 1922–1989 resembles a massive collection of ébauches that helped produce the eventual autobiographies which we have already read. This circuitous relation tends to create a combined sense of confirmation and destabilization, a lulling déjà lu unsettled by a vague Unheimlichkeit. This occurs above all when we read the record of a physical or linguistic event that is to be elaborated later in a work which we have in fact already encountered; the chronology of our ‘Leiris’ is suddenly contradicted by Leiris's most intimate voice. Thus, for example, we encounter the 1955 Fourbis's Khadidja at the physical rather than textual moment of her meeting, in 1940 (J326); or we find that the ‘Dernières paroles’ section of the valedictory Frêle Bruit of 1976 (FB290) was in fact written in 1970 (J645–6). One's first reaction, I feel, is unconsciously to neutralize this potentially disruptive effect. Rather than opt for estrangement, so allowing the Journal to overturn ‘Leiris’ and become the matrix of a somehow new and original reading, the instinct is surely to absorb the journal's entries into the framework of the established ‘Leiris’, assessing them consequently as the raw material for a later but already familiar performance. The journal itself encourages this view in its self-characterization as formless and unfinished.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Michel LeirisWriting the Self, pp. 122 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002