Book contents
- Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene
- New Directions in Sustainability and Society
- Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rethinking Economy and Technology
- 2 The Anthropocene Challenge to Our Worldview
- 3 Producing and Obscuring Global Injustices
- 4 The Money Game
- 5 Anticipating Degrowth
- 6 The Ontology of Technology
- 7 Energy Technologies as Time–Space Appropriation
- 8 Capitalism, Energy, and the Logic of Money
- 9 Unequal Exchange and Economic Value
- 10 Subjects versus Objects
- 11 Anthropocene Confusions
- 12 Animism, Relationism, and the Ontological Turn
- 13 Conclusions and Possibilities
- Afterword
- References
- Names Index
- Subject Index
9 - Unequal Exchange and Economic Value
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 June 2019
- Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene
- New Directions in Sustainability and Society
- Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rethinking Economy and Technology
- 2 The Anthropocene Challenge to Our Worldview
- 3 Producing and Obscuring Global Injustices
- 4 The Money Game
- 5 Anticipating Degrowth
- 6 The Ontology of Technology
- 7 Energy Technologies as Time–Space Appropriation
- 8 Capitalism, Energy, and the Logic of Money
- 9 Unequal Exchange and Economic Value
- 10 Subjects versus Objects
- 11 Anthropocene Confusions
- 12 Animism, Relationism, and the Ontological Turn
- 13 Conclusions and Possibilities
- Afterword
- References
- Names Index
- Subject Index
Summary
In this chapter I will elaborate the critique, introduced in the previous chapter, of some conceptual flaws in eco-Marxist theory. I argue for an extended application of Karl Marx’s insight that the apparent reciprocity of free market exchange is to be understood as an ideology that obscures material processes of exploitation and accumulation. Rather than to confine this insight to the worker’s sale of his or her labor power for wages and basing it on the conviction that labor power is uniquely capable of generating more value than its price, it is evident that capital accumulation also relies on asymmetric transfers of several other biophysical resources such as embodied non-human energy, land, and materials. The notions of price and value serve to obscure the material history and substance of traded commodities. This shift of perspective extends Marx’s foundational critique of mainstream economics by focusing on the unacknowledged role of ecologically unequal exchange but requires a critical rethinking of the concept of “use-value.” It also requires a fundamental reconceptualization of the ontology of technological progress, frequently celebrated in Marxist theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Nature, Society, and Justice in the AnthropoceneUnraveling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex, pp. 151 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019