Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:02:49.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Management of Communication Disorders in Neurorehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2018

By
Rajani Sebastian  and
Donna C. Tippett
Edited by
Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair ,
Marlís González-Fernández  and
Jalesh N. Panicker
Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
Marlís González-Fernández
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, MD
Jalesh N. Panicker
Affiliation:
National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Neurorehabilitation Therapy and Therapeutics , pp. 41 - 51
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, DF, Ardila, A. Aphasia: A clinical perspective. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Engelter, ST, Gostynski, M, Papa, S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37(6): 1379–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flowers, HL, Skoretz, SA, Silver, FL, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2016; 97(12): 2188–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Aphasia Association. Aphasia. New York, NY: National Aphasia Association, 2016.Google Scholar
Yorkston, KM Treatment efficacy: Dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1996; 39(5): S46–7.Google Scholar
Arboix, A, Marti-Vilalta, JL Lacunar infarctions and dysarthria. Archives of Neurology 1990; 47(2): 127–7.Google Scholar
Melo, TP, Bogousslavsky, J, van Melle, G, Regli, F. Pure motor stroke: A reappraisal. Neurology 1992; 42(4): 789–9.Google Scholar
Duffy, JR. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby, 2013.Google Scholar
McNeil, MR, Robin, DA, Schmidt, RA Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In McNeil, MR ed. Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders. New York, NY: Thieme, 2009; 249–68.Google Scholar
Brady, MC, Kelly, H, Godwin, J, Enderby, P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; Issue 5. Art. No.: CD000425.Google Scholar
Byng, S, Duchan, JF Social model philosophies and principles: Their applications to therapies for aphasia. Aphasiology 2005; 19(10–11): 906–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J, Rorden, C, Fridriksson, J. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2010; 41(6): 1229–36.Google Scholar
Vestito, L, Rosellini, S, Mantero, M, Bandini, F. Long-term effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in chronic post-stroke aphasia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2014; 8: 1–7.Google Scholar
Beristain, X, Golombievski, E. Pharmacotherapy to enhance cognitive and motor recovery following stroke. Drugs & Aging 2015; 32(10): 765–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, AE, Barker, PB, Beauchamp, NJ, Winters, BD, Mirski, M, Wityk, RJ Restoring blood pressure reperfused Wernicke’s area and improved language. Neurology 2001; 56(5): 670–2.Google Scholar
Hillis, AE, Ulatowski, JA, Barker, PB A pilot randomized trial of induced blood pressure elevation: Effects on function and focal perfusion in acute and subacute stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2003; 16(3): 236–46.Google Scholar
Hillis, AE, Kleinman, JT, Newhart, M, et al. Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming. Journal of Neuroscience 2006; 26(31): 8069–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymer, AM, Beeson, P, Holland, A, et al. Translational research in aphasia: From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2008; 51(1): S259–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peach, RK. Acquired apraxia of speech: Features, accounts, and treatment. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2004; 11(1): 49–58.Google Scholar
Hersh, D. Ten things our clients might say about their aphasia therapy … if we only asked. ACQ: Issues in Language, Speech and Hearing 2004; 6(2): 102–5.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health-report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.Google Scholar
Leach, E, Cornwell, P, Fleming, J, Haines, T. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disability and Rehabilitation 2010; 32(2): 159–72.Google Scholar
Chapey, R, Duchan, RJ, Garcia, LJ, Kagan, A, Lyon, JG, Simmons-Mackie, N. Life-participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future. In Chapey, R. ed. Language interventions strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001; 279–89.Google Scholar
Baum, CM, Edwards, D. ACS: Activity card sort. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine, 2001.Google Scholar
Haley, K, Jenkins, K, Hadden, C, Womack, J, Hall, J, Schweiker, C. Sorting pictures to assess participation in life activities. SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders 2005; 15(4): 11–15.Google Scholar
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: Position statement. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005.Google Scholar
Cherney, LR, Patterson, JP, Raymer, AM Intensity of aphasia therapy: Evidence and efficacy. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2011; 11(6): 560–9.Google Scholar
Persad, C, Wozniak, L, Kostopoulos, E. Retrospective analysis of outcomes from two intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2013; 20(5): 388–97.Google Scholar
Yorkston, KM, Spencer, KA, Duffy, JR, et al. Evidence-based practice guidelines for dysarthria: Management of velopharyngeal function. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 9(4): 257–74.Google Scholar
Wambaugh, JL, Nessler, C, Cameron, R, Mauszycki, SC Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2013; 22(1): 84–102.Google Scholar
Brady, MC, Kelly, H, Godwin, J, Enderby, P, Campbell, P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016; Issue 6. Art. No.: CD000425.Google Scholar
Allen, L, Mehta, S, McClure, JA, Teasell, R. Therapeutic interventions for aphasia initiated more than six months post stroke: A review of the evidence. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2014; 19(6): 523–35.Google Scholar
Dignam, J, Copland, D, McKinnon, E, Burfein, P, O’Brien, K, Farrell, A, Rodriguez, AD Intensive versus distributed aphasia therapy: A nonrandomized, parallel-group, dosage-controlled study. Stroke 2015; 46(8): 2206–11.Google Scholar
Sellars, C, Hughes, T, Langhorne, P. Speech and language therapy for dysarthria due to non‐progressive brain damage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005; Issue 3, Art. No.: CD002088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crinion, JT, Leff, AP Using functional imaging to understand therapeutic effects in poststroke aphasia. Current Opinion in Neurology 2015;28(4): 330–7.Google Scholar
Meinzer, M, Breitenstein, C. Functional imaging studies of treatment‐induced recovery in chronic aphasia. Aphasiology 2008; 22(12): 1251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, E, Uswatte, G, Elbert, T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002; 3(3): 228–36.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F, Neininger, B, Elbert, T, Mohr, B, Rockstroh, B, Koebbel, P, Taub, E. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32(7): 1621–6.Google Scholar
Maher, LM, Kendall, D, Swearengin, JA, Rodriguez, A, Leon, SA, Pingel, K … Rothi, LJG A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of constraint induced language therapy. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12(06): 843–52.Google Scholar
Meinzer, M, Djundja, D, Barthel, G, Elbert, T, Rockstroh, B. Long-term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke 2005; 36(7): 1462–6.Google Scholar
Szaflarski, JP, Ball, AL, Grether, S, Al-fwaress, F, Griffith, NM, Neils-Strunjas, J … Reichhardt, R. Constraint-induced aphasia therapy stimulates language recovery in patients with chronic aphasia after ischemic stroke. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 2008; 14(5): CR243.Google Scholar
Bonilha, L, Gleichgerrcht, E, Nesland, T, Rorden, C, Fridriksson, J. Success of anomia treatment in aphasia is associated with preserved architecture of global and left temporal lobe structural networks. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2016; 30(3): 266–79.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, CW Cueing hierarchies and word retrieval. In Brookshire, RH ed. Clinical aphasiology. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers, 1997; 19–31.Google Scholar
Cherney, LR Aphasia treatment: Intensity, dose parameters, and script training. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2012; 14(5): 424–31.Google Scholar
Marsh, K, Bertranou, E, Suominen, H, Venkatachalam, M. An economic evaluation of speech and language therapy. Matrix Evidence 2010.Google Scholar
Sebastian, R, Tsapkini, K, Tippett, DC Transcranial direct current stimulation in post stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia: Current knowledge and future clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2016; 39: 141–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeser, MA, Martin, PI, Ho, M, Treglia, E, Kaplan, E, Bashir, S, Pascual-Leone, A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and aphasia rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; 93(1): S26–S34.Google Scholar
Cotelli, M, Fertonani, A, Miozzo, A, Rosini, S, Manenti, R, Padovani, A … Miniussi, C. Anomia training and brain stimulation in chronic aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2011; 21(5): 717–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallett, M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 2000; 406(6792): 147–50.Google Scholar
Walsh, V, Pascual-Leone, A. Neurochronometrics of mind: TMS in cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Martin, PI, Naeser, MA, Ho, M, Doron, KW, Kurland, J, Kaplan, J … Pascual-Leone, A. Overt naming fMRI pre-and post-TMS: Two nonfluent aphasia patients, with and without improved naming post-TMS. Brain and Language 2009; 111(1): 20–35.Google Scholar
Naeser, MA, Martin, PI, Nicholas, M, Baker, EH, Seekins, H, Kobayashi, M … Doron, KW Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: An open-protocol study. Brain and Language 2005; 93(1): 95–105.Google Scholar
Naeser, MA, Martin, PI, Theoret, H, Kobayashi, M, Fregni, F, Nicholas, M … Pascual-Leone, A. TMS suppression of right pars triangularis, but not pars opercularis, improves naming in aphasia. Brain and Language 2011, 119(3): 206–13.Google Scholar
Nitsche, MA, Paulus, W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Physiology 2000; 527(3): 633–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebetanz, D, Nitsche, MA, Tergau, F, Paulus, W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC‐stimulation‐induced after‐effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002; 125(10): 2238–47.Google Scholar
Fridriksson, J, Richardson, JD, Baker, JM, Rorden, C. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: A double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke 2011; 42(3): 819–21.Google Scholar
Kang, EK, Kim, YK, Sohn, HM, Cohen, LG, Paik, NJ Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2011; 29(3): 141–52.Google Scholar
Marangolo, P, Marinelli, CV, Bonifazi, S, Fiori, V, Ceravolo, MG, Provinciali, L, Tomaiuolo, F. Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in the recovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behavioural Brain Research 2011; 225(2): 498–504.Google Scholar
Jung, I-Y, Lim, JY, Kang, EK, Sohn, HM, Paik, N-J The factors associated with good responses to speech therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasic patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011; 35(4): 460–9.Google Scholar
Elsner, B, Kugler, J, Pohl, M, Mehrholz, J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; Issue 5. Art. No.: CD009760.Google Scholar
Byng, S, Cairns, D, Duchan, J. Values in practice and practising values. Journal of Communication Disorders 2002; 35(2): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, ML, Bachman, D, Morgan, A, Helm-Estabrooks, N. Pharmacotherapy of aphasia. Neurology 1988; 38: 877–9.Google Scholar
Güngör, L, Terzi, M, Onar, MK. Does long term use of piracetam improve speech disturbances due to ischemic cerebrovascular diseases? Brain and Language 2011; 117(1): 23–7.Google Scholar
McNamara, P, Albert, ML Neuropharmacology of verbal perseveration. Seminars in Speech and Language 2004; 25(4): 309–32.Google Scholar
Seniów, J, Litwin, M, Litwin, T, Leśniak, M, Członkowska, A. New approach to the rehabilitation of post-stroke focal cognitive syndrome: Effect of levodopa combined with speech and language therapy on functional recovery from aphasia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2009; 283(1), 214–18.Google Scholar
Berthier, ML, Pulvermüller, F, Dávila, G, Casares, NG, Gutiérrez, A. Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: A review of current evidence. Neuropsychology Review 2011; 21(3): 302–17.Google Scholar
Cahana-Amitay, D, Albert, ML, Oveis, A. Psycholinguistics of aphasia pharmacotherapy: Asking the right questions. Aphasiology 2014; 28(2): 133–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, J, Thiel, A, Karbe, H, Heiss, WD Piracetam improves activated blood flow and facilitates rehabilitation of poststroke aphasic patients. Stroke 2000; 31: 2112–16.Google Scholar
Berthier, ML, Pulvermüller, F. (2011). Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia. Nature Reviews. Neurology 2011; 7: 86–97.Google Scholar
de Boissezon, X, Peran, P, de Boysson, C, Démonet, JF. Pharmacotherapy of aphasia: Myth or reality? Brain and Language 2007; 102: 114–25.Google Scholar
Sabe, L, Leiguarda, R, Starkstein, SE. An open-label trial of bromocriptine in nonfluent aphasia. Neurology 1992; 42: 1637–8.Google Scholar
Walker-Batson, D, Curtis, S, Natarajan, R, Ford, J, Dronkers, N, Salmeron, E, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke 2001; 32: 2093–8.Google Scholar
Whiting, E, Chenery, HJ, Chalk, J, Copland, DA Dexamphetamine boosts naming treatment effects in chronic aphasia. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 13: 972–9.Google Scholar
Berthier, ML, Green, C, Higueras, C, Fernandez, I, Hinojosa, J, Martín, MC A randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in poststroke aphasia. Neurology 2006; 67: 1687–9.Google Scholar
Berthier, ML, Green, C, Lara, JP, Higueras, C, Barbancho, MA, Dávila, G, Pulvermüller, F. Memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic poststroke aphasia. Annals of Neurology 2009; 65(5): 577–85.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Li, Y-S, Wang, Z-Y, Xu, Q, Shi, G-W, Lin, Y. The efficacy of donepezil for post-stroke aphasia: A pilot case control study. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi (Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine) 2010; 49(2): 115–18.Google Scholar
Orgogozo, JM. Piracetam in the treatment of acute stroke. Pharmacopsychiatry 1999; 32(1): 25–32.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, Bachman, DL. Pharmacotherapy of aphasia. In Connor, LS, Obler, LK eds. Neurobehavior of language and cognition studies of normal aging and brain damage. Berlin: SpringerLink, 2007; 159–62.Google Scholar
Hillis, AE. Pharmacological, surgical, and neurovascular interventions to augment acute aphasia recovery. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007; 86(6): 426–34.Google Scholar
Rordorf, G, Cramer, SC, Efird, JT, Schwamm, LH, Buonanno, F, Koroshetz, WJ Pharmacological elevation of blood pressure in acute stroke clinical effects and safety. Stroke 1997; 28(11): 2133–8.Google Scholar
Hillis, AE, Wityk, RJ, Barker, PB, Beauchamp, NJ, Gailloud, P, Murphy, K … Metter, EJ Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: The role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain 2002; 125(5): 1094–104.Google Scholar
Perler, BA, Murphy, K, Sternbach, Y, Gailloud, P, Shake, JG Immediate postoperative thrombolytic therapy: An aggressive strategy for neurologic salvage when cerebral thromboembolism complicates carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2000; 31(5): 1033–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, ML, Sparks, RW, Helm, NA Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology 1973; 29(2): 130–1.Google Scholar
Baker, FA Modifying the melodic intonation therapy program for adults with severe non-fluent aphasia. Music Therapy Perspectives 2000; 18(2): 110–14.Google Scholar
Jungblut, M. SIPARI1: A music therapy intervention for patients suffering with chronic, nonfluent aphasia. Music and Medicine 2009; 1(2): 102–5.Google Scholar
Belin, P, Zilbovicius, M, Remy, P, Francois, C, Guillaume, S, Chain, F … Samson, Y. Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: A PET study. Neurology 1996; 47(6): 1504–11.Google Scholar
Bonakdarpour, B, Eftekharzadeh, A, Ashayeri, H. Melodic intonation therapy in Persian aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 2003; 17(1): 75–95.Google Scholar
Schlaug, G, Marchina, S, Norton, A. From singing to speaking: Why singing may lead to recovery of expressive language function in patients with Broca’s aphasia. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2008; 25(4): 315–23.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, I, van de Sandt-Koenderman, ME, Ribbers, GM Melodic intonation therapy: Present controversies and future opportunities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; 93(1): S46–S52.Google Scholar
Schlaug, G, Marchina, S, Norton, A. Evidence for plasticity in white‐matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca’s aphasia undergoing intense intonation‐based speech therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009; 1169(1): 385–94.Google Scholar
Breier, JI, Randle, S, Maher, LM, Papanicolaou, AC Changes in maps of language activity activation following melodic intonation therapy using magnetoencephalography: Two case studies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010; 32(3): 309–14.Google Scholar
Petheram, B. The behaviour of stroke patients in unsupervised computer-administered aphasia therapy. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18(1): 21–6.Google Scholar
Thompson, CK, Choy, JJ, Holland, A, Cole, R. Sentactics®: Computer-automated treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology 2010; 24(10): 1242–66.Google Scholar
Cherney, LR Oral reading for language in aphasia (ORLA): Evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2010; 17(6): 423–31.Google Scholar
Zheng, C, Lynch, L, Taylor, N. Effect of computer therapy in aphasia: A systematic review. Aphasiology 2016; 30(2–3): 211–44.Google Scholar
Bhogal, SK, Teasell, RW, Foley, NC, Speechley, MR Rehabilitation of aphasia: More is better. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2015; 19(6): 523–35.Google Scholar
Lee, AW, Hillis, AE. The pharmacological treatment of aphasia. In Stemmer, B, Whitaker, HA eds. Handbook of the neuroscience of language. London, UK: Academic Press, 2008; 407–15.Google Scholar
Miltner, WH Plasticity and reorganization in the rehabilitation of stroke. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2016; 224: 91–101.Google Scholar
Nitsche, MA, Liebetanz, D, Tergau, F, Paulus, W. Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation. Der Nervenarzt 2002; 73(4): 332–5.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×