Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:00:52.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Catrina Denvir
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Once characterised as a relatively stable profession, unfettered by the influence of modernity and strongly resistant to external forces, the legal services sector has in recent years exhibited marked change. Efforts to preserve profit margins increasingly eroded by the introduction of new fee models, the demand for increased billing transparency, rising client expectations, the adoption of technology and heightened market competition from high volume legal process outsourcers, have all contributed to the sector’s evolution. In what has been viewed as a clear shift towards corporatisation and commercialisation, the legal profession in a number of jurisdictions has moved away from the broader social mission on which it was founded and in which it existed as ‘a branch of the administration of justice and not a mere money-getting trade’. Free market ideologies have undermined ‘justice and rights in the discourse of law’, and in its place, the generation of profit has become the primary indicator of success.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benko, C, Anderson, M and Vickberg, S, ‘The Corporate Lattice: A Strategic Response to the Changing World of Work’ (Deloitte Insights, 1 January 2011) www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/deloitte-review/issue-8/the-corporate-lattice-rethinking-careers-in-the-changing-world-of-work.html accessed 4 May 2019Google Scholar
Boyd, SB, ‘Corporatism and Legal Education in Canada’ (2005) 14(2) Social and Legal Studies 287Google Scholar
Buchanan, R, ‘Wicked Problems in Design Thinking’ (1992) 8(2) Design Issues 5Google Scholar
Burridge, R and Webb, J, ‘The Values of Common Law Legal Education Reprised’ (2010) 42(3) The Law Teacher 263Google Scholar
Campbell, RW, ‘The End of Law Schools: Legal Education in the Era of Legal Service Businesses’ (2016) 85(1) Mississippi Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Canadian Bar Association, ‘Futures: Transforming The Delivery Of Legal Services In Canada’ (Canadian Bar Association 2014) www.cba.org/cbamedialibrary/cba_na/pdfs/cba legal futures pdfs/futures-final-eng.pdf accessed 10 May 2019Google Scholar
Conison, J, ‘The Report and Recommendations of the ABA Task Force on the Future of Legal Education: Its Significance for Bar Admissions and Regulation of Entry into the Legal Profession’ (2014) 83(4) The Bar Examiner 12Google Scholar
Cortés, P, ‘The Online Court: Filling the Gaps of the Civil Justice System?’ (2017) 36(1) Civil Justice Quarterly 109Google Scholar
Edwards, HT, ‘The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession’ (1992) 91(1) Michigan Law Review 34Google Scholar
Flood, J, ‘Legal Education in the Global Context: Challenges from Globalization, Technology and Changes in Government Regulation’ (2011) University of Westminster School of Law Research Paper 11–16 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906687 accessed 4 September 2018Google Scholar
Galanter, MS and Henderson, WD, ‘The Elastic Tournament: The Second Transformation of the Big Law Firm’ (2008) 60 Stanford Law Review 1867Google Scholar
Genn, H, ‘Online Courts and the Future of Justice’ (Birkenhead Lecture, London, 16 October 2017) www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/sites/laws/files/birkenhead_lecture_2017_professor_dame_hazel_genn_final_version.pdf accessed 28 February 2018Google Scholar
Gray, J and Woodley, M, ‘The Relationship between Academic Legal Education and the Legal Profession: The Review of Legal Education in England and Wales and the Teaching Hospital Model’ (2005) 2(1) European Journal of Legal Education 1Google Scholar
Henderson, WD, ‘From Big Law to Lean Law’ (2014) 38(June) International Review of Law and Economics 5Google Scholar
Jones, JW, ‘The Challenge of Change: The Practice of Law in the Year 2000’ (1988) 41(4) Vanderbilt Law Review 683Google Scholar
Katz, DM, ‘Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Preparing for the Data Driven Future of the Legal Services Industry’ (2013) 62 Emory Law Journal 909Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, ‘Legal Education as Training for Hierarchy’ in Kairys, D (ed.), The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique (Pantheon Books 1990)Google Scholar
Kordana, KA, ‘Law Firms and Associate Careers: Tournament Theory Versus the Production-Imperative Model’ (1995) 104(7) Yale Law Journal 1907Google Scholar
Krantz, S and Millemann, M, ‘Legal Education in Transition: Trends and Their Implications’ (2014) 94(1) Nebraska Law Review 1Google Scholar
Maharg, P, ‘Shared Space: Regulation, Technology and Legal Education in a Global Context’ (2015) 6(1) European Journal of Law and Technology 1 http://ejlt.org/article/view/425/541 accessed 17 May 2019Google Scholar
McCloud, V, ‘The Online Court: Suing in Cyberspace’ (2017) 36(1) Civil Justice Quarterly 34Google Scholar
Moliterno, JE, ‘In-House Live-Client Clinical Programs : Some Ethical Issues’ (1999) 67(5) Fordham Law Review 2377Google Scholar
Moorhead, R and others, ‘The Ethical Capacities of New Advocates’ (UCL Centre for Law and Ethics 2015) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2849698 accessed 24 September 2018Google Scholar
Ribstein, LE, ‘The Death of Big Law’ (2010) 3 Wisconsin Law Review 749Google Scholar
Schultz, NL, ‘How Do Lawyers Really Think?’ (1992) 42(1) Journal of Legal Education 57Google Scholar
Sela, A, ‘Streamlining Justice: How Online Courts Can Resolve the Challenges of Pro Se Litigation’ 1(26) Cornel Journal of Law & Public Policy 331Google Scholar
Solicitors Regulation Authority, ‘A New Route to Qualification: The Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) – A Summary of Responses and Next Steps’ (Solicitors Regulation Authority 2017) www.sra.org.uk/documents/sra/consultations/sqe-summary-responses.pdf accessed 31 October 2018Google Scholar
Sommerlad, H and others, ‘The Futures of Legal Education and the Legal Profession’ in Sommerlad, Hilary and others (eds.), The Futures of Legal Education and the Legal Profession (1st edn, Hart Publishing 2015)Google Scholar
Stevens, RB, ‘Law Schools and Legal Education, 1879–1979: Lectures in Honor of 100 Years of Valparaiso Law School’ (1980) 14(2) Valparaiso Law School 179Google Scholar
Stuckey, R, ‘Best Practices for Legal Education: A Vision and A Road Map’ (Clinical Legal Education Association 2007) https://clea.wildapricot.org/resources/documents/best_practices-full.pdf accessed 28 September 2018Google Scholar
Susskind, R, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Thornton, M, ‘The Law School, the Market and the New Knowledge Economy’ (2007) 17(1–2) Legal Education Review 1Google Scholar
Thornton, M, ‘Squeezing the Life out of Lawyers: Legal Practice in the Market Embrace’ (2016) 25(4) Griffith Law Review 471Google Scholar
Webb, J, ‘Taking Values Seriously: The Democratic Intellect and the Place of Values in the School Curriculum’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Webb, J, ‘The LETRs (Still) in the Post: The Legal Education and Training Review and the Reform of Legal Services Education and Training—A Personal (Re)View’ in Sommerlad, Hilary and others (eds.), The Futures of Legal Education and the Legal Profession (Hart 2018)Google Scholar
Webb, J and others, ‘Setting Standards: The Future of Legal Services Education and Training Regulation in England and Wales (Legal Education and Training Review)’ (SRA, BSB and CILEX 2013) www.letr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/letr-report.pdf accessed 17 August 2018Google Scholar
Weinberg, A and Harding, C, ‘Interdisciplinary Teaching and Collaboration in Higher Education: A Concept Whose Time Has Come’ (2004) 14(15) Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 14Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Catrina Denvir, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Modernising Legal Education
  • Online publication: 30 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Catrina Denvir, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Modernising Legal Education
  • Online publication: 30 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Catrina Denvir, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Modernising Legal Education
  • Online publication: 30 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.002
Available formats
×