Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:32:53.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Modelling Nature-based Solutions from Soil Ecosystem Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2020

Neil Sang
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, a review of soil models is carried out. The number of models within the literature is too high to cover every example in depth, so a selection has been made based on age, stage of development and specificity to soil modelling. In addition, several existing soil model reviews have been investigated, to determine the depth of information already available. The best examples for further reading that have been found are those by Molina and Smith (1998), Manzoni and Porporato (2009), Kinnell (2010) and Sheng (2011). Models have also been evaluated for their potential in exploring nature-based solutions, and several recent studies have been highlighted in this area that are relevant for soil modelling.

Type
Chapter
Information
Modelling Nature-based Solutions
Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning
, pp. 82 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M. & Bernhardt, G. 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142, 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boelee, E., Janse, J., Le Gal, A., Kok, M., Alkemade, R. & Ligtvoet, W. 2017. Overcoming water challenges through nature-based solutions. Water Policy, 19(5), 820836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Grosso, S., Ojima, D., Parton, W., Mosier, A., Peterson, G. & Schimel, D. 2002. Simulated effects of dryland cropping intensification on soil organic matter and greenhouse gas exchanges using the DAYCENT ecosystem model. Environmental Pollution, 116, S75S83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dzotsi, K. A., Jones, J. W., Adiku, S. G. K., Naab, J. B., Singh, U., Porter, C. H., et al. 2010. Modeling soil and plant phosphorus within DSSAT. Ecological Modelling, 221, 28392849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., De Boissezon, B. & Vandewoestijne, S. 2017. Nature-based solutions in the EU: innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental Research, 159, 509518.Google Scholar
Farina, R., Coleman, K. & Whitmore, A. P. 2013. Modification of the RothC model for simulations of soil organic C dynamics in dryland regions. Geoderma, 200, 1830.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., et al. 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 235265.Google Scholar
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., et al. 2018. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 610, 9971009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinnell, P. I. A. 2010. Event soil loss, runoff and the Universal Soil Loss Equation family of models: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 385, 384397.Google Scholar
Kucharik, C. J., Foley, J. A., Delire, C., Fisher, V. A., Coe, M. T., Lenters, J. D., et al. 2000. Testing the performance of a Dynamic Global Ecosystem Model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 14, 795825.Google Scholar
Le Dizes, S., Kwiatkowski, B. L., Rastetter, E. B., Hope, A., Hobbie, J. E., Stow, D., et al. 2003. Modeling biogeochemical responses of tundra ecosystems to temporal and spatial variations in climate in the Kuparuk River Basin (Alaska). Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 108(D2), Alt6-1–Alt6-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. S., Frolking, S. & Frolking, T. A. 1992. A model of nitrous-oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events. 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 97, 97599776.Google Scholar
Maes, J. & Jacobs, S. 2017. Nature-based solutions for Europe’s sustainable development. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzoni, S. & Porporato, A. 2009. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: theory and models across scales. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, 13551379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, J. A. E. & Smith, P. 1998. Modeling carbon and nitrogen processes in soils. Advances in Agronomy, 62, 253298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C., Quinton, J. N., Smith, R. E., Govers, G., Poesen, J. W. A., Auerswald, K., et al. 1998. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for redirecting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23, 527544.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz-Rojas, M., Jordan, A., Zavala, L. M., De La Rosa, D., Abd-Elmabod, S. K. & Anaya-Romero, M. 2015. Impact of land use and land cover changes on organic carbon stocks in Mediterranean soils (1956–2007). Land Degradation & Development, 26, 168179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz-Rojas, M., Jordan, A., Zavala, L. M., Gonzalez-Penaloza, F. A., De La Rosa, D., Pino-Mejias, R., et al. 2013. Modelling soil organic carbon stocks in global change scenarios: a CarboSOIL application. Biogeosciences, 10, 82538268.Google Scholar
Negm, L. M., Youssef, M. A., Skaggs, R. W., Chescheir, G. M. & Jones, J. 2014. DRAINMOD-DSSAT model for simulating hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and crop growth for drained crop land. Agricultural Water Management, 137, 3045.Google Scholar
Nendel, C., Berg, M., Kersebaum, K. C., Mirschel, W., Specka, X., Wegehenkel, M., et al. 2011. The MONICA model: testing predictability for crop growth, soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 222, 16141625.Google Scholar
Nesshover, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., et al. 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 12151227.Google Scholar
Nunes, J. P., Quintanilla, P. N., Santos, J. M., Serpa, D., Carvalho-Santos, C., Rocha, J., et al. 2018. Afforestation, subsequent forest fires and provision of hydrological services: a model-based analysis for a Mediterranean mountainous catchment. Land Degradation & Development, 28, 776788.Google Scholar
Panno, A., Carrus, G., Lafortezza, R., Mariani, L. & Sanesi, G. 2017. Nature-based solutions to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot summers. Environmental Research, 159, 249256.Google Scholar
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B. & Cole, C. V. 1988. Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils – a model. Biogeochemistry, 5, 109131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, B. G., Mungai, L. M., Messina, J. P. & Snapp, S. S. 2017. Nature-based agricultural solutions: scaling perennial grains across Africa. Environmental Research, 159, 283290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rastetter, E. B., Ryan, M. G., Shaver, G. R., Melillo, J. M., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Hobbie, J. E., et al.1991. A general biogeochemical model describing the responses of the C-cycle and N-cycle in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO2, climate, and N-deposition. Tree Physiology, 9, 101126.Google Scholar
Sheng, D. C. 2011. Review of fundamental principles in modelling unsaturated soil behaviour. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 757776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silburn, D. M. & Loch, R. J. 1989. Evaluation of the Creams Model. 1. Sensitivity analysis of the soil-erosion sedimentation component for aggregated clay soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 27, 545561.Google Scholar
van der Jagt, A. P. N., Szaraz, L. R., Delshammar, T., Cvejic, R., Santos, A., Goodness, J., et al. 2017. Cultivating nature-based solutions: the governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union. Environmental Research, 159, 264275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Tol, C., Verhoef, W., Timmermans, J., Verhoef, A. & Su, Z. 2009. An integrated model of soil-canopy spectral radiances, photosynthesis, fluorescence, temperature and energy balance. Biogeosciences, 6, 31093129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oost, K., Govers, G. & Desmet, P. 2000. Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage. Landscape Ecology, 15, 577589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, A. J., Whitehead, P. G. & Butterfield, D. 2002. The Integrated Catchments model of Phosphorus dynamics (INCA-P), a new approach for multiple source assessment in heterogeneous river systems: model structure and equations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 6, 583606.Google Scholar
Wild, T. C., Henneberry, J. & Gill, L. 2017. Comprehending the multiple ‘values’ of green infrastructure – valuing nature-based solutions for urban water management from multiple perspectives. Environmental Research, 158, 179187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×