Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T00:02:10.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

Anna Porwit
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden
Marie Christine Béné
Affiliation:
Université de Nantes, France
Get access

Summary

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an established prognostic factor after induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Over the past decades, molecular and flow cytometry-based assays have been optimized to provide highly specific and sensitive MRD assessment that is clinically validated. Flow cytometry is an accessible technique available in most clinical diagnostic laboratories worldwide and has the advantage of being applicable in approximately 90% of patients. Here, the essential aspects of flow cytometry-based MRD assessment are discussed, focusing on the identification of leukaemic cells using leukaemia associated immunophenotypes. Analysis, detection limits of the assay, reporting of results and current clinical applications are also reviewed. Additionally, limitations of the assay will be discussed, including the future perspective of flow cytometry-based MRD assessment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Döhner, H, Wei, AH, Appelbaum, FR, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 2022; 140: 13451377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachowiez, CA, Long, N, Saultz, J, et al. Comparison and validation of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet guidelines in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 2023; 7: 18991909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuurhuis, GJ, Heuser, M, Freeman, S, et al. Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2018; 131: 12751291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, NJ, Zhou, S, Fu, C, et al. Association of measurable residual disease with survival outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6: 18901899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongen-Lavrencic, M, Grob, T, Hanekamp, D, et al. Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 11891199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krigstein, M, Iland, HJ, Wei, AH. Applying molecular measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia. Pathology 2023; 55: 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuser, M, Freeman, SD, Ossenkoppele, GJ, et al. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2021; 138: 27532767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazzarotto, D, Candoni, A. The role of Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) expression as a marker of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 3306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grob, T, Sanders, MA, Vonk, CM, et al. Prognostic value of flt3-internal tandem duplication residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 756765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, LW, Gui, G, Page, KM, et al. DNA sequencing to detect residual disease in adults with acute myeloid leukemia prior to hematopoietic cell transplant. JAMA 2023; 329: 745755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JM, Park, S, Hwang, I, et al. FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia using next-generation sequencing. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 6121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachas, C, Schuurhuis, GJ, Assaraf, YG, et al. The role of minor subpopulations within the leukemic blast compartment of AML patients at initial diagnosis in the development of relapse. Leukemia 2012; 26: 13131320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, L, Ley, TJ, Larson, DE, et al. Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature 2012; 481: 506510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terstappen, LWMM, Safford, M, Könemann, S, et al. Flow cytometric characterization of acute myeloid leukemia. Part II. Phenotypic heterogeneity at diagnosis. Leukemia 1992; 6: 7080.Google ScholarPubMed
Martens, ACM, Schultz, FW, Hagenbeek, A. Nonhomogeneous distribution of leukemia in the bone marrow during minimal residual disease. Blood 1987; 70: 10731078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
San Miguel, JF, Martínez, A, Macedo, A, et al. Immunophenotyping investigation of minimal residual disease is a useful approach for predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood 1997; 90: 24652470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, SD, Virgo, P, Couzens, S, et al. Prognostic relevance of treatment response measured by flow cytometric residual disease detection in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 41234131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeijlemaker, W, Kelder, A, Cloos, J, Schuurhuis, GJ. Immunophenotypic detection of measurable residual (stem cell) disease using LAIP approach in acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Protoc Cytom 2019; 91: e66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tettero, JM, Freeman, S, Buecklein, V, et al. Technical aspects of flow cytometry-based measurable residual disease quantification in acute myeloid leukemia: experience of the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. HemaSphere 2021; 6: E676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeijlemaker, W, Kelder, A, Wouters, R, et al. Absence of leukaemic CD34(+) cells in acute myeloid leukaemia is of high prognostic value: a longstanding controversy deciphered. Br J Haematol 2015; 171: 227238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terwijn, M, van Putten, WLJ, Kelder, A, et al. High prognostic impact of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the HOVON/SAKK AML 42A study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 38893997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuser, M, Freeman, SD, Ossenkoppele, GJ, et al. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2021; 138: 27532767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venditti, A, Piciocchi, A, Candoni, A, et al. GIMEMA AML1310 trial of risk-adapted, MRD-directed therapy for young adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2019; 134: 935945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, BL. Acute myeloid leukemia minimal residual disease detection: the difference from normal approach. Curr Protoc Cytom 2020; 93. e73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngai, LL, Hanekamp, D, Kelder, A, et al. Emerging leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) in bone marrow of acute myeloid leukemia patients after intensive chemotherapy. EHA Libr 2023; 386304: P475.Google Scholar
Hanekamp, D, Tettero, JM, Ossenkoppele, GJ, Kelder, A, Cloos, J, Schuurhuis, GJ. AML/normal progenitor balance instead of total tumor load (MRD) accounts for prognostic impact of flowcytometric residual disease in AML. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 2597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, W, Voskova, D, Schoch, C, Hiddemann, W, Schnittger, S, Haferlach, T. Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2004; 104: 30783085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccisano, F, Palmieri, R, Piciocchi, A, et al. Clinical relevance of an objective flow cytometry approach based on limit of detection and limit of quantification for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia. A post-hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial. Haematologica 2022; 107: 28232833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tettero, JM, Palmieri, R, Ngai, LL, et al. Validation of limit of quantification approach based flow cytometry for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia in the HOVON-SAKK-132 trial. EHA Libr 2023; 386261: P432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurillo, L, Buccisano, F, Spagnoli, A, et al. Monitoring of minimal residual disease in adult acute myeloid leukemia using peripheral blood as an alternative source to bone marrow. Haematologica 2007; 92: 605611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeijlemaker, W, Kelder, A, Oussoren-Brockhoff, YJM, et al. Peripheral blood minimal residual disease may replace bone marrow minimal residual disease as an immunophenotypic biomarker for impending relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2015; 30: 708715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guénot, C, Lacombe, F, Allou, K, et al. Peripheral blood minimal/measurable residual disease assessed in flow cytometry in acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2019; 33: 18141816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godwin, CD, Zhou, Y, Othus, M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia measurable residual disease detection by flow cytometry in peripheral blood vs bone marrow. Blood. 2021; 137: 569572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, MA, Litzow, MR, Letendre, LL, et al. Early peripheral blood blast clearance during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia predicts superior relapse-free survival. Blood 2007; 110: 41724174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacombe, F, Arnoulet, C, Maynadié, M, et al. Early clearance of peripheral blasts measured by flow cytometry during the first week of AML induction therapy as a new independent prognostic factor: a GOELAMS study. Leukemia. 2009; 23: 350357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianfaldoni, G, Mannelli, F, Intermesoli, T, et al. Early peripheral clearance of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in AML: centralized analysis of a randomized trial. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 301311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtzman, NG, El Chaer, F, Baer, MR, et al. Peripheral blood blast rate of clearance is an independent predictor of clinical response and outcomes in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2020; 188: 881887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwenberg, B, Pabst, T, Maertens, J, et al. Addition of lenalidomide to intensive treatment in younger and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed AML: the HOVON-SAKK-132 trial. Blood Adv 2021; 5: 11101121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paras, G, Morsink, LM, Othus, M, et al. Conditioning intensity and peritransplant flow cytometric MRD dynamics in adult AML. Blood 2022; 139: 16941706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnittger, S, Kern, W, Tschulik, C, et al. Minimal residual disease levels assessed by NPM1 mutation–specific RQ-PCR provide important prognostic information in AML. Blood 2009; 114: 22202231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petzer, AL, Hogge, DE, Lansdorp, PM, Reid, DS, Eaves, CJ. Self-renewal of primitive human hematopoietic cells (long-term-culture-initiating cells) in vitro and their expansion in defined medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1996; 93: 14701474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnet, D, Dick, JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 1997; 3: 730737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taussig, DC, Vargaftig, J, Miraki-Moud, F, et al. Leukemia-initiating cells from some acute myeloid leukemia patients with mutated nucleophosmin reside in the CD34(-) fraction. Blood 2010; 115: 19761984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarry, J-E, Murphy, K, Perry, R, et al. Human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells are rare and heterogeneous when assayed in NOD/SCID/IL2Rγc-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 384395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terwijn, M, Zeijlemaker, W, Kelder, A, et al. Leukemic stem cell frequency: a strong biomarker for clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e107587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, RT, Mallet, F, Gaugler, B, et al. Human acute myeloid leukemia CD34+/CD38- progenitor cells have decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy and Fas-induced apoptosis, reduced immunogenicity, and impaired dendritic cell transformation capacities. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 44034411.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, F, Yoshida, S, Saito, Y, et al. Chemotherapy-resistant human AML stem cells home to and engraft within the bone-marrow endosteal region. NatBiotechnol 2007; 25: 13151321.Google ScholarPubMed
Zeijlemaker, W, Grob, T, Meijer, R, et al. CD34+CD38 leukemic stem cell frequency to predict outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2019; 33: 11021112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngai, LL, Hanekamp, D, Janssen, F, et al. Prospective validation of the prognostic relevance of CD34+CD38 AML stem cell frequency in the HOVON-SAKK132 trial. Blood 2023; 141: 26572661.Google ScholarPubMed
Ngai, LL, Kelder, A, Janssen, JJWM, Ossenkoppele, GJ, Cloos, J. MRD tailored therapy in AML: what we have learned so far. Front. Oncol 2021; 10: 603636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, C, Houlton, AE, Akiki, S, et al. Prognostic value of monitoring a candidate immunophenotypic leukaemic stem/progenitor cell population in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2015; 29: 988991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, ABH, van den Oudenrijn, S, Bakker, AQ, et al. C-type lectin-like molecule-1: a novel myeloid cell surface marker associated with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 84438450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeijlemaker, W, Kelder, A, Oussoren-Brockhoff, YJM, et al. A simple one-tube assay for immunophenotypical quantification of leukemic stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2015; 30: 439446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wouters, R, Cucchi, D, Kaspers, GJ, Schuurhuis, GJ, Cloos, J. Relevance of leukemic stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: heterogeneity and influence on disease monitoring, prognosis and treatment design. Expert Rev Hematol 2014; 7: 791805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Solinge, TS, Zeijlemaker, W, Ossenkoppele, GJ, Cloos, J, Schuurhuis, GJ. The interference of genetic associations in establishing the prognostic value of the immunophenotype in acute myeloid leukemia. Cytom Part B - Clin Cytom 2018; 94: 151158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ossenkoppele, GJ, van de Loosdrecht, AA, Schuurhuis, GJ. Review of the relevance of aberrant antigen expression by flow cytometry in myeloid neoplasms. Br J Haematol 2011; 153: 421436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeijlemaker, W, Gratama, JW, Schuurhuis, GJ. Tumor heterogeneity makes AML a ‘moving target’ for detection of residual disease. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2014; 86: 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, W, Zhang, D, Cunningham, MT, Tilzer, L. Leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: changes at refractory disease or first relapse and clinicopathological findings. Int J Lab Hematol 2014; 36: 636649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voskova, D, Schoch, C, Schnittger, S, Hiddemann, W, Haferlach, T, Kern, W. Stability of leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia between diagnosis and relapse: comparison with cytomorphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic findings. Cytom Part B Clin Cytom 2004; 62: 2538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, YW, Su, L, Tan, YH, et al. Measurable residual disease detected by flow cytometry independently predicts prognoses of NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol 2023; 102: 337347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tettero, JM, Ngai, LL, Bachas, C, et al. Measurable residual disease-guided therapy in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients is a valuable strategy in reducing allogeneic transplantation without negatively affecting survival. Haematologica 2023; 108: 27942798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, Gu, R, Zhou, C, et al. Prognostic effect and clinical application of early measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry on de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 2022; 140: 20302032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourigan, CS, Dillon, LW, Gui, G, et al. Impact of conditioning intensity of allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with genomic evidence of residual disease. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 12731283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyiadzis, M, Zhang, MJ, Chen, K, et al. Impact of pre-transplant induction and consolidation cycles on AML allogeneic transplant outcomes: a CIBMTR analysis in 3113 AML patients. Leukemia 2022; 37: 10061017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilleece, MH, Labopin, M, Yakoub-Agha, I, et al. Measurable residual disease, conditioning regimen intensity, and age predict outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a registry analysis of 2292 patients by the Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Am J Hematol 2018; 93: 11421152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cloos, J, Ossenkoppele, GJ, Dillon, R. Minimal residual disease and stem cell transplantation outcomes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019; 2019: 617625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, T-C, Becker, MW. Defining patient-specific risk in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 38573859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanekamp, D, Ngai, LL, Janssen, JJWM, van de Loosdrecht, A, Ossenkoppele, GJ, Cloos, J. Early assessment of clofarabine effectiveness based on measurable residual disease, including AML stem cells. Blood 2021; 137: 16941697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×