Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:05:02.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Organizational Memory as Technology

from Part IV - History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2023

By
Mike Zundel ,
Sam Horner  and
William M. Foster
Edited by
François-Xavier de Vaujany ,
Robin Holt  and
Albane Grandazzi
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Affiliation:
Universite Paris Dauphine-PSL
Robin Holt
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Albane Grandazzi
Affiliation:
Grenoble Ecole de Management
Get access

Summary

How does organizational memory function in the context of digital computing? Organizational memory studies are rooted in information systems approaches that emphasize data storage and retrieval. For some time, however, such technical approaches have become replaced by studies of the human processes involved in remembering, and in social influences affecting the reframing of memories in light of collective influences. However, this analytical emphasis on human (individual and social) aspects stands in contrast with the growth of the use of information technology in organizations. Computers and networked devices not only send, receive, process and store massive amounts of communication, they also automatically generate data through sensors, cameras and algorithms. Moreover, 21st century media are focussed on feeding information back to the user (or organizational agent) to influence their choices, decisions and behaviour in real time. In this chapter we seek to contemplate how organizational memory works in such contemporary technical contexts. Drawing specifically on the media theorists Bernard Stiegler and Mark Hansen we contrast analogue and mechanical forms of memory from digital, computing based ones.

Keywords

Technologyorganizational memorydigital computingrememberingBernard Stiegler
Type
Chapter
Information
Organization as Time
Technology, Power and Politics
 , pp. 375 - 396
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alombert, A. & Krzykawski, M. (2021). Lexicon of Internation: Introduction to the Concepts of Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Collective. In Stiegler, B. (ed.), Bifurcate: There Is No Alternative (pp. 305–30). London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Anders, G. (2016). On Promethean Shame. In Müller, C. J. (ed.), Prometheanism. Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence (pp. 29–96). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anteby, M. & Molnár, V. (2012). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D. & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 44(2), 509–23.Google Scholar
Beverungen, A. & Lange, A. C. (2018). Cognition in high-frequency trading: The costs of consciousness and the limits of automation. Theory, Culture and Society, 35, 75–95.Google Scholar
Blagoev, B., Felten, S. & Kahn, R. (2018). The career of a catalogue: Organizational memory, materiality and the dual nature of the past at the British Museum (1970–Today). Organization Studies, 39(12), 1757–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, D. P. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coraiola, D. M. & Murcia, M. J. (2019). From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field. Management Learning, 51(2), 227–40.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2003). Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 321–50.Google Scholar
De Vaujany, F-X. & Mitev, N. (2017). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell? Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379–407.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (2013). From media history to Zeitkritik. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 132–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, P. & Runde, J. (2019). Theorizing the digital object. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 43(4), 1278–302.Google Scholar
Fiedler, M. & Welpe, I. (2010). How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(4), 381–407.Google Scholar
Foroughi, H., Coraiola, D. M., Rintamäki, J., Mena, S. & Foster, W. M. (2020). Organizational Memory Studies. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1725–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J. & Chandler, D. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59(8), 1176–1200.Google Scholar
Foster, W. M., Suddaby, R., Minkus, A. & Wiebe, E. (2011). History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management & Organizational History, 6(1), 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, A. A. & Thacker, E. (2007). The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Trans. L. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. B. (2014). Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. B. (2017). Bernard Stiegler, philosopher of desire? Boundary 2, 44(1), 167–91.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 657–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Y. (2016). On the Synthesis of Social Memories. In Blom, I., Lundemo, T. & Røssaak (eds), E., Memory in Motion: Archives, Technology, and the Social (pp. 307–27). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, C. & Smith, A. C. T. (2014). Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization, 21(4), 477–94.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1991). On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Trans. J. B. Brough. London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallinikos, J. & Mariategui, J-C. (2011). Video as digital object: Production and distribution of video content in the internet media ecosystem. The Information Society, 27(5), 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, A.-C., Lenglet, M. & Seyfert, R. (2018). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26(4), 598–617.Google Scholar
Lewis, K. & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mena, S., Rintamaki, J., Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 720–38.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M. & Steele, C. W. (2016). History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676–99.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39, 201–16.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A. & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, A. (2020). Mythologizing the story of a scientific invention: Constructing the legitimacy of research commercialization. Organization Studies, 41(6), 799–820. doi:10.1177/0170840618814575Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. R. Beardsworth & G. Collins. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and Time, 2: Disorientation. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2010a). For a New Critique of Political Economy. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2010b). Telecracy against democracy. Cultural Politics, 6(2), 171–80.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2011). Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2016a). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2016b). Automatic Society, Vol. 1: The Future of Work. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2020). The Nanjing Lectures 2016–2019. Trans. D. Ross. London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. P. & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.Google Scholar
Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2018). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Zundel, M., Holt, R. & Popp, A. (2016). Using history in the creation of organizational identity. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 211–35.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×