Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:49:38.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Role of Pheromones and Chemistry: Lessons from Comparative Anatomy

from Section II - Social Functioning: Role of Evolution, Genetics and Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Warrick J. Brewer
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Melbourne
David Castle
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Christos Pantelis
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The human sense of smell is as much a product of the evolutionary history of humankind as is every other physical characteristic of our species. Current perspectives view the sense of smell as evolved with the air-breathing, terrestrial vertebrates sometime in the Devonian, more than 300 million years ago. In its essential elements, it remains remarkably similar to that from which it evolved, and in physiological terms it is not much different from the common chemical sense found today in fish, aquatic and even terrestrial invertebrates. What is specific to an air-breathing life is the means whereby chemical molecules reach the olfactory mucosa. To achieve this, chemical molecules are swept into the nasal cavity where the inspired airstream is filtered and humidified. Part of the stream sweeps the molecules upwards and backwards and deposits them on the olfactory mucosa.

As discussed in more detail in Chapter 8, the physical nose and lateral conchae are relatively uncomplicated in humans, lacking the whorls and labyrinths formed by the convoluted filamentous scroll bones frequently found in mammals. The nostrils are simple, intact and directed downwards without the lateral flaps or even trumpet-like projections that often typify the nostrils of other mammals. Furthermore, the rhinarium – the patch of skin at the tip of the nose and surrounding the nostrils – is dry; a characteristic shared by humans only with the higher apes and a few non-primate species such as horses, moose and some desert antelopes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacchini, A., Gaetani, E. & Cavaggioni, A. (1992) Pheromone binding proteins of the mouse, Mus musculus. Experientia, 48, 419–21.Google Scholar
Barksdale, A. W. (1969) Sexual hormones of Achyla and other fungi. Science, 166, 831–6.Google Scholar
Barnes, R. S. K., Calow, P. & Olive, P. J. W. (1988) The invertebrates: A new synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K. & Boyse, E. A. (1985) The chemosensory recognition of genetic individuality. Sci Am, 253, 86–92.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, K. P. & Smith, K. H. (1996) The human vomeronasal organ. I. Historical perspectives. A study of Ruysch's (1703) and Jacobson's (1811) reports on the vomeronasal organ with comparative comments and English translations. Biomed Res, 7, 211–19.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, K. P. & Smith, T. D. (2003) The human vomeronasal organ. V. An interpretation of its discovery by Ruysch, Jacobson, or Kölliker, with an English translation of Kölliker (1877). Anat Rec, 270B, 4–15.Google Scholar
Bronson, F. H. (1979) The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. Q Rev Biol, 54, 265–99.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. (1959) An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature, 184, 105.Google Scholar
Brunjes, P. C. & Frazier, L. L. (1986) Maturation and plasticity in the olfactory system of vertebrates. Brain Res Rev, 11, 1–45.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. B. (1951) On the hormones and neural control of the release of gametes in ascidians. J Exp Biol, 28, 463–72.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. B. (1953) Origin of the pituitary body of chordates. Nature, 172, 1098.Google Scholar
Dagg, A. I. & Taub, A. (1970) Flehmen. Mammalia, 34, 686–95.Google Scholar
Doherty, P. C. (2004) On the nose: shared themes for the sensory and immune self. Chiron, 2004, 7–9.Google Scholar
Doty, R. L. (2003) Mammalian pheromones: fact or fancy? In Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation 2nd ed. (ed Doty, R. L.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Evans, C. S. (2003) Vomeronasal chemoreception in vertebrates: a study of the second nose. London: Imperial College Press.
Halpern, M. & Kubie, J. L. (1983) Snake tongue flicking behaviour: clues to vomeronasal system functions. In Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 3rd ed. (eds Müller-Schwarze, D. & Silverstein, R. M.), pp. 45–73. New York: Plenum.
Hardistry, M. W. (1979) Biology of the Cyclostomes. London: Chapman & Hall.
Holtzman, D. A. & Halpern, M. (1990) Embryonic and neonatal development of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems in garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.). J Morphol, 203, 123–40.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. C., Payne, C. E., Nevison, C. M., et al. (2001) Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature, 414, 631–34.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. (1986) The ancestry of vertebrates. British Museum (Natural History), London.
Karlson, P. & Lüscher, M. (1959) Pheromones: A new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature, 183, 55–6.Google Scholar
Knouff, R. A. (1935) The developmental pattern of ectodermal placodes in Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol, 62, 17–71.Google Scholar
Loumaye, E., Thorner, J. & Catt, K. J. (1982) Yeast mating pheromone activates mammalian gonadotrophs: evolutionary conservation of a reproductive hormone?Science, 218, 341–50.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, J. & Zihlman, A. (1988) The invisible ape. New Scientist, 120, 56–60.Google Scholar
Mann, G. (1961) Bulbus olfactorius in chiroptera. J Comp Neurol, 116, 135–41.Google Scholar
Monti-Bloch, L., Jennings-White, C. & Berliner, D. L. (1998) The human vomeronasal system: a review. Ann NY Acad Sci, 855, 373–89.Google Scholar
Oelschlager, H. A. (1989) Development of the N terminalis in mammals, including toothed whales and humans. Ann NY Acad Sci, 519, 447–64.Google Scholar
Ruysch, F. (1724) Thesaurys Anatomicus. Vol III. Amsterdam: Jans Waesberg.
Sandor, T. & Mehdi, A. Z. (1979) Steroids and evolution. In Hormones and Evolution. (Barrington, ed E. J. W.), pp. 1–72. New York: Academic Press.
Sarich, V. M. & Wilson, A. C. (1985) Immunological timescale for hominid evolution. Science, 158, 1200–203.Google Scholar
Scalia, F. & Winans, S. S. (1976) New perspectives on the morphology of the olfactory systems: olfactory and vomeronasal pathways in mammals. In Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes and Behavior. (ed Doty, R. L.), pp. 7–28. New York: Academic Press.
Sipos, M. L., Wysocki, C. J., Nyby, J. G., et al. (1995) An ephemeral pheromone of female house mice: perception via the main and accessory olfactory systems. Physiol Beh, 58, 529–34.Google Scholar
Stoddart, D. M. (1979) External nares and olfactory perception. Experientia, 35, 1456–57.Google Scholar
Stoddart, D. M. (1980) The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction. London: Chapman and Hall.
Stoddart, D. M. (1990) The Scented Ape: The Biology and Culture of the Human Nose. Cambridge: CUP.
Trotier, D. & Døving, K. B. (1998) ‘Anatomical description of a new organ in the nose of domesticated animals’ by Ludwig Jacobson (1813). Chem Senses, 23, 743–54.Google Scholar
Trotier, D., Eloit, C., Wassef, M., et al. (2000) The vomeronasal cavity in adult humans. Chem Senses, 25, 369–80.Google Scholar
Verberne, G. (1976) Chemocommunication among domestic cats mediated by the olfactory and vomeronasal senses. II. The relation between the function of Jacobson's organ (Vomeronasal organ) and Flehmen behaviour. Z für Tierpsychologie, 42, 113–28.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (1999) Jacobson's Organ and the Remarkable Nature of Smell. London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.
Wendell Smith, C. P. & Williams, P. L. (1984) Basic Human Embryology. London: Pitman.
Wilson, E. O. & Bossert, W. H. (1963) Chemical communication among animals. Rec Prog Horm Res, 19, 673–710.Google Scholar
Woerdeman, M. (1915) Vergleichende Ontogenie der Hypophysis. Arch In Mikroskopische Anatomie, 86, 198–291.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, M., Beauchamp, G. K., et al. (1981) Chemosensation: an aspect of the uniqueness of the individual. In Biochemistry of Taste and Olfaction (eds Cagan, R. H. & Kare, M. R.), pp. 85–91. New York: Academic Press.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Curran, M., et al. (2000) Parent-progeny recognition as a function of MHC odortype identity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 97, 10500–502.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×