Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
Part I - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019
Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ontologies of EnglishConceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment, pp. 1 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Carrithers, M., Candea, M., Sykes, K., Holbraad, M., and Venkatesan, S. (2010). Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester. Critique of Anthropology, 30(2), 152–200.Google Scholar
Farrar, S. (2007). Using ‘Ontolinguistics’ for language description. In Schalley, A. C. and Zaefferer, D., eds. Ontolinguistics: How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts (pp. 175–191). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2017). BAAL/CUP Seminar 2015. (De)Constructing Englishes: Exploring the implications of ontologies of the language for learning, teaching and assessment. Language Teaching, 50(1), 135–137.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J., Wicaksono, R., Liu, S., Qian, Y., and Xu, X. (2017). Exploring teachers’ ontologies of English. Monolithic conceptions of grammar in a group of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 87–109.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. (2017). The ontological turn. In Stein, F., Lazar, S., Candea, M. et al., eds. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/17ontologyGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, I. (2008). Ontologies and the semantic web. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 58–67.Google Scholar
Isac, D. and Reiss, C. (2008). I-Language. An Introduction to Linguistics as Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B., ed. (1992) The Other Tongue. English across Cultures, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1981). Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lawson, T. (2014). A conception of social ontology. In Pratten, S., ed. Social Ontology and Modern Economics (pp. 19–52). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an International Language. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A., eds. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1980/1953). From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2010). The historical ontology of language. Language Sciences, 32(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F., ed. (2009). English as an International Language. Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1987). Husserl, language and the ontology of the act. In Buzzetti, D. and Ferriani, M., eds. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language (pp. 205–227). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse. In Freeden, M., Tower Sargent, L. and Stears, M., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Mackenzie, I. E. (2013). Standardization, Ideology and Linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barbour, S. (2000). Britain and Ireland: The varying significance of language for nationalism. In Barbour, S. and Carmichael, C., eds., Language and Nationalism in Europe (pp. 18–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (2013). Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4), 443–478.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (1991). Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R. (2006). World Englishes and descriptive grammars. In Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y., and Nelson, C. L., eds., The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 509–525). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Department for Education (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Online. Retrieved 27 July 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standardsGoogle Scholar
Fortier, A. M. (2017). On (not) speaking English: Colonial legacies in language requirements for British citizenship. Sociology. doi: 10.1177/0038038517742854Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. and Guéron, J. (1999). English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2013). Cognitive contributions to plurilithic views of English and other languages. Applied Linguistics, 34, 211–231.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376–385.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2018). Cognitive perspectives on English as a Lingua Franca. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds. Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 74–84). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J., Joyce, J., and Robson, C. (2017). Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 35–59.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J., Wicaksono, R., Liu, S., Qian, Y., and Xu, X. (2017). Exploring teachers’ ontologies of English: Monolithic conceptions of grammar in a group of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 87–109.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr (1985). Meaning and the idiolect: The idioseme. In Jankowsky, K. R., ed., Scientific and Humanistic Dimensions of Language: Festschrift for Robert Lado. On the Occasion of His 70th Birthday (pp. 353–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Systemic background. In Benson, J. D., ed., Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: 1. Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop (pp. 1–15). New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janicki, K. (2006). Language Misconceived: Arguing for Applied Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–176.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2002). Is language a verb? Conceptual change in linguistics and language teaching. In Trappes-Lomax, H. R. and Ferguson, G., eds., Language in Language Teacher Education (pp. 29–47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2004). Language and Identity. National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kohn, K. (2011). English as a lingua franca and the Standard English misunderstanding. In de Hower, A. and Wilton, A., eds., English in Europe Today: Sociocultural and Educational Perspectives (pp. 71–94). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1979). Thinking and “languaging”: A psycholinguistic model of performance and learning. Sophia Linguistica, 12, 3–24.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., and Indefrey, P. (2014). Idiosyncratic grammars: Syntactic processing in second language comprehension uses subjective feature representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(7), 1428–1444.Google Scholar
Le Page, R. B. and Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of Identity. Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A., eds. (2007). Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF. Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555.Google Scholar
Mollin, S. (2009). “I entirely understand” is a Blairism: The methodology of identifying idiolectal collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 367–392.Google Scholar
Mortensen, J. (2013). Notes on English used as a lingua franca as an object of study. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
Padilla, A. M., Lindholm, K. J., Chen, A. et al. (1991). The English-only movement: Myths, reality, and implications for psychology. American Psychologist, 46(2), 120–130.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A., eds., Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133–158.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, R. A. (1974). Ideology and ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 4, 55–64.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Byrnes, H., ed., Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (2017). EFL, ELF, and the question of accuracy. ELT Journal. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccx031Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
UKLA and Owen Education (2016). Curriculum and Assessment in English 3 to 19: A Better Plan. Leicester: UKLA Publications. Online. www.nate.org.uk/file/2016/04/The-National-Curriculum-for-English-from-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2014). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In VanPatten, B. and Williams, J., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (pp. 135–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2015). What is language? A response to Philippe van Parijs. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18(2), 113–130.Google Scholar