Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s
- 3 Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s
- 4 Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
- 5 Critiques of Centralized Control, 1930s–1970s
- 6 International Standards for the Convergence of Computers and Communications, 1960s–1970s
- 7 Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
- 8 The Internet and the Advantages of Autocratic Design, 1970s–1990s
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
4 - Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s
- 3 Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s
- 4 Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
- 5 Critiques of Centralized Control, 1930s–1970s
- 6 International Standards for the Convergence of Computers and Communications, 1960s–1970s
- 7 Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
- 8 The Internet and the Advantages of Autocratic Design, 1970s–1990s
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
I think that if we don’t consider a distinction in our use of the word standard and standardization we are very likely to get into trouble … outsiders will have reason to assert that what we are attempting to do is to muzzle all possible development. What we are actually trying to do by our standardization work is to develop the telephone art in the best way that we know how to develop it.
– Frank Jewett, Assistant Chief Engineer, Western Electric, 1915We have seen how organizations such as the American Standards Association (ASA) arose as creative responses to the status quo – that is, to the inadequacy of existing markets and hierarchies to provide effective mechanisms to coordinate technical standardization in American industry. The emergence of the “voluntary consensus” model of committee standardization, significant as it was, begs a related question: How did monopoly firms develop standards, and how did their standardization efforts fit within the collaborative, consensus-based model developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries within trade associations and engineering societies?
Conventional answers to these questions point to the power of the managerial hierarchies that exist within monopoly firms. In the conventional view, monopolies create standards through a hierarchical, closed, and proprietary process as part of a broader strategy to erect barriers to entry and maintain centralized control over a given market or markets. They capture the network effects that standardization generates. Monopolies, in this view, act in a monolithic and almost petulant manner: their goal is to reduce variety, stifle outside innovations, lock in users, and preserve their control.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Open Standards and the Digital AgeHistory, Ideology, and Networks, pp. 95 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, “Discussion of Mr. McQuarrie’s Paper,” Western Electric Company, Manufacturing and Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, May 24–28, 1915Google Scholar
and , Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999), 103–172Google Scholar
and , Digital Crossroads: American Telecommunications Policy in the Internet Age (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005), 1–30Google Scholar
, “Looking for the Boundaries of Technological Determinism: A Brief History of the Telephone System,” in and , eds., The Development of Large Technical Systems (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988), 143Google Scholar
, Heritage and Destiny: Reflections on the Bell System in Transition (New York: Praeger, 1983), 6Google Scholar
, “The Emergence of Basic Research in the Bell Telephone System, 1875–1915,” Technology and Culture 22 (1981): 512–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Network Nation: Inventing American Telecommunications (Boston: Harvard University Press, 2010), 8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Regulating Railroad Innovation: Business, Technology, and Politics in America, 1840–1920 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), 7–9Google Scholar
, The Anatomy of a Business Strategy: Bell, Western Electric, and the Origins of the American Telephone Industry (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
, The Telephone Enterprise: The Evolution of the Bell System’s Horizontal Structure, 1876–1909 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
, From Invention to Innovation: Long-Distance Telephone Transmission at the Turn of the Century (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
, ed., A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System: The Early Years (New York: The Laboratories, 1975)Google Scholar
, The Bell System and Regional Business: The Telephone in the South, 1877–1920 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), 116–168Google Scholar
, “Long Lines: AT&T’s Long-Distance Network as an Organizational and Political Strategy,” Business History Review 80 (2006): 305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “John Joseph Carty, 1861–1932,” National Academy of Science Biographical Memoirs (New York: Columbia University Press, 1936), 2–27Google Scholar
, Jr., “Probability Theory and the Challenge of Sustaining Innovation: Traffic Management at the Bell System, 1900–1929,” in , , and , eds., The Challenge of Remaining Innovative: Insights from Twentieth-Century Business History (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009), 114–131Google Scholar
, “Theodore N. Vail and the Role of Innovation in the Modern Bell System,” Business History Review 66 (1992): 99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Frank Baldwin Jewett,” National Academy of Science Biographical Memoirs (New York: Columbia University Press, 1952), 239–264Google Scholar
, Creating the Corporate Soul: The Rise of Public Relations and Corporate Imagery in American Big Business (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 48–87Google Scholar
, “Theodore N. Vail and the Civic Origins of Universal Service,” Business and Economic History 28 (1999): 71–81Google Scholar
, Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press and American Enterprise Institute, 1997), 92–135Google Scholar
, Investigation of the Telephone Industry of the United States (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1939), 475–485Google Scholar
, The Principles of Scientific Management (New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1911), 7Google Scholar
, “Bancroft Gherardi, 1873–1941,” National Academy of Science Biographical Memoirs (New York: Columbia University Press, 1957), 157Google Scholar
, “The Commercial Loading of Telephone Circuits in the Bell System,” Transactions of the AIEE 30 (1911): 1743–1773Google Scholar
, “Discussion of Transmission – Cooperation of Departments,” Telephony 62 (1912): 468–470Google Scholar
, Telephone Transmission: Meeting of the Technical Representatives of the Bell System (New York City: December 11–12, 1916)Google Scholar
, The Making of Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 180–181Google Scholar
, “The Development of Development and Research,” Bell Telephone Quarterly 4 (1925): 6 (emphasis added)Google Scholar
and , “Telephone Communication System of the United States,” The Bell System Technical Journal 9 (1930), 1–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Fundamental Role of Standardization in the Operations of the Bell System,” American Standards Association Bulletin (September, 1931), 3Google Scholar
, “Standardization of Non-Technical Telephone Supplies,” American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Plant and Engineering Conference of the Bell System, New York City, December 6–10, 1920, Section IV, 97–103Google Scholar
, “Abstract of Discussion of Osborne Paper on Standardization in the Bell System,” American Standards Association Bulletin (October 1931), 27–28Google Scholar
, “When Women Were Switches: Technology, Work, and Gender in the Telephone Industry, 1890–1920,” American Historical Review 99 (1994): 1074–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Goodbye Central: Automation and the Decline of ‘Personal Service’ in the Bell System, 1878–1921,” Technology and Culture 36 (1995): 912–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Machine Switching for the Bell System,” Telephone Review Vol. 2, Supplement (April 1920): 1–12Google Scholar
, “Engineering Considerations,” in American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Conference to Discuss Economy and Efficiency in Operation, Shawnee, Pennsylvania, October 18–25, 1922; Buckley, “Bancroft Gherardi,” 169–170Google Scholar
, “Innovation in the Modern Bell System”; United States Congress, Report of the Federal Communications Commission on the Investigation of the Telephone Industry in the United States (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1939)Google Scholar
, “The Business Activities and Relations of Members of Engineering and Manufacturing Departments Outside the Western Electric Company,” Manufacturing and Engineering Conference (1915)Google Scholar
and , Manufacturing the Future: A History of Western Electric (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 79Google Scholar
, Inductive Interference between Electric Power and Communication Circuits: Selected Technical Reports with Preliminary and Final Reports of the Joint Committee on Inductive Interference and Commission’s General Order for Prevention or Mitigation of Such Interference (Sacramento: California State Printing Office, 1919)Google Scholar
and , “Inductive Interference as a Practical Problem,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 16 (1916): 1051–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Characteristics of Admittance Type of Wave-Form Standard,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 16 (1916): 1155–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Telephone and Its Several Inventors (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 1995), 158–159Google Scholar
, “Progress of the Joint Committee on Relations of Supply and Signal Circuits,” Bell Telephone Quarterly 1 (April 1922): 49–54Google Scholar
and , “Report on Joint General Committee, Bell System and N. E. L. A.,” National Electric Light Association Proceedings 83 (1926): 191–193Google Scholar
and , “Report on Joint General Committee”; American Committee on Inductive Coordination, Bibliography on Inductive Coordination (New York: American Committee on Inductive Coordination, 1925)Google Scholar
, “Report on Inductive Coordination Committee,” National Electric Light Association Proceedings 83 (1926): 851–852Google Scholar
, “Report of Inductive Coordination Committee,” National Electric Light Association Proceedings 84 (1927): 625–626Google Scholar
, “Discussion at Pacific Coast Convention,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 47 (1928): 50Google Scholar
, Inductive Coordination of Electric Power and Communication Circuits (San Francisco: The J. H. Neblett Pressroom, Ltd., 1936), xiiiGoogle Scholar
, “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists,” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 781–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39,” Social Studies of Science 19 (1989): 387–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “President’s Report,” American Standards Year Book (New York: American Standards Association, 1930), 9–10Google Scholar
, Radio and Television Regulation: Broadcast Technology in the United States, 1920–1960 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, “Standardization in the Bell System – II,” Bell Telephone Quarterly 8 (1929): 150–151Google Scholar