Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:25:32.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2021

Kevin Kinghorn
Kevin Kinghorn
Affiliation:
Asbury Theological Seminary, Kentucky
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Nature of Desert Claims
Rethinking What it Means to Get One's Due
 , pp. 218 - 223
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarøe, Lene and Petersen, Michael Bang. 2014. “Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues.” The Journal of Politics 76(3): 684–697.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2016. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Ross, W. D.. Digireads.com Publishing.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2017. Politics. Trans. Jowett, B.. Digireads.com Publishing.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1961. “Performative Utterances.” In Philosophical Papers, eds. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J., pp. 233–252. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bai, Feng. 2017. “Beyond Dominance and Competence: A Moral Virtue Theory of Status Attainment.” Personality and Social Behavior Review 21(3): 203–227.Google Scholar
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., and Chevallier, C. 2012. “Preschoolers Are Able to Take Merit into Account When Distributing Goods.” Developmental Psychology 28(2): 492–498.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1830. The Rationale of Punishment. London: Robert Heward.Google Scholar
Berman, Mitchell. 2013. “Rehabilitating Retributivism.” Law and Philosophy 32: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, Huub and Mulligan, Thomas. 2019. “Why Not Be a Desertist?” Philosophical Studies 176(9): 2271–2288.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tom. 1974. “Humanity before Justice.” British Journal of Political Science 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cappelen, A., Sørensen, E, and Tungodden, B. 2010. “Responsibility for What? Fairness and Individual Responsibility.” European Economic Review 54(3): 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, Kevin, Darley, John, and Robinson, Paul. 2002. “Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2): 284–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celello, Peter. 2009. “Against Desert as a Forward-Looking Concept.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 26(2): 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. 2013. “Some Theses on Desert.” Philosophical Explorations 16(2): 153–164.Google Scholar
Cogley, Zac. 2013. “Basic Desert of Reactive Attitudes.” Philosophical Explorations 16(2): 165–177.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2006. Reasons and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2015. The Cosmos of Duty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummiskey, David. 1987. “Desert and Entitlement: A Rawlsian Consequentialist Account.” Analysis 47(1): 15–19.Google Scholar
Cupit, Geoffrey. 1996. Justice as Fittingness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doris, John 2015. “Doing Without Desert. Philosophical Studies 172(10): 2625–2634.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. 1992. “An Attributional and Value Analysis of Deservingness in Success and Failure Situations.” British Journal of Social Psychology 31: 125–145.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. 1994. “Attitudes toward High Achievers and Reactions to Their Fall: Theory and Research Concerning Tall Poppies.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Zanna, M. P., Vol. 26, pp. 1–73. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. and Atchison, L. 1998. “Reactions to an Offence in Relation to the Status and Perceived Moral Character of the Offender.” Australian Journal of Psychology 50: 119–127.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. “Justice and Personal Desert.” In Doing and Deserving, ed. Feinberg, Joel, pp. 55–87. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1974. “Noncomparative Justice.” Philosophical Review 83(3): 297–338.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1995a. “Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objection from Justice.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55(3): 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1995b. “Desert: Reconsideration of Some Received Wisdom.” Mind 104(413): 63–77.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1995c. “Justice, Desert, and the Repugnant Conclusion.” Utilitas 7(2): 189–206.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 2016. Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve from Our Country. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred and Skow, Brad. 2016. “Desert.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 edition. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/desert/.Google Scholar
Filonowicz, Joseph Duke. 2008. Fellow-Feeling and the Moral Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiman, Christopher and Nichols, Shaun. 2011. “Is Desert in the Details?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82: 121–133.Google Scholar
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., and Kurki, A. 2004. “Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test.” Public Choice 119: 91–117.Google Scholar
Galston, William. 1980. Justice and the Human Good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 1985. “Negating Positive Desert Claims.” Political Theory 13(4): 575–598.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Geoffrey. 2015. “Moral Character in Person Perception.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 24: 38–44.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Geoffrey; Piazza, Jared; and Rozin, Paul. 2014. “Moral Character Predominates in Person Perception and Evaluation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106: 148–168.Google Scholar
Gordon-Solmon, Kerah. 2017. “Comparative Desert Vs. Fairness.” Law and Philosophy 36(4): 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Joel and Mark, Baker. 2011. Recovering the Scandal of the Cross. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Guglielmo, S., Monroe, A. E., and Malle, B. F. 2009. “At the Heart of Morality Lies Folk Psychology.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52: 449–466.Google Scholar
Hanna, Nathan. 2013. “Two Claims about Desert.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94: 41–56.Google Scholar
Hanna, Nathan. 2019. “Hitting Retributivism Where It Hurts.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 13: 109–127.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1985. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hospers, John. 1961. Human Conduct: An Introduction to the Problem of Ethics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 2001. “The Common Structure of Virtue and Desert.” Ethics 112: 6–31.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 2003. “Desert: Individualistic and Holistic” In Desert and Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S., pp. 45–68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 2014. British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 1999. “Equality and desert.” In What Do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert, eds. Pojman, L. P and McLeod, O., pp. 298–314. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2003. “Comparative Desert.” In Desert and Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S., pp. 186–195. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2012. The Geometry of Desert. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2013. “Desert” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2013 edition. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/desert/.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2017. “Exploring Moral Desert.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 407–426.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1899. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Meiklejohn, J. M. D.. New York, The Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Kershnar, Stephen. 2008. “Desert Tracks Character Alone.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22: 71–88.Google Scholar
Kershnar, Stephen. 2010. Desert and Virtue: A Theory of Intrinsic Value. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, Kevin. 2016. A Framework for the Good. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, John. 1971. “The Concept of Desert.” American Philosophical Quarterly 8(1): 71–78.Google Scholar
Kleinig, John. 1973. Punishment and Desert. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Konow, James. 2001. “Fair and Square: The Four Sides of Distributive Justice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 46(2) 137–164.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1983. “Two Distinctions in Goodness.” Philosophical Review 92(2): 169–195.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, Kristján. 1996. The Social Responsibility View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, Kristján. 2002. Justifying Emotions: Pride and Jealousy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, Kristján. 2006 Justice and Desert-Based Emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lamont, Julian. 1994. “The Concept of Desert in Distributive Justice.” Philosophical Quarterly 44(174): 45–64.Google Scholar
Lee, Kangoh and Shahriar, Quazi. 2017. “Fairness, One’s Source of Income, and Others’ Decisions: An Ultimatum Game Experiment.” Managerial and Decision Economics 38(3): 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Melvin. 1980. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York.Google Scholar
Lerner, Melvin. 1981. “The Justice Motive in Human Relations: Some Thoughts on What We Know and Need to Know about Justice.” In The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change. eds. Lerner, M.J. and Lerner, S.C.. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2016. “Desert, Bell Motion, and Fairness.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10(3): 639–655.Google Scholar
Lupfer, Michael and Gingrich, Bryan. 1999. “When Bad (Good) Things Happen to Good (Bad) People: The Impact of Character Appraisal and Perceived Controllability on Judgments of Deservingness.” Social Justice Research 12(3): 165–188.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., and Monroe, A. E.. 2012. “Moral, Cognitive, and Social: The Nature of Blame. In Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behaviour, eds. Forgas, J., Fiedler, K., and Sedikides, C.. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, Owen. 1999a. “Contemporary Interpretations of Desert.” In What Do We Deserve?, eds. Pojman, L. and McLeod, O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, Owen. 1999b. “Desert and Institutions.” In What Do We Deserve?, eds. Pojman, L. and McLeod, O.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2009. Killing in War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Eric. 2000. “Desert, Virtue, and Justice.” Social Theory and Practice 26: 417–442.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jeffrey. 2003. “Against the Asymmetry of Desert.” Noûs 37: 518–536.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Thomas. 2018. Justice and the Meritocratic State. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Moral Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, Serena. 2003. “Introduction: Debating Desert and Justice.” In Desert and Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S., pp. 1–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1997. “Equality and Priority.” Ratio 10(3): 202–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2012. “Free Will Skepticism, Blame, and Obligation. In Blame: Its Nature and Norms, eds. Tognazzini, N. and Coates, J., pp. 189–206. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piazza, Jared, Landry, Justin, and Goodwin, Geoffrey. 2014. “Cruel Nature: Harmfulness as an Important, Overlooked Dimension in Judgments of Moral Standing.” Cognition 131: 108–124.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1888. The Republic. Trans. Jowett, B. (3rd ed). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis. 1997. “Equality and Desert.” Philosophy 72(282): 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pojman, Louis. 1999a. “Desert: An Historical Introduction.” In What Do We Deserve?, eds Pojman, L. and McLeod, O., pp. 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis. 1999b. “Does Equality Trump Desert? In What Do We Deserve?, eds. Pojman, L. and McLeod, O., pp. 283–297. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis. 2001. “Justice as Desert.” Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal 1: 88–109.Google Scholar
Rachels, Stuart. 1998. “Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Better Than.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76(1): 71–83.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice (rev. ed). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. 2003. Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. 2013. Emotions in the Moral Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul and Kurzban, Robert. 2007. “Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice.” Minnesota Law Review 91: 1829–1907.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina and Malle, Bertram. 2013. “A Strawsonian Look at Desert.” Philosophical Explorations 16(2): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1939. Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 2002. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. 1985. Giving Desert Its Due. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 2013. “Giving Desert Its Due.” Philosophical Explorations 16(2) 101–116.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 1992. “Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21(4): 299–323.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2000. “Justice and Desert in Liberal Theory.” California Law Review 88(3): 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David. 2002. “How to Deserve.” Political Theory 30(6): 774–799.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David. 2006. The Elements of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, George. 1987. Desert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, A. S. and Sidgwick, E. M. S. (eds.) 1906. Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir, London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1981. The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 2009. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. In British Moralists, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., pp. 251–357. BiblioBazaar.Google Scholar
Soltan, Karol. 1987. The Causal Theory of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stellar, Jennifer and Willer, Robb. 2018. “Unethical and Inept? The Influence of Moral Information on Perceptions of Competence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114(2): 195–210.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1962. “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1989. Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. 2017. “Moving Mountains: Variations on a Theme by Shelly Kagan.” Criminal Law & Philosophy 11(2): 393–405.Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry. 1994. “Weighing Goods: Some Questions and Comments.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23(4): 350–380.Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry. 2012. Rethinking the Good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, Manuel. 2013. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, Manuel. 2015. “Desert, Responsibility, and Justification: A Reply to Doris, McGeer, and Robinson.” Philosophical Studies 172(10): 2659–2678.Google Scholar
Zeibert, Leo. 2017. “On the Matter of Suffering: Derek Parfit and the Possibility of Deserved Punishment.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 1–18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Kevin Kinghorn, Asbury Theological Seminary, Kentucky
  • Book: The Nature of Desert Claims
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955546.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Kevin Kinghorn, Asbury Theological Seminary, Kentucky
  • Book: The Nature of Desert Claims
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955546.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Kevin Kinghorn, Asbury Theological Seminary, Kentucky
  • Book: The Nature of Desert Claims
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955546.011
Available formats
×