Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:12:42.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Romania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

By
Erika Stanciu ,
Ioan-Cristian Ioja ,
Mariana Tintarean  and
Mihai Pop
Edited by
Graham Tucker
Graham Tucker
Affiliation:
Nature Conservation Consulting
Get access

Summary

The chapter describes the main nature conservation challenges in Romania, its main policy responses and actions, and their achievements and lessons, primarily over the last 40 years. This covers the country’s natural characteristics, habitats and species of particular importance; the status of nature and main pressures affecting it; nature conservation policies (including biodiversity strategies), legislation, governance and key actors; species measures (e.g. concerning hunting, and large carnivores); protected areas and networks; general conservation measures (e.g. for coastal habitats and the Danube Delta, High Nature Value farmland and forests); nature conservation costs and funding sources; and biodiversity monitoring. Likely future developments are also identified. Conclusions are drawn on what measures have been most effective and why, and what is needed to improve the implementation of existing measures and achieve future nature conservation goals.

Keywords

Romaniabiodiversitynature conservationenvironmental policyenvironmental legislationEuropeEuropean UnionBirds DirectiveHabitats Directiveprotected areas
Type
Chapter
Information
Nature Conservation in Europe
Approaches and Lessons
 , pp. 534 - 554
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamescu, M., Cazacu, C., Arhre, G. et al. (2016) Ghid metodologic pentru evaluarea rapidă a serviciilor ecosistemice în ariile protejate din România. Bucharest: Fundația Centrul Național pentru Dezvoltare Durabilă (CNDD).Google Scholar
ADEPT Transilvania, WWF Romania & ProPark Foundation (2016) Rural Development and High Nature Value Farmland in Romania. Romania: Fundația ADEPT Transilvania.Google Scholar
Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R. et al. (2013) Maintaining cultural and natural biodiversity in the Carpathian Mountain Ecoregion: need for an integrated landscape approach. In The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society towards Sustainability, eds. Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A. & Wyżga, B., pp. 393–424. Berlin: Springer Press.Google Scholar
Beaufoy, G., Blom, S., Hartel, T. et al. (2015) Europe’s wood pastures: condemned to a slow death by the CAP? A test case for EU agriculture and biodiversity policy. Romania: European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism, and Pogány-havas Association.Google Scholar
Bellebaum, J. & Koffijberg, K. (2018) Present agri-environment measures in Europe are not sufficient for the conservation of a highly sensitive bird species, the Corncrake Crex crex. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 257, 30–37.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2017) European Birds of Conservation Concern: Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities. Cambridge, UK: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, K., Păcurar, F., Rotar, I., Rușdea, E., Auch, E. & Reif, A. (2009) The grasslands of the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. In Grasslands in Europe of High Nature Value, eds. Veen, P., Jefferson, R., de Smidt, J. & van der Straaten, J., pp. 226–237. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazacu, C., Adamescu, M., Ionescu, C. et al. (2014) Mapping trends of large and medium size carnivores of conservation interest in Romania. Annals of Forest Research, 57 (1), 97–107.Google Scholar
Coaliția Natura 2000 (2020) Viziunea Federației Coaliția Natura 2000 pentru sistemul de management al rețelei de arii protejate din România 2019-2028. Romania: Fundația Coaliția Natura 2000.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, A., Iuga, A. M. & Tommy, L. (2013) Managing biodiversity rich hay meadows in the EU: a comparison of Swedish and Romanian grasslands. Environmental Conservation, 40, 194–205.Google Scholar
Dudley, N. (ed.) (2008) Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Feurdean, A., Ruprecht, E., Molnár, Z., Hutchinson, S. M. & Hickler, T. (2018) Biodiversity-rich European grasslands: ancient, forgotten ecosystems. Biological Conservation, 228, 224–232.Google Scholar
Gâștescu, P. & Știucă, R. (2008) Delta Dunării. Rezervație a biosferei. Bucharest: CD Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Tudor, M., Doroftei, M. et al. (2019) Changes in ecosystem services from wetland loss and restoration: an ecosystem assessment of the Danube Delta (1960–2010). Ecosystem Services, 39, 100965.Google Scholar
Grădinaru, S., Peilei Fan, R., Iojă, I. C., Niță, M. R., Suditu, B. & Hersperger, A. M. (2020) Impact of national policies on patterns of built-up development: an assessment over three decades. Land Use Policy, 94, 104510.Google Scholar
Habersack, H., Hein, T., Stanica, A. et al. (2016) Challenges of river basin management: current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 543, 828–845.Google Scholar
Hartel, T., Hanspach, J., Moga, C. I. et al. (2018) Abundance of large old trees in wood-pastures of Transylvania (Romania). Science of the Total Environment, 613, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartel, T., Nita, A. & Rozylowicz, L. (2020) Understanding human-nature connections through value networks: the case of ancient wood-pastures of Central Romania. Sustainability Science, 15 , 1357–1367.Google Scholar
Hatna, E. & Bakker, M. (2011) Abandonment and expansion of arable land in Europe. Ecosystems, 14, 720–731.Google Scholar
Hossu, C. A., Iojă, I. C., Niță, M. R., Hartel, T., Badiu, D. L. & Hersperger, A. M. (2017) Need for a cross-sector approach in protected area management. Land Use Policy, 69, 586–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossu, C. A., Iojă, I. C., Susskind, L. E., Badiu, D. L. & Hersperger, A. M. (2018) Factors driving collaboration in natural resource conflict management: evidence from Romania. Ambio, 47, 816–830.Google Scholar
Iojă, I. C. (2017) Methodology for the management and resolution of environmental conflict in Natura 2000 network. Bucharest: University of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies.Google Scholar
Iojă, I. C., Pătroescu, M., Rozylowicz, L. et al. (2010) The efficacy of Romania’s protected areas network in conserving biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 143, 2468–2476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iojă, I. C., Rozylowicz, L., Pătroescu, M., Nita, M. & Onose, D. (2011) Agriculture and conservation in the Natura 2000 network: a sustainable development approach of the European Union. In Agricultural and Environmental Informatics, Governance and Management: Emerging Research Applications, eds. Andreopoulou, Z., Manos, B., Polman, N. & Viaggi, D., pp. 339–358. Hershey, USA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loos, J., Abson, D. J., Dorresteijn, I. et al. (2016) Sustainable Landscapes in Central Romania: A Social-ecological Study on the Future of Southern Transylvania. Lueneburg, Germany: Pensoft.Google Scholar
Maanen, E. van, Predoiu, G., Klaver, R. et al. (2006) Safeguarding the Romanian Carpathian Ecological Network. A vision for large carnivores and biodiversity in Eastern Europe. Brașov: ICAS Wildlife Unit, A&W ecological consultants.Google Scholar
Manolache, S., Nita, A., Hartel, T., Miu, I. V., Ciocanea, C. M. & Rozylowicz, L. (2020) Governance networks around grasslands with contrasting management history. Journal of Environmental Management, 273, 11115Google Scholar
Membretti, A. & Iancu, B. (2017) From peasant workers to amenity migrants. Socialist heritage and the future of mountain rurality in Romania. Journal of Alpine Research, 105-1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ministry of Environmental Protection (1996) Strategia Nationala si Planul de Actiune pentru conservarea Biodiversitatii si utilizarea durabila a componentelor sale.Google Scholar
Ministry of Environmental Protection (2000) Strategia Naţională de Conservare a Biodiversităţii. www.mmediu.ro/img/attachment/32/biodiversitate-54784ffea5918.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (2014) Strategia naţională şi Planul de acţiune pentru conservarea biodiversităţii 2014 – 2020. http://mmediu.ro/new/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/NBSAP.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Waters, Forests and Environmental Protection (2019) Raport privind starea pădurilor Romaniei 2017. www.mmediu.ro/categorie/starea-padurilor/209Google Scholar
MoE (2013) PRIORITISED ACTION FRAMEWORK (PAF) FOR NATURA 2000 in ROMANIA pursuant to Article 8 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive) for the Multiannual Financial Framework period 2014 – 2020. Bucharest: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
MoE (2019) Prioritised Action Framework (PAF) for Natura 2000 in Romania for the multiannual financial framework period 2021–2027. Bucharest: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
Muntean, D. (2000) Romania. In Important BIRD AREAS in Europe: Priority Sites for Conservation. Volume 2: Southern Europe, eds. Heath, M. F., Evans, M. I., Hoccom, D. G., Payne, A. J. & Peet, N. B., pp. 481–502. Cambridge, UK: ICBP – BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Nistorescu, M. C. (2012) Effectiveness of environmental impact assessment in Romania and simple means to improve it. Report in UNDP-GEF Project MP5-PIMS 3069, ‘Strengthening the Capacity to Integrate Environment and Natural Resources Management for Global Environmental Benefits (CB2)’.Google Scholar
Nita, A., Buttler, A., Rozylowicz, L. & Patru-Stupariu, I. (2015) Perception and use of landscape concepts in the procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment: Case study-Switzerland and Romania. Land Use Policy, 44, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, N., Bălan, A., Huband, S., Popa, R., Rakosy, L. & Sutcliffe, L. (2012) Romania. In High Nature Farming in Europe: 35 European Countries – Experiences and Perspectives, eds. Oppermann, R., Beaufoy, G., Jones, G., pp. 346–357. Ubstadt-Weiher, Germany: RegionalKultur Verlag.Google Scholar
Plieninger, T., Hartel, T., Martin-Lopez, B. et al. (2015) Wood-pastures of Europe: geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biological Conservation, 190, 70–79.Google Scholar
Pop, I. M., Bereczky, L., Chiriac, S. et al. (2018) Movement ecology of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the Romanian Eastern Carpathians. Nature Conservation, 26, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popescu, V., Pop, M., Chiriac, S. & Rozylowicz, L. (2019) Romanian carnivores at a crossroads. Science, 364, 1041.Google Scholar
Popescu, V. D., Artelle, K., Pop, M., Manolache, S. & Rozylowicz, L. (2016) Assessing biological realism of wildlife population estimates in data-poor systems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(4), 1248–1259.Google Scholar
Popescu, V. D., Rozylowicz, L., Niculae, I. M., Cucu, A. L. & Hartel, T. (2014) Species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting EU’s Natura 2000 Network. PLoS ONE, 9 (11), e113648.Google Scholar
Popovici, E. A., Bălteanu, D. & Kucsicsa, G. (2016) Utilizarea terenurilor și dezvoltarea actuală a agriculturii. In Romania. Natură și Societate, ed. Bălteanu, D., pp. 329–376. Bucharest: Romanian Academy Press.Google Scholar
Primack, R., Pătroescu, M., Rozylowicz, L. & Iojă, I. C. (2008) Essential in Biological Conservation/Fundamentele conservarea diversității biologice. Bucharest: AGIR Press.Google Scholar
Rolo, V., Hartel, T., Aviron, S. et al. (2020) Challenges and innovations for improving the sustainability of European agroforestry systems of high nature and cultural value: stakeholder perspectives. Sustainability Science, 15, 1301–1315.Google Scholar
Romanian Forest Research and Management Institute (2018) National Forest inventory of Romania – second cycle. http://roifn.ro/site/ifn-ciclul-ii/Google Scholar
Rozylowicz, L., Nita, A., Manolache, S., Ciocanea, C. M. & Popescu, V. D. (2017) Recipe for success: a network perspective of partnership in nature conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 38, 21–29.Google Scholar
Rozylowicz, L., Nita, A., Manolache, S., Popescu, V. D. & Hartel, T. (2019) Navigating protected areas networks for improving diffusion of conservation practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 230, 413–421.Google Scholar
Salvatori, V., Balian, E., Blanco, J. C. et al. (2020) Applying participatory processes to address conflicts over the conservation of large carnivores: understanding conditions for successful management. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 182.Google Scholar
Salvatori, V., Okarma, H., Ionescu, O., Dovhanych, Y., Find’o, S. & Boitani, L. (2002) Hunting legislation in the Carpathian Mountains: implications for the conservation and management of large carnivores. Wildlife Biology, 8 (1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Sărbu, A., Negrean, G. & Sârbu, I. (2009) The grasslands of the Dobrogea, Romania. In Grasslands in Europe of high nature value, eds. Veen, P., Jefferson, R., de Smidt, J. & van der Straaten, J., pp. 218–225. Zeist, the Netherlands: KNNV Publishing.Google Scholar
Stanciu, E. & Ioniță, A. (2014) Governance of Protected Areas in Eastern Europe. Overview on Different Governance Types, Case Studies and Lessons Learned. Study commissioned to ProPark, Romania, by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN). BfN-Skripten.Google Scholar
Strat, D. & Mihăilescu, S. (2017) Conservation status of habitat types of European Community Interest in the Alpine Biogeographic Region of Romania. Forum Geografic, 16 (1), 59–69.Google Scholar
Szocs, B. & Miklos, A. (2015) Land Grabbing in Romania. Romania: Eco Ruralis.Google Scholar
Tănăsescu, M. & Constantinescu, S. (2020) The human ecology of the Danube Delta: a historical and cartographic perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110324.Google Scholar
Teampău, P. (2020) Trouble in paradise: competing discourses and complex governance in the Romanian Danube Delta. Marine Policy, 112, 103522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toniuc, N., Oltean, M., Romanca, G. & Zamfir, M. (1992) List of protected areas in Romania. Ocrotirea mediului înconjurător, 36, 23–33.Google Scholar
Văidianu, N., Tătui, F., Ristea, M. & Stănică, A. (2020) Managing coastal protection through multi-scale governance structures in Romania. Marine Policy, 112, 103567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veen, P., Fanta, J., Raev, I., Biriş, I. A., de Smidt, J. & Maes, B. (2010) Virgin forests in Romania and Bulgaria: results of two national inventory projects and their implications for protection. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 1805–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×