Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:38:57.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Organizing Intimacy

from Part 3 - Networks and Other Social Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2019

Göran Ahrne
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Nils Brunsson
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Despite strong emotions and a high density of communication, intimacy does not preclude organization. Intimate relationships can often be recognized as partially organized. In this chapter I examine three intimate relationships – families, kinship, and friendship – in order to investigate how the variation in combinations of organizational elements can be explained by the core component of love in each type of relationship.In examining the appearance of organizational elements in intimate relationships, one can see considerable differences among them, not only in their degree of organization, but also in the elements that are present. There is a connection between the elements that appear in a relationship and the emotional content. But there are also differences within the same type of relationship in how much and in which ways they are organized. An investigation of organizational elements in intimate relationships also provides an awareness of the limits of organization and why intimate relationships remain partially organized.A broadening of the analysis examining connections between states and intimate relationships demonstrates why states can use membership as an organizational element only to a limited extent. States are extremely organized in many respects, yet they are only partially organized.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organization outside Organizations
The Abundance of Partial Organization in Social Life
, pp. 235 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeniji, A. (2008) Inte den typ som gifter sig. Feministiska samtal om äktenskapsmotstånd. Göteborg: Makadam förlag.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. (2014) Samhället mellan oss. Om vänskap, kärlek, relationer och organisationer. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Alberoni, F. (2016) Friendship. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Almaatouq, A., Radaelli, L., Pentland, A., & Shmueli, E. (2016) Are You Your Friends’ Friend? Poor Perception of Friendship Ties Limits the Ability to Promote Behavioral Change. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badgett, M. V. L. (2009) When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Blatterer, H. (2013) Friendship´s Freedom and Gendered Limits. European Journal of Social Theory 16(4): 435–56.Google Scholar
Bommes, M. & Tacke, V. (2005) Luhmann’s Systems Theory and Network Theory. In Seidl, D. & Becker, K. H. (eds.), Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Malmö: Liber. 282304.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (2007) The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2000) Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness. In Carsten, J. (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 136.Google Scholar
Chauncey, G. (2004) Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today´s Debate over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finch, J. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Finch, J. (2008) Naming Names: Kinship, Individuality and Personal Names. Sociology 42(4): 709–25.Google Scholar
Finch, J. & Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., Mohr, J. W., Roose, H., & Gardinali, P. (2014) The Institutional Logic of Love: Measuring Intimate Life. Theory and Society 43(3/4): 333–70.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2012) The Origins of Political Order. From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love & Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. & Sutton, P. W. (2017) Sociology. 8th edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1959) For Sociology. Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. & Nyman, C. (2008) Dela rätt är inte lätt. In Grönlund, A. & Halleröd, B. (eds.), Jämställdhetens pris. Umeå: Boréa. 175–93.Google Scholar
Heady, P. & Kohli, M. (2010) Introduction: Towards a Political Economy of Kinship and Welfare. In Heady, P. & Kohli, M. (eds.), Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. 1530.Google Scholar
Heater, D. (1999) What Is Citizenship? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heater, D. (2004) A Brief History of Citizenship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Illouz, E. (2012) Why Love Hurts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
James, P. (2006) Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism. Bringing Theory Back In. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Jamieson, L. (1999) Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the ‘Pure Relationship’. Sociology 33(3): 477–94.Google Scholar
Layder, D. (2004) Emotion in Social Life. The Lost Heart of Society. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2001) The End of Marriage. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1986) Love as Passion. The Codification of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (2002) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1993) Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. H. J. (2011) Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. (1991) Beyond the Family. The Social Organization of Human Reproduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Roman, C. & Peterson, H. (2011) Familjer i tiden. Förhandling, kön och gränslöst arbete. Umeå: Boréa.Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. (2000) Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, L. B. (1985) Just Friends. The Role of Friendship in Our Lives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1974) Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Schatz, E. (2004) Modern Clan Politics. The Power of ‘Blood’ in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. (2006) Goffman Unbound. A New Paradigm for Social Science. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life. New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, L. & Pahl, R. (2006) Rethinking Friendship. Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swidler, A. (2001) Talk of Love. How Culture Matters. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. (2013) The Character of Friendship. In Calouri, D. (ed.), Thinking about Friendship. Historical and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 3044.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2005) Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. Volume 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, J., Brian, H., & Donovan, C. (2001) Same Sex Intimacies. Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weiner, M. S. (2013) The Rule of the Clan. What an Ancient Form of Social Organization Reveals about the Future of Individualism. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Young, M. & Willmott, P. (1962) Family and Kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A. (2005) The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (2012) Ancestors and Relatives. Genealogy, Identity, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×