Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:20:19.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Women as EU Citizens: Caught between Work, (Sufficient) Resources, and the Market

from Part II - Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2021

By
Sandra Mantu
Edited by
Tesseltje de Lange ,
Willem Maas  and
Annette Schrauwen
Tesseltje de Lange
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Willem Maas
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Annette Schrauwen
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

This contribution examines EU citizenship as a ‘market’ and gendered notion and explores how these two dimensions are interlinked as they build on and reinforce each other with exclusionary effects that limit the scope of EU citizenship as a fundamental status. The normative model underpinning EU citizenship has been criticized as ‘market citizenship’ and described as exclusionary of those who are not rich or failing to engage with the market via employment or self-employment. The case law of the European Court of Justice suggests that quite a number of those affected by EU citizenship’s market orientation are women, prompting questions as to how and why EU law constrains and shapes the capacity of women to exercise their EU citizenship rights. By undertaking a critical analysis of the recent EU citizenship jurisprudence from a gender perspective this contribution shows that EU citizenship is not only a ‘market citizenship’ that attaches value primarily to work and financial self-sufficiency but also a gendered construct and that the two reinforce each other in limiting the reach of EU citizenship.

Keywords

EU citizenshipmarket citizenshipgendersocial solidarityfinancial self-sufficiency
Type
Chapter
Information
Money Matters in Migration
Policy, Participation, and Citizenship
 , pp. 188 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackers, Louise. 1996. ‘Citizenship, Gender and Dependence in the European Union: Women and International Migration’. Social Politics 5: 316–330.Google Scholar
Ackers, Louise. 1998. Shifting Spaces. Women, Migration and Citizenship in the European Union. Bristol: Policy press.Google Scholar
Ackers, Louise and Dweyer, Paul. 2002. Senior Citizenship? Retirement, Migration and Welfare in the European Union. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2013. Us and Them: The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Askola, Helli. 2012. ‘Tale of Two Citizenships? Citizenship, Migration and Care in the European Union’. Social & Legal Studies 21, no. 3: 341–356.Google Scholar
Costello, Cathryn. 2014. ‘Reflections on an Anniversary: EU Citizenship at 20’. In Anderson, Bridget and Keith, Michael, eds., Migration: A COMPAS Anthology. Oxford: COMPAS.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2020. Women’s employment in the EU. At https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20200306-1, accessed 1 October 2020.Google Scholar
Gehring, Jacqueline. 2013. ‘Roma and the Limits of Free Movement in the European Union’. In Maas, Willem, ed., Democratic Citizenship and the Free Movement of People. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff: 143–174.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Heidi. 2015. ‘Why Workers’ Rights are not Women’s Rights’. Laws 4: 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, Elspeth, Peers, Steve and Tomkin, Jonathan. 2014. The EU Citizenship Directive. A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guth, Jessica and Elfving, Sanna. 2018. Gender and the Court of Justice of the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Encarnación. 2014. ‘The Precarity of Feminisation: On domestic Work, Heteronormativity and the Coloniality of Labour’. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 27, no. 2: 191–202.Google Scholar
Iben Jensen, Ulla. 2013. ‘Free Movement of Au Pair EU Workers: Obstacles to Temporary and Part-Time EU Workers’. Online Journal on Free Movement of Workers within the European Union 5: 27–36.Google Scholar
Maas, Willem. 2007. Creating European Citizens. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2006. ‘Introduction: Gender and the Politics of Scale’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 13, no. 4: 457–461.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2013. ‘Concepts of Time and European Citizenship’. European Journal of Migration and Law 15, no. 4: 447–464.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2014. ‘Protecting EU Workers in Case of Involuntary Unemployment. Retention of Worker Status’. Online Journal on Free Movement of Workers in the European Union 7: 15–24.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra and Minderhoud, Paul. 2016. ‘Exploring the Limits of Social Solidarity: Welfare Tourism and EU Citizenship’. UNIO – EU Law Journal 2: 4–19.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2017. ‘Alternative Views on EU Citizenship’. In Grutters, Carolus, Mantu, Sandra and Minderhoud, Paul, eds., Migration on the Move – Essays on the Dynamics of Migration. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff: 225–246.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra and Minderhoud, Paul. 2017. ‘EU Citizenship and Social Solidarity’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 24, no. 5: 703–720.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2018. ‘Controlling “Poverty Migration” – Asserting Gradations of EU Citizenship’. In Mercier, Heidi, Ni Chaoimh, E., Damay, L. and Delledone, G., eds., La libre circulation sous pression, Régulation et dérégulation des mobilités dans l’Union européenne. Bruxelles: Bruylant: 170–184.Google Scholar
McDowell, Linda. 2014. ‘Gender, Work, Employment and Society: Feminist Reflections on Continuity and Change’. Work, Employment & Society 28, no. 5: 825–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minderhoud, Paul. 2016. ‘Sufficient Resources and Residence Rights under Directive 2004/38’. In Verschueren, Herwig, ed., Residence, Employment and Social Rights of Mobile Persons. On How EU Law Defines Where They Belong. Intersentia: 47–73.Google Scholar
Minderhoud, Paul and Mantu, Sandra. 2017. ‘Back to the Roots? No Access to social Assistance for Union Citizens Who are Economically Inactive’. In Thym, Daniel, ed., Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 191–207.Google Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce and Abels, Gabriele. 2015. ‘The Gender Politics of the EU’. In Liebert, U. and Wolff, J. eds., Interdisziplinäire Europastudien: Eine Einführung. Springer VS: 309–321.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Charlotte. 2016. ‘Civis Capitalist Sum: Class as the New Guiding Principle of EU Free Movement Rights’. Common Market Law Review 53, no. 4: 937–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, Aino and Calloni, Marina. 2012. Builders of a New Europe: Women Immigrants from the Eastern Trans-regions. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jo. 2000. ‘Importing Gender: The Challenge of Feminism and the Analysis of the EU Legal Order’. Journal of European Public Policy 7, no. 3: 406–431.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jo. 2002. ‘The European Union and Gender Mainstreaming: Constitutionally Embedded or Comprehensively Marginalized’. Feminist Legal Studies 10, no. 3: 213–226.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2004. ‘The European Union and Gender Equality: Emergent Varieties of Gender Regime’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 11, no. 1: 4–29.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Herwig. 2015. ‘Preventing “Benefit Tourism” in the EU: A Narrow or Broad Interpretation of the Possibilities Offered by the ECJ in Dano?’. Common Market Law Review 52: 363–390.Google Scholar
Weldon-Johns, Michelle. 2013. ‘EU Work-Family Policies – Challenging Parental Roles or Reinforcing Gendered Stereotypes’. European Law Journal 19, no. 5: 662–681.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×