Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume II
- Preface
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- Part I The Character of the Early Modern State
- PART II Economy, Environment, and Technology
- Part III Social Practices and Cultures of Early Modern Japan
- Index
- References
Introduction
Genealogies of Japanese Early Modernity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2024
Edited by
Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- The New Cambridge History of Japan
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume II
- Preface
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- Part I The Character of the Early Modern State
- PART II Economy, Environment, and Technology
- Part III Social Practices and Cultures of Early Modern Japan
- Index
- References
Summary
I introduce this volume of the New Cambridge History of Japan with two questions: How is it that Anglophone scholars have come to refer to the Tokugawa period (1603–1868) and immediately surrounding years as Japan’s “early modern” period? And does calling the period early modern suggest something fundamentally different from the term used in Japanese, kinsei? When the first Cambridge History of Japan was published, in 1991, the answer to the latter question was yes: the kinsei of “the Japanese” was “more feudal than modern,” whereas the early modernity of “Western historians” was “more modern than feudal.” As this introduction demonstrates, however, the term kinsei has nothing to do with feudalism. The evolution of the terms of periodization used to refer to the Tokugawa era tell us something important about the global history of conceptualizing historical time, particularly the surprising career of modernity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge History of Japan , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Araki, Moriaki. “Hōsoku ninshiki to jidai kubunron.” In Sengo Nihon shigaku no tenkai, edited by Asao, Naohiro, Ishii Susumu, Inoue Mitsusada, Ōishi Kaichirō, Kano Masanao, Kuroda Toshio, Sasaki Junnosuke, et al., 59–94. Vol. 24 of Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi. Iwanami Shoten, 1975.Google Scholar
Asakawa, Kan’ichi. “Some Aspects of Japanese Feudal Institutions.” Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan 46, no. 1 (1918): 76–102.Google Scholar
Barbour, Violet. “Rigidities Affecting Business in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” American Economic Review 30, no. 1 (1940): 290–97.Google Scholar
Elison, George S. Deus Destroyed: The Image of Christianity in Early Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Friday, Karl. “The Futile Paradigm: In Quest of Feudalism in Early Medieval Japan.” History Compass 8, no. 2 (2010): 179–96.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. “The Problem of the ‘Early Modern World.’” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 41, no. 3 (1998): 249–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John Whitney. “The Castle Town and Japan’s Modern Urbanization.” Far Eastern Quarterly 15, no. 1 (November 1955): 37–56.Google Scholar
Hall, John Whitney. ed. Early Modern Japan. Vol. 4 of The Cambridge History of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hall, John Whitney. Hall, John Whitney. “Introduction.” In Hall, Early Modern Japan, 1–39.Google Scholar
Hall, John Whitney, and Jansen, Marius B., eds. Studies in the Institutional History of Early Modern Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Howell, David L. “Nihon kinseishi to ārii modan hisutorii: Jidai kubun to hikakushi no kanōsei.” Kokushigaku 210 (June 2013): 98–122.Google Scholar
Keirstead, Thomas. “Inventing Medieval Japan: The History and Politics of National Identity.” Medieval History Journal 1, no. 1 (1998): 45–71.Google Scholar
Miyakawa, Hisayuki. “An Outline of the Naitō Hypothesis and Its Effects on Japanese Studies of China.” Far Eastern Quarterly 14, no. 4 (August 1955): 533–52.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Ichisada. “Tōyō no runesansu to seiyō no runesansu.” Shirin 25, no. 4 (1940): 465–80, and 26, no. 1 (1941): 69–102.Google Scholar
Ōtsu, Tōru, Sakurai, Eiji, Fujii, Jōji, Yoshida, Yutaka, and Ri, Sonshi (Lee, Sungsi), eds. Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi. 22 vols. Iwanami Shoten, 2013–16.Google Scholar
Pai, Hyung Il. Constructing “Korean” Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-Formation Theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2000.Google Scholar
Palais, James B. “A Search for Korean Uniqueness.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 55, no. 2 (1995): 409–25.Google Scholar
Reischauer, Edwin O. “Japanese Feudalism.” In Feudalism in History, edited by Coulborn, Rushton, 26–48. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Shōzō. “Edo jidai o ‘kinsei’ to iu koto.” Nihon rekishi 769 (June 2012): 105–14.Google Scholar
Seed, Patricia. “Early Modernity: The History of a Word.” CR: The New Centennial Review 2, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 1–16.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas C. “Landlords and Rural Capitalists in the Modernization of Japan.” Journal of Economic History 16, no. 2 (June 1956): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starn, Randolph. “The Early Modern Muddle.” Journal of Early Modern History 6, no. 3 (2002): 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tōyama, Shigeki and Nagahara, Keiji. “Jidai kubun ron.” In Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi, edited by Ienaga Saburō, Ishimoda Shō, Inoue Kiyoshi, Inoue Mitsusada, Kitajima Masamoto, Kitayama Shigeo, Satō Shin’ichi, et al. Vol. 22, 165–226. Iwanami Shoten, 1963.Google Scholar
Wakita, Osamu. “The Social and Economic Consequences of Unification.” Translated by McClain, James L.. In Hall, Early Modern Japan, 96–127.Google Scholar
Wigen, Kären. “Mapping Early Modernity: Geographical Meditations on a Comparative Concept.” Early Modern Japan 5, no. 2 (December 1995): 1–13.Google Scholar
Yang, Lien-Sheng. “Review of Chūgoku kinseishi (History of [early] modern China), by Naitō Torajirō, and Chūgoku shigakushi (History of Chinese historiography), by Naitō Torajirō.” Far Eastern Quarterly 12, no. 2 (February 1953): 208–10.Google Scholar