Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:38:36.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Use of Neuraxial Ultrasound for Axial Skeletal Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2024

By
Alexandria Papadelis  and
Carlo Pancaro
Edited by
David R. Gambling ,
M. Joanne Douglas  and
Grace Lim
David R. Gambling
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
M. Joanne Douglas
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Grace Lim
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

This chapter describes the use of neuraxial ultrasound in uncommon axial skeletal conditions that the clinician occasionally faces in the labor and delivery suite. For each condition we outline whether subspecialty consultation and lumbosacral spine imaging are needed before spine ultrasound scanning and performing neuraxial blocks. We selected certain disorders and syndromes where spine ultrasound scanning has been a useful tool in facilitating the success of labor analgesia and cesarean neuraxial anesthesia.

Keywords

musculoskeletal disordersneurological disorders spinal dysraphismstethered spinal cordChiari malformationsyringomyeliaCurrarino syndromeVACTERLKlippel Feil syndromeKlippel-Trénaunay syndromespinal rodsspinal cord stimulatorslumboperitoneal shuntsintrathecal pumps
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesia and Uncommon Disorders , pp. 110 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Young, B, Onwochei, D, Desai, N. Conventional landmark palpation vs. preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics – a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analyses. Anaesthesia 2021;76:818–831.Google Scholar
Reynolds, F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2001;56:238–247.Google Scholar
Yeo, ST, French, R. Combined spinal-epidural in the obstetric patient with Harrington rods assisted by ultrasonography. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:670–672.Google Scholar
Costello, JF, Balki, M. Cesarean delivery under ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia [corrected] in a parturient with poliomyelitis and Harrington instrumentation. Can J Anaesth 2008;55:606–611.Google Scholar
Chin, KJ, Perlas, A, Chan, V, et al. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology 2011;115:94–101.Google Scholar
Pancaro, C, Rajala, B, Vahabzadeh, C, et al. Sacral anatomical interspace landmark for lumbar puncture in pregnancy: a randomized trial. Neurology 2020;94:e626–634.Google Scholar
Ebraheim, NA, Miller, RM, Xu, R, et al. The location of the intervertebral lumbar disc on the posterior aspect of the spine. Surg Neurol 1997;48:232–236.Google Scholar
Chin, KJ, Karmakar, MK, Peng, P. Ultrasonography of the adult thoracic and lumbar spine for central neuraxial blockade. Anesthesiology 2011;114:1459–1485.Google Scholar
Balki, M, Lee, Y, Halpern, S, et al. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1876–1881.Google Scholar
Soens, MA, Birnbach, DJ, Ranasinghe, JS, et al. Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:6–19.Google Scholar
Murphy, CJ, Stanley, E, Kavanagh, E, et al. Spinal dysraphisms in the parturient: implications for perioperative anaesthetic care and labour analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015;24:252–263.Google Scholar
Hoffman, HJ, Hendrick, EB, Humphreys, RP. The tethered spinal cord: its protean manifestations, diagnosis, and surgical correction. Childs Brain 1976;2:145–155.Google Scholar
Warder, DE, Oakes, WJ. Tethered cord syndrome: the low-lying and normally positioned conus. Neurosurgery 1994;34:597–600; discussion 600.Google Scholar
O’Neal, MA. A pregnant woman with spina bifida: need for a multidisciplinary labor plan. Front Med 2017;4:172.Google Scholar
Yamada, S, Won, DJ, Yamada, SM, et al. Adult tethered cord syndrome: relative to spinal cord length and filum thickness. Neurol Res 2004;26:732–734.Google Scholar
Sarnat, HB. Disorders of segmentation of the neural tube: Chiari malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 2008;87:89–103.Google Scholar
Menezes, AH. Chiari I malformations and hydromyelia–complications. Pediatr Neurosurg 1991;17:146–154.Google Scholar
Teo, MM. Spinal neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section in a parturient with type I Arnold Chiari malformation and syringomyelia. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2018;6:2050313X18786114.Google Scholar
Leffert, LR, Schwamm, LH. Neuraxial anesthesia in parturients with intracranial pathology: a comprehensive review and reassessment of risk. Anesthesiology 2013;119:703–718.Google Scholar
Landau, R, Giraud, R, Delrue, V, et al. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a woman with a surgically corrected type I Arnold Chiari malformation. Anesth Analg 2003;97:253–255.Google Scholar
Chantigian, RC, Koehn, MA, Ramin, KD, et al. Chiari I malformation in parturients. J Clin Anesth 2002;14:201–205.Google Scholar
Gruffi, TR, Peralta, FM, Thakkar, MS, et al. Anesthetic management of parturients with Arnold Chiari malformation-I: a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019;37:52–56.Google Scholar
Ghaly, RF, Tverdohleb, T, Candido, KD, et al. Management of parturients in active labor with Arnold Chiari malformation, tonsillar herniation, and syringomyelia. Surg Neurol Int 2017;8:10.Google Scholar
Opoku, AA, Mathew, GV, Thode, A, et al. Arnold-Chiari malformation, and significant lumbar disc prolapse in pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Womens Health 2021;31:e00337.Google Scholar
Shenoy, VS, Sampath, R. Syringomyelia 2019. Available from: https://europepmc.org/books/nbk537110 [last accessed September 7, 2022].Google Scholar
Milhorat, TH. Classification of syringomyelia. Neurosurg Focus 2000;8:E1.Google Scholar
Garvey, GP, Wasade, VS, Murphy, KE, et al. Anesthetic and obstetric management of syringomyelia during labor and delivery: a case series and systematic review. Anesth Analg 2017;125:913–924.Google Scholar
Todor, DR, Mu, HT, Milhorat, TH. Pain and syringomyelia: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2000;8:E11.Google Scholar
Caldarelli, M, Di Rocco, C. Diagnosis of Chiari I malformation and related syringomyelia: radiological and neurophysiological studies. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20:332–335.Google Scholar
Laxton, AW, Perrin, RG. Cordectomy for the treatment of posttraumatic syringomyelia. Report of four cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:174–178.Google Scholar
Margarido, C, Mikhael, R, Salman, A, et al. Epidural anesthesia for Cesarean delivery in a patient with post-traumatic cervical syringomyelia. Can J Anaesth 2011;58:764–768.Google Scholar
Kenevan, MR, Smith, HM, Olsen, DA, et al. Ultrasound-assisted combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a parturient with Currarino triad: a case report. A A Pract 2019. 2019;12:393–395.Google Scholar
Neumann, KE, Pappas, H, McCrory, EH. Peripartum diagnosis of Currarino syndrome with anterior sacral meningocele: a case report. A A Pract 2021;15:e01506.Google Scholar
McGregor, C, Katz, S, Harpham, M. Management of a parturient with an anterior sacral meningocele. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22:64–67.Google Scholar
Heijden MWJ van der, Smits, H, Willekes, C, et al.Spinal anesthesia for a parturient with the triad of Currarino. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009;18:173–175.Google Scholar
McKenzie, AG, Burns, R, Cowan, S. Combined spinal-epidural technique for caesarean delivery of a parturient with Currarino triad. Int J Obstet Anesth 2016;25:93–95.Google Scholar
Hilton, G, Mihm, F, Butwick, A. Anesthetic management of a parturient with VACTERL association undergoing Cesarean delivery. Can J Anesth 2013;60:570–576.Google Scholar
Klippel, M, Feil, A. The classic: a case of absence of cervical vertebrae with the thoracic cage rising to the base of the cranium (cervical thoracic cage). Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975:109:3–8.Google Scholar
Naguib, M, Farag, H, Ibrahim A el-W. Anaesthetic considerations in Klippel-Feil syndrome. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986;33:66–70.Google Scholar
Hensinger, RN, Lang, JE, MacEwen, GD. Klippel-Feil syndrome: a constellation of associated anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1246–1253.Google Scholar
Michie, I, Clark, M. Neurological syndromes associated with cervical and craniocervical anomalies. Arch Neurol 1968;18:241–247.Google Scholar
Smith, KA, Ray, AP. Epidural anesthesia for repeat cesarean delivery in a parturient with Klippel-Feil syndrome. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:377–379.Google Scholar
Stevens, E, Williams, B, Kock, N, et al. Cord injury after spinal anaesthesia in a patient with previously undiagnosed Klippel-Feil syndrome. Anaesth Rep 2019;7:7–10.Google Scholar
Steinbok, P. Dysraphic lesions of the cervical spinal cord. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995;6:367–376.Google Scholar
Dobbs, P, Caunt, A, Alderson, TJ. Epidural analgesia in an obstetric patient with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:144–146.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Wang, K, Mei, J. Late puerperal hemorrhage of a patient with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: a case report. Medicine 2019;98:e18378.Google Scholar
Watermeyer, SR, Davies, N, Goodwin, RI. The Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome in pregnancy. BJOG 2002;109:1301–1302.Google Scholar
Larson, A, Covington, T, Anderson, K, et al. Spinal neurovascular malformations in Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: a single center study. Neurosurgery 2021;88:515–522.Google Scholar
Ohrt-Nissen, S, Dahl, B, Gehrchen, M. Choice of rods in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what are the clinical implications of biomechanical properties? Review of the literature. Neurospine 2018;15:123–130.Google Scholar
Harrington, PR, Dickson, JH. Spinal instrumentation in the treatment of severe progressive spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;117:157–163.Google Scholar
Walker, CT, Kakarla, UK, Chang, SW, et al. History and advances in spinal neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;31:775–785.Google Scholar
Ko, JY, Leffert, LR. Clinical implications of neuraxial anesthesia in the parturient with scoliosis. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1930–1934.Google Scholar
Bauchat, JR, McCarthy, RJ, Koski, TR, et al. Labor analgesia consumption and time to neuraxial catheter placement in women with a history of surgical correction for scoliosis: a case-matched study. Anesth Analg 2015;121:981–987.Google Scholar
Majeed, A, Ahmed, I, Alkahtani, GJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided continuous spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a parturient with scoliosis corrected with Harrington’s rod surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:479–482.Google Scholar
Patel, S, Das, S, Stedman, RB. Urgent cesarean section in a patient with a spinal cord stimulator: implications for surgery and anesthesia. Ochsner J 2014;14:131–134.Google Scholar
Barolat, G, Massaro, F, He, J, et al. Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg 1993;78:233–239.Google Scholar
Sommerfield, D, Hu, P, O’Keeffe, D, et al. Caesarean section in a parturient with a spinal cord stimulator. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010;19:114–117.Google Scholar
Zanfini, BA, De Martino, S, Frassanito, L, et al. “Please mind the gap”: successful use of ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia for urgent cesarean section in a patient with implanted spinal cord stimulation system for giant chest wall arteriovenous malformation – a case report. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01042-6Google Scholar
Bédard, JM, Richardson, MG, Wissler, RN. Epidural anesthesia in a parturient with a lumboperitoneal shunt. Anesthesiology 1999;90:621–623.Google Scholar
Kaul, B, Vallejo, MC, Ramanathan, S, et al. Accidental spinal analgesia in the presence of a lumboperitoneal shunt in an obese parturient receiving enoxaparin therapy. Anesth Analg 2002;95:441–443.Google Scholar
Moreno-Duarte, I, Hall, RR 3rd, Shutran, MS, et al. Epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a parturient with lumboperitoneal shunt: a case report. AA Pract 2019;12:436–437.Google Scholar
Balaratnam, MS, Donnelly, A, Padilla, H, et al. Reducing intrathecal baclofen-related infections: service evaluation and best practice guidelines. Neuromodulation 2020;23:991–995.Google Scholar
Dziurzynski, K, Mcleish, D, Ward, M, et al. Placement of baclofen pumps through the foramen magnum and upper cervical spine. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22: 270–273.Google Scholar
Eklund, SE, Samineni, AV, Koka, A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children with baclofen pumps. Paediatr Anaesth 2021;31:178–185.Google Scholar
Sakr Esa W, Ali, Toma, I, Tetzlaff, JE, et al. Epidural analgesia in labor for a woman with an intrathecal baclofen pump. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009;18:64–66.Google Scholar
Tarshis, J, Zuckerman, JE, Katz, NP, et al. Labour pain management in a parturient with an implanted intrathecal pump. Can J Anesth 1997;44:1278–1281.Google Scholar
Badve, M, Shah, T, Jones-Ivy, S, et al. Ultrasound guided epidural analgesia for labor in a patient with an intrathecal baclofen pump. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20:370–372.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×