Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:10:24.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Arterial Vascular Diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2024

By
Ethan Jackson ,
Anitra Romfh ,
Yon K. Sung  and
Natalie J. Bodmer
Edited by
David R. Gambling ,
M. Joanne Douglas  and
Grace Lim
David R. Gambling
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
M. Joanne Douglas
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Grace Lim
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the physiologic changes of pregnancy and how they relate specifically to major arterial vascular diseases – namely, thoracic aortopathies, pulmonary hypertension, and splenic artery aneurysms. It summarizes the key management strategies throughout preconception, pregnancy, intra-partum, and post-partum stages.

Keywords

Physiology of pregnancythoracic aortic aneurysmsthoracic aortic dissectionschronic hypertensionpreeclampsiagestational hypertensionbicuspid aortic valveaortic coarctationMarfan syndromeLoeys-Dietz syndromeEhlers-Danlos SyndromeTurner syndromepulmonary hypertensionEisenmenger syndromesplenic artery aneurysm
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesia and Uncommon Disorders , pp. 64 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Regitz-Zagrosek, V, Roos-Hesselink, JW, Bauersachs, J, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2018;39: 3165–3241.Google Scholar
Hiratzka, LF, Bakris, GL, Beckman, JA, et al. 2010Google Scholar
ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;76:E43–E86.Google Scholar
Mehta, LS, Warnes, CA, Bradley, E, et al. Cardiovascular considerations in caring for pregnant patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020;141:e884–e903.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Presidential Task Force on Pregnancy and Heart Disease and Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133:e320-e356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Kelly, AC, Scott, N, DeFaria Yeh, D. Delivering coordinated cardio-obstetric care from preconception through postpartum. Cardiol Clin 2021;39:163–173.Google Scholar
Thorne, S, MacGregor, A, Nelson-Piercy, C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart 2006;92:1520–1525.Google Scholar
Balci, A, Sollie-Szarynska, KM, Bijl AG, van der, et al. Prospective validation and assessment of cardiovascular and offspring risk models for pregnant women with congenital heart disease. Heart 2014;100:1373–1381.Google Scholar
van Hagen, IM, Boersma, E, Johnson, MR, et al. Global cardiac risk assessment in the registry of pregnancy and cardiac disease: results of a registry from the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:523–533.Google Scholar
Davis, MB, Walsh, MN. Cardio-Obstetrics. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019;12:e005417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meah, VL, Cockcroft, JR, Backx, K, et al. Cardiac output and related haemodynamics during pregnancy: a series of meta-analyses. Heart 2016;102:518–526.Google Scholar
Robson, SC, Hunter, S, Boys, RJ, et al. Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am J Physiol 1989;256:H1060–H1065.Google Scholar
Kametas, NA, McAuliffe, F, Krampl, E, et al. Maternal cardiac function in twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:806–815.Google Scholar
Green, LJ, Mackillop, LH, Salvi, D, et al. Gestation-specific vital sign reference ranges in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:653–664.Google Scholar
Tkachenko, O, Shchekochikhin, D, Schrier, RW. Hormones and hemodynamics in pregnancy. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2014;12:e14098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gant, NF, Worley, RJ, Everett, RB, et al. Control of vascular responsiveness during human pregnancy. Kidney Int 1980;18:253–258.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Thompson, LP. Nitric oxide and pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 1997;21:367–380.Google Scholar
Kristiansson, P, Wang, JX. Reproductive hormones and blood pressure during pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2001;16:13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguree, S, Gernand, AD. Plasma volume expansion across healthy pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheikh, M, Ostadrahimi, P, Salarzaei, M, et al. Cardiac complications in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of BNP and N-Terminal Pro-BNP. Cardiol Ther 2021;10:501–514.Google Scholar
Hameed, AB, Chan, K, Ghamsary, M, et al. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol 2009;32:E60–E62.Google Scholar
Tanous, D, Siu, SC, Mason, J, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide in pregnant women with heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1247–1253.Google Scholar
Resnik, JL, Hong, C, Resnik, R, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:450–454.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, T, Yoshimura, M, Yasue, H, et al. Plasma concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide during normal human pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Endocrinol 1994;140:393–397.Google Scholar
Kampman, MA, Balci, A, van Veldhuisen, DJ, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide predicts cardiovascular complications in pregnant women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2014;35:708–715.Google Scholar
Umazume, T, Yamada, T, Yamada, S, et al. Morphofunctional cardiac changes in pregnant women: associations with biomarkers. Open Heart 2018;5:e000850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. WHO Guidelines approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva, 2018.Google Scholar
Robson, SC, Dunlop, W, Boys, RJ, et al. Cardiac output during labour. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:1169–1172.Google Scholar
Kinsella, SM, Lohmann, G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:774–788.Google Scholar
Jangsten, E, Mattsson, LA, Lyckestam, I, et al. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2011;118:362–369.Google Scholar
Ueland, K. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. VII. Intrapartum blood volume changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:671–677.Google Scholar
Green, LJ, Kennedy, SH, Mackillop, L, et al. International gestational age-specific centiles for blood pressure in pregnancy from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project in 8 countries: a longitudinal cohort study. PLoS Med 2021;18:e1003611.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Cotton, DB, Lee, W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1439–1442.Google Scholar
LoMauro, A, Aliverti, A. Respiratory physiology of pregnancy: physiology masterclass. Breathe (Sheff) 2015;11:297–301.Google Scholar
Kamel, H, Roman, MJ, Pitcher, A, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of aortic dissection or rupture: a cohort-crossover analysis. Circulation 2016;134:527–533.Google Scholar
Thalmann, M, Sodeck, GH, Domanovits, H, et al. Acute type A aortic dissection and pregnancy: a population-based study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:e159–e163.Google Scholar
Rimmer, L, Heyward-Chaplin, J, South, M, et al. Acute aortic dissection during pregnancy: trials and tribulations. J Card Surg 2021;36:1799–1805.Google Scholar
Nienaber, CA, Eagle, KA. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: part I: from etiology to diagnostic strategies. Circulation 2003;108:628–635.Google Scholar
Evangelista, A, Isselbacher, EM, Bossone, E, et al. Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation 2018;137:1846–1860.Google Scholar
Landenhed, M, Engstrom, G, Gottsater, A, et al. Risk profiles for aortic dissection and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4:e001513.Google Scholar
ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203 Summary: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:215–219.Google Scholar
Whelton, PK, Carey, RM, Aronow, WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2018;138:e426–e483.Google Scholar
ACOG. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–e260.Google Scholar
Halpern, DG, Weinberg, CR, Pinnelas, R, et al. Use of medication for cardiovascular disease during pregnancy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:457–476.Google Scholar
Committee Opinion No. 623: Emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:521–525.Google Scholar
Weber-Schoendorfer, C, Kayser, A, Tissen-Diabate, T, et al. Fetotoxic risk of AT1 blockers exceeds that of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: an observational study. J Hypertens 2020;38:133–141.Google Scholar
Bullo, M, Tschumi, S, Bucher, BS, et al. Pregnancy outcome following exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists: a systematic review. Hypertension 2012;60:444–450.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JI, Kaplan, S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890–1900.Google Scholar
Hahn, RT, Roman, MJ, Mogtader, AH, et al. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:283–288.Google Scholar
Fedak, PW, Verma, S, David, TE, et al. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2002;106:900–904.Google Scholar
Tadros, TM, Klein, MD, Shapira, OM. Ascending aortic dilatation associated with bicuspid aortic valve: pathophysiology, molecular biology, and clinical implications. Circulation 2009;119:880–890.Google Scholar
Keane, MG, Wiegers, SE, Plappert, T, et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation 2000;102:35–39.Google Scholar
Borger, MA, Preston, M, Ivanov, J, et al. Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:677–683.Google Scholar
Erbel, R, Eggebrecht, H. Aortic dimensions and the risk of dissection. Heart 2006;92:137–142.Google Scholar
Verma, S, Siu, SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1920–1929.Google Scholar
Borger, MA, Fedak, PWM, Stephens, EH, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:e41–e74.Google Scholar
von Kodolitsch, Y, Aydin, MA, Koschyk, DH, et al. Predictors of aneurysmal formation after surgical correction of aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:617–624.Google Scholar
Pourmoghadam, KK, Velamoor, G, Kneebone, JM, et al. Changes in protein distribution of the aortic wall following balloon aortoplasty for coarctation. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:91–93.Google Scholar
Stout, KK, Daniels, CJ, Aboulhosn, JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1494–1563.Google Scholar
Vriend, JW, Mulder, BJ. Late complications in patients after repair of aortic coarctation: implications for management. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:399–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, DP, Dietz, HC. Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 2005;366:1965–1976.Google Scholar
Smith, K, Gros, B. Pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome: a review of the literature. Congenit Heart Dis 2017;12:251–260.Google Scholar
Kuperstein, R, Cahan, T, Yoeli-Ullman, R, et al. Risk of aortic dissection in pregnant patients with Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:132–137.Google Scholar
Elkayam, U, Ostrzega, E, Shotan, A, et al. Cardiovascular problems in pregnant women with Marfan syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:117–122.Google Scholar
Donnelly, RT, Pinto, NM, Kocolas, I, et al. The immediate and long-term impact of pregnancy on aortic growth rate and mortality in women with Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:224–229.Google Scholar
Shores, J, Berger, KR, Murphy, EA, et al. Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long-term beta-adrenergic blockade in Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1335–1341.Google Scholar
Rybczynski, M, Mir, TS, Sheikhzadeh, S, et al. Frequency and age-related course of mitral valve dysfunction in Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:1048–1053.Google Scholar
Pyeritz, RE, Fishman, EK, Bernhardt, BA, et al. Dural ectasia is a common feature of Marfan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1988;43:726–732.Google Scholar
Fattori, R, Nienaber, CA, Descovich, B, et al. Importance of dural ectasia in phenotypic assessment of Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 1999;354:910–913.Google Scholar
Foran, JR, Pyeritz, RE, Dietz, HC, et al. Characterization of the symptoms associated with dural ectasia in the Marfan patient. Am J Med Genet A 2005;134A: 58–65.Google Scholar
Lacassie, HJ, Millar, S, Leithe, LG, et al. Dural ectasia: a likely cause of inadequate spinal anaesthesia in two parturients with Marfan’s syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:500–504.Google Scholar
Loeys, BL, Chen, J, Neptune, ER, et al. A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat Genet 2005;37:275–281.Google Scholar
Loeys, BL, Schwarze, U, Holm, T, et al. Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med 2006;355:788–798.Google Scholar
Attias, D, Stheneur, C, Roy, C, et al. Comparison of clinical presentations and outcomes between patients with TGFBR2 and FBN1 mutations in Marfan syndrome and related disorders. Circulation 2009;120:2541–2549.Google Scholar
Malfait, F, Francomano, C, Byers, P, et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:8–26.Google Scholar
Chetty, SP, Shaffer, BL, Norton, ME. Management of pregnancy in women with genetic disorders, Part 1: Disorders of the connective tissue, muscle, vascular, and skeletal systems. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2011;66:699–709.Google Scholar
Bondy, CA, Turner Syndrome Study G. Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92: 10–25.Google Scholar
Elder, DA, Roper, MG, Henderson, RC, et al. Kyphosis in a Turner syndrome population. Pediatrics 2002;109:e93.Google Scholar
Sachdev, V, Matura, LA, Sidenko, S, et al. Aortic valve disease in Turner syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1904–1909.Google Scholar
Matura LA, Ho VB, Rosing DR, et al. Aortic dilatation and dissection in Turner syndrome. Circulation 2007;116:1663–1670.Google Scholar
Mortensen, KH, Andersen, NH, Gravholt, CH. Cardiovascular phenotype in Turner syndrome – integrating cardiology, genetics, and endocrinology. Endocr Rev 2012;33:677–714.Google Scholar
Landin-Wilhelmsen, K, Bryman, I, Wilhelmsen, L. Cardiac malformations and hypertension, but not metabolic risk factors, are common in Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:4166–4170.Google Scholar
Gravholt, CH, Andersen, NH, Conway, GS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol 2017;177:G1–G70.Google Scholar
Crawford, JD, Hsieh, CM, Schenning, RC, et al. Genetics, pregnancy, and aortic degeneration. Ann Vasc Surg 2016;30:158 e5–e9.Google Scholar
Lansman, SL, Goldberg, JB, Kai, M, et al. Aortic surgery in pregnancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:S44–S48.Google Scholar
Lin, YH, Seow, KM, Hwang, JL, et al. Myocardial infarction and mortality caused by methylergonovine. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1022.Google Scholar
Simonneau, G, Montani, D, Celermajer, DS, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019;53:1801913. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01913-2018Google Scholar
Low, TT, Guron, N, Ducas, R, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review of outcomes in the modern era. Pulm Circ 2021;11:20458940211013671.Google Scholar
Galiè, N, Humbert, M, Vachiery, JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J 2015;46:903–975.Google Scholar
Ballard, W, Dixon, B, McEvoy, CA, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy. Cardiol Clin 2021;39:109–118.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Lu, J. Anesthesia for pregnant women with pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35: 2201–11.Google Scholar
Rex, S, Devroe, S. Anesthesia for pregnant women with pulmonary hypertension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016;29:273–281.Google Scholar
Monagle, J, Manikappa, S, Ingram, B, et al. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy: the experience of a tertiary institution over 15 years. Ann Card Anaesth 2015;18:153–160.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Lu, J, Zhou, X, et al. Perioperative management of pregnant women with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: an observational case series study from China. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018;32:2547–2559.Google Scholar
Strumpher, J, Jacobsohn, E. Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction: physiology and perioperative management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:687–704.Google Scholar
Maxwell, BG, Jackson, E. Role of ketamine in the management of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012;26:e24–e25; author reply e5–6.Google Scholar
Basagan-Mogol, E, Goren, S, Korfali, G, et al. Induction of anesthesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the hemodynamic and analgesic effects of ketamine. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010;65:133–138.Google Scholar
Williams, GD, Philip, BM, Chu, LF, et al. Ketamine does not increase pulmonary vascular resistance in children with pulmonary hypertension undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1578–1584.Google Scholar
Williams, GD, Maan, H, Ramamoorthy, C, et al. Perioperative complications in children with pulmonary hypertension undergoing general anesthesia with ketamine. Paediatr Anaesth 2010;20:28–37.Google Scholar
Loomba, RS, Gray, SB, Flores, S. Hemodynamic effects of ketamine in children with congenital heart disease and/or pulmonary hypertension. Congenit Heart Dis 2018;13:646–654.Google Scholar
Thunberg, CA, Morozowich, ST, Ramakrishna, H. Inhaled therapy for the management of perioperative pulmonary hypertension. Ann Card Anaesth 2015;18:394–402.Google Scholar
Tremblay, JA, Couture, EJ, Albert, M, et al. Noninvasive administration of inhaled nitric oxide and its hemodynamic effects in patients with acute right ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019;33:642–647.Google Scholar
Price, LC, Wort, SJ, Finney, SJ, et al. Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: current and emerging options for management: a systematic literature review. Crit Care 2010;14:R169.Google Scholar
Pilkington, SA, Taboada, D, Martinez, G. Pulmonary hypertension and its management in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2015;70:56–70.Google Scholar
Dutta, T, Aronow, WS. Echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle: clinical implications. Clin Cardiol 2017;40:542–548.Google Scholar
Meng, ML, Landau, R, Viktorsdottir, O, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: a report of 49 cases at four tertiary North American sites. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:511–520.Google Scholar
Price, LC, Martinez, G, Brame, A, et al. Perioperative management of patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing non-cardiothoracic, non-obstetric surgery: a systematic review and expert consensus statement. Br J Anaesth 2021;126:774–790.Google Scholar
Chookun, J, Bounes, V, Ducasse, JL, et al. Rupture of splenic artery aneurysm during early pregnancy: a rare and catastrophic event. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:898, e5–6.Google Scholar
Tcbc-Rj, RA, Ferreira, MC, Ferreira, DA, et al. Splenic artery aneurysm. Rev Col Bras Cir 2016;43:398–400.Google Scholar
Al-Habbal, Y, Christophi, C, Muralidharan, V. Aneurysms of the splenic artery – a review. Surgeon 2010;8:223–231.Google Scholar
Sadat, U, Dar, O, Walsh, S, et al. Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy–a systematic review. Int J Surg 2008;6:261–265.Google Scholar
Nanez, L, Knowles, M, Modrall, JG, et al. Ruptured splenic artery aneurysms are exceedingly rare in pregnant women. J Vasc Surg 2014;60:1520–1523.Google Scholar
Veterano, C, Monteiro, E, Rego, D, et al. Laparoscopic resection of a splenic artery aneurysm with vascular reconstruction during pregnancy. Ann Vasc Surg 2021;72:666, e7–e11.Google Scholar
Jacobson, J, Gorbatkin, C, Good, S, et al. Splenic artery aneurysm rupture in pregnancy. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:935, e5–e8.Google Scholar
Samame, J, Kaul, A, Garza, U, et al. Laparoscopic aneurysm resection and splenectomy for splenic artery aneurysm in the third trimester of pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2988–2991.Google Scholar
1. Lankford, AS, Chow JH, Jackson AM, et al. Clinical outcomes of pregnant and postpartum extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:777–787.Google Scholar
2. Agerstrand C, Abrams D, Biscotti M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiopulmonary failure during pregnancy and postpartum. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:774–9.Google Scholar
3. Moore SA, Dietl CA, Coleman DM. Extracorporeal life support during pregnancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:1154–60.Google Scholar
4. Biderman P, Carmi U, Setton E. Maternal salvage with extracorporeal life support: Lessons learned in a single center. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1275–1280.Google Scholar
5. Sharma NS, Wille KM, Bellot SC, et al. Modern use of extracorporeal life support in pregnancy and postpartum. ASAIO 2015; 61:110–114.Google Scholar
6. Naoum EE, Chalupka A, Haft J. Extracorporeal life support in pregnancy: A systemic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 913:e016072.Google Scholar
7. Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure. Circulation 2017; 136:314–326.Google Scholar
1. Lankford, AS, Chow JH, Jackson AM, et al. Clinical outcomes of pregnant and postpartum extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:777–787.Google Scholar
2. Agerstrand C, Abrams D, Biscotti M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiopulmonary failure during pregnancy and postpartum. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:774–9.Google Scholar
3. Moore SA, Dietl CA, Coleman DM. Extracorporeal life support during pregnancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:1154–60.Google Scholar
4. Biderman P, Carmi U, Setton E. Maternal salvage with extracorporeal life support: Lessons learned in a single center. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1275–1280.Google Scholar
5. Sharma NS, Wille KM, Bellot SC, et al. Modern use of extracorporeal life support in pregnancy and postpartum. ASAIO 2015; 61:110–114.Google Scholar
6. Naoum EE, Chalupka A, Haft J. Extracorporeal life support in pregnancy: A systemic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 913:e016072.Google Scholar
7. Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure. Circulation 2017; 136:314–326.Google Scholar

Additional Reading on VA ECMO

1. Lankford, AS, Chow JH, Jackson AM, et al. Clinical outcomes of pregnant and postpartum extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:777–787.Google Scholar
2. Agerstrand C, Abrams D, Biscotti M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiopulmonary failure during pregnancy and postpartum. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:774–9.Google Scholar
3. Moore SA, Dietl CA, Coleman DM. Extracorporeal life support during pregnancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:1154–60.Google Scholar
4. Biderman P, Carmi U, Setton E. Maternal salvage with extracorporeal life support: Lessons learned in a single center. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1275–1280.Google Scholar
5. Sharma NS, Wille KM, Bellot SC, et al. Modern use of extracorporeal life support in pregnancy and postpartum. ASAIO 2015; 61:110–114.Google Scholar
6. Naoum EE, Chalupka A, Haft J. Extracorporeal life support in pregnancy: A systemic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 913:e016072.Google Scholar
7. Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure. Circulation 2017; 136:314–326.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×