Book contents
- Money Matters in Migration
- Money Matters in Migration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Money Matters in Migration: A Synthetic Approach
- Part I Migration
- 2 The Changing Landscape of Multilateral Financing and Global Migration Governance
- 3 Digging a Moat around Fortress Europe: EU Funding as an Instrument of Exclusion
- 4 The “Refugee Hospital”. Aid Money, Migration Politics, and Uncertain Care in Neoliberal Morocco
- 5 Cash Rules Everything: Money and Migration in the Colombian-Venezuelan Borderlands
- 6 Recruitment Fees, Indebtedness, and the Impairment of Asian Migrant Workers’ Rights
- 7 Pushing Out the Poor: Unstable Income and Termination of Residence
- 8 Follow the Money: Income Requirements in Norwegian Immigration Regulations
- Part II Participation
- Part III Citizenship
- Index
- References
3 - Digging a Moat around Fortress Europe: EU Funding as an Instrument of Exclusion
from Part I - Migration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 November 2021
Book contents
- Money Matters in Migration
- Money Matters in Migration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Money Matters in Migration: A Synthetic Approach
- Part I Migration
- 2 The Changing Landscape of Multilateral Financing and Global Migration Governance
- 3 Digging a Moat around Fortress Europe: EU Funding as an Instrument of Exclusion
- 4 The “Refugee Hospital”. Aid Money, Migration Politics, and Uncertain Care in Neoliberal Morocco
- 5 Cash Rules Everything: Money and Migration in the Colombian-Venezuelan Borderlands
- 6 Recruitment Fees, Indebtedness, and the Impairment of Asian Migrant Workers’ Rights
- 7 Pushing Out the Poor: Unstable Income and Termination of Residence
- 8 Follow the Money: Income Requirements in Norwegian Immigration Regulations
- Part II Participation
- Part III Citizenship
- Index
- References
Summary
Since 2015 and in response to the so-called migration crisis, the European Union (EU) has adopted several budget amendments, and created new funds in the field of migration. The chapter analyses these changes in the EU funding landscape from a border drawing perspective. After showing that funds have been extensively used by EU institution as a response to the so-called migration crisis, the chapter attempts to answer the following research question: does the evolution of the EU funding landscape in response to the migration crisis illustrate a mainly inclusive or mainly exclusive border drawing dynamic? To do so, the chapter starts by describing the various areas and objectives of the EU migration policy that funding decisions could be intended to support, classifying them as areas with a mainly inclusive purpose and areas with a mainly exclusive purpose. Then, it gives an overview of the changes in the EU’s funding patterns since the outbreak of the migration crisis in 2015. Finally, it examines these changes from a border drawing perspective, reaching the conclusion that EU funding decisions taken after the migration crisis have responded to a mainly exclusive dynamic.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Money Matters in MigrationPolicy, Participation, and Citizenship, pp. 38 - 54Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ackrill, Robert and Kay, Adrian. 2006. ‘Historical-Institutionalist Perspectives on the Development of the EU Budget System’. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 1: 113–33Google Scholar
Bauder, Harald. 2011. ‘Toward a Critical Geography of the Border: Engaging the Dialectic of Practice and Meaning’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, no. 5: 1126–39Google Scholar
Carrera, Sergio. 2016. Implementation of EU Readmission Agreements: Identity Determination Dilemmas and the Blurring of Rights. London: Springer InternationalGoogle Scholar
Carrera, Sergio and Allsopp, Jennifer. 2018. ‘The Irregular Immigration Policy Conundrum’. In Servent, Ariadna Ripoll and Trauner (eds), Florian, The Routledge Handbook of Justice and Home Affairs Research, London: Routledge, pp. 70–82.Google Scholar
Carrera, Sergio, Den Hertogh, Leonhard, Ferrer, Jorge Núñez, Musmeci, Roberto, Vosyliūtė, Lina, and Pilati, Marta. 2018. ‘Oversight and Management of the EU Trust Funds: Democratic Accountability Challenges and Promising Practices’. European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary ControlGoogle Scholar
Castillejo, Clare. 2017a. ‘The European Union Trust Fund for Africa: What Implications for Future EU Development Policy?’. Briefing Paper. Bonn: German Development InstituteGoogle Scholar
Castillejo, Clare. 2017b. ‘The EU Migration Partnership Framework: Time for a Rethink?’. Discussion Paper 28/2017. Bonn: German Development InstituteGoogle Scholar
Concord and CINI. 2018. ‘Partnership or Conditionality? Monitoring the Migration Compacts and EU Trust Fund for Africa’. Brussels: Concord EuropeGoogle Scholar
Conte, Carmine and Cortinovis, Roberto. 2018. ‘Migration-Related Conditionality in EU External Funding’. Discussion Brief, Brussels: ReSOMAGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Richard. 2017. ‘The European Budgetary Galaxy’. European Constitutional Law Review 13, no. 3: 428–52Google Scholar
Csuros, Gabriella. 2013. ‘Characteristics, Functions and Changes (?) Of the EU Budget’. Curentul Juridic, 59, no. 4: 92–107Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Marek. 2010. ‘The Global Financial Crisis: Lessons for European Integration’. Economic Systems 34, no. 1: 38–54Google Scholar
De Genova, Nicholas. 2013. ‘Spectacles of Migrant “Illegality”: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36, no. 7: 1180–98Google Scholar
Duvell, Franck. 2011. ‘Paths into Irregularity: The Legal and Political Construction of Irregular Migration The Pathways in and out of Irregular Migration’. European Journal of Migration and Law 13: 275–96Google Scholar
Ferdoush, Md Azmeary. 2018. ‘Seeing Borders through the Lens of Structuration: A Theoretical Framework’. Geopolitics 23, no. 1: 180–200Google Scholar
Funk, Marco, Mc Namara, Frank, Pardo, Romain, and Rose, Norma. 2017. ‘Tackling Irregular Migration through Development – a Flawed Approach?’. Discussion Paper. European Policy Center, 12Google Scholar
Gkliati, Mariana. 2018. ‘The Next Phase of the European Border and Coast Guard: Towards Operational Effectiveness’. EU Law Analysis (blog)Google Scholar
Heinemann, Friedrich, Mohl, Philipp, and Osterloh, Steffen. 2010. ‘Reforming the EU Budget: Reconciling Needs with Political- Economic Constraints’. Journal of European Integration 32, no. 1: 59–76Google Scholar
den Hertog, Leonhard. 2016a. ‘EU Budgetary Responses to the “Refugee Crisis”: Reconfiguring the Funding Landscape’. CEPS Paper in Liberty & Security in Europe No. 93Google Scholar
den Hertog, Leonhard. 2016b. ‘Money Talks: Mapping the Funding for EU External Migration Policy’. CEPS Paper in Liberty & Security in Europe No. 95Google Scholar
Horga, Ioan and Brie, Mircea. 2010. ‘Europe between Exclusive Borders and Inclusive Frontiers’. MPRA Paper No. 44309Google Scholar
Kamarás, Éva, Saunier, Mathieu, and Todaro, Laura. 2016. ‘Overview on the Use of EU Funds for Migration Policies’. European Parliament’s Committee on BudgetsGoogle Scholar
Latek, Marta. 2017. ‘Growing Impact of EU Migration Policy on Development Cooperation’. European Parliament Members’ Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
Montani, Guido. 2009. ‘Which European Response to the Financial Crisis?’. Perspectives on Federalism 1: 40–67Google Scholar
Neframi, Eleftheria. 2011. ‘Division of Competences between the European Union and Its Member States Concerning Immigration’. European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsGoogle Scholar
Neville, Darren, Sy, Sarah, and Rigon, Amalia. 2016. ‘On the Frontline: The Hotspot Approach to Managing Migration’. European Parliament’s LIBE CommitteeGoogle Scholar
Newman, David. 2003. ‘On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework’. Journal of Borderlands Studies 18, no. 1: 13–25Google Scholar
Parry, Matthew and Sapala, Magdalena. 2018. ‘2021–2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and New Own Resources: Analysis of the Commission’s Proposal’. In Depth Analysis. European Parliamentary Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
Paul, Regine. 2015. The Political Economy of Border Drawing Arranging Legality in European Labor Migration Policies. New York: Berghahn BooksGoogle Scholar
Perkowski, Nina and Squire, Vicki. 2018. ‘The Anti-Policy of European Anti-Smuggling as a Site of Contestation in the Mediterranean Migration “Crisis”’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45: 1–18Google Scholar
Polanco, Geraldina and Zell, Sarah. 2017. ‘English as a Border-Drawing Matter: Language and the Regulation of Migrant Service Worker Mobility in International Labor Markets’. Journal of International Migration and Integration 18, no. 1: 267–89Google Scholar
Rumford, Chris. 2008. ‘Introduction: Citizens and Borderwork in Europe’. Space and Polity 12, no. 1: 1–12Google Scholar
Scott, James Wesley. 2006. ‘Wider Europe as a Backdrop’. In Scott, J. W., ed., EU Enlargement, Region Building and Shifting Borders of Inclusion and Exclusion. Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 3–14Google Scholar
Trauner, Florian and Angelescu, Irina. 2018. ‘10,000 Border Guards for Frontex: Why the EU Risks Conflated Expectations’. Policy Brief. European Policy CenterGoogle Scholar
Triandafyllidou, Anna. 2018. ‘A “Refugee Crisis” Unfolding: “Real” Events and Their Interpretation in Media and Political Debates’. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16, no. 1–2: 198–216Google Scholar
UNHCR and ECRE (European Council on Refugees and Exiles). 2018. ‘Follow the Money: A Critical Analysis of the Implementation of the EU Asylum, Migration & Integration Fund | ALNAP’.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by