Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:14:28.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Disorders of the Vertebral Column

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2024

By
Robert Jee  and
Edward T. Crosby
Edited by
David R. Gambling ,
M. Joanne Douglas  and
Grace Lim
David R. Gambling
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
M. Joanne Douglas
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Grace Lim
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Symptoms relating to the musculoskeletal system are among the most common complaints registered by pregnant women. The maternal axial skeleton is subjected to considerable gestational changes and stresses; congenital and acquired skeletal anomalies may impact both the process and outcome of gestation and labor. The most common anomaly is scoliosis, arising either in the idiopathic form or from an underlying neuromuscular disorder. Other less common conditions include symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, ankylosing spondylitis, spondylolysis, and spondylolisthesis. Most scoliotic patients will experience pregnancy, labor, and delivery with a similar incidence of complications as the general population. However, within the population of scoliotic parturients, there is a subpopulation at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. These patients include those with scoliosis resulting from neuromuscular disorders and severe restrictive pulmonary disease complicated by pulmonary hypertension. A multidisciplinary team approach best serves these patients. The obstetric and anesthetic management of patients with less common and less extreme vertebral syndromes is guided by individual case characteristics.

Keywords

scoliosisadolescent idiopathic scoliosisneuromuscular scoliosislumbar disc herniationspondylolysisspondylolisthesisankylosing spondylitispregnancycesarean deliverylabor analgesiaanesthesia
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesia and Uncommon Disorders , pp. 159 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goldstein, LA, Waugh, TR. Classification and terminology of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1973; 93 :10–22.Google Scholar
Negrini, S, Donzelli, S, Aulisa, AG, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2018;13:1–48.Google Scholar
Weinstein, SL. Natural history. Spine 1999;24:2592–2600.Google Scholar
Blevins, K, Battenberg, A, Beck, A. Management of scoliosis. Adv Pediatr 2018;65:249–266.Google Scholar
Asher, MA, Burton, DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long-term treatment effects. Scoliosis 2006;1:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-2.Google Scholar
Kopenhager, T. A review of 50 pregnant patients with kyphoscoliosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977;84:585–587.Google Scholar
Kafer, ER. Respiratory and cardiovascular functions in scoliosis and the principles of anesthetic management. Anesthesiology 1980;52:339–351.Google Scholar
Shands, AR, Eisberg, HB. The incidence of scoliosis in the state of Delaware. J Bone Joint Surg 1955;37A:1243.Google Scholar
Bergofsky, EH. Respiratory failure in disorders of the thoracic cage. Am Rev Resp Dis 1979;119:643–649.Google Scholar
Visscher, W, Lonstein, JE, Hoffman, DA, et al. Reproductive outcomes in scoliosis patients. Spine 1988;13:1096–1098.Google Scholar
Danielsson, AJ, Nachemson, AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A case-controlled study. Spine 2001;26:1449–1456.Google Scholar
Orvomaa, E, Hiilesmaa, V, Poussa, M, et al. Pregnancy and delivery in patients operated by the Harrington method for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1997;6:304–307.Google Scholar
To, WWK, Wong, MWN. Kyphoscoliosis complicating pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996;55:123–128.Google Scholar
Lonstein, JE, Carlson, JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg 1984;66A:1061–1071.Google Scholar
Pehrsson, K, Larsson, S, Oden, A, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms. Spine 1992;17 :1091–1096.Google Scholar
Collis, DK, Ponseti, IV. Long-term follow-up patients with idiopathic scoliosis not treated surgically. J Bone Joint Surg 1969;51A:425–445.Google Scholar
Freychuss, U, Nilsonne, U, Lundgren, KD. Idiopathic scoliosis in old age. I. Respiratory function. Acta Med Scand 1968;184:365–372.Google Scholar
Sevastik, JA, Aaro, S, Scoliosis, Normelli H. : Experimental and clinical studies. Clin Orthop 1984;191:27–34.Google Scholar
White, AA III, Panjabi, MM. Practical biomechanics of scoliosis and kyphosis. In Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990.Google Scholar
Koumbourlis, AC. Scoliosis and the respiratory system. Paediatr Respir Rev 2006;7:152–160.Google Scholar
Hasler, CC. A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013;7:57–62.Google Scholar
Lee, ACH, Feger, MA, Singla, A, et al. Effect of surgical approach on pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine 2016;41:E1343–E1355.Google Scholar
Sponseller, PD, Cohen, MS, Nachemson, AL, et al. Results of surgical treatment of adults with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A:667–675.Google Scholar
Cochran, T, Irstam, L, Nachemson, A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;8:576–584.Google Scholar
Moskowitz,A, Moe, JH, Wmter, RB, et al. Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62A:364–369.Google Scholar
Hamilton, PP, Byford, LJ. Respiratory pathophysiology in musculoskeletal disorders. Prob Anesth 1991;5:91–106.Google Scholar
Dimeglio, A, Canavese, F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 2012;21:64–70.Google Scholar
Roussos, CS, Macklem, PT. Diaphragmatic fatigue in man. J Appl Physiol 1977;43:189–197.Google Scholar
Kesten, S, Garfinkel, SK, Wright, T, et al. Impaired exercise capacity in adults with moderate scoliosis. Chest 1991;99:663–666.Google Scholar
Mezon, BL, West, P, Israels, J, et al. Sleep breathing abnormalities in scoliosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980;122:617–621.Google Scholar
Roth, A, Rosenthal, A, Hall, JE, et al. Scoliosis and congenital heart disease. Clin Orthop 1973;93:95–102.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, SS, Rudner, C, Nasch, CL, et al. The incidence of mitral valve prolapse in adolescent scoliosis and thoracic hypokyphosis. Pediatrics 1982;70:451–454.Google Scholar
Moni, SS, Murthy, S. Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2020;63:868–877.Google Scholar
Arendt, KW, Lindley, KJ. Obstetric anesthesia management of the patient with cardiac disease. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019;37:73–85.Google Scholar
Jha, N, Jha, AK, Mishra, SK, et al. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;253:108–116.Google Scholar
Sullivan, PJ, Miller, DR, Wynands, JE. Cardiovascular manifestations of musculoskeletal diseases. Prob Anesth 1991;5:107–123.Google Scholar
Allam, AM, Schwabe, AL. Neuromuscular scoliosis. PMR 2013;5:957–963.Google Scholar
Berman, AT, Cohen, DL, Schwentker, EP. The effects of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary report on eight cases and a review of the literature. Spine 1982;7:76–77.Google Scholar
Blount, WP, Mellencamp, DD. The effect of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62A:1083–1087.Google Scholar
Betz, RR, Bunnell, WP, Lambrecht-Mulier, E, et al. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A:90–96.Google Scholar
Dewan, MC, Mummareddy, N, Bonfield, C. The influence of pregnancy on women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2018;27:253–263.Google Scholar
Chan, EW, Gannon, SR, Shannon, CN, et al. The impact of curve severity on obstetric complications and regional anesthesia utilization in pregnant patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43(4):E4. https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17321Google Scholar
Grabala, P, Helenius, I, Shah, SA, et al. Impact of pregnancy on loss of deformity correction after pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2020;139:e121–e126.Google Scholar
Sawicka, EH, Spencer, GT, Branthwaite, MA. Management of respiratory failure complicating pregnancy in severe kyphoscoliosis: a new use for an old technique? Br J Dis Chest 1986;80:191–196.Google Scholar
Siegler, D, Zorab, PA. Pregnancy in thoracic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest 1981;75:367–370.Google Scholar
Manning, CW, Prime, FJ, Zorab, PA. Pregnancy and scoliosis. Lancet 1967;2:792–795.Google Scholar
Grabala, P, Helenius, I, Buchowski, JM, et al. Back pain and outcomes of pregnancy after instrumented spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2019;124:e404–e410.Google Scholar
Zeldis, SM. Dyspnea during pregnancy. Distinguishing cardiac from pulmonary causes. Clin Chest Med 1992;13:567–585.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R, Auchincloss, J. Dyspnea of pregnancy: clinical and physiological observations. Am J Med Sci 1966;252:270–276.Google Scholar
Nava, S, Zanotti, E, Ambrosino, N, et al. Evidence of acute diaphragmatic fatigue in a “natural” condition. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:1226–1230.Google Scholar
Charbonneau, M, Falcone, T, Cosio, MG, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea during pregnancy: therapy and implications for fetal health. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:461–463.Google Scholar
Schneerson, JM. Pregnancy in neuromuscular and skeletal disorders. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1994;49:227–230.Google Scholar
Lapinsky, SE, Tram, C, Mehta, S, et al. Restrictive lung disease in pregnancy. Chest 2014;145:394–398.Google Scholar
Gandevia, SC. Muscle fatigue. Does the diaphragm fatigue during parturition? Lancet 1993;341:347–348.Google Scholar
Jones, DH. Kyphoscoliosis complicating pregnancy. Lancet 1964;1:517–519.Google Scholar
Phelan, JP, Dainer, MI, Cowherd, DW. Pregnancy complicated by thoracolumbar scoliosis. South Med J 1978;71:76–78.Google Scholar
Lebel, DE, Sergienko, R, Wiznitzer, A, et al. Mode of delivery and other pregnancy outcomes of patients with documented scoliosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:639–641.Google Scholar
Crosby, ET, Halpern, SH. Obstetric epidural anaesthesia in patients with Harrington instrumentation. Can J Anaesth 1989;36:693–696.Google Scholar
Smedstead, KG, Cramb, R, Morison, DH. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy: a series of eight cases. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:502–512.Google Scholar
Roberts, NV, Keast, PJ. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy: a lethal combination. Anaesth Intens Care 1990;18:366–374.Google Scholar
Weeks, SK, Smith, JB. Obstetric anaesthesia in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:814–816.Google Scholar
Daley, MD, Morningstar, BA, Rolbin, SH, et al. Epidural anesthesia for obstetrics after spinal surgery. Reg Anesth 1990;15:280–284.Google Scholar
Kaimal, A, Norton, ME. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #55: Counselling woman at increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:B16–23.Google Scholar
Bach, JR. Successful pregnancies for ventilator users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:226–229.Google Scholar
Restrick, LJ, Clapp, BR, Mikelsons, C, et al. Nasal ventilation in pregnancy: treatment of nocturnal hypoventilation in a patient with kyphoscoliosis. Eur Respir J 1997;10:2657–2658.Google Scholar
Chan, WS, Rey, E, Kent, NE, et al. Venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36:527–553.Google Scholar
Chau, W, Lee, KH. Kyphosis complicating pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1970;77:1098–1102.Google Scholar
Lim, G, Bader, AM. Neurologic and neuromuscular disease. In Chestnut, DH (ed.) Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020, pp. 1160–1189.Google Scholar
Ko, JY, Leffert, LR. Clinical implications of neuraxial anesthesia in the parturient with scoliosis. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1930–1934.Google Scholar
Huang, J. Paramedian approach for neuroaxial anesthesia in parturients with scoliosis. Anesth Analg 2010;111:821–822.Google Scholar
Bauchat, JR, McCarthy, JR, Koski, TR, et al. Labor analgesia consumption and time to neuraxial catheter placement in women with a surgical correction for scoliosis: a case matched study. Anesth Analg 2015;121:981–987.Google Scholar
Feldstein, G, Ramanathan, S. Obstetrical lumbar epidural anesthesia in patients with previous posterior spinal fusion for kyphoscoliosis. Anesth Analg 1985;64:83–85.Google Scholar
Sponseller, PD, Cohen, MS, Nachemson, AL, et al. Results of surgical treatment of adults with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A:667–675.Google Scholar
Chestnut, DH, Owen, CL, Bates, IN, et al. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1988;68:754–759.Google Scholar
Chau, A, Tsen, LC. Update on modalities and techniques for labor analgesia and anesthesia. Adv Anesth 2018;36:139–162.Google Scholar
Smith, PS, Wilson, RC, Robinson, APC, et al. Regional blockade for delivery in women with scoliosis or previous spinal surgery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003;12:17–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, SE, Cherry, SM, Holbrook, RH Jr, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia: sensory changes, side effects and fetal heart rate changes. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1155–1160.Google Scholar
Ducey, JP, Knape, KG, Talbot, J, et al. Intrathecal narcotics for labor cause hypotension (abstract). Anesthesiology 1992;77:A997.Google Scholar
Camann, WR, Mintzer, BH, Denney, RA, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia: effects of added epinephrine. Anesthesiology 1993;78:870–874.Google Scholar
Camann, WR, Denney, RA, Holby, ED, et al. A comparison of intrathecal, epidural, and intravenous sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1993;77:884–887.Google Scholar
Honet, JE, Arkoosh, VA, Norris, MC, et al. Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 1991;75:734–739.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, R, Anderson, MT, Philip, J, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil compared to epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1209–1215.Google Scholar
Ransom, DM, Leicht, CH. Continuous spinal analgesia with sufentanil for labor and delivery in a parturient with severe pulmonary stenosis. Anesth Analg 1995;80:418–421.Google Scholar
Leicht, CH, Evans, DE, Durkan, WJ. Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia: results of a pilot study. Anesthesiology 1990;73:A980.Google Scholar
Moran, DH, Johnson, MD. Continuous spinal anesthesia with combined hyperbaric and isobaric bupivacaine in a patient with scoliosis. Anesth Analg 1990;70:445–447.Google Scholar
Crosby, E, Read, D. Salvaging inadequate epidural anaesthetics: the chloroprocaine save. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:136.Google Scholar
Beck, GN, Griffiths, AG. Failed extradural anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Complication of subsequent spinal block. Anaesthesia 1992;47:690–692.Google Scholar
Mets, B, Broccoli, E, Brown, AR. Is spinal anesthesia after failed epidural anesthesia contraindicated for Cesarean section? Anesth Analg 1993;77:629–631.Google Scholar
Stone, PA, Thorburn, J, Lamb, KSR. Complications of spinal anaesthesia following extradural block for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1989;62:335–337.Google Scholar
Waters, JR, Leivers, D, Hullander, M. Response to spinal anesthesia after inadequate epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994;78:1033–1034.Google Scholar
Pascoe, HF, Jennings, GS, Marx, GF. Successful spinal anesthesia after inadequate epidural block in a parturient with prior surgical correction of scoliosis. Reg Anesth 1993;18:191–192.Google Scholar
Duggan, AB, Katz, SG. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for caesarean section in a parturient with severe primary pulmonary hypertension. Anaesth Int Care 2003;31:565–569.Google Scholar
Gandhimathi, K, Atkinson, S, Gibson, FM. Pulmonary hypertension complicating twin pregnancy: continuous spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002;11:301–305.Google Scholar
Miller, KA, Harkin, CP, Bailey, PL. Postoperative tracheal extubation. Anesth Analg 1995;80:149–172.Google Scholar
Ali, J, Weisel, RD, Layug, AB, et al. Consequences of postoperative alterations in respiratory mechanics. Am J Surg 1974;128:376–382.Google Scholar
Strandberg, A, Tokics, L, Brismar, B, et al. Atelectasis during anaesthesia and in the postoperative period. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986;30:154–158.Google Scholar
Gamsu, G, Singer, MM, Vincent, H, et al. Postoperative impairment of mucous transport in the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976;114:673–679.Google Scholar
Bickler, PE, Dueck, R, Prutow, RJ. Effects of barbiturate anesthesia on functional residual capacity and ribcage/diaphragm contributions to ventilation. Anesthesiology 1987;66:147–152.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, R, Husain, FJ, Hayashi, H, et al. Systemic and pulmonary blood pressure during Caesarean section in parturients with gestational hypertension. Can Anaesth Soc J 1980;27:389–394.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Lu, J. Anesthesia for pregnant women with pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021;35:2201–2211.Google Scholar
MacEvilly, M, Buggy, D. Back pain and pregnancy: a review. Pain 1996;64:405–414.Google Scholar
Whiles, E, Shafafy, R, Valsamis, EM, et al. The management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2020;10:908–918.Google Scholar
Di Martino, A, Russo, F, Denaro, L, et al. How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards. Eur Spine J 2017;26:s496–504.Google Scholar
Benzakour, T, Igoumenou, V, Mavrogenis, AF, et al. Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop 2019;43:841–851.Google Scholar
Weinreb, JC, Wolbarsht, LB, Cohen, JM, et al. Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disc abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic pregnant women. Radiology 1989;170:125–128.Google Scholar
Garmel, SH, Guzelian, GA, D’Alton, JG, et al. Lumbar disc disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89(2):821–822.Google Scholar
Brown, MD, Levi, ADO. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation during pregnancy. Spine 2001;26:440–443.Google Scholar
LaBan, MM, Rapp, NS, Van Oeyen, P, et al. The lumbar herniated disc of pregnancy: a report of six cases identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:476–479.Google Scholar
Hebl, JR, Horlocker, TT, Kopp, SL, et al. Neuraxial blockade in patients with preexisting spinal stenosis, lumbar disk disease, or prior spine surgery: efficacy and neurologic complications. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1511–1519.Google Scholar
Zochling, J, Smith, EUR. Seronegative spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:747–756.Google Scholar
Timur, H, Tokmak, A, Turkmen, GG, et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:2470–2474.Google Scholar
Bourlier, RA, Birnbach, DJ. Anesthetic management of the parturient with ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995;4:244–247.Google Scholar
Mokbel, A, Lawson, DO, Farrokhyar, F. Pregnancy outcomes in women with ankylosing spondylitis: a scoping literature and methodological review. Clin Rheumatol 2021 (online). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05588-9Google Scholar
Jakobsson, G, Stephansson, O, Askling, J, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide register study. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1838–1842.Google Scholar
Hoffman, SL, Zaphiratos, V, Girard, MA, et al. Failed epidural analgesia in a parturient with advanced ankylosing spondylitis: a novel explanation. Can J Anesth 2012;59:871–874.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S, Gupta, KL. Cesarean section in a patient with advanced ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Gyne Obstet 2005;89:272–273.Google Scholar
Schelew, BL, Vaghadia, H. Ankylosing spondylitis and neuraxial anesthesia – a 10-year review. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:65–68.Google Scholar
Vaghadia, H, Germaine, G, Tang, R. Epidural analgesia in parturients with ankylosing spondylitis: a role for ultrasound surveillance and ultrasound-guided placement. Can J Anesth 2013;60:206–207.Google Scholar
Sanderson, PL, Fraser, RD. The influence of pregnancy on the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-B;951–954.Google Scholar
Saraste, H. Spondylolysis and pregnancy – a risk analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;65:727–729.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×